sources - Nottingham eTheses - The University of Nottingham

sources - Nottingham eTheses - The University of Nottingham sources - Nottingham eTheses - The University of Nottingham

etheses.nottingham.ac.uk
from etheses.nottingham.ac.uk More from this publisher
01.03.2013 Views

interlocking rows, with the lowest notes nearest the player, and resting on ropes made of straw. This latter feature gave rise to the distinctive German term for the instrument, Strohfiedel [straw fiddle], sometimes also known as the Holz-und-Stroh. Lacking the resonators of the modern xylophone, the bars and ropes were arranged on a flat surface and struck with a pair of spoon-shaped mallets (again like the cimbalom) made of wood or horn, giving a much harder, dryer sound than the modern instrument. 17 The wooden bars were so arranged that the two central rows corresponded approximately to the ‘white’ or natural pitches, with the outer rows containing mainly the ‘black’ accidentals, and with some pitches duplicated so as to facilitate the playing of faster passages, as shown in the diagrammatic representation above. As well as being laid out on ropes of straw, the bars were strung loosely together, so that the entire instrument could be rolled up for carrying. The range was variable, at most 2 2 /3 octaves, and notational convention dictated that the written pitches (a) sounded an octave higher (b): Ex. A6.1 At the turn of the century, there appears to have been a mini-boom of works including a part for the xylophone: in addition to Jenůfa, the instrument features in Mahler’s Sixth Symphony and Puccini’s Madama Butterfly (both 1904), Strauss’s Salome (1905), Debussy’s Ibéria (1909) and Stravinsky’s L’Oiseau de feu (1910). However, this boom owed less to the appearance of the modern ‘Deagan’ xylophone (most European orchestras, and certainly central and eastern European orchestras, continued 17 Holland 1978, 169–70. 173

to use the four-row instrument well into the twentieth century) 18 than it did to the instrument’s growing popularity during the nineteenth century. This trend can largely be credited to Michał Józef Guzikow (1806–1837), a Polish Jew who had the distinction of being the first acknowledged xylophone virtuoso, touring Europe and impressing the likes of Mendelssohn, Chopin and Liszt. 19 He not only raised the instrument’s profile within the world of art music, but reinforced a perception of it as a typically Slavic instrument. 20 In one of the chief Czech reference books of the early twentieth century, Otto’s Encyclopedia, the xylophone (listed as Slamozvuk, literally ‘straw noise’) is described as a musical instrument of the Russians, Cossacks, Tartars and Poles, also particularly the Carpathian and Ural highlanders, and lastly favoured by Tyrolean singers and called by them Strohfiedel, also Holzharmonika, Gige-lyra, hölzernes Gelächter. It is made of 16–20 tuned sticks of fir wood, semi-cylindrical in shape [i.e. convex], resting on straw ropes or on long wooden rods wound with rope, the notes are produced by two wooden beaters. 21 Although this description seems to be of the even older one-row diatonic xylophone (which pre-dated Guzikow and was described, as the author of Otto’s entry points out, by Agricola), the instrument’s Slavic roots, attested to in other sources of the time, may well have appealed to Janáček’s wider pan-Slavic sentiments, notwithstanding 18 In Russian orchestras the four-row xylophone was in use until the later twentieth century; see Baines 1992, 384. 19 Irena Poniatowska, ‘Guzikow, Michał Józef’, NG2, vii, 608–9; James Blades/James Holland, ‘Xylophone, §2: Europe’, NG2, xxvii, 619. 20 This was undoubtedly emphasised by his appearance in folk costume at his concerts; see AmZ no. 36 (September 1835). 21 OSN xxiii (1905), 334. 174

interlocking rows, with the lowest notes nearest the player, and resting on ropes made<br />

<strong>of</strong> straw. This latter feature gave rise to the distinctive German term for the<br />

instrument, Strohfiedel [straw fiddle], sometimes also known as the Holz-und-Stroh.<br />

Lacking the resonators <strong>of</strong> the modern xylophone, the bars and ropes were arranged on<br />

a flat surface and struck with a pair <strong>of</strong> spoon-shaped mallets (again like the cimbalom)<br />

made <strong>of</strong> wood or horn, giving a much harder, dryer sound than the modern<br />

instrument. 17 <strong>The</strong> wooden bars were so arranged that the two central rows<br />

corresponded approximately to the ‘white’ or natural pitches, with the outer rows<br />

containing mainly the ‘black’ accidentals, and with some pitches duplicated so as to<br />

facilitate the playing <strong>of</strong> faster passages, as shown in the diagrammatic representation<br />

above.<br />

As well as being laid out on ropes <strong>of</strong> straw, the bars were strung loosely<br />

together, so that the entire instrument could be rolled up for carrying. <strong>The</strong> range was<br />

variable, at most 2 2 /3 octaves, and notational convention dictated that the written<br />

pitches (a) sounded an octave higher (b):<br />

Ex. A6.1<br />

At the turn <strong>of</strong> the century, there appears to have been a mini-boom <strong>of</strong> works including<br />

a part for the xylophone: in addition to Jenůfa, the instrument features in Mahler’s<br />

Sixth Symphony and Puccini’s Madama Butterfly (both 1904), Strauss’s Salome<br />

(1905), Debussy’s Ibéria (1909) and Stravinsky’s L’Oiseau de feu (1910). However,<br />

this boom owed less to the appearance <strong>of</strong> the modern ‘Deagan’ xylophone (most<br />

European orchestras, and certainly central and eastern European orchestras, continued<br />

17 Holland 1978, 169–70.<br />

173

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!