- Page 1 and 2:
THE 1904 VERSION OF LEOŠ JANÁČEK
- Page 3 and 4:
FOR MY FRIENDS, WITHOUT WHOSE NEVER
- Page 5 and 6:
APPENDICES 145 APPENDIX I Programme
- Page 7 and 8:
Jenůfa. Thanks in part to a certai
- Page 9 and 10:
our knowledge of the work’s overa
- Page 11 and 12:
Acknowledgements That the project o
- Page 13 and 14:
using it. However long this project
- Page 15 and 16:
people who have helped me through v
- Page 17 and 18:
NOTES Copyright The reconstruction
- Page 19 and 20:
UE 1996 Cz./Ger./Eng. full score, e
- Page 21 and 22:
1903 version (Urfassung/original ve
- Page 23 and 24:
Of Janáček’s nine completed ope
- Page 25 and 26:
manuscript sources. There are never
- Page 27 and 28:
surviving sketch-leaf (SK) is anyth
- Page 29 and 30:
and effort, both physical and emoti
- Page 31 and 32:
performed in January 1904. In addit
- Page 33 and 34:
most of the critics there were form
- Page 35 and 36:
1.5 Later revisions and publication
- Page 37 and 38:
Jenůfa for Prague towards the end
- Page 39 and 40:
That situation changed, however, wh
- Page 41 and 42:
CHAPTER 2: SOURCES AND RECONSTRUCTI
- Page 43 and 44:
folio suggests that this brief sket
- Page 45 and 46:
ŠFS into line with the Kovařovic
- Page 47 and 48:
Fig. 2.2 ŠFS I 203v, detail, rotat
- Page 49 and 50:
or other details (erased or otherwi
- Page 51 and 52:
Fig. 2.5 ŠVS II 53r (II/vi/126-43)
- Page 53 and 54:
list is amended by Janáček, with
- Page 55 and 56:
Fig. 2.6 OP violin 1: detail from A
- Page 57 and 58:
1904 bn 2 [OP] OPx title page and
- Page 59 and 60:
On the facing page (the recto of th
- Page 61 and 62:
Fig. 2.9 LB, 55: end of Act 3, show
- Page 63 and 64:
issues of practical, pre-revision u
- Page 65 and 66:
Jenůfa in 1913, providing a ‘sna
- Page 67 and 68:
2.2 Determining the 1904 version fr
- Page 69 and 70: Štědroň 1968b Tyrrell 1996 / Tyr
- Page 71 and 72: two ensembles in Act 1, ‘A vy, mu
- Page 73 and 74: een cut before the première. 46 Th
- Page 75 and 76: and 2 in unison (in the context of
- Page 77 and 78: nature of the changes, which can th
- Page 79 and 80: anomalous status there. 50 A furthe
- Page 81 and 82: Ex. 2.4b However much more practica
- Page 83 and 84: score. Playing standards have impro
- Page 85 and 86: Such instances have been tacitly co
- Page 87 and 88: Ex. 2.7 Articulation and phrasing E
- Page 89 and 90: Instrumentation In line with Univer
- Page 91 and 92: trombone 3 part, and in both ŠFS a
- Page 93 and 94: Act 1. On the basis of all availabl
- Page 95 and 96: development of twentieth-century op
- Page 97 and 98: 3.1 The Urfassung and the pre-premi
- Page 99 and 100: seems also to reflect an original c
- Page 101 and 102: could speculate that the change of
- Page 103 and 104: accompaniment evaporates completely
- Page 105 and 106: This radical pre-première revision
- Page 107 and 108: corresponds to the present figs 122
- Page 109 and 110: more specific cuts, the first of tw
- Page 111 and 112: with the same words, but also agree
- Page 113 and 114: and 16b in APPENDIX IV) to Laca’s
- Page 115 and 116: y Laca’s ‘Chci, Jenůfka’ —
- Page 117 and 118: Other extensive cuts made at this s
- Page 119: Ex. 3.12 3.3.2 Textural alterations
- Page 123 and 124: Ex. 3.16 Sinfonietta VI/18 (1926),
- Page 125 and 126: Ex. 3.19 Other instances of motivic
- Page 127 and 128: In 1908 Janáček delays the appear
- Page 129 and 130: Whilst a general trend at this stag
- Page 131 and 132: Ex. 3.25b 3.3.3 Folk passages and t
- Page 133 and 134: Fig. 3.2 BJ III, 900. The use by et
- Page 135 and 136: sketch for the oboe melody of the p
- Page 137 and 138: Ex. 3.27c In his 1907 changes to th
- Page 139 and 140: Janáček added ‘Maestoso con mot
- Page 141 and 142: Jenůfa’s cheek is slashed, but a
- Page 143 and 144: Ex. 3.33a Ex. 3.33b 122
- Page 145 and 146: so that the stress fell on the firs
- Page 147 and 148: the controversy surrounding Josef C
- Page 149 and 150: Although numerous instances of smal
- Page 151 and 152: Ex. 3.42a Ex. 3.42b This example al
- Page 153 and 154: ‘vertical’ dimensions: the harm
- Page 155 and 156: most pages of the score; unlike Jan
- Page 157 and 158: establishment of the 1904 score, pu
- Page 159 and 160: London audiences at the time, 54 Bu
- Page 161 and 162: Jenůfa can also be viewed as part
- Page 163 and 164: (particularly in textural terms) cl
- Page 165 and 166: genre might offer in his own quest
- Page 167 and 168: APPENDIX I Programme note from the
- Page 169 and 170: APPENDIX II Letter from Cyril Metod
- Page 171 and 172:
On Saturday following your departur
- Page 173 and 174:
APPENDIX IV 1906 cuts in ŠVS, ŠFS
- Page 175 and 176:
Act/sc/bar No. of bars II/viii/187-
- Page 177 and 178:
Reh. fig. ŠFS KPU UE 1917 10 21
- Page 179 and 180:
Reh. fig. ŠFS KPU UE 1917 80 57 51
- Page 181 and 182:
Reh. fig. ŠFS KPU UE 1917 14 17 14
- Page 183 and 184:
Reh. fig. ŠFS KPU UE 1917 86 8 →
- Page 185 and 186:
Reh. fig. ŠFS KPU UE 1917 24 20 20
- Page 187 and 188:
APPENDIX VI Janáček, Jenůfa and
- Page 189 and 190:
seem to be post-copying additions (
- Page 191 and 192:
Janáček attempted to pursue the m
- Page 193 and 194:
Fig. A6.1 Diagrammatic representati
- Page 195 and 196:
to use the four-row instrument well
- Page 197 and 198:
conducted a programme of choral and
- Page 199 and 200:
its icy tone will be damped’ sugg
- Page 201 and 202:
APPENDIX VII Bar counts for the dif
- Page 203 and 204:
APPENDIX VIIIa ŠVS I 72v-73r: tran
- Page 205 and 206:
APPENDIX VIIIb ŠVS I 72v-73r: tran
- Page 207 and 208:
APPENDIX IX ŠFS I 197v-200v: trans
- Page 209 and 210:
188
- Page 211 and 212:
190
- Page 213 and 214:
192
- Page 215 and 216:
JODA John Tyrrell: Janáček’s op
- Page 217 and 218:
Dürr 1968 Joannes Martin Dürr:
- Page 219 and 220:
Smaczny 1985 Jan Smaczny: ‘Janá
- Page 221:
Vogel 1981 ——: Leoš Janáček: