sources - Nottingham eTheses - The University of Nottingham

sources - Nottingham eTheses - The University of Nottingham sources - Nottingham eTheses - The University of Nottingham

etheses.nottingham.ac.uk
from etheses.nottingham.ac.uk More from this publisher
01.03.2013 Views

Ex. A6.2 The subsequent exchange between Kudrjáš and Varvara makes it clear that this is meant to be an aural representation of the nightwatchman beating out the hour. 26 In Jenůfa, the consistent use of this (notated) tenor register as a xylophonic ‘drone’ raises the question of whether, as is usually assumed in his use of the instrument, Janáček intended the notes to sound an octave higher according to convention, or whether they were to sound as written. The latter would have been unlikely in practice, both because the actual sounding range of the instrument precluded it and because the manner of reproduction — on a flat surface, without the resonators of the modern instrument, and played with the hard sticks customary of the period — would in any case have tended to emphasise the upper partials. And Janáček’s request to Kleiber, quoted above, that the instrument be placed ‘on the stage near the mill where 26 Another instance of a repeated xylophone monotone comes in the second moon scene of Výlety páně Broučkovy (as well as in the original Epilogue to the self-standing Moon excursion, I/6), where it seems to be associated with the mechanical act of chopping meat for sausages. Elsewhere in Brouček, the xylophone appears to represent the clinking of glasses at the Vikárka inn. Other representational writing for the instrument includes knocks at the door in both Act 3 of Věc Makropulos and the pantomime scene in Act 2 of Z mrtvého domu. 177

its icy tone will be damped’ suggests both, on the one hand, that this was the case and, on the other, that the composer wanted to mute this aspect of its sound. If the latter observation is correct, the possibility that Janáček may have had in mind a sound closer to written pitch cannot be ruled out. The fact that two passages (I/i/293–302 and I/vii/1–12) are doubled at written pitch by the violas might be taken to support this view, but is inconclusive in itself, for octave doubling is not uncommon in xylophone writing, with the instrument’s bright high range ‘colouring’ the lower instrument with which it is paired. More persuasive, however, is the fact that all the xylophone’s passages in the piano vocal score (ŠVS) are written at the same octave as in the full score (ŠFS). 27 This provides some justification for the solution (unavailable to Janáček himself) adopted by Charles Mackerras in his two recordings of Jenůfa, of using a marimba, with its increased lower range and employing softer sticks, to obtain a sound which corresponds to the written pitch — a sound which may arguably be closer to what Janáček may have had in mind for this first use of the xylophone in any of his works. 28 Whatever the possible answers to these questions, Janáček’s use of the xylophone in Jenůfa helps to create an unmistakable sound-world. For a comparably bold use of an instrument with clear extra-musical associations to open an extended work, one has to look to the sleigh bells that launch Mahler’s Fourth Symphony, composed in 1899–1900 and premièred in 1901. 29 The xylophone plays a similar kind 27 This argument is strengthened by the fact that the same pitches remain in KPU which, in Tyrrell’s words, ‘carries particular authority, especially since it was subjected to more rigorous proofreading […] than was the case in [Janáček’s] later works.’ Tyrrell 1996, xiii and Tyrrell 2000, vii. 28 Mackerras’s two recordings are on Decca 414 483-2 (Söderström, Randová, Wiener Philharmoniker, et al.) and Chandos CHAN 3106(2) (in English: Vaughan, Barstow, Welsh National Opera, et al.). 29 Given Janáček’s well-documented dislike of Viennese operetta, it seems unlikely (notwithstanding his brief time spent as a student in the Habsburg capital and his wife’s family connections there) that he was familiar with Johann Strauss the younger’s Moulinet-Polka, op.57 (1858), which opens with a woodblock depicting the turning of the ‘little mill’ of the title. 178

its icy tone will be damped’ suggests both, on the one hand, that this was the case and,<br />

on the other, that the composer wanted to mute this aspect <strong>of</strong> its sound. If the latter<br />

observation is correct, the possibility that Janáček may have had in mind a sound closer<br />

to written pitch cannot be ruled out. <strong>The</strong> fact that two passages (I/i/293–302 and<br />

I/vii/1–12) are doubled at written pitch by the violas might be taken to support this<br />

view, but is inconclusive in itself, for octave doubling is not uncommon in xylophone<br />

writing, with the instrument’s bright high range ‘colouring’ the lower instrument with<br />

which it is paired. More persuasive, however, is the fact that all the xylophone’s<br />

passages in the piano vocal score (ŠVS) are written at the same octave as in the full<br />

score (ŠFS). 27 This provides some justification for the solution (unavailable to Janáček<br />

himself) adopted by Charles Mackerras in his two recordings <strong>of</strong> Jenůfa, <strong>of</strong> using a<br />

marimba, with its increased lower range and employing s<strong>of</strong>ter sticks, to obtain a sound<br />

which corresponds to the written pitch — a sound which may arguably be closer to what<br />

Janáček may have had in mind for this first use <strong>of</strong> the xylophone in any <strong>of</strong> his works. 28<br />

Whatever the possible answers to these questions, Janáček’s use <strong>of</strong> the<br />

xylophone in Jenůfa helps to create an unmistakable sound-world. For a comparably<br />

bold use <strong>of</strong> an instrument with clear extra-musical associations to open an extended<br />

work, one has to look to the sleigh bells that launch Mahler’s Fourth Symphony,<br />

composed in 1899–1900 and premièred in 1901. 29 <strong>The</strong> xylophone plays a similar kind<br />

27 This argument is strengthened by the fact that the same pitches remain in KPU which, in Tyrrell’s<br />

words, ‘carries particular authority, especially since it was subjected to more rigorous pro<strong>of</strong>reading […]<br />

than was the case in [Janáček’s] later works.’ Tyrrell 1996, xiii and Tyrrell 2000, vii.<br />

28 Mackerras’s two recordings are on Decca 414 483-2 (Söderström, Randová, Wiener Philharmoniker,<br />

et al.) and Chandos CHAN 3106(2) (in English: Vaughan, Barstow, Welsh National Opera, et al.).<br />

29 Given Janáček’s well-documented dislike <strong>of</strong> Viennese operetta, it seems unlikely (notwithstanding<br />

his brief time spent as a student in the Habsburg capital and his wife’s family connections there) that he<br />

was familiar with Johann Strauss the younger’s Moulinet-Polka, op.57 (1858), which opens with a<br />

woodblock depicting the turning <strong>of</strong> the ‘little mill’ <strong>of</strong> the title.<br />

178

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!