01.03.2013 Views

LE 0908 copy - Leader Connections

LE 0908 copy - Leader Connections

LE 0908 copy - Leader Connections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Excellence<br />

L E A D E R S H I P<br />

THE MAGAZINE OF <strong>LE</strong>ADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT, MANAGERIAL EFFECTIVENESS, AND ORGANIZATIONAL PRODUCTIVITY<br />

Jackie Freiberg<br />

<strong>Leader</strong>ship Consultant<br />

w w w . L e a d e r E x c e l . c o m<br />

SEPTEMBER 2008<br />

Lead Like<br />

a Sherpa<br />

Create a Culture<br />

of Urgency<br />

Link Learning<br />

and Performance<br />

Manage the<br />

Innovation Journey<br />

“<strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence is an exceptional<br />

way to learn and then apply the best and<br />

latest ideas in the field of leadership.”<br />

—WARREN BENNIS, AUTHOR AND<br />

USC PROFESSOR OF MANAGEMENT


Excellence<br />

L E A D E R S H I P<br />

THE MAGAZINE OF <strong>LE</strong>ADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT, MANAGERIAL EFFECTIVENESS, AND ORGANIZATIONAL PRODUCTIVITY<br />

VOL. 25 NO. 9 SEPTEMBER 2008<br />

JOHN KOTTER<br />

Shared Urgency<br />

Create a culture of<br />

urgency in six ways . . . . . 3<br />

JIM CHAMPY<br />

Great Companies<br />

They share five traits. . . . .4<br />

NELSON SOKEN AND B.<br />

KIM BARNES<br />

Innovation Journey<br />

Take a proven path<br />

through five phases . . . . . 5<br />

WARREN BENNIS,<br />

DANIEL GO<strong>LE</strong>MAN,<br />

AND JAMES O’TOO<strong>LE</strong><br />

Candor Killers<br />

Identify what impedes<br />

transparency. . . . . . . . . . . .6<br />

DENNIS A. KEL<strong>LE</strong>Y<br />

Are You a <strong>Leader</strong>?<br />

Sense of Urgency<br />

Having eagle eyes for early<br />

opportunities is just the first<br />

part to the excellence equation.<br />

You must then exercise your<br />

ambition by modeling urgent<br />

behaviors, thus hunting ideas<br />

for innovation and seizing the<br />

magic of the moment.<br />

To find out, answer<br />

seven questions. . . . . . . . .7<br />

RON CROSSLAND<br />

<strong>Leader</strong>ship Itch<br />

This is a poor way to<br />

develop leaders. . . . . . . . .8<br />

BILL GEORGE, ANDREW<br />

MC<strong>LE</strong>AN, NICK CRAIG<br />

Compass Center<br />

Build self-awareness<br />

and self-acceptance . . . . . 9<br />

MATT SCHUY<strong>LE</strong>R<br />

Future of Work<br />

Current trends shape it. . 10<br />

MARK AL<strong>LE</strong>N<br />

Wisdom Management<br />

Apply four principles . . .11<br />

MARSHALL GOLDSMITH<br />

AND PATRICIA WHEE<strong>LE</strong>R<br />

Coaching for Growth<br />

The best advice has four<br />

recurring themes . . . . . . .12<br />

KEVIN AND JACKIE<br />

FREIBERG<br />

Lead Like a Sherpa<br />

Everyone must embrace<br />

the summit goal. . . . . . . .13<br />

JOSEPH MICHELLI<br />

New Gold Standard<br />

Look to Ritz-Carlton<br />

for service excellence . . . 14<br />

KIM MARCIL<strong>LE</strong><br />

Create Momentum<br />

Amplify possibilities<br />

into realities . . . . . . . . . . .15<br />

DANIEL R. TOBIN<br />

Action Learning<br />

Make it part of your<br />

leadership program. . . . .16<br />

DEBBE KENNEDY<br />

Leading High Performance<br />

<strong>Leader</strong>ship influences<br />

positive outcomes. . . . . . 17<br />

RAM CHARAN<br />

<strong>Leader</strong>ship Potential<br />

Learn how to spot a leader<br />

at different stages . . . . . .18<br />

GARY HARPST<br />

Strategy Execution<br />

Grow your capacity<br />

to execute strategy. . . . . .19<br />

HOWARD M. GUTTMAN<br />

Onboarding Tips<br />

Learn from leaders who<br />

have met the challenge. .19<br />

MARY JO HUARD<br />

Creative <strong>Leader</strong>s<br />

Ideas are now the<br />

currency of success. . . . . 20


E<br />

Top 100+ People in LD<br />

. D . I . T . O . R’S N . O . T . E<br />

The field is ripe and ready to harvest.<br />

by Ken Shelton<br />

FOR EIGHT OF OUR 25 YEARS,<br />

we’ve published a list of<br />

top leadership development<br />

(LD) programs, but failed to mention the<br />

designers, directors or drill sergeants of<br />

these programs as top practitioners in the<br />

field. In this issue, we are naming names.<br />

Our selection is based on three criteria:<br />

1) These individuals led a LD program in a<br />

for-profit company, or had a key role in the<br />

design or implementation of the program;<br />

2) They prepared participants for and<br />

placed them in leadership positions; 3) positive<br />

business outcomes accrued to the organization<br />

as a result of the LD program.<br />

I was also influenced by a report by Kortny<br />

Williamson, CorpU Research Analyst, on “Six<br />

Personalities of a CLO.” With some irony, she<br />

writes: “Organizations need more leadership<br />

for the learning (LD) function.” Otherwise,<br />

“LD teams tend to focus more on delivering<br />

training programs than developing strategy,<br />

driving performance, and contributing to the<br />

bottom line.” She suggests assigning the task<br />

of LD to “seasoned executives who have<br />

strong business and relationship skills, and<br />

can leverage LD to achieve business results.”<br />

She notes that six competencies identify<br />

the CLO’s roles and responsibilities:<br />

Alan Malinchak - ManTech U.<br />

Alex Stiber - Schwan<br />

Alicia Mandel - USOC<br />

Alysa Parks, Maureen<br />

McDermott - CDW<br />

Andrea Johnson - Home Depot<br />

Andrew Noon - Mutual of Omaha<br />

Angella Rosata - St. Thomas Health<br />

Anne Nagy - Nationwide Ins.<br />

Arlene Ferebee - GlaxoSmithKline<br />

Audrey Goodman - Medco<br />

Barbara Amone - UBS<br />

Beau Parnell, Irada Sadykhova -<br />

Microsoft<br />

Beverly Momsen - Chevron<br />

Beverly Saunders - Atlantis Resort<br />

Bill Robinson - Ontario Power<br />

Bret Skousen - Black & Decker<br />

Brian Wallace - HSBC Bank<br />

Bryan Murphy, David Clark -<br />

Farmers Group<br />

Camille Mirshokrai - Accenture<br />

Carol Birt - Boise Cascade<br />

Carol Pledger - Goldman Sachs<br />

Cathy Gorman - Interstate Batteries<br />

Cedric Coco - Lowe’s<br />

Cherlz Franz - Pfizer, Inc.<br />

Chip Chesmore - John Deere<br />

Christa Centola, David Letts -<br />

Raytheon<br />

Clark Handy, Marianne Langlois -<br />

Convergys<br />

Claire Schooley - Forrester Research<br />

Cynthia McCague - Coca-Cola<br />

Cyrus Devere - Panda Resturants<br />

D'Anne Carpenter - Trinity Health<br />

Daisy Ng - Darden Restaurants<br />

Daniel J. Stewart - Kohls Corp.<br />

Dave DeFilippo - Bank of N.Y.<br />

Mellon Asset Mgt<br />

Dave Roberts - Western Union<br />

David Clark - Nike<br />

Deborah Exo, Elizabeth Rohlck -<br />

Herman Miller<br />

Denise Smith-Hams - Genetech<br />

Dermot O'Brien - TIAA-CREF<br />

Diana Oreck - Ritz-Carlton<br />

Diana Thomas - McDonald’s<br />

Eileen Rogers - Deloitte<br />

Elizabeth Vales - Allstate<br />

Technology & Operations<br />

Eric T. Hicks - JP Morgan Chase<br />

Fabio Tonolini - Tenaris Univ.<br />

Faye Richardson - Steelcase<br />

Franklin Shaffer - Cross Country<br />

Healthcare<br />

Gary Fisher, Peter Marchesini -<br />

InVentive Health<br />

Greg A. Lee - Motorola<br />

Heather Bock, Lori Berman - Howrey<br />

Horacio Rozanski-BoozAllenHamilton<br />

Janet Baker - Aflac<br />

Jayne Johnson, John Lynch -<br />

General Electric<br />

Jeannie Milan - InsureMe<br />

Jerry Moran, Tina Grove -<br />

Mohegan Sun<br />

Jim Brolley - Harley-Davidson<br />

Jim Heinz, Tim Fennell - Lockheed<br />

Martin<br />

1) Visionary—draws a blueprint how the<br />

development of leaders will create a competitive<br />

advantage; 2) Strategic Alliance Architect<br />

—LD requires many suppliers to provide<br />

training programs, technology, and services<br />

that meet business needs and serve its purposes;<br />

3) Master of Communication—heightens<br />

awareness of the strategic importance of LD<br />

and facilitates more purposeful communication,<br />

presenting a few key objectives that are<br />

easy-to-understand, and aligned with the<br />

company’s core values and strategies; 4)<br />

Relationship Engineer —builds relationships<br />

with internal and external partners, understands<br />

business issues, appreciates the cultural<br />

and environmental issues that impact<br />

performance, and influences other executives<br />

on the value of performance consulting; 5)<br />

Extreme Innovator— drives performance higher,<br />

using creativity to analyze problems and performance<br />

challenges, determine root causes,<br />

assess the cost of not intervening, and apply<br />

effective intervention tools; 6) Performance<br />

Consultant—meets with business unit leaders<br />

who know where the business is heading and<br />

its key strategies and priorities, understands<br />

where performance gaps exist and uncovers<br />

root causes of those gaps, and measures the<br />

costs and benefits of closing these gaps by<br />

applying resources to resolve problems.<br />

Here’s our list of the top 100+ players in<br />

the growth field of leadership development:<br />

Jim Phelan, Kathy Koressel -<br />

Merck<br />

John Christman - Genworth Financial<br />

John Congemi - Best Buy<br />

John Donnelly, Kathleen Goldreich -<br />

Citigroup<br />

John Rooney - U.S. Cellular<br />

John Schlembach - Aramco Services<br />

John Shepherd - Mars<br />

Jonathan Amy, Martha Brophy -<br />

Pricewaterhouse-Coopers<br />

Jose Conejos - Nokia<br />

Judi Affek, Vickie Canon - 7-Eleven<br />

Judith Edge - Fed Ex<br />

Julie-Ellen Acosta - Boeing<br />

Justin Lombardo - Northwestern<br />

Memorial Hospital<br />

Karie Willyerd - Sun Microsystems<br />

Karen Gay - Cirque du Soleil<br />

Kate Martine, Lanny Hoel - Trustmark<br />

Ken Kenner - BJ Services<br />

Kenny Kinder, Mark Searcy -<br />

Coverall Cleaning Concepts<br />

Kevin Peterson-ArcherDanielsMidland<br />

Kevin Wilde - General Mills<br />

Kimberly Kelly, Susan Berg - Paychex<br />

Ky C. Lewis III - Sharp Healthcare<br />

Leon Ronzana - American Honda<br />

Leslie Young - Bank of America<br />

Lesley Hoare - Kimberly-Clark<br />

Lisa Northup - Americredit<br />

Linda O’Connell - Mayo Clinic<br />

Lynne Zappone - InterContinental<br />

Marc Reed, Shawne Angelle -<br />

Verizon<br />

Marian Anderson - Washington<br />

Mutual<br />

Martha Soehren - Comcast<br />

Matt Schuyler, Capital One<br />

Matthew Bertman - Pulte Homes<br />

Michael Trusty - Rolls Royce<br />

Mike Stafford - Starbucks<br />

Moheet Nagrath - P&G<br />

Nancy Brennock - Trexton<br />

Pam Bilbrey - Baptist Health Care<br />

Pat Crull - Time Warner<br />

Patricia A. Bradford - Unisys<br />

Pru Sullivan - Green Mountain Coffee<br />

Ralph Schiavone - Malcolm Pirnie<br />

Randy Krug - Hormel<br />

Ray Stevens - Staples<br />

Rebecca Ray - Mastercard<br />

Richard Ames - Carnival<br />

Robert Russcoe - Unisys<br />

Ronald Glaser - Intl. Trade Admin.<br />

Sally Levell - Tenet HealthSystems<br />

Sari Brody - Ikea<br />

Sharon Smart - Mattress Giant<br />

Sherry Makely - Clarian Health<br />

Stephen Hadlock - Wheeler Machinery<br />

Susan Muehlbach - Northwest Airlines<br />

Susan Skara - Watson Labs<br />

Susan Suver - U.S. Steel<br />

Suzanne Scott - Cisco<br />

Tamar Elkeles - Qualcomm<br />

Tamara Patrick - Whirlpool<br />

Teresa Roche - Agilent<br />

Tim Galbraith - Yum!Brands<br />

Vicky Jones - GM Global LP<br />

Vicky Rogers - Jet Blue<br />

Volume 25 Issue 9<br />

<strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence (ISSN 8756-2308) is<br />

published monthly by Executive Excellence<br />

Publishing, LLC (dba <strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence),<br />

