- Page 1 and 2: THE 1904 VERSION OF LEOŠ JANÁČEK
- Page 3 and 4: FOR MY FRIENDS, WITHOUT WHOSE NEVER
- Page 5 and 6: APPENDICES 145 APPENDIX I Programme
- Page 7 and 8: Jenůfa. Thanks in part to a certai
- Page 9 and 10: our knowledge of the work’s overa
- Page 11 and 12: Acknowledgements That the project o
- Page 13 and 14: using it. However long this project
- Page 15: people who have helped me through v
- Page 19 and 20: UE 1996 Cz./Ger./Eng. full score, e
- Page 21 and 22: 1903 version (Urfassung/original ve
- Page 23 and 24: Of Janáček’s nine completed ope
- Page 25 and 26: manuscript sources. There are never
- Page 27 and 28: surviving sketch-leaf (SK) is anyth
- Page 29 and 30: and effort, both physical and emoti
- Page 31 and 32: performed in January 1904. In addit
- Page 33 and 34: most of the critics there were form
- Page 35 and 36: 1.5 Later revisions and publication
- Page 37 and 38: Jenůfa for Prague towards the end
- Page 39 and 40: That situation changed, however, wh
- Page 41 and 42: CHAPTER 2: SOURCES AND RECONSTRUCTI
- Page 43 and 44: folio suggests that this brief sket
- Page 45 and 46: ŠFS into line with the Kovařovic
- Page 47 and 48: Fig. 2.2 ŠFS I 203v, detail, rotat
- Page 49 and 50: or other details (erased or otherwi
- Page 51 and 52: Fig. 2.5 ŠVS II 53r (II/vi/126-43)
- Page 53 and 54: list is amended by Janáček, with
- Page 55 and 56: Fig. 2.6 OP violin 1: detail from A
- Page 57 and 58: 1904 bn 2 [OP] OPx title page and
- Page 59 and 60: On the facing page (the recto of th
- Page 61 and 62: Fig. 2.9 LB, 55: end of Act 3, show
- Page 63 and 64: issues of practical, pre-revision u
- Page 65 and 66: Jenůfa in 1913, providing a ‘sna
- Page 67 and 68:
2.2 Determining the 1904 version fr
- Page 69 and 70:
Štědroň 1968b Tyrrell 1996 / Tyr
- Page 71 and 72:
two ensembles in Act 1, ‘A vy, mu
- Page 73 and 74:
een cut before the première. 46 Th
- Page 75 and 76:
and 2 in unison (in the context of
- Page 77 and 78:
nature of the changes, which can th
- Page 79 and 80:
anomalous status there. 50 A furthe
- Page 81 and 82:
Ex. 2.4b However much more practica
- Page 83 and 84:
score. Playing standards have impro
- Page 85 and 86:
Such instances have been tacitly co
- Page 87 and 88:
Ex. 2.7 Articulation and phrasing E
- Page 89 and 90:
Instrumentation In line with Univer
- Page 91 and 92:
trombone 3 part, and in both ŠFS a
- Page 93 and 94:
Act 1. On the basis of all availabl
- Page 95 and 96:
development of twentieth-century op
- Page 97 and 98:
3.1 The Urfassung and the pre-premi
- Page 99 and 100:
seems also to reflect an original c
- Page 101 and 102:
could speculate that the change of
- Page 103 and 104:
accompaniment evaporates completely
- Page 105 and 106:
This radical pre-première revision
- Page 107 and 108:
corresponds to the present figs 122
- Page 109 and 110:
more specific cuts, the first of tw
- Page 111 and 112:
with the same words, but also agree
- Page 113 and 114:
and 16b in APPENDIX IV) to Laca’s
- Page 115 and 116:
y Laca’s ‘Chci, Jenůfka’ —
- Page 117 and 118:
Other extensive cuts made at this s
- Page 119 and 120:
Ex. 3.12 3.3.2 Textural alterations
- Page 121 and 122:
Ex. 3.13b This revision is similar
- Page 123 and 124:
Ex. 3.16 Sinfonietta VI/18 (1926),
- Page 125 and 126:
Ex. 3.19 Other instances of motivic
- Page 127 and 128:
In 1908 Janáček delays the appear
- Page 129 and 130:
Whilst a general trend at this stag
- Page 131 and 132:
Ex. 3.25b 3.3.3 Folk passages and t
- Page 133 and 134:
Fig. 3.2 BJ III, 900. The use by et
- Page 135 and 136:
sketch for the oboe melody of the p
- Page 137 and 138:
Ex. 3.27c In his 1907 changes to th
- Page 139 and 140:
Janáček added ‘Maestoso con mot
- Page 141 and 142:
Jenůfa’s cheek is slashed, but a
- Page 143 and 144:
Ex. 3.33a Ex. 3.33b 122
- Page 145 and 146:
so that the stress fell on the firs
- Page 147 and 148:
the controversy surrounding Josef C
- Page 149 and 150:
Although numerous instances of smal
- Page 151 and 152:
Ex. 3.42a Ex. 3.42b This example al
- Page 153 and 154:
‘vertical’ dimensions: the harm
- Page 155 and 156:
most pages of the score; unlike Jan
- Page 157 and 158:
establishment of the 1904 score, pu
- Page 159 and 160:
London audiences at the time, 54 Bu
- Page 161 and 162:
Jenůfa can also be viewed as part
- Page 163 and 164:
(particularly in textural terms) cl
- Page 165 and 166:
genre might offer in his own quest
- Page 167 and 168:
APPENDIX I Programme note from the
- Page 169 and 170:
APPENDIX II Letter from Cyril Metod
- Page 171 and 172:
On Saturday following your departur
- Page 173 and 174:
APPENDIX IV 1906 cuts in ŠVS, ŠFS
- Page 175 and 176:
Act/sc/bar No. of bars II/viii/187-
- Page 177 and 178:
Reh. fig. ŠFS KPU UE 1917 10 21
- Page 179 and 180:
Reh. fig. ŠFS KPU UE 1917 80 57 51
- Page 181 and 182:
Reh. fig. ŠFS KPU UE 1917 14 17 14
- Page 183 and 184:
Reh. fig. ŠFS KPU UE 1917 86 8 →
- Page 185 and 186:
Reh. fig. ŠFS KPU UE 1917 24 20 20
- Page 187 and 188:
APPENDIX VI Janáček, Jenůfa and
- Page 189 and 190:
seem to be post-copying additions (
- Page 191 and 192:
Janáček attempted to pursue the m
- Page 193 and 194:
Fig. A6.1 Diagrammatic representati
- Page 195 and 196:
to use the four-row instrument well
- Page 197 and 198:
conducted a programme of choral and
- Page 199 and 200:
its icy tone will be damped’ sugg
- Page 201 and 202:
APPENDIX VII Bar counts for the dif
- Page 203 and 204:
APPENDIX VIIIa ŠVS I 72v-73r: tran
- Page 205 and 206:
APPENDIX VIIIb ŠVS I 72v-73r: tran
- Page 207 and 208:
APPENDIX IX ŠFS I 197v-200v: trans
- Page 209 and 210:
188
- Page 211 and 212:
190
- Page 213 and 214:
192
- Page 215 and 216:
JODA John Tyrrell: Janáček’s op
- Page 217 and 218:
Dürr 1968 Joannes Martin Dürr:
- Page 219 and 220:
Smaczny 1985 Jan Smaczny: ‘Janá
- Page 221:
Vogel 1981 ——: Leoš Janáček: