01.03.2013 Views

JST Vol. 21 (1) Jan. 2013 - Pertanika Journal - Universiti Putra ...

JST Vol. 21 (1) Jan. 2013 - Pertanika Journal - Universiti Putra ...

JST Vol. 21 (1) Jan. 2013 - Pertanika Journal - Universiti Putra ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Modelling of Motion Resistance Ratios of Pneumatic and Rigid Bicycle Wheels<br />

TABLE 7: Determination of the factors between motion resistance ratio of the pneumatic wheel obtained<br />

by empirical and analytical methods at different dynamic loads and 414 kPa<br />

Dynamic Load<br />

(N)<br />

98.1<br />

196.2<br />

392.4<br />

A: MRR (Empirical) B: MRR (Analytical) C: Factors (A/B)<br />

Tilled wet Tilled Wet Tilled Wet<br />

0.0878 0.2540 0.0527 0.0474 1.6660 5.3586<br />

0.1108<br />

0.1041<br />

0.2250<br />

0.2332<br />

0.0504<br />

0.0518<br />

0.0472<br />

0.0482<br />

588.6 0.1116 0.1945 0.0501 0.0495 2.2275 3.9293<br />

Mean 2.0254 4.7233<br />

Coefficient of variation 12.758% 12.52%<br />

Inflation Pressure, P = 414 kPa and Overall Wheel Diameter (metallic rim), D = 660mm.<br />

Field Condition: Tilled Surface (Sandy-Clay-Loam Soil)<br />

Added Dynamic Load range: 98.1 – 588.6 N<br />

Field condition: Wet soil (sandy-clay-loam soil) surface<br />

Added dynamic load range: 98.1 – 588.6 N<br />

From Brixius’ (1987) equation for bias-ply tractor tyres, the motion resistance ratio is as<br />

stated in Equation 5. Therefore, for the 660 mm pneumatic bicycle wheels at 414 kPa inflation<br />

pressure, the motion resistance ratio was derived as follows:<br />

1<br />

MRR ( Bicycle ) = 4.7233 (0.04 + )<br />

B<br />

4.7233<br />

MRR( Bicycle)<br />

= 0.1889+<br />

B<br />

From Brixius’ (1987) equation for bias-ply tractor tyres, the motion resistance ratio is as<br />

stated in Equation 5. For the rigid bicycle wheel on tilled surface, the motion resistance ratio<br />

was therefore derived as follows:<br />

<strong>Pertanika</strong> J. Sci. & Technol. <strong>21</strong> (1): 283 - 298 (<strong>2013</strong>)<br />

n<br />

n<br />

2.1984<br />

2.0097<br />

4.7669<br />

4.8382<br />

TABLE 8: Determination of the factors between motion resistance ratio of the rigid wheel obtained by<br />

empirical and analytical methods at different dynamic loads<br />

Dynamic Load<br />

(N)<br />

98.1<br />

196.2<br />

392.4<br />

A: MRR (Empirical) B: MRR (Analytical) C: Factors (A/B)<br />

Tilled wet Tilled Wet Tilled Wet<br />

0.1778 0.3180 0.0515 0.0578 3.4524 5.5017<br />

0.1704<br />

0.1818<br />

0.3513<br />

0.2605<br />

0.0529<br />

0.0646<br />

0.0606<br />

0.0662<br />

3.2<strong>21</strong>2<br />

2.8142<br />

5.7970<br />

3.9350<br />

588.6 0.2431 0.2637 0.0797 0.0675 3.0502 3.9067<br />

Mean 3.1345 4.7851<br />

Coefficient of variation<br />

Field Condition: Tilled Surface (Sandy-Clay-Loam Soil)<br />

8.60% <strong>21</strong>%<br />

Added Dynamic Load range: 98.1 – 588.6 N<br />

[17]<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!