1806 North 1120 West, Provo, UT 84604.<br />

Editorial Purpose:<br />

Our mission is to promote personal and organizational<br />

leadership based on constructive values,<br />

sound ethics, and timeless principles.<br />

Basic Annual Rate:<br />

US $129 one year (12 issues)<br />

US $219 two years (24 issues)<br />

Canada add US $30 postage per year.<br />

All other non-U.S. add US $70 per year.<br />

Corporate Bulk Rates (to same address)<br />

US $190 each per year for 5 to 25<br />

US $99 each per year for 26 and up<br />

* Ask about logo and custom editions and<br />

foreign bulk rates.<br />

Article Reprints:<br />

For reprints of 100 or more, please contact the<br />

editorial department at 801-375-4060 or email<br />

custserv@eep.com. Back Issues: (print) US<br />

$25.00. Permission PDF US: $50.<br />

Internet Address: www.eep.com<br />

Submissions & Correspondence:<br />

All correspondence, articles, letters, and<br />

requests to reprint articles should be sent to:<br />

Editorial Department, Executive Excellence,<br />

1806 North 1120 West, Provo, Utah 84604;<br />

801-375-4060, or editorial@eep.com.<br />

Customer Service/Circulation:<br />

For information on products and services call<br />

1-877-250-1983 or email: custserv@eep.com.<br />

Executive Excellence Publishing:<br />

Ken Shelton, CEO, Editor-in-Chief<br />

Scott Spjut, Asst. Editor----<br />

Sarah Hayes, Circulation Manager<br />

Nancy Low, Marketing Manager<br />

Rob Kennedy, Business Manager<br />

Contributing Editors:<br />

Chip Bell, Warren Bennis, Dianna Booher,<br />

Kevin Cashman, Marshall Goldsmith, Howard<br />

Guttman, Jim Kouzes, Jim Loehr, Tom Peters,<br />

Norm Smallwood<br />

The table of contents art is a detail from<br />

SSoovveerreeiiggnn RReeppoossee (image cropped) © Daniel<br />

Smith, and is courtesy of the artist and art<br />

print publisher Greenwich Workshop.<br />

For additional information on artwork by<br />

Daniel Smith, please contact:<br />

Greenwich Workshop<br />

151 Main Street<br />

Saymour, CT 06483<br />

1-800-243-4246<br />

www.greenwichworkshop.com<br />

Full view of table of contents art.<br />

Copyright © 2008 Executive Excellence Publishing.<br />

No part of this publication may be reproduced or<br />

transmitted without written permission from the<br />

publisher. Quotations must be credited.<br />

2 September 2008 <strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence


PERFORMANCE URGENCY<br />

Shared Urgency<br />

Make it part of the culture.<br />

by John Kotter<br />

SUCCESSFUL CHANGE<br />

follows a basic pattern,<br />

starting with creating<br />

a sense of urgency. In fact, the biggest<br />

challenge leaders face in causing<br />

change comes right at the beginning—<br />

in creating a strong sense of urgency.<br />

Most leaders struggle to meet this<br />

challenge for two interrelated reasons:<br />

First, they miss important information.<br />

Most information is filtered before<br />

it gets to them, and much good information<br />

never gets to them. So, they<br />

don’t see the complacency that resides<br />

two levels down, or in a branch office.<br />

They can’t believe it, because they see<br />

their margins slipping and clearly communicate<br />

urgent priorities. They don’t<br />

understand why everyone doesn’t<br />

share a sense of urgency to deal with<br />

the dilemma or seize the opportunity.<br />

Some leaders remain out of touch<br />

because they’re overwhelmed with<br />

work, have a thousand messages coming<br />

at them daily, are internally<br />

focused, or have succeeded in the past<br />

and become arrogant.<br />

Second, they mistake<br />

energy and activity for real<br />

urgency. Top execs often<br />

see enormous activity:<br />

they see people running<br />

around, holding meetings,<br />

and starting projects, and<br />

so they look at me and say,<br />

“Look, we have a sense of<br />

urgency!” I find frenetic<br />

activity, usually driven by<br />

anxiety, but no sense of shared urgency.<br />

When people have a shared sense of<br />

real urgency, they tend to be extraordinarily<br />

alert. They move faster, launching<br />

initiatives that address the problems<br />

and opportunities they face. They listen<br />

better and cooperate more. When their<br />

agenda starts to fill with new tasks<br />

because they must run the current<br />

operations and leap into the future—<br />

they identify the low-priority items and<br />

either cancel them off their calendars or<br />

delegate them to others to free up time<br />

to handle new, more important tasks.<br />

They think, “This change may take us<br />

three years to complete, but every day<br />

we’ll make progress. We’ll redirect con-<br />

versation to the real issues and cancel<br />

unnecessary activities.”<br />

UUrrggeennccyy OOppttiioonnss aanndd MMiinnddsseett<br />

In effect, people face three options:<br />

Option 1: Complacency and anxiety.<br />

Many people believe that things are<br />

not perfect, but for them, they’re doing<br />

the right thing. At a feeling level, they<br />

are content with what they’re doing,<br />

even complacent. In fact, they may be<br />

critical of highly productive people.<br />

Their complacency is manifest in their<br />

behavior, as they continue doing what<br />

they did yesterday. They tend to postpone<br />

or procrastinate new behavior.<br />

Option 2: False urgency and frenetic<br />

activity. This is what many leaders<br />

often mistake for real urgency. False<br />

urgency is manifest in anxiety-driven,<br />

frenetic, unproductive behavior.<br />

Option 3: Real urgency with process<br />

and progress. At a feeling level, this is<br />

driven by a determination to move<br />

now, to win now. At a behavioral level,<br />

it’s seen as hyper-alertness to what’s<br />

happening on the outside (in the market),<br />

focused on the real issues, getting<br />

up every day with a commitment to<br />

make progress on those<br />

issues, without getting<br />

burned out, which happens<br />

if you fail to get rid<br />

of the junk and delegate.<br />

The urgency mindset is<br />

this: “There are great<br />

opportunities and hazards<br />

out there, and we must<br />

deal with them.” There’s<br />

enormous determination<br />

to make something happen<br />

now and win. And determination is<br />

different from frenetic activity, anxiety,<br />

contentment, and the complacency of<br />

showing up and doing the same thing.<br />

CCuullttuurree ooff UUrrggeennccyy<br />

You may find a sense of urgency in a<br />

person or a pocket with a company, but<br />

rarely do you find it through an entire<br />

culture. As a leader, you need to instill<br />

(not try to install) a sense of urgency in<br />

the culture. If you start building the<br />

best practices into your systems and<br />

structures, urgency will eventually seep<br />

into the culture. You need to identify<br />

and implement methods that increase<br />

urgency and build momentum. Soon<br />

these urgency practices become “the<br />

way we do things around here.”<br />

When I consult, I talk about two<br />

kinds of change—episodic and continuous—and<br />

ask, “What kind of change<br />

are you facing?” Historically, most leaders<br />

report facing episodic change—an<br />

IP changeover or new strategy implementation<br />

in Division X. It’s a specific<br />

thing that comes and goes. Now, more<br />

executives are facing continuous<br />

change. And I can’t imagine how they<br />

will cope, unless they can build a sense<br />

of shared urgency into their culture.<br />

The leaders who do this best tend to<br />

be leading medium-sized and smaller<br />

companies. Some big companies that<br />

once had a shared sense of urgency now<br />

have arrogance and complacency. Even<br />

after being whacked hard by the competition,<br />

they are mostly engaged in frenetic<br />

activity—people are running around<br />

in circles like rats in a maze—not building<br />

a shared sense of urgency into the<br />

systems, structure, and culture.<br />

SSiixx WWaayyss ttoo PPrroommoottee UUrrggeennccyy<br />

A shared sense of urgency is not<br />

always the consequence of tough competition<br />

or harsh external conditions.<br />

Proactive leaders and lower-level managers<br />

create urgency in four ways:<br />

1. Bring the outside in. People on the<br />

inside tend to become disconnected<br />

from the world. Great leaders maintain<br />

a sense of urgency by reconnecting<br />

people with the outside world—by<br />

bringing the outside in, bringing information<br />

and outsiders in, at the right<br />

time and in the right way, realizing that<br />

change is a head/heart thing. It’s not<br />

just about how people think, but mostly<br />

about how they feel. And that means not<br />

hiring a big consulting company and<br />

having them dump a logical report on<br />

people at the wrong time and place.<br />

That practice only creates anxiety. The<br />

leader has to say, “Let’s look at the<br />

facts—we’ve got to move, now.”<br />

2. Send scouts out. One CEO told a<br />

high-potential employee that he wanted<br />

him to enroll in a university’s leadership<br />

development program, and<br />

then said, “Let me explain why. I think<br />

you have potential, and this program<br />

will accelerate your development. You<br />

will learn what’s going on and leave<br />

wanting to come back here and help<br />

others develop that same sense of<br />

urgency—to share with them in a way<br />

that captures their minds and hearts<br />

what you’ve gone through. That’s my<br />

primary objective.” So, sending a scout<br />

out is another way to bring the outside<br />

in and create a sense of urgency.<br />

3. Listen to your front-line sales and<br />

<strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence September 2008 3


service employees. Tell them, “You’re<br />

not only selling products—you’re supplying<br />

vital information about what’s<br />

going on.” And don’t send this information<br />

up seven levels of hierarchy or<br />

write meaningless reports. Senior leaders<br />

should seek these people out. Sam<br />

Walton would fly around in his prop<br />

plane, talking to store managers and<br />

staff associates alike, constantly asking,<br />

“What’s up? Don’t just tell me what<br />

people are buying—tell me when they<br />

smile, or frown. What are the trends?<br />

What cars are in the parking lot now?”<br />

His aim was to bring the outside in,<br />

and not do it in a dry, factual, everybody-forgets-it-in-15-minutes<br />

way.<br />

4. Find opportunity in crisis. When<br />

a crisis looms or appears, pause for a<br />

minute and ask, “Is there an opportunity<br />

here to help us get out of complacency<br />

and start feeling a strong sense<br />

of urgency?” Don’t assume there will<br />

be. In many cases, you must get in<br />

there and bail out the boat. But cultivate<br />

the mindset of looking for opportunity<br />

in every real or potential crisis.<br />

5. Behave urgent every day. Once at<br />

Harvard I met a CEO who bragged<br />

about one of his Indian managers who<br />

had become a beacon of urgency. He<br />

was constantly talking about what was<br />

happening in the industry and company,<br />

how their past success meant nothing,<br />

how they had to move faster, and<br />

then modeled moving faster. If holding<br />

a meeting was a low priority, he’d canceled<br />

it; if he held it, he would end<br />

every meeting by saying, “Next week,<br />

I’m going to do A, B and C as a result<br />

of this meeting.” He’d turn to the guy<br />

on his left and says, “How about<br />

you?” He tapped into their aspirations<br />

to do something great and win.<br />

6. Deal with the No-Nos. These are<br />

people who have some power, usually,<br />

who hate all change, and who won’t<br />

admit it. They present themselves<br />

appropriately, but they are relentless in<br />

keeping complacency up, creating fear<br />

and false urgency. When you find<br />

these people, you need to deal with<br />

them so they’re not in the way.<br />

To inspire a strong sense of shared<br />

urgency, you’ve got to win over the<br />

hearts and minds of people. Creating a<br />

sense of urgency is a life-and-death<br />

issue. If you don’t get your act together<br />

quickly, somebody will buy you up<br />

and then slice and dice you out of existence.<br />

If that image doesn’t engender a<br />

sense of urgency, nothing will. <strong>LE</strong><br />

John Kotter, HBS professor, is best-selling author of Our Iceberg<br />

Is Melting and a new book, A Sense of Urgency. Visit<br />

JohnKotter.com; for training call Greg Kaiser at 919-618-9955.<br />

ACTION: Create a sense of urgency in your culture.<br />

<strong>LE</strong>ADERSHIP GREATNESS<br />

Great Companies<br />

What are five shared traits?<br />

by Jim Champy<br />

FOR YEARS I’VE<br />

searched for great<br />

companies. Like many<br />

objectives, greatness is in the eye of the<br />

beholder. It’s an honorable aspiration.<br />

I’ve looked at over 1,000 high-growth<br />

companies and found many good ones.<br />

My search is driven by a desire to<br />

find companies that have new business<br />

models, delivering new products<br />

and services to customers and executing<br />

in new ways. I’ve written about<br />

my discoveries in Outsmart!. Although<br />

I could find no single formula for what<br />

creates a great company, I did find six<br />

shared characteristics.<br />

1. Culture. My ultimate test of the<br />

quality of a company is whether I<br />

would like to work there. The good<br />

news: I see many high-growth companies<br />

where I would work.<br />

One simple test for a great<br />

culture is how a company is<br />

experienced by its constituents—its<br />

customers,<br />

associates, owners, and<br />

business partners. The best<br />

companies treat all of their<br />

constituents well and, in<br />

their own unique ways,<br />

aspire to greatness.<br />

2. Ambition: The leaders<br />

of great companies have a great ambition<br />

for the company—one that<br />

addresses an unmet customer need.<br />

The ambition is not one of personal<br />

greed—it’s about building a company<br />

that delivers on its promise and does it<br />

with a unique quality. My experience<br />

is that it takes a great ambition to create<br />

even a good company. I’m inspired<br />

by the company Minute Clinic, whose<br />

ambition is to change how healthcare<br />

is delivered, for the benefit of everyone<br />

involved in the system.<br />

3. Customer: Every good company<br />

begins by meeting a customer need.<br />

That need is often deeply understood<br />

by the founders because they, themselves,<br />

experienced the need—and saw<br />

how that need was not being well met.<br />

Sometimes the founder delegates the<br />

management of the company to someone<br />

who operationalizes the idea. But<br />

that wasn’t the case in the example of<br />

Sonicbids, a company that saw the<br />

unmet needs of thousands of independent<br />

musicians and performers and<br />

whose founder has led the company to<br />

a unique position in the music business<br />

for independent performers—a $13 billion-a-year<br />

market that no one saw or<br />

organized until Sonic bids came along.<br />

4. Focus: Good companies stay<br />

focused on what they know and can<br />

do well. When companies search for<br />

new ideas, they often drift into<br />

unknown territory and get in trouble.<br />

Good companies just keep growing<br />

and expanding into familiar territory.<br />

Shutterfly is a wonderful example of a<br />

company that’s growing by expanding<br />

within the social expressions business,<br />

