01.03.2013 Views

Sangrovit - Jadis Additiva

Sangrovit - Jadis Additiva

Sangrovit - Jadis Additiva

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Importance of bitter substances originating from<br />

<strong>Sangrovit</strong> as modulator between animal health and<br />

performance<br />

Dr. Kathrin Tschirner; Phytobiotics Feed Additives; Eltville; Germany<br />

Rennes, 11.06.2009


<strong>Sangrovit</strong> ® - An unique Product with approved Active Substances<br />

The Product<br />

Standardized, phytogenic feed additive<br />

Manufactured from one selected plant<br />

(Papaveraceae family)<br />

Defined, analysable active substances<br />

Scientific based, proven efficiency<br />

Documented Safety<br />

Transparent Production


<strong>Sangrovit</strong> ® - An unique Product with approved Active Substances


<strong>Sangrovit</strong> ® - An unique Product with approved Active Substances<br />

Active Principles<br />

Produced by the plant as defence substances<br />

(phytoalexines)<br />

Chemical classification: Benzophenanthridine alkaloids (BA)<br />

Functional classification: Bitter substances<br />

BA possess widespread biological activities<br />

Used in human/veterinary phytopreparations and dental care products since a long time<br />

Phytobiotics’ research shows that BA can impact animal performance and health<br />

Secondary plant metabolites


Bitter substances<br />

Definition: No defined chemical group, classification occurs in accordance to its function<br />

and taste<br />

MOA: Bitters bind to T2R-receptors (located on the tong ground) → release of calcium →<br />

release of neuro-transmitters → activation of the Nervus Vagus<br />

(Bitter taste receptors expressed mainly in the mouth, but also in the gastrointestinal<br />

tract 1 )<br />

Effects: stimulate digestive enzymes, gastric and pancreatic juice, increase appetite, have<br />

a general tonic action on digestion<br />

Bitter taste receptors react to very low concentrations<br />

(protection)<br />

1 S. V. Wu et al. (2002)


<strong>Sangrovit</strong> ® - Unique, known Mode of Action<br />

Stimulation of various digestive organs and functions<br />

Improved absorption of nutrients<br />

Improved liver function and health<br />

Anti-inflammatory properties<br />

Inhibition of enzymatic degradation of amino acids<br />

Higher growth performance (FI, FCR, DWG)<br />

Improved carcass quality<br />

Health promoting/stabilizing properties (e.g. lower<br />

mortality)


<strong>Sangrovit</strong> ® - Unique, known Mode of Action<br />

Improved liver<br />

health<br />

Stimulation<br />

digestion<br />

<strong>Sangrovit</strong><br />

Anti-inflammatory<br />

effects<br />

Amino Acids<br />

AADE<br />

Healthier Mucosa<br />

Better Absorption<br />

Higher<br />

Carcass value<br />

Stabilization of Immune-System<br />

Improved<br />

N-Balance<br />

Higher amino acid levels in the blood<br />

Higher availability of amino acids (e.g Trp)<br />

Amino Acids ⇑<br />

Nutrients for bacteria ⇓<br />

Indol, Skatol ⇓<br />

Less harmful substances<br />

at mucosa surface


Higher Availability of Amino Acids<br />

Plasma Lys Lys Concentration Concentration (µmol/l) (µmol/l)<br />

(µmol/l)<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

a<br />

a,b = significant differences<br />

Effect of <strong>Sangrovit</strong> Amino Acid Concentration in the Blood<br />

Lysine<br />

b<br />

Control <strong>Sangrovit</strong><br />

Institute of animal nutrition, University Kiel, Germany (2003)<br />

Plasma Plasma Try Try Try Concentration Concentration (µmol/l) (µmol/l) (µmol/l)<br />

70 70<br />

60 60<br />

50 50<br />

40 40<br />

30 30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

a<br />

Tryptophan<br />

b<br />

Control <strong>Sangrovit</strong>


Higher Availability of Amino Acids - Impact<br />

Optimized AS metabolism<br />

Improved N-balance<br />

Lees urea in the blood → less detoxfication for the liver<br />

Improved N/Protein retention<br />

Better carcass quality and value<br />

…Special Impact of TRP<br />

Amino acid for protein metabolism<br />

Precursor for serotonin metabolism (►In the intestine, serotonin influences the<br />

secretion of digestive enzymes and the motility of the gut (Blundell, 1992)).<br />

