01.03.2013 Views

A User's Manual for DELSOL3 - prod.sandia.gov - Sandia National ...

A User's Manual for DELSOL3 - prod.sandia.gov - Sandia National ...

A User's Manual for DELSOL3 - prod.sandia.gov - Sandia National ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

power and annual energy. Section 111.1 discusses the effect this approximation<br />

might have on calculating design point receiver thermal power during system op-<br />

timization. Essentially, the approximation is good if design point spillage is close<br />

to annual average spillage. However, the shape of the image at design point may<br />

well be different from the annual average, so flux levels at a specific point may be<br />

up to 10% different than calculated during a final per<strong>for</strong>mance run.<br />

The cosine, shadowing and blocking, and atmospheric attenuation losses used<br />

in system optirnization are calculated using minor assumptions of the effect of<br />

scaling with tower height and receiver size, as discussed below. Unlike spillage<br />

and flux calculations, these losses are calculated separately <strong>for</strong> design point and<br />

<strong>for</strong> annual averages used during the optimization.<br />

DELSOL designs a field <strong>for</strong> each system during optimization by using the in-<br />

solation value REFSOL and the design point efficiencies as discussed below, and<br />

by adding zones or fractions of zones based on best cost/per<strong>for</strong>mance until the<br />

requested design power is reached. Note that total yearly insolation, which is<br />

used <strong>for</strong> calculating annual energy, is calculated during the initial per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

run dependent on the insolation model chds'en, and the design point insolation as<br />

predicted by that model may be different from REFSOL. For an actual plant, in-<br />

solation at design point will vary due to weather conditions, but if design point<br />

insolatioil is reached (REFSOL) then design point per<strong>for</strong>mance predictions will be<br />

valid.<br />

1V.A-I. Cosine-The field points remain at the same relative position in units<br />

of tower height as the tower height is varied. The angles between the sun, helio-<br />

stat, and receiver (Section 1I.A) remain the same, and there<strong>for</strong>e the cosine is not<br />

a function of the tower height. The very small change in the cosine as the receiver<br />

width from the tower centerline is varied is ignored. Thus, only one design point<br />

and one annual average loss calculation is needed <strong>for</strong> examining a set of systems<br />

during optimization.<br />

1V.A-2. Shadowing and Blocking-The actual shadow cast by a heliostat in<br />

the same relative field position is independent of the tower height. However, the<br />

displacement of heliostats relative to each other in radial layouts depends on the<br />

ratio of the heliostat dimension to the tower height. Hence, the shadowing and<br />

blocking has a small dependence on the tower height. The code, however, neglects<br />

this effect. For large systems, i.e., heliostat dimension/tower height

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!