helping communities of people share<br />

photographs in hundreds of ways.<br />

Niches can be very large markets.<br />

5. Execution: Satisfying a customer<br />

requires relentless attention to execution.<br />

Building a company’s capability to<br />

deliver makes the difference between<br />

turning a great idea into a business or<br />

failure. But execution is not just about<br />

delivering a product—it’s also about<br />

service. Over the years, I’ve observed<br />

that technology companies are bad at<br />

recognizing and responding to the service<br />

needs of their customers.<br />

Counter-intuitively,<br />

high-tech requires a lot of<br />

high-touch. Partsearch is a<br />

company that knows what<br />

it’s doing with customer<br />

service, helping customers<br />

find what they need in an<br />

ocean of millions of parts<br />

and accessories for consumer<br />

electronic products.<br />

6. Inspiration: Smart<br />

companies engage all of their associates<br />

in building the business, from idea creation<br />

though delivery. Ideas may come<br />

tops-down, but they also come bottoms-up<br />

and from every other direction.<br />

Everyone in the company feels<br />

that they own a piece of the action and<br />

are accountable for performance. The<br />

inspiration for a company starts at the<br />

top, but good leadership drives that<br />

inspiration deep into the company by<br />

engaging people broadly in decisionmaking.<br />

People are more than mechanical<br />

parts of the enterprise, and the<br />

more they see customers, the better<br />

their business sensibilities.<br />

These six traits are common in great<br />

organizations, smart companies operating<br />

quite brilliantly. <strong>LE</strong><br />

Jim Champy, author of Outsmart! Reengineering the<br />

Corporation, X-Engineering, Reengineering Management, and<br />

The Arc of Ambition, is Chairman of Perot Systems’ consulting<br />

practice and head of strategy. Visit www.jimchampy.com.<br />

ACTION: Become a great organization.<br />

4 September 2008 <strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence


CHANGE INNOVATION<br />

Innovation Journey<br />

How can you lead and manage it?<br />

by Nelson Soken and B. Kim Barnes<br />

SUPPOSE THAT YOU’VE BEEN ASSIGNED<br />

to “accelerate innovation” and<br />

given a free hand to develop the strategy<br />

and operational plan. Where do<br />

you start? How can you achieve it?<br />

<strong>Leader</strong>s are under pressure to meet<br />

or exceed market expectations each<br />

quarter. Different approaches are touted<br />

as the road to success. Methods<br />

such as Six Sigma and Lean Sigma<br />

deliver results by improving bottomline<br />

performance through operational<br />

efficiency and effectiveness. In contrast,<br />

innovation, seen as a key means<br />

to achieve competitive advantage,<br />

delivers results by generating organic<br />

growth to the company’s top line.<br />

Innovation requires tapping people’s<br />

creativity and imagination and<br />

cultivating a culture that stimulates<br />

and supports innovation. Innovation<br />

is not the result of imposing specific<br />

processes and disciplines, but is an<br />

inherently human activity that<br />

requires a broad understanding of<br />

how people think and behave.<br />

Innovation differs from development<br />

efforts because it requires a degree<br />

of uncertainty and challenges to<br />

the status quo. Often, processes that<br />

drive improvement require repeatability<br />

and minimize variability. Innovation<br />

is about increasing variability and<br />

encouraging expansive and divergent<br />

thinking. Rather than the “drive for<br />

results” leadership that seeks quick<br />

alignment and efficient execution,<br />

innovation leaders ask people to look<br />

at problems from different perspectives,<br />

take unfamiliar positions, identify<br />

and test their assumptions, and take<br />

risks. Such leaders make room for<br />

experimentation, mistakes, and failures<br />

while requiring focus and discipline.<br />

JJoouurrnneeyy tthhrroouugghh FFiivvee PPhhaasseess<br />

We describe innovation as a journey—adventure<br />

travel with twists and<br />

turns, dead-ends, retracing of steps,<br />

accidents, surprises, dangers, and pos-<br />

sible failures. Success may seem like<br />

the result of good luck or timing; however,<br />

consistently successful innovation<br />

is not random. Effective innovation<br />

leaders and managers use a consistent<br />

pattern, moving through five phases. In<br />

the program Managing Innovation, we<br />

use the concept of avatars to describe<br />

personae that represent the mindsets<br />

and skill-sets that support each phase.<br />

Each avatar is an archetype—an embodiment<br />

of a set of qualities and skills.<br />

1. Searching: Hunting and gathering<br />

ideas and opportunities for innovation.<br />

In this phase, the Seeker is far-sighted,<br />

outward looking, curious, and ardent<br />

in looking for ideas and opportunities<br />

for innovation. When Searching, look<br />

inside and outside your organization<br />

and industry for ideas. Diversity of<br />

thinking is the mother of innovation.<br />

2. Exploring: Examining and testing<br />

ideas to discern their potential value. In<br />

this phase, the Alchemist is tireless,<br />

discovery-oriented, skeptical, and logical<br />

in exploring and investigating ideas<br />

when it is time to focus on those that<br />

are most promising. When Exploring,<br />

encourage constructive debate. Provide<br />

a forum where members of your team<br />

can challenge one another’s thinking in<br />

a respectful and productive way.<br />

3. Committing: Making clear decisions<br />

and commitments on how to<br />

move forward. In this phase, the Judge<br />

is wise and prudent, but also decisive<br />

and bold in making commitments to<br />

invest time, talent, and other resource<br />

in specific innovation efforts. When<br />

Committing, be prepared to kill ideas<br />

that are not chosen or are outmoded in<br />

order to provide resources for innovation.<br />

Do so skillfully and with compassion,<br />

but don’t hesitate to do it.<br />

4. Realizing: Delivering the innovation.<br />

The Director drives the innovation<br />

to completion; he or she is team-focused,<br />

results-oriented, and requires discipline<br />

and politically savvy to move toward<br />

implementation. When Realizing, be a<br />

“buffer” to protect your team from interference<br />

while they are driving for results.<br />

5. Optimizing: Maximizing the value<br />

created by the innovation. In this phase,<br />

the Magician—optimistic, creative,<br />

entrepreneurial, generous—makes the<br />

most of the innovation, creates maximum<br />

value for the team and the organization,<br />

even if the specific innovation<br />

fails (as many do). When Optimizing,<br />

ask, “How else can we use, improve,<br />

extend, or scale this idea” before moving<br />

on to the next big thing.<br />

TThhee LLeeaaddeerr’’ss RRoollee<br />

<strong>Leader</strong>s play a critical role in guiding<br />

innovation. As in any journey into<br />

unknown territory, fear and risk should<br />

be minimized. The traveler is more likely<br />

to succeed with a professional, seasoned,<br />

and prepared guide to facilitate<br />

the journey. As Louis Pasteur said:<br />

“Chance favors only the prepared mind.”<br />

Strong leaders help provision people<br />

for their journey. They communicate the<br />

vision of a strategic destination while at<br />

the same time leaving room for passion,<br />

excitement, spontaneity, and responsiveness<br />

to circumstances and opportunity.<br />

Innovation leaders deliberately<br />

manage the journey with its inevitable<br />

variability in a way that optimizes the<br />

outcome while maintaining focus on a<br />

timely arrival at the destination—even<br />

if the destination changes en route.<br />

Such leadership and management<br />

demand high flexibility. Each phase of<br />

the journey requires different mindsets<br />

and skill-sets, though many skills are<br />

useful in more than one phase. Most<br />

people are more comfortable in one or<br />

two of the phases of the journey and<br />

tend to stay in their “comfort zone”<br />

longer than necessary. <strong>Leader</strong>s and<br />

managers must either learn how to<br />

“morph” from one to another or identify<br />

others who can represent and call<br />

forth the required mindsets and skillsets<br />

at each phase. Since innovation is<br />

an untidy process, you need to know<br />

when to move back and forth.<br />

As you begin your innovation journey,<br />

“provision” yourself with these<br />

insights. Ultimately, innovation is<br />

about people and psychology, behavior<br />

and attitudes—not just good intentions<br />

and well-defined processes. Innovation<br />

leadership and management give you<br />

a competitive advantage. <strong>LE</strong><br />

B. Kim Barnes is CEO of Barnes & Conti Assoc. (visit<br />

www.barnesconti.com) and co-developer with David Francis,<br />

Ph.D., of Managing Innovation. Nelson Soken, Ph.D., is senior<br />

manager at Medtronic and facilitator of Managing Innovation.<br />

ACTION: Lead and manage innovation.<br />

<strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence September 2008 5


ETHICS CANDOR<br />

Candor Killers<br />

What impedes transparency?<br />

by Warren Bennis, Dan Goleman<br />

and James O’Toole<br />

IN A RATIONAL UNIVERSE, <strong>LE</strong>ADERS<br />

would embrace transparency on ethical<br />

and practical grounds, as the state<br />

in which it is easiest to accomplish<br />

goals. But that is rarely the case.<br />

Powerful countervailing forces tend to<br />

stymie candor and transparency.<br />

Here are four such forces:<br />

1. <strong>Leader</strong>s routinely hoard or mishandle<br />

information. A common malady<br />

among insiders is hoarding information.<br />

This is one way information gets<br />

stuck and is kept from flowing to those<br />

who need it to make solid decisions.<br />

Wholesale classification keeps information<br />

away from the frontline people<br />

who actually manage the business and<br />

serve customers. Small cliques of insiders<br />

tend to hoard information because<br />

they want to know things that others<br />

do not. Some executives seem to take<br />

an almost juvenile pleasure in knowing<br />

the “inside dope” and keeping it away<br />

from their underlings. In some organizations,<br />

knowledge is seen as the ultimate<br />

executive perk, not unlike the<br />

company jet, kept solely for the use<br />

and delight of the elite. This stance is<br />

costly in terms of efficiency and morale.<br />

2. Structure or system impediments<br />

hamper information flow and bungle<br />

decision making. The U.S. declaration<br />

of war on Iraq was largely based on<br />

seriously flawed data from America’s<br />

intelligence community. Later internal<br />

investigations brought a structural<br />

problem to light. Inadvertently, the<br />

system of information flow had been<br />

designed to foster poor decisions by<br />

depriving key decision-makers of crucial<br />

data. The main flaw lay in the different<br />

mandates of two divisions at<br />

the CIA: the operations directorate,<br />

which gathers intelligence data from<br />

around the world, and the intelligence<br />

directorate, which sifts through that<br />

raw information to draw conclusions.<br />

To protect their sources’ identities,<br />

the operations people did not reveal<br />

their own assessments of the reliability<br />

of the source of specific data. As a<br />

result, sources with low credibility<br />

introduced information that was later<br />

found to be wrong. Analysts should<br />

not be put in the position of making a<br />

judgment on crucial issues without full<br />

understanding of the reliability and<br />

source of the relevant information.<br />

Businesses tend to operate with less<br />

openness about mistakes—and fewer<br />

full-scale investigations—than does a<br />

democratic government, and so examples<br />

from government are easier to<br />

find. But any time an organization<br />

makes a seriously wrong decision, its<br />

leaders should call for an intensive<br />

postmortem. Such learning opportunities<br />

are often overlooked. Sadly, leaders<br />

tend to call on the PR department<br />

to spin the matter, to make another<br />

inadequately thought-out decision,<br />

and perhaps to scapegoat, even fire, a<br />

few staff members. Because most leaders<br />

cover up their mistakes, systemic<br />

flaws in information flow tend to remain<br />

to do their damage another day.<br />

3. The “shimmer factor” impedes the<br />

free flow of information. The public and<br />

precipitous fall of many celebrity CEOs<br />

has dimmed the once-shining image of<br />

executives. But despite the discrediting<br />

of many executives, leaders still tend to<br />

be perceived by many as demigods.<br />

And that perception still deters followers<br />

from telling those leaders essential<br />

but awkward truths. As everyone<br />

knows, there’s a far different standard<br />

for scrutiny of the CEO’s expense<br />

account from that of a file clerk. In too<br />

many organizations, one of the privileges<br />

of rank is a tendency to get automatic<br />

approval of behavior that would<br />

be questioned in the less exalted. Many<br />

leaders encourage this godlike view of<br />

themselves in countless nonverbal<br />

ways—from the cost and spotlessness<br />

of their desks to the size and isolation of<br />

their homes. We often hear tales of leaders<br />

who do something outrageous,<br />

undeterred by those who should be<br />

watching but who fail to speak up.<br />

The best antidote to the shimmer<br />

effect is the behavior of the leader. The<br />

wisest leaders seek broad counsel, not<br />

because they are so enlightened but<br />

because they need it. Power does not<br />

confer infallibility. There’s a compelling<br />

reason to become more open to information<br />

from people at every level: those<br />

close to the action usually know more<br />

about what’s actually going on with<br />

clients, production or customer service,<br />

than do those on the top floors.<br />

Effective leaders find their own ways to<br />

elicit many points of view, believing<br />

“None of us is as smart as all of us.”<br />

The CEO of Pacific Rim bank, for<br />

instance, schedules 20 days each year to<br />

meet with groups of his top 800 people,<br />

40 at a time. Aware that isolation in a<br />

corner office may weaken his ability to<br />

make good decisions, he regularly seeks<br />

frank feedback from many sources.<br />

Beyond asking for the counsel of<br />

others, leaders have to hear and heed<br />

it. Reflect on how receptive you are to<br />

the suggestions and opinions of others<br />

and alternate points of view.<br />

4. Sheer hubris hinders the flow of<br />

information. One motive for turning a<br />

deaf ear to what others have to say<br />

seems to be sheer hubris: leaders often<br />

believe they are wiser than all those<br />

around them. The literature on executive<br />

narcissism tells us that the selfconfidence<br />

of top executives can easily<br />

blur into a blind spot, an unwillingness<br />

to turn to others for advice.<br />

In extreme cases, narcissism can<br />

cause leaders to refuse to hear what<br />

others say. <strong>Leader</strong>s can suffer from<br />

“tired ears.” The CEO of one international<br />

organization, for instance,<br />

decried the lack of an informal pipeline<br />

within the company—he felt that the<br />