Positive influence on protein metabolism in the liver (Peters, 1991)<br />

Supports liver health and liver metabolism in general<br />

Supports the immune system


Higher Availability of Amino Acids - Impact<br />

<strong>Sangrovit</strong> ® Improves N-Balance<br />

(Research Station HOECHST)<br />

Control Flavomycine <strong>Sangrovit</strong><br />

Weight gain, g/d 796 822 821<br />

FCR 2.24 2.20 2.16<br />

N excretion 100 94 91<br />

N retention 100 107 108<br />

N balance<br />

Urea blood<br />

100<br />

100<br />

106<br />

91<br />

109<br />

Ammonia blood 100 102 92<br />

Improved N-Retention and Balance<br />

Less Urea and Ammonia in the blood<br />

76<br />

<strong>Sangrovit</strong> ® Influences Serum Urea in lactating<br />

sows (University of Kiel, 2003)<br />

Urea Serum Serum concentration<br />

(mg/dl) (mg/dl)<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

***<br />

Control <strong>Sangrovit</strong><br />

30 ppm<br />

<strong>Sangrovit</strong> ® = Less Urea and Ammonia in the<br />

blood


Higher Availability of Amino Acids - Impact<br />

Effect of <strong>Sangrovit</strong> on carcass quality in pigs<br />

Institute of animal nutrition, University Kaunas, Lithuania (2003)<br />

120<br />

%<br />

110<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

*<br />

*<br />

Thickness of back<br />

fat<br />

* Significant differences<br />

*<br />

*<br />

Thickness of<br />

muscle meat<br />

Control = 100%<br />

<strong>Sangrovit</strong> (30 ppm)<br />

Proportion of<br />

lean meat<br />

Effect of <strong>Sangrovit</strong> on Lean Meat Percentage<br />

(Average of trials from 2002 – 2008)<br />

9 of 12 trials show an improved lean meat<br />

percentage due to <strong>Sangrovit</strong> supplementation<br />

Average: + 0.7% more lean meat


Anti-inflammatory effects of <strong>Sangrovit</strong><br />

► Literature data and own studies (next slide) show anti-<br />

inflammatory properties of <strong>Sangrovit</strong><br />

Where are these effects relevant?<br />

<strong>Sangrovit</strong> is not absorbed from the intestine → local effects<br />

the gut mucosa<br />

Impact of anti-inflammatory properties<br />

healthier intestinal mucosa ► better absorption of nutrients,<br />

minerals… ► lower demand of nutrients to fight against<br />

infections/inflammation<br />

promoting immune system ► intestinal tract is the biggest immune<br />

organ in the body<br />

Effect of <strong>Sangrovit</strong> and indomethacine<br />

on inflammation processes<br />

Inflammatory processes<br />

control =100%<br />

0<br />

-10<br />

-20<br />

-30<br />

-40<br />

-50<br />

(Lenfeld et al. 1981)<br />

<strong>Sangrovit</strong> QBA<br />

Indometacine<br />

0 1 2 3<br />

Time (h)


Anti-inflammatory effects of <strong>Sangrovit</strong><br />

Effects of <strong>Sangrovit</strong> on mucosa integrity<br />

(Prof. W. Gebreyes, North Carolina State University, USA, 2006)<br />

Method: Evaluation (In vitro; Ussing chambers) of Transepithelial Electrical<br />

Resistance (TER) as a parameter of mucosa thickness, integrity and<br />

inflammation processes.<br />

► Higher TER in the <strong>Sangrovit</strong> treatment indicates less<br />

inflammation and lesions and a healthier gut mucosa in general.<br />

Effects of <strong>Sangrovit</strong> on inflammation parameters<br />

(M. Quereshi, North Carolina State University, USA, 2004)<br />

Method: Determination of microphage nitrite production as an indicator of<br />

inflammatory processes.<br />

► Dose-dependent decrease in nitrite production<br />

► Less inflammation with higher concentration of <strong>Sangrovit</strong><br />

