sources - Nottingham eTheses - The University of Nottingham
sources - Nottingham eTheses - The University of Nottingham sources - Nottingham eTheses - The University of Nottingham
tenors and basses in ‘Daleko, široko’. In the Act 3 village girls’ song (‘Ej, mamko, mamko’), he not only lightened the scoring — making it considerably less earthy and bass-heavy — but also removed Barena’s charming yet fussy descant. 24 Particularly notable are the revisions Janáček made to passages featuring the duvaj or ‘double-stroke’ style of folk accompaniment. This homophonic, chordal string figuration featuring offbeat stress patterns ( ) was described at some length by Janáček himself in his detailed introduction (XV/163) to Národní písně moravské v nově nasbírané [Moravian folksongs newly collected] (XIII/3; 1901). 25 There he identified it as a typical rhythmic figure of the Starosvětská [old-world] dance 26 from Slovácko, and emphasised its disruptive and vivifying qualities. Several of the accompanied dance-songs and melodies included in the latter part of this monumental volume (in the section devoted to dance tunes) contain examples of the duvaj accompaniment in context, including the one reproduced on the following page (Fig. 3.2), showing the beginning of a transcription from Velká nad Veličkou in the Horňácko district of Slovácko. In the accompanimental chords, each pair of quavers is slurred in a continuous bow-stroke, with an increase in pressure on the second quaver (indicated in Janáček’s notation by an accent). In Moravian (and specifically Slovácko) folk ensemble music this is an idiomatic string accompaniment, typically using simple diatonic chords and usually taken by the second fiddle (kontráš) and string bass (bassa) which together support the voice (zpěv) and first fiddle (hudec). 24 Barena’s descant was perhaps influenced by the leader-chorus style of Slovakian female-voice folksong that also led to Janáček’s Lidová nokturna [Folk nocturnes] (IV/32, 1906). Janáček first collected the material that gave rise to these nocturnes in September 1901; see JYL i, 343, 345 and 649–50. 25 BJ III, i–cxxxvi. 26 ‘Typická sčasovka Starosvětské’, ibid., cxv. 111
Fig. 3.2 BJ III, 900. The use by ethnomusicologists of the term duvaj for this type of figuration is more recent: 27 the term itself appears originally to come from Slovakia, and is perhaps onomatopoeic, with the vowel shift from u to a mimicking the opening out of sound on the second, stressed quaver. 28 Duvaj-style folk accompaniments can be found not only in Slovácko and Slovakia but also further south and east in Hungary and Romania, 29 and influences in art music can be detected, for example, in the accented offbeat chords of the opening of Bartók’s Rhapsody no. 1 for violin and piano or orchestra (BB94a/b, 1928–9). 27 See Marta Toncrová (with Oskár Elschek), ‘Czech Republic, §II, 2: Traditional music: Moravia and Silesia: (iii) Instrumental music’, NG2, vi, 821; also Holý 1963. 28 Holý 1963, 65. 29 Ibid. 112
- Page 81 and 82: Ex. 2.4b However much more practica
- Page 83 and 84: score. Playing standards have impro
- Page 85 and 86: Such instances have been tacitly co
- Page 87 and 88: Ex. 2.7 Articulation and phrasing E
- Page 89 and 90: Instrumentation In line with Univer
- Page 91 and 92: trombone 3 part, and in both ŠFS a
- Page 93 and 94: Act 1. On the basis of all availabl
- Page 95 and 96: development of twentieth-century op
- Page 97 and 98: 3.1 The Urfassung and the pre-premi
- Page 99 and 100: seems also to reflect an original c
- Page 101 and 102: could speculate that the change of
- Page 103 and 104: accompaniment evaporates completely
- Page 105 and 106: This radical pre-première revision
- Page 107 and 108: corresponds to the present figs 122
- Page 109 and 110: more specific cuts, the first of tw
- Page 111 and 112: with the same words, but also agree
- Page 113 and 114: and 16b in APPENDIX IV) to Laca’s
- Page 115 and 116: y Laca’s ‘Chci, Jenůfka’ —
- Page 117 and 118: Other extensive cuts made at this s
