sources - Nottingham eTheses - The University of Nottingham
sources - Nottingham eTheses - The University of Nottingham sources - Nottingham eTheses - The University of Nottingham
interlocking rows, with the lowest notes nearest the player, and resting on ropes made of straw. This latter feature gave rise to the distinctive German term for the instrument, Strohfiedel [straw fiddle], sometimes also known as the Holz-und-Stroh. Lacking the resonators of the modern xylophone, the bars and ropes were arranged on a flat surface and struck with a pair of spoon-shaped mallets (again like the cimbalom) made of wood or horn, giving a much harder, dryer sound than the modern instrument. 17 The wooden bars were so arranged that the two central rows corresponded approximately to the ‘white’ or natural pitches, with the outer rows containing mainly the ‘black’ accidentals, and with some pitches duplicated so as to facilitate the playing of faster passages, as shown in the diagrammatic representation above. As well as being laid out on ropes of straw, the bars were strung loosely together, so that the entire instrument could be rolled up for carrying. The range was variable, at most 2 2 /3 octaves, and notational convention dictated that the written pitches (a) sounded an octave higher (b): Ex. A6.1 At the turn of the century, there appears to have been a mini-boom of works including a part for the xylophone: in addition to Jenůfa, the instrument features in Mahler’s Sixth Symphony and Puccini’s Madama Butterfly (both 1904), Strauss’s Salome (1905), Debussy’s Ibéria (1909) and Stravinsky’s L’Oiseau de feu (1910). However, this boom owed less to the appearance of the modern ‘Deagan’ xylophone (most European orchestras, and certainly central and eastern European orchestras, continued 17 Holland 1978, 169–70. 173
to use the four-row instrument well into the twentieth century) 18 than it did to the instrument’s growing popularity during the nineteenth century. This trend can largely be credited to Michał Józef Guzikow (1806–1837), a Polish Jew who had the distinction of being the first acknowledged xylophone virtuoso, touring Europe and impressing the likes of Mendelssohn, Chopin and Liszt. 19 He not only raised the instrument’s profile within the world of art music, but reinforced a perception of it as a typically Slavic instrument. 20 In one of the chief Czech reference books of the early twentieth century, Otto’s Encyclopedia, the xylophone (listed as Slamozvuk, literally ‘straw noise’) is described as a musical instrument of the Russians, Cossacks, Tartars and Poles, also particularly the Carpathian and Ural highlanders, and lastly favoured by Tyrolean singers and called by them Strohfiedel, also Holzharmonika, Gige-lyra, hölzernes Gelächter. It is made of 16–20 tuned sticks of fir wood, semi-cylindrical in shape [i.e. convex], resting on straw ropes or on long wooden rods wound with rope, the notes are produced by two wooden beaters. 21 Although this description seems to be of the even older one-row diatonic xylophone (which pre-dated Guzikow and was described, as the author of Otto’s entry points out, by Agricola), the instrument’s Slavic roots, attested to in other sources of the time, may well have appealed to Janáček’s wider pan-Slavic sentiments, notwithstanding 18 In Russian orchestras the four-row xylophone was in use until the later twentieth century; see Baines 1992, 384. 19 Irena Poniatowska, ‘Guzikow, Michał Józef’, NG2, vii, 608–9; James Blades/James Holland, ‘Xylophone, §2: Europe’, NG2, xxvii, 619. 20 This was undoubtedly emphasised by his appearance in folk costume at his concerts; see AmZ no. 36 (September 1835). 21 OSN xxiii (1905), 334. 174
- Page 143 and 144: Ex. 3.33a Ex. 3.33b 122
- Page 145 and 146: so that the stress fell on the firs
- Page 147 and 148: the controversy surrounding Josef C