TER (ohms/cm²)<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

<strong>Sangrovit</strong><br />

(50 mg/kg)<br />

CTC<br />

(60 mg/kg)


Effect of <strong>Sangrovit</strong> on Gut Morphology<br />

<strong>Sangrovit</strong> cause a -20% lower weight of the intestine.<br />

► Thinner intestinal wall<br />

► Reduced inflammation<br />

► Better Absorption of nutrients<br />

At the same time the length was 10% higher.<br />

► More absorption surface<br />

► Higher capacity for synthesis of immune cells<br />

Chang Won Kang, Ph.D. Konkuk University Seoul, Korea, (2008)


Anti-inflammatory effects of <strong>Sangrovit</strong><br />

Effect of <strong>Sangrovit</strong> on absorption capacity<br />

Dr. J. Hoffmann, Agroproduct GmbH, Germany (2005)<br />

Method: Evaluation of yolk colour as parameter of absorption capacity<br />

Method of analyses<br />

* Significant difference (p


Feed/Feeding<br />

Health Performance


Impact of inflammation on protein turnover in different organs<br />

Mercier, s. et al. (2002). J. Nutr. 132, 1921-1928<br />

180<br />

%<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Control = 100%<br />

Inflammation<br />

(=Colitis)<br />

IIeum Colon Muscle<br />

Liver<br />

Chronic intestinal inflammations (e.g. colitis) increase the protein turn over/requirement of the<br />

intestinal mucosa at the expense muscle protein formation and daily growth .


Nutrients/Protein/AS requirement<br />

Deficit<br />

(Nutrients,<br />

AS…)<br />

Nutrients/Protein/AS delivered by the diet<br />

► decreased performance<br />

► reduces health status<br />

► higher mortality<br />

Stress /Infection pressure/Health problems…<br />

<strong>Sangrovit</strong><br />

in the diet<br />

2<br />

2<br />

Reduced<br />

deficit<br />

► less reduction in performance<br />

► healthier animals<br />

► reduced mortality<br />

low high low<br />

low high<br />

low<br />

1<br />

Stress /Infection pressure/Health problems…<br />

Lower and shorter infection processes due to <strong>Sangrovit</strong>‘s<br />

anti-inflammatory effects<br />

1<br />

Higher protein/amino acid availability from the feed due to<br />

<strong>Sangrovit</strong> (amino acid protection; increased nutrient availability,<br />

better nutrient absorption)


<strong>Sangrovit</strong> during a three week lactation<br />

Objective<br />

Does <strong>Sangrovit</strong> increase the litter weight at weaning?<br />

Method:<br />

Place: farm with 400 sows in Germany, 2003<br />

Treatments: Control; <strong>Sangrovit</strong> 30 mg/kg<br />

Animals: 105 sows (parity 1 – 9)<br />

Diet: 13.8 MJ/kg; 17.5 % CP; 9.0 g Lys/kg<br />

Parity (lactation number) class<br />

PC1 = Parity 1<br />

PC2 = Parity 2<br />

PC3 = Parity 3-6<br />

PC4 = Parity 7-9


<strong>Sangrovit</strong> during a three week lactation<br />

Litter weight gain [kg] – All sows (PC 1-4) LSmeans ± SEM<br />

Day 1-10*<br />

Day 11-20*<br />

Day 1-20*<br />

C (n=35)<br />

21.4 ± 0.7<br />

22.8 ± 0.7<br />

44.0 ± 1.1<br />

* T x PC (Treatment x Parity class) effect p


<strong>Sangrovit</strong> during a three week lactation<br />

60<br />

kg<br />

50<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

Litter weight gain [kg] in first and second litter sows<br />

First Litter Sows (PC 1)<br />

C S30<br />

(PC1 and 2; LSmeans ± SEM)<br />

+ 10%<br />

60<br />

kg<br />

50<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

Second Litter Sows (PC 2)<br />

a<br />

a,b significant differences<br />

+13 %<br />

+ 13,5%<br />

b<br />

C S30<br />

Higher litter weight gain was observed in first and second litter sows treated with <strong>Sangrovit</strong>.<br />

