01.03.2013 Views

A User's Manual for DELSOL3 - prod.sandia.gov - Sandia National ...

A User's Manual for DELSOL3 - prod.sandia.gov - Sandia National ...

A User's Manual for DELSOL3 - prod.sandia.gov - Sandia National ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

108<br />

other apertures (<strong>for</strong> a multiple cavity receiver) will be fixed by the val-<br />

ues of RX2TRX, RXSTRX, and RX4TRX. The second receiver variable<br />

to be varied when IOPTUM=2 is the receiver diameter, W as defined in<br />

Section 1I.E. Since the depth of the Ith cavity is proportional to W (RW-<br />

CAV(I), Namelist REC), the second receiver variable also varies the cavity<br />

depth. There are NUMHTW (520) discrete equally spaced values of the<br />

width, W, from a minimum of HTWST meters to a maximum value of<br />

HTWEND meters. W, and thus the cavity depths W x RWCAV(I), is de-<br />

termined almost entirely by receiver flux limits, if any. There is a slight<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance disadvantage, due to receiver losses, of making the cavity<br />

deeper <strong>for</strong> a fixed aperture size. There is also a cost penalty <strong>for</strong> making<br />

the cavity deeper, since the size of the heat exchanger surface grows as<br />

discussed in Section V.A-5(b). There<strong>for</strong>e, DELSOL will not increase the<br />

depth of the cavity above the minimum value allowed in the optimization<br />

search (HTWST x RWCAV(1)) unless it is <strong>for</strong>ced to by a flux constraint<br />

on the heat absorbing surface. Note that the flux calculation is done sep-<br />

arately from the power calculation and does not affect the power calcula-<br />

tion in any way, since the power calculation is done at the aperture. Thus,<br />

other than a slight change in receiver losses, changing the cavity depth<br />

will not affect the receiver power, but it will directly affect the fluxes inci-<br />

dent on the heat absorbing surface.<br />

If NUMREC or NUMHTW is set to 1, then the appropriate value of<br />

RX(1) or W as defined in the previous REC Namelist will be used, rather<br />

than using the limits defined above.<br />

The second step in optimizing a cavity is to fine tune the width and aspect<br />

ratio of the apertures by specifying IOPTUM=l. During this optimization<br />

step the user should set the parameter W in the Namelist REC<br />

to the optimum W found in the first step. With IOPTUM=l the first receiver<br />

variable is again the width of the first aperture, RX(1). However,<br />

the second receiver variable is now the dimensionless aspect ratio of the<br />

aperture, RY (1) /RX( 1). There are NUMHT W (520) equally spaced values<br />

of the aspect ratio from a minimum value of HTWST to a maximum<br />

value of HTWEND. As mentioned be<strong>for</strong>e, if NUMREC or NUMHTW is<br />

set to 1, then the appropriate value of RX(1) or RY(1) as defined in the<br />

previous namelist will be used, and the limits described here will be ignored.<br />

Flux values should be checked during both steps of optimizing a cavity<br />

receiver as described above. In the first step, cavity depth directly affects<br />

flux, while having a different aperture in the second step could affect aim<br />

strategies and thus the flux incident on the absorber surface. This second<br />

effect should be minor, however, since the aperture area will probably stay<br />

nearly constant, although the aperture shape could change.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!