executive summaries he received daily<br />

from his direct reports were being sanitized<br />

for him. Yet he could not imagine<br />

himself turning to anyone lower in the<br />

ranks for a private conversation—let<br />

alone cultivating a nonpowerful confidant—because<br />

it might be seen as a<br />

sign of weakness on his part.<br />

Address these and other impediments<br />

to transparency. <strong>LE</strong><br />

Warren Bennis, Dan Goleman, and James O’Toole are coauthors<br />

of Transparency (Jossey-Bass). Visit www.josseybass.com.<br />

ACTION: Address the candor killers at your work.<br />

6 September 2008 <strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence


<strong>LE</strong>ADERSHIP TEAMS<br />

Are You a <strong>Leader</strong>?<br />

Answer seven questions to find out.<br />

by Dennis A. Kelley<br />

<strong>LE</strong>ADERS TODAY MUST<br />

balance many<br />

responsibilities and<br />

roles. They are pulled in many different<br />

directions and can get caught<br />

between what they need to do in<br />

order to create a winning team and<br />

keeping all their constituencies happy.<br />

<strong>Leader</strong>ship requires quick action and<br />

the need to juggle multiple priorities<br />

that may cause leaders to lose focus<br />

on the development of their team.<br />

One big mistake a leader can make<br />

is to believe that developing their team<br />

isn’t their top priority. The best-run<br />

companies devote much time and<br />

resources to developing the skill, values,<br />

beliefs and identity of their team.<br />

No single person can accomplish<br />

everything that must be done for a<br />

business to grow and prosper. That is<br />

where the team comes in. A leader<br />

with a strong team will see exponentially<br />

greater results. A leader has no<br />

greater responsibility than to recruit,<br />

train, develop, coach, recognize and<br />

reward the people who are responsible<br />

for the success of the leader’s business.<br />

AAsskk SSeevveenn QQuueessttiioonnss<br />

To ensure you devote the time and<br />

effort necessary to build a winning<br />

team, ask yourself these seven questions<br />

and see how well you stack up.<br />

Does your team clearly understand<br />

your vision? A vision is useless empty<br />

rhetoric unless the people responsible<br />

for delivering it through the company’s<br />

products and services know,<br />

understand, and live the vision. As a<br />

leader, you must have a laser focus on<br />

your vision. You must communicate it<br />

to the entire team and then reinforce it<br />

through coaching, at meetings, and<br />

through your recognition and reward<br />

programs. Ensure that your vision is<br />

clearly connected with your strategic<br />

plan and that a specific cause is tied to<br />

it. A vision should be connected to an<br />

action plan that makes the vision come<br />

to life. When you communicate the<br />

vision to your team, connect the vision<br />

to the cause so your team will understand<br />

how it influences what they do.<br />

Paint a picture with your words.<br />

Speak it, write it, even draw it if necessary<br />

to ensure the team understands it.<br />

Your team will respond much better to<br />

the work they do when they clearly<br />

understand why they are doing it and<br />

how it helps the company. People want<br />

to feel meaning in the work they do.<br />

When they understand the company<br />

vision and how their job fits into it,<br />

they will feel connected and valued.<br />

Does your team have clear, specific,<br />

measurable goals that support the<br />

vision? Once you communicate the<br />

vision and your team understands how<br />

they fit into it, you must ensure they<br />

have specific goals to measure their<br />

progress. Goals enable the leader to<br />

measure how the team is progressing<br />

toward the vision. You can reward team<br />

members who contribute to the success<br />

of the team, and provide support to<br />

those who don’t. Goals bring accountability<br />

to the leadership process. Your<br />

team will thank you for creating equity<br />

within the team. It destroys morale and<br />

frustrates team members when weak<br />

performers and strong performers are<br />

all treated the same. Goals allow you to<br />

easily separate the weak from the<br />

strong and manage them accordingly.<br />

Just make sure goals are set fairly and<br />

equitably, are meaningful and connected<br />

to the vision. They must be specific<br />

and measure progress against the goal.<br />

The more clearly you define the goals,<br />

the more likely your team will achieve<br />

them. The goals should make team<br />

members stretch and grow to achieve<br />

them, and yet the goals must be achievable—or<br />

the team may just give up.<br />

Does the team understand the system<br />

of rewards and consequences? Strong<br />

leaders ensure that team members<br />

understand the consequences of their<br />

performance. Develop and communi-<br />

cate clear systems for handling team<br />

performance. It destroys morale and<br />

creates mediocre performance when<br />

team members sense that no matter<br />

how hard they work—or how little<br />

they achieve—they’ll be treated the<br />

same as everyone else. Why work<br />

harder or do more than expected if<br />

there’s no reward? Your team must<br />

understand the consequences—both<br />

good and bad—to their performance.<br />

<strong>Leader</strong>s must communicate the<br />

reward system in place as well as the<br />

corrective action systems. Rewards do<br />

not always have to be monetary. There<br />

are many ways to reward your team<br />

that are low cost or no cost. Find the<br />

right ones for your situation and apply<br />

them consistently—your team will<br />

respond. And with poor performance,<br />

make sure the team understands the<br />

consequences for not contributing and<br />

consistently apply them.<br />

Do you pull the weeds when you<br />

need to? Your team will respect you<br />

and perform better for you when you<br />

remove the weak members from the<br />

team (pull the weeds). In gardens,<br />

weeds show up. They start to grow,<br />

and soon they are choking the flowers.<br />

As more weeds grow, more flowers<br />

disappear. When you have a team<br />

member who does not perform or creates<br />

conflict you must deal with the<br />

problem—not pretend it will get better<br />

or hope the person leaves. One major<br />

mistake leaders make is to let these<br />

non-performers pull the team down.<br />

Strong performers know who isn’t<br />

performing, and they respect you<br />

more when you deal with problems.<br />

Does your team receive regular<br />

communication, coaching, and development?<br />

Once you communicate the<br />

vision, provide clear goals and communicate<br />

the consequences, you can’t<br />

kick back and take it easy. Strong<br />

leaders are also great coaches. They<br />

communicate regularly as conditions<br />

change and make adjustments to the<br />

strategy. The team must be kept<br />

abreast of updates and issues impacting<br />

their roles. In your coaching role,<br />

find out what is working and what<br />

isn’t. Where they are succeeding and<br />

where they are struggling. Ask questions<br />

and listen to what they say. Find<br />

out how they feel about their performance<br />

and abilities. Determine if they<br />

are confident in their ability to<br />

achieve the goals or if they need<br />

training or help. When you show you<br />

care and provide the support they<br />

need, they will follow your lead.<br />

Does your team fear the “F” word?<br />

Teams that fear failure in their attempts<br />

<strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence September 2008 7


to become better will become paralyzed<br />

by that fear. They will fail to<br />

take action without first checking<br />

with you, even on trivial points.<br />

Winning teams do whatever it takes<br />

to get the job done and take reasonable<br />

business risks. As a leader, you<br />

must support this risk-taking. Trust<br />

your hiring decisions and your coaching<br />

talents and let them do their job<br />

with minimal interference. The only<br />

failure is the failure to participate. If<br />

they take action and make a mistake,<br />

they should learn from it and become<br />

better for it. Your team will achieve<br />

high success more quickly by failing<br />

than by always playing it safe and<br />

running to you for permission or to<br />

make all their decisions for them. If<br />

you and the team communicate regularly<br />

and you are coaching effectively,<br />

your risk will be minimal, and their<br />

development will soar.<br />

Does your team trust you and<br />

respect you? When customers like<br />

you, trust you and believe you, they<br />

will buy from you. As a leader, realize<br />

that you are selling your team every<br />

day on what you need them to do<br />

and why they should do it. If your<br />

team does not trust you or respect<br />

you, they won’t buy what you are<br />

telling them. When you lose their<br />

trust and respect, you must fight to<br />

get it back—and it will have a negative<br />

impact on their performance. Do<br />

what you say you will do—even if it<br />

is not popular. Be fair, honest and ethical<br />

in your dealings with them, and<br />

they will follow your lead. Never<br />

compromise your ethics or tell your<br />

team simply what they want to hear.<br />

Confidentiality may prohibit you<br />

sharing everything with them, but do<br />

not hold it over their head. Deal with<br />

them honestly and keep their trust—it<br />

will pay big dividends.<br />

CCrreeaattee aa SSttrroonngg TTeeaamm<br />

If you are strong in all seven areas,<br />

you deserve congratulations—as you<br />

are well on your way to leadership<br />

success. If you still need to work on<br />

some of these areas, make a commitment<br />

to yourself and your team to get<br />

started today. As a leader, your primary<br />

role is to create a strongest team.<br />

The more successful the team, the<br />

more successful you will be. Get the<br />

RIGHT people on your team, doing<br />

the RIGHT things, and work hard to<br />

develop your team. <strong>LE</strong><br />

Dennis A. Kelley is President of The D. Kelley Group and<br />

author of Achieving Unlimited Success. Visit<br />

www.AchievingUnlimitedSuccess.com.<br />

ACTION: Ask yourself these seven questions.<br />

<strong>LE</strong>ADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT<br />

<strong>Leader</strong>ship Itch<br />

It’s a bad way to develop people.<br />

by Ron Crossland<br />

ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE<br />

is down or flat. Labor<br />

relation tensions are up.<br />

Competitors create new products faster.<br />

Turnover increases. Wall Street snubs<br />

you. The C-suite team becomes querulous.<br />

Factions appear. Satisfaction is low.<br />

<strong>Leader</strong>ship development is now seen<br />

as a key strategy for preventing or reducing<br />

the effects of these ailments and has<br />

become a standard feature in companies.<br />

What mistakes do companies make<br />

in creating a LD strategy? The biggest<br />

one is scratching the leadership itch.<br />

Have you ever had an itch that irritated<br />

you constantly? A rash, hive, or<br />

bug bite that controlled your attention<br />

and soured your mood? You want to<br />

scratch or medicate it until it goes away.<br />

You get temporary relief,<br />

but the itch returns, causing<br />

you to scratch harder and<br />

longer and overuse the itch<br />

creams, potions, and tablets.<br />

Many companies have<br />

an itch and then focus their<br />

LD program or process on<br />

relieving the itch, not on<br />

maintaining a healthy body.<br />

Two cases come to mind.<br />

One company was criticized<br />

in the media for its unethical behavior.<br />

The company was called a soulless machine<br />

that concentrated only on market domination<br />

without regard to means. Its answer<br />

was to develop a set of values and drive a<br />

values-based LD process, without placing<br />

the values in a larger context.<br />

A second company enjoyed an enviable<br />

market position. It had no serious<br />

competitors and had good financial<br />

returns, but was not growing. It’s<br />

emphasis for LD was to focus on strategy.<br />

All other leadership issues were<br />

either lightly addressed or ignored.<br />

This itch response is a poor way to<br />

develop leaders. Senior managers are<br />

simply viewing the tiers of leaders and<br />

managers beneath them as functional<br />

cogs to be focused on current problems.<br />

They use training and development to<br />

focus attention. Over time, participants<br />

realize that many aspects of leadership<br />

are being ignored and that their development<br />

is a guise for scratching.<br />

My advice? If you have an itch,<br />

scratch it. But treat it as an itch, and<br />

don’t equate scratching with having a<br />

healthy LD regimen. When you have a<br />

healthy LD system, itches occur rarely,<br />

and you can build the health of the<br />

company, not just react to irritations.<br />

There are three things you should<br />

do that may prevent itching altogether.<br />

1. Eat healthy, exercise, and get plenty<br />

of rest. These healthy habits maintain<br />

physical, emotional, and mental<br />

health and reduce the odds for suffering<br />

from many ailments. Likewise, a<br />

LD process that provides a broad base<br />

of development across all leadership<br />

domains is like eating healthy. If this is<br />

accompanied by job rotation, career<br />

management opportunities, or frequent,<br />

rigorous, mandatory training<br />

programs, you have the exercise component.<br />

Getting plenty of rest means<br />

keeping an eye on time for personal<br />

reflection, conversation, sabbaticals,<br />

and appropriate work-life balance.<br />

2. Senior team involvement and<br />

coaching. No counselor would advise<br />

parents: “Ensure your kids are well fed,<br />

do their homework, and get plenty of<br />

sleep. After that, leave everything to the<br />

school system, television,<br />

social networks, and random<br />

opportunities.” So<br />

why would you do this<br />

when developing leaders?<br />

C-suite leaders and senior<br />

managers should be<br />

involved in attending programs,<br />

teaching participants,<br />

and touching base<br />

through conference calls or<br />

in-class visits, even if for<br />

only 30 minutes at a time. If all a senior<br />

manager does for LD is write the check<br />

and delegate responsibility to HR, then<br />

kill the program and save the money.<br />

Coaching can double the impact of<br />

LD processes. So, to amp up your LD<br />

process with only marginal financial<br />

investment, add coaching and train<br />

your managers in coaching practices.<br />

3. Raise graduate entrance expectations.<br />

A good LD program provides<br />

basic education and coaching for all<br />

managers. But advanced LD or “highpotential”<br />

programs should be tough<br />

to enter and stay in. Everyone should<br />

have a shot, but invest extra resources<br />

in those who make the grade. About 60<br />

percent of VP-level managers don’t<br />

aspire to go higher. Invest in people<br />

who do and facilitate their progress. <strong>LE</strong><br />

Ron Crossland is Chairman of Bluepoint <strong>Leader</strong>ship Development,<br />

and co-author of The <strong>Leader</strong>’s Voice, and The<br />

<strong>Leader</strong>ship Experience. Email info@bluepointleadership.com.<br />