<strong>Sangrovit</strong> has a positive effect particularly in young sows that are typically affected by two<br />

types of stress at the same time: Their own growth and milk production.<br />

a<br />

b


<strong>Sangrovit</strong> in combination with Organic acids (1)<br />

Britsh Quality Pork, Great Britain 2007<br />

Trial duration: 64 days (45-110 kg body weight)<br />

Treatment:<br />

control<br />

control + Benzoic acid (5 kg/t) (+BA)<br />

control + Benzoic acid (5 kg/t) + <strong>Sangrovit</strong> (30 mg/kg) (+BA + <strong>Sangrovit</strong>)<br />

4 recurrences per treatment<br />

(4 x 5 animals, 2 sows and 3 boars respectively)


<strong>Sangrovit</strong> in combination with Organic acids (2)<br />

Effect of <strong>Sangrovit</strong> on fattening performance<br />

(Total fattening period 48-110 kg, 64 d)<br />

Total weight gain, 64 days of fattening<br />

control: 60,15 kg, control + BA:61,3 kg, control + BA + <strong>Sangrovit</strong>: 66,62 kg


Summary: Effect of <strong>Sangrovit</strong> in Growing/Fattening pigs 1<br />

Daily weight gain<br />

(in relation to the control group = 100%)<br />

<strong>Sangrovit</strong><br />

+3.3%<br />

1 Average of 30 trials around the world over last 6 years<br />

FCR<br />

(in relation to the control group = 100%)<br />

<strong>Sangrovit</strong><br />

- 3.8%


<strong>Sangrovit</strong> for Piglets – Meta-Analysis (1) 1<br />

Effect on Fed intake<br />

1 Results of 5 trials on efficacy of <strong>Sangrovit</strong> ® in weaned piglets: IRTA , Spain, 2007/2008; IRTA, Spain, 2008; Provimi, Netherlands, 2007;<br />

UWM, Poland, 2008; Kaposvar, Hungary, 2008; Treatment groups: Control, <strong>Sangrovit</strong> 15 mg/kg; <strong>Sangrovit</strong> 30 mk/kg; <strong>Sangrovit</strong> 60 mg/kg<br />

2 <strong>Sangrovit</strong> = S<br />

2


<strong>Sangrovit</strong> for Piglets – Meta-Analysis (2) 1<br />

Effect on Weight gain<br />

1 Results of 5 trials on efficacy of <strong>Sangrovit</strong> ® in weaned piglets: IRTA , Spain, 2007/2008; IRTA, Spain, 2008; Provimi, Netherlands, 2007;<br />

UWM, Poland, 2008; Kaposvar, Hungary, 2008; Treatment groups: Control, <strong>Sangrovit</strong> 15 mg/kg; <strong>Sangrovit</strong> 30 mk/kg; <strong>Sangrovit</strong> 60 mg/kg<br />

2 <strong>Sangrovit</strong> = S<br />

2


<strong>Sangrovit</strong> for Piglets – Meta-Analysis (3) 1<br />

Effect on FCR<br />

1 Results of 5 trials on efficacy of <strong>Sangrovit</strong> ® in weaned piglets: IRTA , Spain, 2007/2008; IRTA, Spain, 2008; Provimi, Netherlands, 2007;<br />

UWM, Poland, 2008; Kaposvar, Hungary, 2008; Treatment groups: Control, <strong>Sangrovit</strong> 15 mg/kg; <strong>Sangrovit</strong> 30 mk/kg; <strong>Sangrovit</strong> 60 mg/kg<br />

2 <strong>Sangrovit</strong> = S<br />

2


Summary: <strong>Sangrovit</strong> for Piglets<br />

Daily weight gain<br />

(in relation to the control group = 100%)<br />

<strong>Sangrovit</strong><br />

+ 4.4%<br />

FCR<br />

(in relation to the control group = 100%)<br />

<strong>Sangrovit</strong><br />

- 3.3%


<strong>Sangrovit</strong> is a clear defined standardized product<br />

Well described mode of action<br />

Health promoting properties lead to an increased performance<br />

Anti-inflammatory effects<br />

Liver protection<br />

Amino acid sparing effect<br />

Improved FCR<br />

Higher daily weight gain<br />

Higher carcass value and quality<br />

Constant performance and stability


Thank you very much for<br />

your attention!<br />

Don’t worry…. Be happy with <strong>Sangrovit</strong>!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!