sources - Nottingham eTheses - The University of Nottingham

sources - Nottingham eTheses - The University of Nottingham sources - Nottingham eTheses - The University of Nottingham

etheses.nottingham.ac.uk
from etheses.nottingham.ac.uk More from this publisher
01.03.2013 Views

Preissová over to the idea, and was soon at work on the opera. 15 Apart from Jenůfa’s various musical ‘precursors’, as identified by Bohumír Štědroň, 16 the earliest documented work on the opera is contained in Janáček’s marginal annotations and sketches in his copy (PL) of Preissová’s drama. Dates entered by Janáček into PL appear to chart a careful read-through and sketching, and provide the earliest detailed chronology of his work (end of Act 1: 18 March 1894; end of Act 2: 17 January 1895; end of Act 3: 11 February 1895). 17 In the middle of this initial stage of sketching, Janáček composed the self-standing prelude (Úvod) later known as Žárlivost [Jealousy] (VI/10); this was completed, according to a note on the last page of Preissová’s play, on 31 December 1894. 18 From this preliminary sketching of ideas, Janáček seems to have proceeded to a short-score draft, if the one 15 JODA, 43. Janáček’s approach, apparently taking steps to reach what Preissová later called a ‘happy agreement’ before starting work on the opera, may well have been influenced by his experience with Julius Zeyer, the author of Šárka, who, requested by Janáček to grant permission for composition only after it was virtually a fait-accompli, repeatedly refused; see JODA, 4–6 and Jiří Zahrádka’s Preface to the UE vocal score of Šárka (Vienna: Universal Edition, 2002), i–ii (Czech original) and xxiv–xxv (Eng. translation). 16 ZGJ, 11–57, also Štědroň 1966a and Štědroň 1968a. These ‘precursors’ include the piano piece Ej, danaj! (VIII/12); Zelené sem seła [I have sown green] (III/3) for chorus and orchestra; the male-voice chorus Žárlivec [The jealous man] (IV/19 no. 3); Úvod k Její pastorkyni (Žárlivost) [Prelude to ‘Její pastorkyňa’ (Jealousy)] (VIII/16) for piano four hands, and its orchestral version Žárlivost (Úvod k Její pastorkyni) (VI/10). 17 PL = Janáček’s copy of Preissová’s drama, BmJA, L6; see CHAPTER 2, §2.1, and Tyrrell 1996, ii / Tyrrell 2000, i. For a detailed account of Janáček’s work on and annotations to Její pastorkyňa, see Štědroň 1965 and ZGJ, 59–74. The gap between the read-through of Act 1 and Acts 2 and 3, whilst it may have been caused by Janáček’s heavy workload from teaching and folk-collecting activities, seems to parallel the later (and even longer) hiatus at the same point during composition proper. 18 Tyrrell takes the view that the date of 31 December 1894 probably refers to the completion of the four-hand piano version (VIII/16): see JYL i, 411. Although the music for the orchestral version of this prelude was subsequently copied into all the orchestral parts for the 1904 Jenůfa (as well as those newly copied out in 1906 and 1911), it appears never to have been performed as part of the opera in Janáček’s lifetime (see CHAPTER 2, §2.1, especially OP and OPx). It was, however, played as an independent concert piece, receiving its first performance in Prague on 14 September 1906 by the Czech Philharmonic Orchestra under František Neumann; see Němcová 1974, 134 (fn. 5), and Tyrrell 2000, ix. See also Němcová 1980, 159 and 164 (endnote 3), and Němcová 1984, 25–6. 5

surviving sketch-leaf (SK) is anything to judge by. 19 A further note at the beginning of Act 2 in the play reads: ‘dne 16.II.1895 zap.[očata] instru.[mentace]’ [16 February 1895 instrumentation begun]. 20 Janáček himself later maintained, in a letter to Otakar Nebuška, that for the first time in an opera he wrote directly into full score, which was then transcribed into vocal score. 21 Although the progression from short-score to ‘instrumentation’ seems to contradict this assertion, it is probable that the first fully worked-out version of the score (i.e. beyond mere sketch or draft state) was indeed in full score. Certainly the nature of the manuscript vocal score reduction (ŠVS) copied out for Janáček by Josef Štross 22 suggests such a process: it is for the most part more obviously a reduction than a pianistically conceived original (unlike VIII/16), though several minor discrepancies between it and the manuscript full score (ŠFS) point to a common ancestor, probably Janáček’s autograph full score which he subsequently destroyed. 23 In any event, by mid-1896 Act 1 was probably substantially complete, according to ideas advanced by John Tyrrell. 24 Janáček himself later pointed out, in 19 SK = autograph sketch-leaf, undated, containing fragments of Act 1 Scene 2 (voices and accompaniment), BmJA, A30.380; see CHAPTER 2, §2.1. Concerning a further, very brief sketch fragment, see Štědroň 1970b. 20 JODA, 46–7. 21 JODA, JP9 (letter to Otakar Nebuška, 22 February 1917). 22 Josef Štross (1826–1912), oboist and Janáček’s chief copyist from the first version of Šárka (1887) to the first version of Osud (1905). 23 According to the reminiscences of the Janáčeks’ maid, Marie Stejskalová (1873–1968), the autograph manuscript was burnt in the stove when the Janáčeks moved in the summer of 1910 from their rented apartment in Staré Brno (Klášterní 2) to their new house (Giskrova [now Kounicova] 30) in the grounds of the Brno Organ School (Trkanová 1959, 94). From a practical point of view, the autograph score had been superseded by Štross’s authorised copies, into which the subsequent layers of revision were entered; by 1910 the first printed edition of the vocal score had also appeared (KPU, published in 1908). One can only guess as to the wider possible motives for Janáček burning the autograph, given the associations of the later stages of composition with the fatal illness of his daughter Olga (see below). 24 Tyrrell 1998, 14–15, and JYL i, 422–4; not 1897 as had previously been thought. 6