ACTION: Have a healthy LD regimen.<br />

8 September 2008 <strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence


<strong>LE</strong>ADERSHIP SELF-AWARENESS<br />

Compass Center<br />

Build your self-awareness.<br />

by Bill George, Andrew McLean<br />

and Nick Craig<br />

YOU DISCOVER YOUR AUTHENTIC <strong>LE</strong>ADership<br />

by developing yourself. All<br />

leaders face challenges in staying<br />

aligned with their True North—their<br />

most deeply held beliefs, values, and<br />

principles—as they cope with the<br />

pressures and seductions of leading.<br />

You will need a compass to guide<br />

you on your journey. At the center of<br />

the True North compass is the theme of<br />

this article: Build your self-awareness.<br />

To the north: live your values. To the<br />

east: use your motivated capabilities.<br />

To the south: build your support team.<br />

To the west: lead an integrated life.<br />

These five points of the compass<br />

enable you to stay focused on your<br />

True North while coping with and<br />

overcoming challenges. You must take<br />

responsibility for your own development,<br />

using this compass to guide you.<br />

BBuuiilldd YYoouurr SSeellff--AAwwaarreenneessss<br />

Self-awareness is at the center of<br />

the True North compass. A compass<br />

needle orients itself to Earth’s magnetic<br />

field. To do so, it pivots on the fixed<br />

point of a tiny fulcrum. Your selfawareness<br />

is the pivot on which your<br />

balanced development and your orientation<br />

to your True North depend.<br />

With self-awareness, you know<br />

when something is authentic for you<br />

and when it is not. You can’t be truly<br />

self-aware without honest and direct<br />

feedback from others. So, enlist the<br />

assistance of trusted peers, mentors,<br />

and friends, reflect on their feedback<br />

and explore what changes it suggests<br />

in your life and leadership.<br />

When you review your feedback,<br />

you may find that your self-assessment<br />

differs from the assessments you<br />

receive from others. Explore these discrepancies.<br />

How and why does your<br />

perspective differ from that of others?<br />

You can’t be authentic without being<br />

aware of your core strengths, your<br />

weaknesses, and your underdeveloped<br />

areas. You also need to develop<br />

an understanding of your blind spots,<br />

areas of resilience, and vulnerabilities.<br />

We all know inauthentic leaders<br />

who represent themselves in one way<br />

and then behave in the opposite manner.<br />

You may have been guilty of this<br />

as well. However, authenticity is not<br />

about being or pretending to be perfect.<br />

Those leaders who can speak openly<br />

about their weaknesses, blind spots,<br />

and vulnerabilities permit others to do<br />

the same. If you can do this, you create<br />

deep trust and commitment in your<br />

relationships. Thus you<br />

will be living with the<br />

humble truth of owning<br />

and accepting all of who<br />

you are—both the gifts and<br />

the challenges.<br />

We each have many<br />

aspects that we present to<br />

the world in layered succession.<br />

Like an onion, we<br />

have many layers. Outer<br />

layers are expressions of<br />

our external identity to the<br />

world. These are the first signals to<br />

others about who we are and what lies<br />

beneath. They are also forms of protection;<br />

they prevent the world from<br />

intruding on our core selves.<br />

Underneath the outer layer are deeper<br />

layers: our strengths and weaknesses,<br />

our needs and desires. These are the<br />

elements from which we operate.<br />

Deeper still lie our values and motivations,<br />

the criteria that define our own<br />

sense of success and fulfillment.<br />

Most hidden of all are our shadow<br />

sides, our vulnerabilities and our blind<br />

spots. We all have them, whether or<br />

not we’re aware of them or acknowledge<br />

them. Often others see these<br />

“blind spots,” even if we do not. These<br />

deeper layers are difficult to identity<br />

unless we are brutally honest with<br />

ourselves or invite others to give us<br />

feedback about such vulnerable places.<br />

At the core of our being lies our<br />

authentic self—our true and genuine<br />

nature. If we can “own” all aspects of<br />

who we are, we can live in harmony<br />

with our authentic selves and present<br />

our true self to others and to the world<br />

around us. Our True North comes<br />

from this authentic place, from which<br />

we find our calling to leadership.<br />

Why is the outer skin of our onion<br />

so tough? For fear of being judged or<br />

rejected by others, we are understandable<br />

reluctant to expose our deeper<br />

layers. We want to display our<br />

strengths, not expose our weaknesses.<br />

We want to state our desires, but naturally<br />

we are concerned about the<br />

power others gain over us when they<br />

see our needs. Deeper down, our values<br />

and motivations are important<br />

sources of authentic leadership.<br />

As a result of our fears, we often try<br />

to cover up the core where our vulnerabilities,<br />

weaknesses, blind spots, and<br />

shadow sides reside. We may be so good<br />

at covering them that we’re unaware of<br />

them. We may be in denial about them<br />

until we are forced into situations<br />

where they are suddenly exposed.<br />

The paradox underlying the showing<br />

of only parts of ourselves while<br />

hiding others is that our<br />

vulnerabilities, shadow<br />

sides, and blind spots are<br />

also the parts of us most<br />

starved for expression,<br />

acceptance, and integration.<br />

When we do not<br />

acknowledge them as<br />

being just as critical to<br />

who we are as our<br />

strengths, they cause us to<br />

behave in inauthentic<br />

ways. Only when we<br />

embrace these aspects can we become<br />

fully authentic as leaders and people.<br />

AAcccceepptt WWhhoo YYoouu AArree<br />

None of us can be the best at everything.<br />

Each of us has a set of strengths<br />

that come naturally, talents we have<br />

developed over time, and things we<br />

are never going to be good at. What<br />

enables us to be authentic and effective<br />

leaders is maximizing the use of<br />

our strengths—not focusing on our<br />

weaknesses—and surrounding ourselves<br />

with others whose strengths<br />

complement our own and fill in for<br />

our gaps. The ability to accept yourself<br />

as you are is a gift that leads not only<br />

to self-acceptance but to true freedom.<br />

Accepting and loving yourself for<br />

who you are requires compassion. For<br />

you to acknowledge your weakness<br />

and shadow sides, you have to accept<br />

the things you like least about yourself<br />

as integral to who you are.<br />

The goal of self-awareness is selfknowledge,<br />

and ultimately self-acceptance<br />

as the leader you are and the<br />

leader you are capable of becoming. <strong>LE</strong><br />

Bill George, Andrew McLean, and Nick Craig are coauthors of<br />

Finding Your True North: A Personal Guide (Jossey-Bass). Visit<br />

www.truenorthleaders.com.<br />

ACTION: Boost your self-awareness as a leader.<br />

<strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence September 2008 9


MANAGEMENT TRENDS<br />

Future of Work<br />

Today’s trends shape it.<br />

by Matt Schuyler<br />

EMERGING TRENDS ARE<br />

changing the nature<br />

of knowledge work,<br />

demanding new options. Business<br />

cycles create more intensity, complexity,<br />

and uncertainty—demanding high productivity.<br />

Also, the balance of power is<br />

shifting from individual contributors<br />

to cross-functional, networked teams;<br />

and technology is accelerating the pace<br />

and scope of change. Work is more<br />

complex, collaborative, distributed in<br />

time and place, less predictable, and<br />

more demanding. To remain viable,<br />

leaders need to respond to trends with<br />

flexibility, speed, and innovative, costeffective<br />

solutions.<br />

WWoorrkkffoorrccee TTrreennddss<br />

Retiring Baby Boomers could soon<br />

lead to a scarcity of knowledge workers.<br />

If these retiring workers can’t be<br />

replaced, more work may be offshored,<br />

or companies may need to<br />

bring back retired workers on a parttime<br />

basis. Also, some companies are<br />

experiencing a breakdown in the<br />

employer-employee bond as pensions<br />

disappear, benefits become portable,<br />

job sites increase or become mobile,<br />

and employee churn rises.<br />

The millennial generation, or Gen<br />

Y, is altering employee expectations.<br />

For example, most millennials would<br />

prefer to work for companies that give<br />

them opportunities to contribute their<br />

talents to nonprofits on company<br />

time. A company’s commitment to<br />

social responsibility can determine<br />

whether millennials will accept a job<br />

offer. And they are more likely to pick<br />

an area to live that suits their lifestyle.<br />

Work models and patterns that enable<br />

people to work when it’s convenient to<br />

them and when they’re most productive<br />

are popular. Gen Y expects work to<br />

mirror the college experience with flexibility<br />

in work hours. Gen Xers also<br />

value flexible work hours and locations<br />

that enable them care for children or<br />

continue their education. Baby Boomers<br />

too are vocal about wanting more flexible<br />

work practices that allows for elder<br />

care, exercise, or personal growth.<br />

TTeecchhnnoollooggiiccaall TTrreennddss<br />

The rate and reach of technological<br />

change also impact the workplace. The<br />

infrastructure is now widely available<br />

to give employees access to information<br />

anywhere and anytime. Soon, highspeed<br />

Internet and wireless access will<br />

grow more robust and ubiquitous and<br />

become an expected amenity, while<br />

mobile devices quickly converge into a<br />

single, fully-integrated tool. Traditional<br />

brick-and-mortar offices may no longer<br />

be the focus of work efforts as meetings<br />

are conducted in cyberspace.<br />

Technological advances also introduce<br />

uncertainty and risk. Consumers<br />

expect faster transaction speeds and<br />

greater accuracy, while more marketing<br />

channels make reaching the consumer<br />

harder. Regulatory compliance,<br />

information security, and privacy issues<br />

will create added risk and uncertainty<br />

for both companies and consumers.<br />

BBuussiinneessss PPrroocceessss TTrreennddss<br />

Future enterprises will be more dispersed<br />

in terms of markets and suppliers,<br />

and expand their dependence on<br />

multiple extended partners. Businesses<br />

will focus on improving productivity<br />

with shorter product cycles. “Faster,<br />

better, cheaper” will remain the mantra.<br />

Uncertainty will drive structure churn,<br />

while environmental regulations will<br />

create economic uncertainty. Flexibility,<br />

adaptability and ideation will be success<br />

factors. Global risks will intensify<br />

due to the threat of terrorism, financial<br />

shocks, and natural disasters.<br />

TToommoorrrrooww’’ss WWoorrkkppllaaccee<br />

The workplace will need to be flexible.<br />

In some cases, companies will<br />

have to create new spaces to enhance<br />

concentration and focus, privacy and<br />

security, and yet allow for spontaneous<br />

interaction. Workspaces will become<br />

increasingly diverse, some co-located,<br />

some virtual, and some both. Web<br />

2.0—the use of the Internet as a collaborative<br />

platform to maximize creativity<br />

and productivity—social networking<br />

and social computing will be the conference<br />

rooms and workspaces of the<br />

future. Employers need to increase the<br />

usable workspace in the office.<br />

Tomorrow’s workplace needs to be<br />

vibrant and energizing, with a focus on<br />

natural daylight, sustainable healthy<br />

space, natural landscaping, open space<br />

to maximize views from windows, creative<br />

office construction, low panels<br />

between offices, open desking, and<br />

glazed walls to make activity apparent<br />

and expose inefficient use of space.<br />

Mobile technologies help eliminate the<br />

need for brick and mortar, or reduce<br />

costs for energy or real estate.<br />

TThhrreeee PPhhaasseess ooff CChhaannggee<br />

The key to coping with change is<br />

actively managing the change process<br />

while enabling people to move through<br />

three phases of the change curve:<br />

1. Awareness. In this phase, leaders<br />

build cognizance that change is coming.<br />

Common emotions include denial, anxiety,<br />

and shock. Productivity and morale<br />

may decline. <strong>Leader</strong>s should help people<br />

understand the new direction and<br />

what options are available to them.<br />

Employees may begin to feel fear, anger,<br />

frustration, and confusion.<br />

2. Acceptance. During this phase,<br />

leaders and employers begin to make<br />

decisions regarding the new change.<br />

This is often a stressful period. People<br />

may engage in approach-avoidance<br />

behavior—they may recognize and<br />

even wish to embrace change, but fear<br />

the negative consequences of giving up<br />

their old way of working. Morale and<br />

productivity dip, but will soon rebound.<br />

3. Adoption. In this phase, employee<br />

skepticism turns to hope, energy, and<br />

enthusiasm, and morale and productivity<br />

are restored. <strong>Leader</strong>s should help<br />

employees explore their new work<br />

behaviors, commit to a new way of<br />

working, and institutionalize the new<br />

ways by ensuring that the company’s<br />

mission, leadership alignment, and<br />

goals support the desired changes.<br />

By focusing on trends in technology,<br />

the workplace and business processes,<br />

leaders can adapt to the new future of<br />

work and enjoy market success. <strong>LE</strong><br />

Matt Schuyler is the Chief HR Officer at Capital One Financial<br />

Corporation. Visit www.capitalone.com.<br />

ACTION: Adapt to the future of work.<br />

10 September 2008 <strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence


<strong>LE</strong>ADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT<br />