- Page 149 and 150: Although numerous instances of smal
- Page 151 and 152: Ex. 3.42a Ex. 3.42b This example al
- Page 153 and 154: ‘vertical’ dimensions: the harm
- Page 155 and 156: most pages of the score; unlike Jan
- Page 157 and 158: establishment of the 1904 score, pu
- Page 159 and 160: London audiences at the time, 54 Bu
- Page 161 and 162: Jenůfa can also be viewed as part
- Page 163 and 164: (particularly in textural terms) cl
- Page 165 and 166: genre might offer in his own quest
- Page 167 and 168: APPENDIX I Programme note from the
- Page 169 and 170: APPENDIX II Letter from Cyril Metod
- Page 171 and 172: On Saturday following your departur
- Page 173 and 174: APPENDIX IV 1906 cuts in ŠVS, ŠFS
- Page 175 and 176: Act/sc/bar No. of bars II/viii/187-
- Page 177 and 178: Reh. fig. ŠFS KPU UE 1917 10 21
- Page 179 and 180: Reh. fig. ŠFS KPU UE 1917 80 57 51
- Page 181 and 182: Reh. fig. ŠFS KPU UE 1917 14 17 14
- Page 183 and 184: Reh. fig. ŠFS KPU UE 1917 86 8 →
- Page 185 and 186: Reh. fig. ŠFS KPU UE 1917 24 20 20
- Page 187 and 188: APPENDIX VI Janáček, Jenůfa and
- Page 189 and 190: seem to be post-copying additions (
- Page 191 and 192: Janáček attempted to pursue the m
- Page 193: Fig. A6.1 Diagrammatic representati
- Page 197 and 198: conducted a programme of choral and
- Page 199 and 200: its icy tone will be damped’ sugg
- Page 201 and 202: APPENDIX VII Bar counts for the dif
- Page 203 and 204: APPENDIX VIIIa ŠVS I 72v-73r: tran
- Page 205 and 206: APPENDIX VIIIb ŠVS I 72v-73r: tran
- Page 207 and 208: APPENDIX IX ŠFS I 197v-200v: trans
- Page 209 and 210: 188
- Page 211 and 212: 190
- Page 213 and 214: 192
- Page 215 and 216: JODA John Tyrrell: Janáček’s op
- Page 217 and 218: Dürr 1968 Joannes Martin Dürr:
- Page 219 and 220: Smaczny 1985 Jan Smaczny: ‘Janá
- Page 221: Vogel 1981 ——: Leoš Janáček:
interlocking rows, with the lowest notes nearest the player, and resting on ropes made<br />
<strong>of</strong> straw. This latter feature gave rise to the distinctive German term for the<br />
instrument, Strohfiedel [straw fiddle], sometimes also known as the Holz-und-Stroh.<br />
Lacking the resonators <strong>of</strong> the modern xylophone, the bars and ropes were arranged on<br />
a flat surface and struck with a pair <strong>of</strong> spoon-shaped mallets (again like the cimbalom)<br />
made <strong>of</strong> wood or horn, giving a much harder, dryer sound than the modern<br />
instrument. 17 <strong>The</strong> wooden bars were so arranged that the two central rows<br />
corresponded approximately to the ‘white’ or natural pitches, with the outer rows<br />
containing mainly the ‘black’ accidentals, and with some pitches duplicated so as to<br />
facilitate the playing <strong>of</strong> faster passages, as shown in the diagrammatic representation<br />
above.<br />
As well as being laid out on ropes <strong>of</strong> straw, the bars were strung loosely<br />
together, so that the entire instrument could be rolled up for carrying. <strong>The</strong> range was<br />
variable, at most 2 2 /3 octaves, and notational convention dictated that the written<br />
pitches (a) sounded an octave higher (b):<br />
Ex. A6.1<br />
At the turn <strong>of</strong> the century, there appears to have been a mini-boom <strong>of</strong> works including<br />
a part for the xylophone: in addition to Jenůfa, the instrument features in Mahler’s<br />
Sixth Symphony and Puccini’s Madama Butterfly (both 1904), Strauss’s Salome<br />
(1905), Debussy’s Ibéria (1909) and Stravinsky’s L’Oiseau de feu (1910). However,<br />
this boom owed less to the appearance <strong>of</strong> the modern ‘Deagan’ xylophone (most<br />
European orchestras, and certainly central and eastern European orchestras, continued<br />
17 Holland 1978, 169–70.<br />
173