sources - Nottingham eTheses - The University of Nottingham

More documents

Recommendations

Info

187
188
Page 1 and 2:
THE 1904 VERSION OF LEOŠ JANÁČEK
Page 3 and 4:
FOR MY FRIENDS, WITHOUT WHOSE NEVER
Page 5 and 6:
APPENDICES 145 APPENDIX I Programme
Page 7 and 8:
Jenůfa. Thanks in part to a certai
Page 9 and 10:
our knowledge of the work’s overa
Page 11 and 12:
Acknowledgements That the project o
Page 13 and 14:
using it. However long this project
Page 15 and 16:
people who have helped me through v
Page 17 and 18:
NOTES Copyright The reconstruction
Page 19 and 20:
UE 1996 Cz./Ger./Eng. full score, e
Page 21 and 22:
1903 version (Urfassung/original ve
Page 23 and 24:
Of Janáček’s nine completed ope
Page 25 and 26:
manuscript sources. There are never
Page 27 and 28:
surviving sketch-leaf (SK) is anyth
Page 29 and 30:
and effort, both physical and emoti
Page 31 and 32:
performed in January 1904. In addit
Page 33 and 34:
most of the critics there were form
Page 35 and 36:
1.5 Later revisions and publication
Page 37 and 38:
Jenůfa for Prague towards the end
Page 39 and 40:
That situation changed, however, wh
Page 41 and 42:
CHAPTER 2: SOURCES AND RECONSTRUCTI
Page 43 and 44:
folio suggests that this brief sket
Page 45 and 46:
ŠFS into line with the Kovařovic
Page 47 and 48:
Fig. 2.2 ŠFS I 203v, detail, rotat
Page 49 and 50:
or other details (erased or otherwi
Page 51 and 52:
Fig. 2.5 ŠVS II 53r (II/vi/126-43)
Page 53 and 54:
list is amended by Janáček, with
Page 55 and 56:
Fig. 2.6 OP violin 1: detail from A
Page 57 and 58:
1904 bn 2 [OP] OPx title page and
Page 59 and 60:
On the facing page (the recto of th
Page 61 and 62:
Fig. 2.9 LB, 55: end of Act 3, show
Page 63 and 64:
issues of practical, pre-revision u
Page 65 and 66:
Jenůfa in 1913, providing a ‘sna
Page 67 and 68:
2.2 Determining the 1904 version fr
Page 69 and 70:
Štědroň 1968b Tyrrell 1996 / Tyr
Page 71 and 72:
two ensembles in Act 1, ‘A vy, mu
Page 73 and 74:
een cut before the première. 46 Th
Page 75 and 76:
and 2 in unison (in the context of
Page 77 and 78:
nature of the changes, which can th
Page 79 and 80:
anomalous status there. 50 A furthe
Page 81 and 82:
Ex. 2.4b However much more practica
Page 83 and 84:
score. Playing standards have impro
Page 85 and 86:
Such instances have been tacitly co
Page 87 and 88:
Ex. 2.7 Articulation and phrasing E
Page 89 and 90:
Instrumentation In line with Univer
Page 91 and 92:
trombone 3 part, and in both ŠFS a
Page 93 and 94:
Act 1. On the basis of all availabl
Page 95 and 96:
development of twentieth-century op
Page 97 and 98:
3.1 The Urfassung and the pre-premi
Page 99 and 100:
seems also to reflect an original c
Page 101 and 102:
could speculate that the change of
Page 103 and 104:
accompaniment evaporates completely
Page 105 and 106:
This radical pre-première revision
Page 107 and 108:
corresponds to the present figs 122
Page 109 and 110:
more specific cuts, the first of tw
Page 111 and 112:
with the same words, but also agree
Page 113 and 114:
and 16b in APPENDIX IV) to Laca’s
Page 115 and 116:
y Laca’s ‘Chci, Jenůfka’ —
Page 117 and 118:
Other extensive cuts made at this s
Page 119 and 120:
Ex. 3.12 3.3.2 Textural alterations
Page 121 and 122:
Ex. 3.13b This revision is similar
Page 123 and 124:
Ex. 3.16 Sinfonietta VI/18 (1926),
Page 125 and 126:
Ex. 3.19 Other instances of motivic
Page 127 and 128:
In 1908 Janáček delays the appear
Page 129 and 130:
Whilst a general trend at this stag
Page 131 and 132:
Ex. 3.25b 3.3.3 Folk passages and t
Page 133 and 134:
Fig. 3.2 BJ III, 900. The use by et
Page 135 and 136:
sketch for the oboe melody of the p
Page 137 and 138:
Ex. 3.27c In his 1907 changes to th
Page 139 and 140:
Janáček added ‘Maestoso con mot
Page 141 and 142:
Jenůfa’s cheek is slashed, but a
Page 143 and 144:
Ex. 3.33a Ex. 3.33b 122
Page 145 and 146:
so that the stress fell on the firs
Page 147 and 148:
the controversy surrounding Josef C
Page 149 and 150:
Although numerous instances of smal
Page 151 and 152:
Ex. 3.42a Ex. 3.42b This example al
Page 153 and 154:
‘vertical’ dimensions: the harm
Page 155 and 156:
most pages of the score; unlike Jan
Page 157 and 158: establishment of the 1904 score, pu
Page 159 and 160: London audiences at the time, 54 Bu
Page 161 and 162: Jenůfa can also be viewed as part
Page 163 and 164: (particularly in textural terms) cl
Page 165 and 166: genre might offer in his own quest
Page 167 and 168: APPENDIX I Programme note from the
Page 169 and 170: APPENDIX II Letter from Cyril Metod
Page 171 and 172: On Saturday following your departur
Page 173 and 174: APPENDIX IV 1906 cuts in ŠVS, ŠFS
Page 175 and 176: Act/sc/bar No. of bars II/viii/187-
Page 177 and 178: Reh. fig. ŠFS KPU UE 1917 10 21
Page 179 and 180: Reh. fig. ŠFS KPU UE 1917 80 57 51
Page 183 and 184: Reh. fig. ŠFS KPU UE 1917 86 8 →
Page 187 and 188: APPENDIX VI Janáček, Jenůfa and
Page 189 and 190: seem to be post-copying additions (
Page 191 and 192: Janáček attempted to pursue the m
Page 193 and 194: Fig. A6.1 Diagrammatic representati
Page 195 and 196: to use the four-row instrument well
Page 197 and 198: conducted a programme of choral and
Page 199 and 200: its icy tone will be damped’ sugg
Page 201 and 202: APPENDIX VII Bar counts for the dif
Page 203 and 204: APPENDIX VIIIa ŠVS I 72v-73r: tran
Page 205 and 206: APPENDIX VIIIb ŠVS I 72v-73r: tran
Page 207: APPENDIX IX ŠFS I 197v-200v: trans
Page 211 and 212: 190
Page 213 and 214: 192
Page 215 and 216: JODA John Tyrrell: Janáček’s op
Page 217 and 218: Dürr 1968 Joannes Martin Dürr:
Page 219 and 220: Smaczny 1985 Jan Smaczny: ‘Janá
Page 221: Vogel 1981 ——: Leoš Janáček:
show all

sources - Nottingham eTheses - The University of Nottingham

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?