Wisdom Management<br />

Link learning and performance.<br />

by Mark Allen<br />

WE’VE EVOLVED FROM<br />

from talking of<br />

continuous learning<br />

and knowledge work to managing<br />

and sharing knowledge. So why aren’t<br />

we seeing more productivity? Why<br />

does learning have a flurry of activity<br />

but a shortage of meaningful results?<br />

Research shows that 60 to 90 percent<br />

of job-related skills and knowledge<br />

acquired in programs are not<br />

being implemented on the job. If 75<br />

percent of the $60 billion U.S. training<br />

investment is being wasted, we’re<br />

wasting $45 billion a year!<br />

This happens because of a failure to<br />

employ wisdom management—a failure<br />

to manage how knowledge is used.<br />

Wisdom management is a planned and<br />

systematic process for managing how people<br />

use and apply their knowledge and<br />

skills in ways that benefit the organization.<br />

TThhrreeee VViittaall LLiinnkkss<br />

To cultivate wisdom management,<br />

make these three vital links:<br />

1. Link learning and wisdom. A corporate<br />

university conducts activities<br />

that cultivate learning, knowledge, and<br />

wisdom. While most CUs focus on<br />

learning and knowledge, few cultivate<br />

wisdom. I advocate that the CU be the<br />

locus for WM. Beyond giving people<br />

knowledge and skills—we need to<br />

ensure that they are being utilized.<br />

2. Link design and results. It’s not<br />

enough to ensure that learning takes<br />

place. Learning without behavior<br />

change doesn’t affect performance. We<br />

want people to do things differently.<br />

And behavior changes should produce<br />

positive results, not negative<br />

results or no change. Training is predicated<br />

on a desire to improve performance.<br />

To know whether training is<br />

beneficial, we need to measure performance<br />

improvement.<br />

When we know a training program<br />

will be evaluated (we’ll measure<br />

whether it improves results), we’re<br />

more likely to design the training in a<br />

way that gets us the results we want.<br />

By building the evaluation in up front,<br />

we help to ensure meeting our goals in<br />

the design and delivery phases. Evalua-<br />

tion is something you build in up front.<br />

To get measurable results, fist define<br />

clearly what success would be—articulate<br />

precisely what results you want<br />

before you design the training. You can<br />

then focus on achieving those results.<br />

Beyond creating a program that delivers<br />

the learning people need to achieve<br />

goals, you need to ensure that the learning<br />

becomes behaviors.<br />

3. Link learning and action. The best<br />

programs ensure transfer of knowledge<br />

and skills to behaviors that enhance<br />

performance and achieve desired results.<br />

Of course, approaches to learning<br />

that try to link coursework to real-work<br />

aren’t new (action learning is predicated<br />

on this concept). What is new is the<br />

idea that all development efforts should<br />

be linked directly to real-world application—and<br />

this process should be man-<br />

aged by the corporate university.<br />

FFoouurr CCoorree PPrriinncciipplleess ooff WWMM<br />

For years we’ve excoriated companies<br />

for not investing in the development<br />

of their people and growing the<br />

capabilities of their employees. Even<br />

worse is when companies invest<br />

money to develop people, but see no<br />

return. While the company that does<br />

nothing gets nothing, at least it doesn’t<br />

waste money. Companies that do it<br />

poorly also get little return, but they’re<br />

also wasting money and time (people<br />

hate sitting in training classes that<br />

have no value, and fail to complete<br />

valueless e-learning programs).<br />

Wisdom management refers to processes<br />

designed to ensure ROI in developing<br />

people. To ensure a successful<br />

WM application, take these four steps:<br />

1. Define the developmental needs of<br />

your organization and its people. I<br />

often see managers using a shotgun<br />

approach to training and development.<br />

They throw a bunch of stuff out<br />

there and hope that something sticks.<br />

My ability to evaluate the effectiveness<br />

of training or development programs<br />

depends on the answer to the question,<br />

“What are you trying to achieve<br />

with this program?” Many people<br />

struggle to answer this question. If you<br />

don’t know what you are trying to do,<br />

I can’t tell you if you succeed. When<br />

you clearly articulate what you are trying<br />

to accomplish, you have a much<br />

better chance of measuring it and succeeding<br />

at it. If you can’t define it, you<br />

can’t achieve it.<br />

2. Determine the best means of giving<br />

people the required knowledge, skills,<br />

and experience. People used to think of<br />

CUs as a catalogue of classes, but there<br />

are many methods for developing people<br />

beyond classroom training. Select<br />

from the menu of choices (the best solution<br />

may be a combination), and try to<br />

execute as well as possible.<br />

3. Translate the development initiative<br />

into behaviors that impact performance.<br />

Whether you choose classroom<br />

training, e-learning, coaching, mentoring,<br />

job rotation, or puppet shows as<br />

your means of development, good<br />

execution means there is some means<br />

of translating that activity into behaviors<br />

that matter. Although I advocate<br />

detailed measurement, the goal is not<br />

evaluation—it is implementation. By<br />

specifying the desired outcomes,<br />

you’re more likely to achieve them. So<br />

the goal is not “spend three months<br />

with a coach” or “take a class for two<br />

weeks.” The goal is, “reduce the number<br />

of employee grievances to zero” or<br />

“create a marketing plan that complements<br />

the strategy.” Clearly stated<br />

goals with measurable outcomes will<br />

get you the results you want.<br />

4. Always ask, What do I need to do<br />

to ensure this developmental activity<br />

delivers the behaviors I want to see<br />

and the results we need to see? If you<br />

keep asking this question, you’ll focus<br />

more on delivering the behaviors and<br />

results and less on activities. The key<br />

is not designing a great curriculum<br />

and getting a terrific instructor—it is<br />

getting results. If you develop this discipline<br />

and change the focus to this<br />

question, you’ll shift the mindset to<br />

one of WM—and consistently achieve<br />

desired results. <strong>LE</strong><br />

Mark Allen, Ph.D. is an educator, consultant, author, speaker,<br />

and faculty member at Pepperdine’s Graziadio School of Business<br />

and Management, and editor of The Next Generation of<br />

Corporate Universities (Pfeiffer) and The Corporate University<br />

Handbook (Amacom). Email mallen@pepperdine.edu.<br />

ACTION: Take four steps of wisdom management.<br />

<strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence September 2008 11


PEOP<strong>LE</strong> GROWTH<br />

Coaching for Growth<br />

This is the best advice you’ll ever get.<br />

by Marshall Goldsmith and Patricia Wheeler<br />

THE BEST COACHING ADVICE YOU’LL<br />

ever receive in life comes from a<br />

wise old person. Listen carefully:<br />

First, take a deep breath. Now,<br />

imagine that you are 95 years old and<br />

about to die. Before you take your last<br />

breath, you are given a wonderful,<br />

beautiful gift: the ability to travel back<br />

in time and talk with the person you<br />

are today. The 95-year-old you has the<br />

chance to help the you of today to<br />

have a great career and a great life.<br />

The 95-year-old you knows what<br />

was really important and what wasn’t;<br />

what really mattered and what<br />

didn’t; what really counted and what<br />

didn’t count at all. What advice does<br />

the wise “old you” have for you? Take<br />

your time. Jot down the answers on<br />

two levels: personal advice and professional<br />

advice. And once you write<br />

down these words, take them to heart.<br />

In a world of performance appraisals,<br />

this may well be the one that matters<br />

most. At the end of life, if the old<br />

you thinks that you did the right thing,<br />

you probably did. If the old you thinks<br />

that you screwed up, you probably<br />

did. At the end of life, you don’t have<br />

to impress anyone else—just the person<br />

you see in the mirror.<br />

FFoouurr RReeccuurrrriinngg TThheemmeess<br />

When a friend once talked with old<br />

people facing death and asked them<br />

what advice they would have given<br />

themselves, their answers were filled<br />

with wisdom—and four themes:<br />

1. Take time to reflect on life and find<br />

happiness and meaning now. A frequent<br />

comment runs along these lines: “I got<br />

so wrapped up in looking at what I<br />

didn’t have that I missed what I did<br />

have. I had almost everything. I wish I<br />

had taken more time to appreciate it.”<br />

2. Look to the present. The great<br />

disease of “I will be happy when…” is<br />

sweeping the world. You know the<br />

symptoms. You start thinking: I’ll be<br />

happy when I get that . . . BMW . . .<br />

promotion . . . status . . . money. The<br />

only way to cure the disease is to find<br />

happiness and meaning now.<br />

3. Don’t get so lost in pleasing the<br />

people who don’t care that you neglect<br />

the people who do—your friends and<br />

family. You may work for a wonderful<br />

company and believe that your contribution<br />

is important. But when you’re<br />

95 and on your death bed, very few of<br />

your fellow employees will be waving<br />

goodbye! Your friends and family will<br />

likely be the only people who care.<br />

4. Give it a try—follow your dreams.<br />

Older people who tried to achieve their<br />

dreams were happier with their lives.<br />

None of us will ever achieve all of our<br />

dreams. If we do, we will just make up<br />

new ones! If we go for it, we can at<br />

least say at the end, “I tried!” instead<br />

of, “Why didn’t I at least try?”<br />

When we interview high-potential<br />

leaders worldwide and ask them: “If<br />

you stay in this company, why will<br />

you stay?”, we hear the same answers:<br />

“I’m finding meaning and happiness<br />

now.” “The work is exciting, and I love<br />

what I am doing.” “I like the people<br />

here. They are my friends. This feels<br />

like a team—like a family. I might<br />

make more money if I left, but I don’t<br />

want to leave the people here.” “I can<br />

follow my dreams. This organization<br />

gives me the chance to grow and do<br />

what I really want to do in life.”<br />

To make a new beginning in life or<br />

in your leadership, look ahead to the<br />

end and then decide what to do.<br />

GGrroowwiinngg IInnttoo SSuucccceessss<br />

Why do some people reach their<br />

creative potential early while equally<br />

talented peers don’t? We’ve all seen the<br />

near-misses: people who have talent to<br />

spare but never quite make it; and<br />

those, like the tortoise in Aesop’s fable,<br />

who enjoy eventual success that once<br />

seemed out of reach to most observers.<br />

If you believe you are born with all<br />

the smarts and gifts you’ll ever have,<br />

you tend to approach life with a fixed<br />

mind-set. However, those who believe<br />

that their abilities can expand over<br />

time live with a growth mind-set—and<br />

they’re much more innovative.<br />

As coaches, we encounter people<br />

who have a stellar track record, off-thechart<br />

IQ, great technical expertise, and<br />

a track history of success—but who<br />

then reach a career plateau. In contrast,<br />

we work with individuals who,<br />

despite a rather pedestrian early track<br />

record, lack of Ivy League pedigree,<br />

surpass those who appear to be the<br />

“chosen ones.” How does this happen—and<br />

what can you do about it?<br />

This is good news for those who do<br />

not grow up feeling chosen or special.<br />

Feeling much more like the tortoise<br />

than the hare, you may stumble along<br />

while others seem to sail through life<br />

easily and successfully—or so it seems.<br />

In reality, the pampered and pedigreed<br />

are often the ones who stumble,<br />

due to adopting a fixed mindset. We’ve<br />

all seen folks who were tapped as stars<br />

early in life. Cheered on by doting,<br />

praise-lavishing parents, they develop<br />

the sense that their talents are Godgiven<br />

qualities that they can count on<br />

for future success.<br />

What’s the problem with this? They<br />

feel entitled to succeed and become riskavoidant,<br />

fearing the embarrassment of<br />

failure. They deal with obstacles by giving<br />

up, feigning disinterest or blaming<br />

others. Or, having enjoyed so many<br />

early wins, they keep on doing what<br />

made them successful, despite all the<br />

changes around them—not a great<br />

recipe for ongoing success.<br />

Mark was a bright, results-oriented<br />

VP in his company and yet he offended<br />

his peers with his brusque style and<br />

impatience. His manager doubted that<br />

he could, or would, change. And Mark<br />

had no patience with fluff. He needed<br />

a clear business case for making any<br />

behavior change. Once he understood<br />

that listening more and increasing his<br />

patience would lead to better buy-in<br />

from others and improve his department’s<br />

product, he embraced the<br />

change enthusiastically. Mark implemented<br />

his development plan diligently<br />

with great results—to the<br />

astonishment of his manager.<br />

What propelled Mark’s progress? He<br />

embraced a mindset of growth. Never<br />

a natural star or charismatic presence,<br />

he’s a regular guy who approached<br />

12 September 2008 <strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence


challenges with curiosity and saw<br />

roadblocks as signs that he needed to<br />

change strategy, increase effort, stretch<br />

himself, or try new behaviors (high<br />

emotional intelligence).<br />

In our early meetings, Mark took a<br />

learner’s approach to his 360-degree<br />

feedback. Although surprised with the<br />

negatives, he didn’t deflect or blame<br />

his stakeholders. Although a very private<br />

man, he faced his fear of disclosing<br />

more about himself to others to<br />

enhance his leadership. In other<br />

words, he embraced the possible.<br />

You can adopt an attitude that<br />

enables you to grow and change.<br />

First, listen to yourself—to the<br />

internal music and lyrics that you hear<br />

inside your head? Are you telling yourself<br />

to give up? That your challenges<br />

are the fault of others, less wonderful,<br />

less “enlightened” people? Or do you<br />

tell yourself that you can figure out<br />

what abilities you need to grow or<br />

stretch toward to succeed? These belief<br />

systems are the underpinning of the<br />

success—and failure—of many.<br />

Second, create a regular time and<br />

space to reflect on who you are—your<br />

beliefs, your vision, your inner dialogue.<br />

This will be unfamiliar and<br />

uncomfortable for those who value<br />

speed and are used to a track record of<br />

stardom. My advice: do it anyway.<br />

Third, find a partner to serve as<br />

“spotter” and dialogue partner as you<br />

grow. This could be a trusted colleague<br />

or an experienced executive coach.<br />

They’ll help you leverage your<br />

strengths and stay out of the way of<br />

your blind spots.<br />

Recently, Mark described how he<br />

now observed patterns in meetings.<br />

“Now that I know myself better,” he<br />

said, “I see how other people use different<br />

behaviors to manage stress. I’m<br />

less impatient with them because I<br />

know what they’re trying to do, and I<br />

don’t let it get to me.” In fact, Mark<br />

now uses his new knowledge in developing<br />

and mentoring others. His<br />

department is delivering results more<br />

effectively, and other leaders are asking<br />

him and his team to participate in<br />

highly visible and strategic projects.<br />

So what started out as a simple selfimprovement<br />

project by an ordinary<br />

guy has turned into a big win for his<br />

company—largely because he has a<br />

mindset of growth. <strong>LE</strong><br />

Marshall Goldsmith is best selling author of What Got You Here<br />

Won’t Get You There. Visit www.MarshallGoldsmithLibrary.com.<br />

Patricia Wheeler is an executive and team coach and Managing<br />

Partner in the Levin Group. E-mail Patricia@TheLevinGroup.com<br />

or call 404 377-9408.<br />

ACTION: Cultivate a mindset of growth.<br />

PERFORMANCE INSPIRATION<br />

Lead Like a Sherpa<br />

Inspire your team to the summit.<br />

by Kevin and Jackie Freiberg<br />

IF YOU BELIEVE THAT AN ORGANIZATION’S<br />

success is as much the will of the<br />

people as it is the will of the leader,<br />

then we as leaders must do whatever<br />

it takes to inspire success.<br />

What plagues most businesses<br />

today? The data on employee engagement,<br />

satisfaction, loyalty and commitment<br />

is shocking! Most people today<br />

feel stuck, stalled, bored, or frustrated—and<br />

some are even actively disengaged<br />

when they come to work.<br />

Problem: There are far too many<br />

Dead People Working today. DPWs are<br />

physically present but psychologically,<br />

emotionally and intellectually<br />

checked-out at work.<br />

This is a big problem because<br />

DPWs won’t provide<br />

your company with the<br />

intellectual and emotional<br />

capital that you need to get<br />

ahead and stay ahead.<br />

Solution: It is time to<br />

think and act like a Sherpa.<br />

We learned some powerful<br />

lessons from the Sherpas<br />

who skillfully and courageously guide<br />

teams to summit Mount Everest. While<br />

preparing for a program for Intel, we<br />

met Dave Arnett, a Director at Intel,<br />

who summited Mount Everest on May<br />

21, 2007. Fewer than 3,000 people have<br />