Preissová over to the idea, and was soon at work on the opera. 15<br />

Apart from Jenůfa’s various musical ‘precursors’, as identified by Bohumír<br />

Štědroň, 16 the earliest documented work on the opera is contained in Janáček’s<br />

marginal annotations and sketches in his copy (PL) <strong>of</strong> Preissová’s drama. Dates<br />

entered by Janáček into PL appear to chart a careful read-through and sketching, and<br />

provide the earliest detailed chronology <strong>of</strong> his work (end <strong>of</strong> Act 1: 18 March 1894;<br />

end <strong>of</strong> Act 2: 17 January 1895; end <strong>of</strong> Act 3: 11 February 1895). 17 In the middle <strong>of</strong><br />

this initial stage <strong>of</strong> sketching, Janáček composed the self-standing prelude (Úvod)<br />

later known as Žárlivost [Jealousy] (VI/10); this was completed, according to a note<br />

on the last page <strong>of</strong> Preissová’s play, on 31 December 1894. 18 From this preliminary<br />

sketching <strong>of</strong> ideas, Janáček seems to have proceeded to a short-score draft, if the one<br />

15 JODA, 43. Janáček’s approach, apparently taking steps to reach what Preissová later called a ‘happy<br />

agreement’ before starting work on the opera, may well have been influenced by his experience with Julius<br />

Zeyer, the author <strong>of</strong> Šárka, who, requested by Janáček to grant permission for composition only after it was<br />

virtually a fait-accompli, repeatedly refused; see JODA, 4–6 and Jiří Zahrádka’s Preface to the UE vocal<br />

score <strong>of</strong> Šárka (Vienna: Universal Edition, 2002), i–ii (Czech original) and xxiv–xxv (Eng. translation).<br />

16 ZGJ, 11–57, also Štědroň 1966a and Štědroň 1968a. <strong>The</strong>se ‘precursors’ include the piano piece Ej, danaj!<br />

(VIII/12); Zelené sem seła [I have sown green] (III/3) for chorus and orchestra; the male-voice chorus Žárlivec<br />

[<strong>The</strong> jealous man] (IV/19 no. 3); Úvod k Její pastorkyni (Žárlivost) [Prelude to ‘Její pastorkyňa’ (Jealousy)]<br />

(VIII/16) for piano four hands, and its orchestral version Žárlivost (Úvod k Její pastorkyni) (VI/10).<br />

17 PL = Janáček’s copy <strong>of</strong> Preissová’s drama, BmJA, L6; see CHAPTER 2, §2.1, and Tyrrell 1996, ii /<br />

Tyrrell 2000, i. For a detailed account <strong>of</strong> Janáček’s work on and annotations to Její pastorkyňa, see<br />

Štědroň 1965 and ZGJ, 59–74. <strong>The</strong> gap between the read-through <strong>of</strong> Act 1 and Acts 2 and 3, whilst it<br />

may have been caused by Janáček’s heavy workload from teaching and folk-collecting activities, seems to<br />

parallel the later (and even longer) hiatus at the same point during composition proper.<br />

18 Tyrrell takes the view that the date <strong>of</strong> 31 December 1894 probably refers to the completion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

four-hand piano version (VIII/16): see JYL i, 411. Although the music for the orchestral version <strong>of</strong> this<br />

prelude was subsequently copied into all the orchestral parts for the 1904 Jenůfa (as well as those<br />

newly copied out in 1906 and 1911), it appears never to have been performed as part <strong>of</strong> the opera in<br />

Janáček’s lifetime (see CHAPTER 2, §2.1, especially OP and OPx). It was, however, played as an<br />

independent concert piece, receiving its first performance in Prague on 14 September 1906 by the<br />

Czech Philharmonic Orchestra under František Neumann; see Němcová 1974, 134 (fn. 5), and Tyrrell<br />

2000, ix. See also Němcová 1980, 159 and 164 (endnote 3), and Němcová 1984, 25–6.<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!