- Page 119 and 120: Ex. 3.12 3.3.2 Textural alterations
- Page 121 and 122: Ex. 3.13b This revision is similar
- Page 123 and 124: Ex. 3.16 Sinfonietta VI/18 (1926),
- Page 125 and 126: Ex. 3.19 Other instances of motivic
- Page 127 and 128: In 1908 Janáček delays the appear
- Page 129 and 130: Whilst a general trend at this stag
- Page 131: Ex. 3.25b 3.3.3 Folk passages and t
- Page 135 and 136: sketch for the oboe melody of the p
- Page 137 and 138: Ex. 3.27c In his 1907 changes to th
- Page 139 and 140: Janáček added ‘Maestoso con mot
- Page 141 and 142: Jenůfa’s cheek is slashed, but a
- Page 143 and 144: Ex. 3.33a Ex. 3.33b 122
- Page 145 and 146: so that the stress fell on the firs
- Page 147 and 148: the controversy surrounding Josef C
- Page 149 and 150: Although numerous instances of smal
- Page 151 and 152: Ex. 3.42a Ex. 3.42b This example al
- Page 153 and 154: ‘vertical’ dimensions: the harm
- Page 155 and 156: most pages of the score; unlike Jan
- Page 157 and 158: establishment of the 1904 score, pu
- Page 159 and 160: London audiences at the time, 54 Bu
- Page 161 and 162: Jenůfa can also be viewed as part
- Page 163 and 164: (particularly in textural terms) cl
- Page 165 and 166: genre might offer in his own quest
- Page 167 and 168: APPENDIX I Programme note from the
- Page 169 and 170: APPENDIX II Letter from Cyril Metod
- Page 171 and 172: On Saturday following your departur
- Page 173 and 174: APPENDIX IV 1906 cuts in ŠVS, ŠFS
- Page 175 and 176: Act/sc/bar No. of bars II/viii/187-
- Page 177 and 178: Reh. fig. ŠFS KPU UE 1917 10 21
- Page 179 and 180: Reh. fig. ŠFS KPU UE 1917 80 57 51
- Page 181 and 182: Reh. fig. ŠFS KPU UE 1917 14 17 14
tenors and basses in ‘Daleko, široko’. In the Act 3 village girls’ song (‘Ej, mamko,<br />
mamko’), he not only lightened the scoring — making it considerably less earthy and<br />
bass-heavy — but also removed Barena’s charming yet fussy descant. 24<br />
Particularly notable are the revisions Janáček made to passages featuring the<br />
duvaj or ‘double-stroke’ style <strong>of</strong> folk accompaniment. This homophonic, chordal<br />
string figuration featuring <strong>of</strong>fbeat stress patterns ( ) was described at some<br />
length by Janáček himself in his detailed introduction (XV/163) to Národní písně<br />
moravské v nově nasbírané [Moravian folksongs newly collected] (XIII/3; 1901). 25<br />
<strong>The</strong>re he identified it as a typical rhythmic figure <strong>of</strong> the Starosvětská [old-world]<br />
dance 26 from Slovácko, and emphasised its disruptive and vivifying qualities. Several<br />
<strong>of</strong> the accompanied dance-songs and melodies included in the latter part <strong>of</strong> this<br />
monumental volume (in the section devoted to dance tunes) contain examples <strong>of</strong> the<br />
duvaj accompaniment in context, including the one reproduced on the following page<br />
(Fig. 3.2), showing the beginning <strong>of</strong> a transcription from Velká nad Veličkou in the<br />
Horňácko district <strong>of</strong> Slovácko. In the accompanimental chords, each pair <strong>of</strong> quavers<br />
is slurred in a continuous bow-stroke, with an increase in pressure on the second<br />
quaver (indicated in Janáček’s notation by an accent). In Moravian (and specifically<br />
Slovácko) folk ensemble music this is an idiomatic string accompaniment, typically<br />
using simple diatonic chords and usually taken by the second fiddle (kontráš) and<br />
string bass (bassa) which together support the voice (zpěv) and first fiddle (hudec).<br />
24 Barena’s descant was perhaps influenced by the leader-chorus style <strong>of</strong> Slovakian female-voice<br />
folksong that also led to Janáček’s Lidová nokturna [Folk nocturnes] (IV/32, 1906). Janáček first<br />
collected the material that gave rise to these nocturnes in September 1901; see JYL i, 343, 345 and<br />
649–50.<br />
25 BJ III, i–cxxxvi.<br />
26 ‘Typická sčasovka Starosvětské’, ibid., cxv.<br />
111