made it to the summit of Everest, and<br />

Dave is one of them. Last year seven<br />

people died trying, and Dave knew<br />

four of them. It is a daunting journey,<br />

even for the bravest of the brave! Dave<br />

humbly noted that his success in summiting<br />

Everest had everything to do<br />

with the support he gained from his<br />

family, his team, and the gifted Sherpas.<br />

Family. It’s hard to imagine saying<br />

yes to an adventure that could leave<br />

you widowed and all alone to raise two<br />

young daughters, yet Dave had unconditional<br />

support from this family.<br />

Dave’s wife and children were fully<br />

supportive of this crazy journey. They<br />

were with him in spirit and prayer<br />

every step of the way! Is your family<br />

fully supportive of your journey? Are<br />

they willing to give financially, emotionally,<br />

and unselfishly so you can do<br />

whatever it takes to achieve a challenging<br />

professional goal, a dream or even a<br />

personal passion? Maybe you’re not<br />

trying to summit Everest, but what are<br />

you trying to summit? A new project, a<br />

career transition, a personal health or<br />

wellness goal? Part of our ability to<br />

accomplish big things is to know we<br />

have the unconditional love and support<br />

of our family and friends at home.<br />

Your team at home must be your<br />

biggest fans, allies and supporters.<br />

Team. You cannot climb or summit<br />

Everest on your own—it takes a team.<br />

Summiting Everest is about knowing<br />

and trusting members of your team to<br />

be there whenever and wherever you<br />

need them. Do you know and trust<br />

your team inside and out? Do you<br />

know who you can count on in a<br />

pinch? Do you know who provides<br />

intellectual support when the going<br />

gets tough, and who provides emotional<br />

support when things get frustrating?<br />

Who is willing and capable of<br />

doing whatever it takes under stress<br />

and extreme pressure? Is your team<br />

worthy of your trust? Are<br />

you worthy of their trust?<br />

Sherpas. Dave says the<br />

Sherpas are without a<br />

doubt tactical experts and<br />

athletic wonders. However,<br />

after seeing the Sherpas in<br />

action, Dave thinks what<br />

really makes them great is<br />

their ability to truly understand<br />

the dynamics of the<br />

team. Sherpas have to be<br />

gutsy! There are times when a Sherpa<br />

has to make a tough call and tell a<br />

climber that they are a liability to the<br />

team, and that if they continue the<br />

team could die. Are you a liability to<br />

your team? Do you have the guts to act<br />

like a Sherpa and call out the liabilities?<br />

DPWs are serious liabilities. If you are<br />

a DPW or know of one, be a Sherpa—<br />

remind your team of the importance of<br />

team and teamwork.<br />

Every summit, every program,<br />

every project, every new goal must be<br />

embraced by everyone! An organization’s<br />

success is as much the will of the<br />

people as it is the will of the leader. If<br />

people choose not to engage, and<br />

become a liability, everyone suffers. Is<br />

it time to invite people to step up and<br />

be players or stop the climb? <strong>LE</strong><br />

Dr. Kevin and Dr. Jackie Freiberg are speakers, thought leaders<br />

and authors of the best-seller NUTS!, GUTS! and BOOM! Visit<br />

www.freibergs.com or call 619-624-9691.<br />

ACTION: Inspire your team to the summit.<br />

<strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence September 2008 13


PERFORMANCE STANDARD<br />

New Gold Standard<br />

Five factors lead to sustained success.<br />

by Joseph Michelli<br />

WHEN IT COMES TO<br />

refined service<br />

and award-winning<br />

hospitality, The Ritz Carlton Hotel Co.<br />

sets the standard of excellence. With<br />

unyielding attention to detail, staff<br />

members consistently create memorable<br />

experiences for their guests.<br />

As I studied this company, I identified<br />

five factors in its sustained success:<br />

1. Define and refine. Simon Cooper,<br />

president, noted, “You can’t put the<br />

veneer of quality on a business that<br />

lacks a sound foundation. The Gold<br />

Standards, and the disciplined business<br />

practices that emerge from them,<br />

create the platform for our achievements.”<br />

The Gold Standards can be<br />

found on a pocket-sized card carried<br />

as part of the uniform of Ritz-Carlton<br />

employees. The Standards reflect the<br />

service values, credo, motto and three<br />

steps of service each employee is to<br />

use as guidelines for the care they<br />

provide one another and guests.<br />

These values are reinforced daily in<br />

“line-ups” where all employees hear<br />

stories of service excellence in the context<br />

of the mission and culture. <strong>Leader</strong>s<br />

define their culture through their Credo<br />

card, Line-up and Gold Standards, and<br />

they refine their products and service<br />

delivery methods in accord with changing<br />

customer needs. New hotel designs<br />

reflect the uniqueness of the locale and<br />

personal service delivery.<br />

2. Empower through trust. Ritz-Carlton<br />

leaders have created a culture of trust<br />

that begins with a methodical selection<br />

process that assesses and measures the<br />

talents of prospects against the talent<br />

levels of high performers. Once selected,<br />

leaders extensively train new hires<br />

in the operational aspects of their jobs<br />

and in the desired outcomes they want<br />

their employees to produce for customers.<br />

Once staff members understand<br />

those outcomes (memorable<br />

guest experiences and customer<br />

engagement), leaders step back and<br />

allow the frontline to create those outcomes<br />

for the customer. This is evidenced<br />

in the $2,000 per day, per guest<br />

authority given to every staff member,<br />

enabling them to do whatever is nec-<br />

essary to enhance a guest’s stay or<br />

recover service without seeking the<br />

approval of a supervisor.<br />

3. It’s not about you. Since the 1990s,<br />

Ritz-Carlton executives looked outside<br />

their business to drive internal process<br />

innovation. They sought input from<br />

other world-class businesses through<br />

the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality<br />

Award evaluation process. Ritz-Carlton<br />

leadership not only benchmarks other<br />

businesses, but they invest heavily in<br />

systematic listening to their staff, customers<br />

and investors.<br />

Extensive data is secured<br />

from these sources and performance<br />

is measured<br />

against the engagement<br />

level of guests and staff.<br />

<strong>Leader</strong>s understands that<br />

the more they listen to the<br />

needs of those they serve,<br />

the more likely their staff<br />

will be to listen to the needs<br />

of the guests.<br />

4. Deliver WOW. Ritz-Carlton leaders<br />

define the desired memorable and<br />

emotional connection of a guest as a<br />

“Wow” experience. Staff members are<br />

encouraged to personally affect guests<br />

in pursuit of this emotional intensity.<br />

The idea of a “Wow” experience hinges<br />

on delivering service that appeals to<br />

both the thinking and feeling aspects of<br />

the consumer. Twice a week, “wow<br />

stories” are presented during the lineup<br />

process. These stories range from<br />

herculean efforts made by staff to serve<br />

customers (such as constructing a<br />

ramp on their off time so a guest in a<br />

wheelchair could enjoy a sunset on the<br />

beach) to more subtle or smaller acts of<br />

care and concern. In all cases, excellent<br />

service is a reward unto itself. Whether<br />

a staff member works alone or with a<br />

team, service gives back to the giver—<br />

and those acts of giving are held up as<br />

examples of how well-defined values<br />

come alive through the efforts of staff<br />

each day. <strong>Leader</strong>s celebrate and cement<br />

culture by the stories they tell.<br />

5. Leave a lasting footprint. From the<br />

onset, leaders at Ritz-Carlton sought to<br />

build a company with an enduring<br />

legacy. Social responsibility was not a<br />

trendy add-on but a component of its<br />

early mission statements. In addition to<br />

formal giving programs such as<br />

Community Footprints, The Ritz-<br />

Carlton has developed the <strong>Leader</strong>ship<br />

Center to provide training programs in<br />

quality focus and service excellence to<br />

individuals from businesses large and<br />

small. Also, Ritz-Carlton leadership<br />

partners with hotel guests, vendors, and<br />

key account reps to celebrate those relationships<br />

and enable those individuals<br />

to participate with leadership in community<br />

outreach programs.<br />

Consistent application of these leadership<br />

principles has led to legendary<br />

customer service and memorable and<br />

transformational experiences for all<br />

who come in contact with The Ritz-<br />

Carlton, thus setting The New Gold<br />

Standard of excellence.<br />

SShhrriinnkk NNoott——AAddjjuusstt tthhee SSaaiill<br />

While cost-cutting may be inevitable<br />

in tighter economic cycles,<br />

the leaders at Ritz-Carlton<br />

avoid a scarcity mentality<br />

in challenging times:<br />

1. When consumers face<br />

economic challenges, they<br />

often place a greater<br />

emphasis on value. While<br />

many customers will<br />

“pinch pennies” and “clip<br />

coupons” to address financial<br />

hardships, they will<br />

still look for opportunities to “treat”<br />

themselves. When consumers do<br />

spend money freely they will want to<br />

experience true quality and not a<br />

watered-down or corporately scaledback<br />

version of quality.<br />

2. Focused excellence prevails. If cutbacks<br />

are necessary, companies can<br />

and should reallocate resources toward<br />

their core areas of excellence. To be<br />

“excellent” means resisting the urge to<br />

overreach into areas where your products<br />

or service will be mediocre. Doing<br />

a few things expertly beats doing<br />

many things adequately.<br />

3. Inspire staff to focus on purpose and<br />

outcomes, not fulfillment and procedures.<br />

All business is personal. While most<br />

hotel companies that compete for this<br />

market segment have exquisitely clean<br />

and well-appointed facilities, the primary<br />

driver for guest loyalty emerges from<br />

the personal attention and caring of<br />

staff. From the onset of their employee<br />

selection process, leadership at Ritz-<br />

Carlton looks for underlying talent in<br />

service characteristics. They then train<br />

and certify the skills necessary for the<br />

new hires to do their jobs while constantly<br />

linking job function to the overarching<br />

purpose of the business—<br />

namely to provide for “the genuine care<br />

and comfort” of their guest.<br />

14 September 2008 <strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence


4. Empowering the front-line saves<br />

money. While many leaders talk about<br />

their empowered workforce, few put<br />

money behind the hype. Since staff<br />

members (Ladies and Gentlemen) at Ritz-<br />

Carlton, are given the authority to<br />

spend up to $2,000 per day per guest,<br />

without seeking the approval of their<br />

supervisors, front-line workers can<br />

immediately resolve service breakdowns<br />

for guests or simply engage<br />

guests by doing something unexpected<br />

that will make the hotel stay memorable.<br />

The cost-saving nature of this<br />

financial empowerment is derived<br />

from the morale and loyalty of employees,<br />

the clear cost savings of resolving<br />

problems immediately, and the impact<br />

that an empowered workforce has on<br />

customers. Empowered employees<br />

transform satisfied customers into<br />

fully-engaged brand loyalists who<br />

spend more and refer family and<br />

friends to the business.<br />

Rather than contracting or adopting<br />

a defensive posture during economic<br />

uncertainty, The Ritz-Carlton leadership<br />

stays the course. By clearly “defining”<br />

the core components of the company’s<br />

values, quality standards, and service<br />

tradition, Ritz-Carlton communicates<br />

the path by which a guest’s experience<br />

can be elevated, how the staff member<br />

can purposefully add value and the<br />

means by which the company will<br />

thrive. By having every staff member<br />

take time every day at every hotel<br />

worldwide to participate in a process<br />

called line-up, Ritz-Carlton leadership<br />

re-engages staff in a discussion of the<br />

overarching mission they all share.<br />

Further, by being attentive to the need<br />

to “refine” the brand so that it remains<br />

relevant in changing economic times,<br />

for evolving customer segments and in<br />

diverse international markets, leadership<br />

builds on their well-defined culture.<br />

The “It’s not about you” principle<br />

reflects the disciplined practice of listening<br />

to staff, customers, vendors and<br />

all stakeholders to constantly assure<br />

that business does not principally serve<br />

the needs and preferences of leadership.<br />

By adopting a penchant for listening<br />

to stated and unstated needs while<br />

maintaining a passion for service, great<br />

leaders produce businesses that<br />

endure. From the customer’s perspective,<br />

these businesses are extensions of<br />

themselves and not commodities.<br />

Learn from Ritz-Carlton and adjust<br />

to arrive at your desired destination. <strong>LE</strong><br />

Joseph A. Michelli, Ph.D., is a speaker, consultant and author<br />

of THE NEW GOLD STANDARD (McGraw-Hill) and The<br />

Starbucks Experience. Email joseph@themichelliexperience.com.<br />

ACTION: Set your own gold standard.<br />

<strong>LE</strong>ADERSHIP MOMENTUM<br />

Create Momentum<br />

Amplify possibility into reality.<br />

by Kim Marcille<br />

ESCALATING PRICES OF<br />

oil and gas will have<br />

a ripple effect. People<br />

will spend even less, as the price of<br />

heating their homes, getting to work,<br />

and buying groceries bite further into<br />

their stressed budgets. Businesses will<br />

spend less trying to meet their numbers.<br />

Are you ready for the ripple effect?<br />

If not, take heart: By starting now,<br />

you can prepare—and protect your<br />

business from future threat—by applying<br />

the concept of quantum physics<br />

called decoherence where all possibilities<br />

are available at the same time. It’s<br />

the universe’s method for amplifying<br />

specific quantum possibilities while<br />

suppressing others, for turning quantum<br />

possibility into reality.<br />

The key is in choosing the specific,<br />

positive possibilities that<br />

you want to amplify into<br />

reality—such as filling the<br />

sales pipeline with quality<br />

leads—while suppressing<br />

negative possibilities, such<br />

as running out of cash.<br />

How can you amplify the<br />

positive possibilities and<br />

suppress the negative? A<br />

quantum possibility must<br />

possess specific characteristics<br />

in order to be amplified into reality.<br />

Your business possibilities must<br />

have the same characteristics.<br />

When applying decoherence, consider<br />

two main things: 1) the possibilities<br />

that get amplified are robust,<br />

meaning a lot of information exists<br />

about them; and 2) the possibilities<br />

that get amplified are stable, meaning<br />

they remain consistent over time.<br />

The desired possibilities for your<br />

business must be robust and have lots<br />

of stable information about them. You<br />

can create four types of records:<br />

1. Thought records. Do you have a<br />

vision for what you would like your<br />

business to look like by the end of the<br />

year? In five years? How clear is that<br />

vision? Define the specific possibilities<br />

you want to turn into reality.<br />

2. Verbal records. Whom have you<br />

told about your vision? Do your people<br />

clearly understand the vision?<br />

Sharing the vision will create align-<br />

ment. Telling associates may connect<br />

you with resources you might not<br />

have imagined on your own. Telling<br />

your family and friends will set their<br />

expectations and garner their support.<br />

3. Written records. Now that you<br />

know where you’re going, do you have<br />

a written plan to get there? The plan<br />

will help you break down the achievement<br />

of your vision into monthly<br />

goals. For example, how many<br />

prospects must you touch to develop<br />

enough hot leads to result in the number<br />

of closed deals you need to meet<br />

your goals? Does a new compensation<br />

plan need to be written for your salespeople<br />

to drive the right behavior, perhaps<br />

rewarding them for new<br />

business? Writing down your vision is<br />

helpful, as you can refer back to it regularly<br />

to ensure you and your people<br />

are still working toward that target.<br />

4. Action records. If you were to act<br />

as if your vision was definitely going to<br />

become reality, how would your day<br />

be different? Prioritize the actions that<br />

are focused on the creation of your<br />

vision. Would you write a business<br />

plan to raise capital, set an appointment<br />

with a banker to present that<br />

plan, speak at more functions,<br />

buy a targeted list of<br />

prospects, or seek the<br />

advice of a mentor.<br />

Determine which actions<br />

you can you take today in<br />

support of amplifying your<br />

vision into reality.<br />

Remember to believe in<br />

your vision and in your<br />

ability to create what you<br />

envision. There are two<br />

places when you may have trouble<br />

applying decoherence: at the beginning—when<br />

the fear of commitment<br />

prevents you from getting started—<br />

and in the middle—when it sometimes<br />

seems as if nothing is happening. Once<br />

you begin your decoherence plan,<br />

you’re halfway there. By persisting,<br />

