01.03.2013 Views

sources - Nottingham eTheses - The University of Nottingham

sources - Nottingham eTheses - The University of Nottingham

sources - Nottingham eTheses - The University of Nottingham

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

two ensembles in Act 1, ‘A vy, muzikanti, jděte dom’ and ‘Každý párek si musí svoje<br />

trápení přestát’, and further suggests two short cuts, one <strong>of</strong> two bars, the other <strong>of</strong><br />

three, in Act 1 Scene 7. Earlier in the letter, Hrazdira indicates that, as he is still<br />

waiting for the copy <strong>of</strong> the full score from the composer, he is making do in his<br />

preparations with the piano reduction (‘Prozatím mi stačí kl. výtah.’): by this he must<br />

have meant ŠVS, for it is in this that his suggestions appear to have been entered. 41<br />

As described above (§2.1), ŠVS contains many extensive cuts, mostly<br />

indicated in bold red pencil. 42 However, an examination <strong>of</strong> the passages specified in<br />

Hrazdira’s letter shows that his more limited cuts were suggested by lightly pencilled<br />

‘vi-de’ markings (using a normal lead pencil) which were then reinforced in bolder<br />

pencil (likewise lead); these cuts were evidently made at some time before the more<br />

numerous and extensive red pencil excisions. In fact, the ‘red’ cuts must have been<br />

made between late 1906 and December 1907, when Janáček handed over the vocal<br />

score for publication by the Klub přátel umění. 43 Closer examination <strong>of</strong> ŠVS suggests<br />

that, as well as those passages specifically mentioned in his letter <strong>of</strong> 11 July, Hrazdira<br />

may have proposed further cuts (perhaps feeling emboldened by a positive response to<br />

his written suggestions), including some in Act 2, since these too are indicated in the<br />

same neat, light pencil. Most <strong>of</strong> Hrazdira’s suggestions were accepted by Janáček,<br />

although traces <strong>of</strong> rubbed-out pencil marks indicate that a few were rejected — some<br />

permanently, others only to be made again at a later stage (see APPENDIX IV, cuts (i)–<br />

(v)).<br />

41 Whether or not there was other vocal material for the early performances <strong>of</strong> Jenůfa (i.e. before the<br />

publication in 1908 <strong>of</strong> KPU), it is clear from the many alterations, corrections and annotations that ŠVS<br />

served as the main vocal material in the years 1904–6.<br />

42 <strong>The</strong>se are the cuts listed by Štědroň in ZGJ, 85.<br />

43 <strong>The</strong>se ‘red’ cuts include changes corresponding to those made to ŠFS by January 1907: Janáček<br />

made a note at the end <strong>of</strong> Act 2 <strong>of</strong> ŠFS, ‘Opraveno 10/1 1907’ (see §2.1, ŠFS).<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!