sources - Nottingham eTheses - The University of Nottingham

sources - Nottingham eTheses - The University of Nottingham sources - Nottingham eTheses - The University of Nottingham

etheses.nottingham.ac.uk
from etheses.nottingham.ac.uk More from this publisher
01.03.2013 Views

3.2 From 1904 to 1906 As mentioned in CHAPTER 1, it was suggested by Bohumír Štědroň on the basis of a letter from Janáček to Kovařovic that the first layer of post-première revisions to Jenůfa may have been made as early February 1904. 7 On the whole, however, this seems unlikely. Firstly, Janáček may well have been referring in that letter to revisions made before the première, i.e. those made by October 1903. 8 Furthermore, all the available performance material would still have been at the Brno theatre (the autograph manuscript, still in Janáček’s possession at this stage, had already been rendered effectively redundant as performance material because of the pre-première revisions made to both ŠFS and ŠVS, as outlined above). Whilst ŠVS may possibly have been available to Janáček, enabling him to make changes to the voice parts, the singers would already have learnt their parts, making any significant alterations to their lines unlikely from a practical point of view. Furthermore, the evidence of the orchestral parts suggests that, with minor exceptions (most notably the removal of an harmonically awkward anticipatory motif for cello and bassoon before the beginning of the Kostelnička’s Act 3 confession), 9 the first substantive changes (a) occurred largely in the form of cuts and (b) appear not to have been made until 1906, in preparation for the three performances given by the Brno company that autumn. Hrazdira’s letter to Janáček of 11 July 1906 (see APPENDIX II) mentions relatively few changes compared with the number of cuts that were eventually made by that September (listed in full in APPENDIX IV). He suggests making cuts to the two Act 1 ensembles, ‘A vy, muzikanti’ and ‘Každý párek’, without giving details (‘I would copy out those passages and send them to you for you to inspect’), and two 7 CHAPTER 1, fn. 48. 8 Ibid. 9 III/x/32–3; see vol. II/3, p. 736, footnote. 87

more specific cuts, the first of two bars and the second of three, in Act 1 Scene 7. Presumably with Janáček’s approval, or even participation, these suggestions were greatly expanded upon in ŠVS (where the cuts seem first to have been made), and then transferred to ŠFS and OP. If the evidence of OP and LB is reliable (see CHAPTER 2), these cuts included the Kostelnička’s Act 1 aria, ‘Aji on byl zlatohřivý’ (cut no. 2 in APPENDIX IV), together with its introductory orchestral paragraph (Ex. 3.8; cut no. 1): 10 Ex. 3.8 The cutting of the Kostelnička’s aria at this stage is a significant one in the light of the criticisms in 1904 of the opera’s self-proclaimed but only imperfectly achieved ‘realism’. 11 For although this passage is not referred to in any of the contemporary 10 See CHAPTER 2, fn. 47. 11 See APPENDIX I and CHAPTER 1, §1.3. 88

3.2 From 1904 to 1906<br />

As mentioned in CHAPTER 1, it was suggested by Bohumír Štědroň on the basis <strong>of</strong> a<br />

letter from Janáček to Kovařovic that the first layer <strong>of</strong> post-première revisions to<br />

Jenůfa may have been made as early February 1904. 7 On the whole, however, this<br />

seems unlikely. Firstly, Janáček may well have been referring in that letter to<br />

revisions made before the première, i.e. those made by October 1903. 8 Furthermore,<br />

all the available performance material would still have been at the Brno theatre (the<br />

autograph manuscript, still in Janáček’s possession at this stage, had already been<br />

rendered effectively redundant as performance material because <strong>of</strong> the pre-première<br />

revisions made to both ŠFS and ŠVS, as outlined above). Whilst ŠVS may possibly<br />

have been available to Janáček, enabling him to make changes to the voice parts, the<br />

singers would already have learnt their parts, making any significant alterations to<br />

their lines unlikely from a practical point <strong>of</strong> view. Furthermore, the evidence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

orchestral parts suggests that, with minor exceptions (most notably the removal <strong>of</strong> an<br />

harmonically awkward anticipatory motif for cello and bassoon before the beginning<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Kostelnička’s Act 3 confession), 9 the first substantive changes (a) occurred<br />

largely in the form <strong>of</strong> cuts and (b) appear not to have been made until 1906, in<br />

preparation for the three performances given by the Brno company that autumn.<br />

Hrazdira’s letter to Janáček <strong>of</strong> 11 July 1906 (see APPENDIX II) mentions<br />

relatively few changes compared with the number <strong>of</strong> cuts that were eventually made<br />

by that September (listed in full in APPENDIX IV). He suggests making cuts to the two<br />

Act 1 ensembles, ‘A vy, muzikanti’ and ‘Každý párek’, without giving details (‘I<br />

would copy out those passages and send them to you for you to inspect’), and two<br />

7 CHAPTER 1, fn. 48.<br />

8 Ibid.<br />

9 III/x/32–3; see vol. II/3, p. 736, footnote.<br />

87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!