even when it seems useless, you’ll see<br />

your vision decohere—become real.<br />

TTaakkee AAccttiioonn oonn YYoouurr PPllaann<br />

To create stability in your desired<br />

business possibilities, continue to generate<br />

new information about your<br />

vision every day. Get it out there!<br />

Think about it, write about it, talk<br />

about it, and take action on it to create<br />

momentum and ride the wave. <strong>LE</strong><br />

Kim Marcille is a speaker, consultant, founder of Possibilities<br />

Amplified, and author of Amp It Up! Secrets from Science for<br />

Creating the Life of Your Dreams. Visit PossibilitiesAmplified.com<br />

or e-mail Kim@possibilitiesamplified.com.<br />

ACTION: Amplify possibilities into reality.<br />

<strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence September 2008 15


COMPETENCY <strong>LE</strong>ARNING<br />

Action Learning<br />

Use it to develop leaders.<br />

by Daniel R. Tobin<br />

ONCE I MET A SENIOR<br />

partner at a large<br />

consulting firm. He<br />

proudly told me about how they planned<br />

to send 2,000 of their brightest associates,<br />

in groups of 200, to two days of lectures<br />

by a leadership guru at a leading business<br />

school. I asked how they would follow up<br />

on the training to ensure that people<br />

applied what they learned to their jobs. He<br />

said, “Oh, they’re all very bright people.<br />

They’ll figure is out.” Right! And more<br />

than $1 million down the drain!<br />

In building leadership pipelines,<br />

many leaders spend much money<br />

providing leadership education to<br />

selected high-potentials. Some employees<br />

may be sent to multi-week executive<br />

development programs at leading<br />

business schools. Others may be sent<br />

for a few days or a week to a seminar<br />

from a training firm. Still other companies<br />

develop their own LD programs,<br />

using internal trainers and<br />

company leaders to provide instruction<br />

or bringing in professors or consultants<br />

from the outside.<br />

Most of these LD efforts don’t give<br />

participants the chance to try out their<br />

new skills within a safe environment<br />

at work. As one executive told me<br />

after returning from a multi-week program<br />

at a business school, “I learned<br />

and changed a lot, but I got back to<br />

my office and nothing there had<br />

changed. Plus, I was backed up in my<br />

work because of my absence. I haven’t<br />

met with my manager to discuss what<br />

I learned or how I might apply it.”<br />

Without a chance to use what was<br />

learned, the investment in an individual’s<br />

education may be wasted if it<br />

makes no difference in the achievement<br />

of personal and organizational goals.<br />

What if this employee’s manager<br />

met with her before the program and<br />

discussed the outline—what topics the<br />

manager felt were most important,<br />

and what she would be expected to<br />

apply to her work once she returned<br />

from the program? What if, on returning<br />

from the program, she met with<br />

her manager to debrief the experience<br />

and develop an action plan for apply-<br />

ing what she learned? And what if<br />

they together defined an action learning<br />

project, with a timeline, milestones,<br />

and a reporting mechanism?<br />

If these steps had been taken before<br />

starting the education program, she<br />

likely would be using what she<br />

learned. Action learning projects ensure<br />

that what is learned gets put to use.<br />

AA SSuucccceessssffuull PPrrooggrraamm DDeessiiggnn<br />

I once designed a two-year LD program<br />

for 35 mid-level managers designated<br />

as having high potential for<br />

future leadership positions. The program<br />

had three core components:<br />

1. A series of two-day educational<br />

sessions were presented quarterly by<br />

business school faculty or consultants<br />

on a variety of topics.<br />

2. At the conclusion of each session,<br />

participants were given an actionlearning<br />

assignment, sometimes as<br />

teams and sometimes as individuals.<br />

3. At the beginning of the next quarterly<br />

session, participants presented<br />

their results and lessons learned to a<br />

panel of senior company executives.<br />

The action-learning assignment<br />

served three purposes: 1) Participants<br />

immediately got to apply some of what<br />

they learned in the education session,<br />

transforming the information they<br />

received into their personal knowledge.2)<br />

Senior executives, in reviewing<br />

the presentations, got to view a number<br />

of people who would not normally<br />

have been in their direct line of sight.<br />

And 3) The executives were able to see<br />

who took leadership positions on the<br />

teams and how effectively participants<br />

worked as part of the ad hoc teams.<br />

What made a good action-learning<br />

project? Since participants all had fulltime<br />

jobs, the projects could not require<br />

more than 15 percent of their time; they<br />

had to be done within the three months<br />

before the next program; and they had<br />

to relate to an organizational goal.<br />

Potential projects came from the<br />

company’s executive committee members.<br />

We suggested that they look at<br />

their meeting minutes from the past<br />

several years and to identify issues that<br />

kept arising, but were never deemed<br />

critical enough to dedicate human and<br />

monetary resources to solve – these<br />

were ideal projects for the LD program.<br />

JJuuddggiinngg PPrroojjeecctt PPeerrffoorrmmaannccee<br />

When we first proposed the actionlearning<br />

projects as part of the program<br />

design, several questions and<br />

concerns were raised:<br />

• What if a team member didn’t pull his<br />

or her weight on the project? We expected<br />

this to occasionally happen, and<br />

wouldn’t we be better off discovering<br />

this about a participant before he or she<br />

was promoted or given greater responsibility?<br />

• What if a participant or team can’t complete<br />

the project in the time allotted? This<br />

was a test of the participants’ planning<br />

and project management skills.<br />

• What if a participant or team tried a new<br />

approach to a problem and failed? When<br />

this happened, we asked participants to<br />

focus their presentation on why the project<br />

failed, what they would do differently<br />

if they were to try it again, and<br />

what they learned from the experience.<br />

Sometimes, more learning comes from a<br />

failed project than a successful one.<br />

When projects were presented to the<br />

executives, judgments were made not<br />

just on the success of the project, but<br />

also on the participants’ roles in each<br />

project: Who led and who followed?<br />

Who put in extra effort and who<br />

slacked off? How well did the team<br />

work together? What were the attitudes<br />

of the participants toward their<br />

projects and their accomplishments?<br />

In one round of the program, two<br />

teams presented their projects, both<br />

with excellent results. At the end of the<br />

first team’s presentation, the team<br />

leader challenged the senior executives:<br />

“Now that we have done all this excellent<br />

work, what are YOU going to do to<br />

ensure that this project doesn’t die, that<br />

the great work we have done gets disseminated<br />

across the company?” When<br />

the second team completed its presentation,<br />

they told the executives: “What<br />

we have demonstrated in this project<br />

can benefit the company more than we<br />

were able to accomplish in three<br />

months. We have already developed a<br />

kit of materials so that others can repli-<br />

16 September 2008 <strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence


cate what we have done in their local<br />

areas. We have sent the kit to key managers<br />

worldwide and told them that<br />

the members of our team are available<br />

to answer questions and to coach them<br />

through the process.”<br />

If you were on the executive panel,<br />

to which of these two teams would you<br />

look to fill a vacant leadership position?<br />

RReettuurrnn oonn IInnvveessttmmeenntt<br />

When we proposed the LD program,<br />

one executive team member asked if<br />

we had done a ROI analysis to justify<br />

the investment. We said that we had<br />

not and would not. We reminded him<br />

of a painful episode in the company’s<br />

history: two years earlier, a product line<br />

wasn’t doing well. The senior executive<br />

who led this product line left the company.<br />

The CEO promoted a mid-level<br />

manager, who had built a good track<br />

record in the two years he’d been with<br />

the company, to fill the vacancy.<br />

The appointment was a disaster. The<br />

person came in “knowing all the<br />

answers” without asking any questions,<br />

and wouldn’t listen to the ideas of anyone<br />

else in the product line. He issued<br />

orders and wouldn’t abide questions or<br />

objections. Within a year, several key<br />

personnel had resigned and market<br />

share eroded even more. Eventually,<br />

this high potential individual was fired,<br />

but the damage was done.<br />

When asked how we could justify<br />

the investment in the LD program, I<br />

asked the executives to consider what<br />

this errant promotion had cost the company.<br />

What would it be worth, I asked,<br />

to be able to test these high-potential<br />

employees before promoting them and<br />

to develop their skills before they were<br />

put into a leadership position? The losses<br />

to the company from that one errant<br />

promotion were many times what the<br />

LD program would cost.<br />

Whether building your LD program,<br />

sending individuals to an external<br />

program, or bringing in leadership<br />

education session from a third-party<br />

provider, your chances of success<br />

improve greatly when you tie actionlearning<br />

projects to the education<br />

effort to ensure that what gets learned<br />

in the classroom gets applied to the<br />

participants’ work. Action learning<br />

projects also provide opportunities to<br />

judge the strengths and weaknesses of<br />

high-potentials before promoting them<br />

into important leadership positions. <strong>LE</strong><br />

Dan Tobin is VP of design and development for the American<br />

Management Association, author of five books on corporate<br />

learning strategies, and coauthor with Margaret Pettingell of<br />

The AMA Guide To Management Development (AMACOM).<br />

ACTION: Tie action learning to your LD program.<br />

PERFORMANCE DIVERSITY<br />

Leading High<br />

Performance<br />

Diversity accelerates innovation.<br />

by Debbe Kennedy<br />

IN EVERY DIRECTION WE<br />

look, a siren is sounding,<br />

calling for new<br />

ideas, innovative thinking, and a<br />

courageous leadership that brings out<br />

the best in all of us to deliver higher<br />

performance, achievement, and contribution.<br />

The urgency asks for more<br />

than traditional top-down or bottomup<br />

approaches. The needs are greater,<br />

the stakes higher, and nature of our<br />

organizations has upped the ante. Us<br />

and them won’t do it. The response<br />

must be a collective one. We can’t opt<br />

out as a cynic, victim, or bystander. All<br />

leaders must show up and step out to<br />

solve pressing problems.<br />

Putting our differences<br />

to work is the most powerful<br />

accelerator for generating<br />

new ideas, creating<br />

innovative solutions, executing<br />

strategies, and<br />

engaging everyone. It is<br />

the renewable source of<br />

energy—fuel for the engine<br />

of growth and prosperity.<br />

The breakthrough is the<br />

element of diversity, as real<br />

value lies at the intersection of our differences.<br />

This encompasses our thinking<br />

styles, problem-solving methods,<br />

experiences, competencies, work<br />

habits, management styles, ethnic origins,<br />

cultural backgrounds, and generational<br />

insight. Our differences give<br />

each of us a unique perspective.<br />

As Dr. Shirley Ann Jackson said:<br />

“Innovation is advanced by chance,<br />

challenge, choices, and informed coincidence.<br />

It is nourished and powered<br />

by the full breadth of diversity and by<br />

the quest for excellence.”<br />

The magic begins when we come together.<br />

The secret is learning how, when,<br />

and where to tap into all the wealth of<br />

insight, wisdom, and new thinking to<br />

solve problems, create new products<br />

and services, and build stronger communities<br />

that benefit everyone.<br />

I once visited with 550 leaders at an<br />

online <strong>Leader</strong>ship Forum to pinpoint<br />

problems standing in the way of inno-<br />

vation, change, and growth; address gaps<br />

between leaders and employees; and<br />

decide how to put differences to work<br />

to innovate and boost performance.<br />

See if these sound familiar to you<br />

and what other truths you might add:<br />

• Our culture isn’t open to new<br />

ideas; process is more important. There<br />

is little interest in change and innovation.<br />

Everyone sees the need; no one<br />

wants to take the risk.<br />

• Gender, race, and age still play a<br />

role in acceptance of new ideas. If you<br />

think differently or ask too many questions,<br />

you lose the respect of leaders.<br />

• Senior leaders take ideas and present<br />

them as their own. The focus is on<br />

executing strategy; they forget that people<br />

are leading the execution and show<br />

little interest in what people have to say.<br />

These issues prohibit putting our<br />

differences to work. They erode trust,<br />

productivity, and achievement. Are<br />

you leaving similar impressions?<br />

You don’t want to have members of<br />

your team thinking this way, but it isn’t<br />

what you think you are doing that matters—it<br />

isn’t what you’ve said, think<br />

you’ve said, or wish you’d said: it’s what<br />

others perceive and receive from you that<br />

may restrict them from<br />

delivering the results, innovation,<br />

and performance.<br />

TThhrreeee IIddeeaass ttoo GGeett SSttaarrtteedd<br />

Today we can all influence<br />

positive outcomes—<br />

this is leadership. The<br />

landscape for how we do<br />

this continues to expand<br />

across differences, distance,<br />

culture, technology.<br />

Here are three powerful ways for<br />

leaders to put differences to work:<br />

• Consciously choose your words. Cut<br />

the buzzwords and jargon. They are<br />

empty and meaningless. Be aware of<br />

your spoken and written words. Aim<br />

to connect the people you serve.<br />

• Take time to get to know people.<br />

Develop a curiosity about people and<br />

their unique experience, perspective,<br />

and differences. This knowledge will<br />

help tap into the talent they possess, so<br />

they can accomplish great things.<br />

• Create a perpetual practice of rich<br />

communication. Make checking in with<br />

one another a routine way of boosting<br />

performance. Ask a few questions:<br />

What’s going well? What isn’t? What<br />

are we going to do about it? Listen.<br />

Let’s put our differences to work. <strong>LE</strong><br />

Debbe Kennedy is CEO of the Global Dialogue Center and<br />

<strong>Leader</strong>ship Solutions and author of Putting Our Differences to<br />

Work. Visit www.puttingourdifferencestowork.com.<br />

ACTION: Put your differences to work.<br />

<strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence September 2008 17


<strong>LE</strong>ADERSHIP RECOGNITION<br />

<strong>Leader</strong>ship Potential<br />

How can you best recognize it?<br />

by Ram Charan<br />

EVEN THE BEST<br />

coaches can’t build<br />

championship teams if<br />

they pick the wrong players. So, learn<br />

to spot high-potential leaders early,<br />

treat them as such, and be clear about<br />

the earmarks of leadership potential.<br />

Do you know a leader when you see<br />

one? If you have the wrong notion of<br />

what a leader really is and does and<br />

focus on the wrong people, all your<br />

development efforts can’t deepen the<br />

leadership pool. Brilliant strategists,<br />

creative geniuses, financial engineers,<br />

hard workers, and other bright people<br />

command our attention and respect.<br />

Unaware of their shortcomings and<br />

driven to succeed, such experts may<br />

push for leadership jobs, persuading—even<br />

intimidating—their bosses<br />

to promote them. But many lack<br />

essential leadership traits. And without<br />

a natural ability to lead, they’re<br />

unlikely to succeed as high-level leaders<br />

outside their domains of expertise.<br />

What do natural leaders look like at<br />

25 or 45? Attempts to answer that<br />

question take the form of lists of qualities;<br />

however, these can be misleading.<br />

PPeeooppllee aanndd BBuussiinneessss AAccuummeenn<br />

One way to think about the talent<br />

or inner engine of a leader is to think<br />

of two strands of a helix: people acumen<br />

(the ability to harness people’s<br />

energy) and business acumen (knowing<br />

how a business makes money).<br />

These strands are largely in place in<br />

individuals by their twenties. After<br />

that, we can test for people and business<br />

acumen and expand these capabilities,<br />

but we can’t implant them in<br />

mature people who lack them entirely.<br />

People acumen. <strong>Leader</strong>ship is predicated<br />

on the ability to mobilize others<br />

to accomplish a vision, goal, or task.<br />

<strong>Leader</strong>s can’t do everything; they get<br />

other people to do things by managing.<br />

They increase their capacity—the<br />

ability to get more done—through delegation<br />

combined with follow-through.<br />

They set expectations, get the best people<br />

to do what needs to be done, and<br />

oversee relationships to ensure that<br />

destructive or self-interested behaviors<br />

don’t subvert the common purpose.<br />

You know you have a leader with<br />

people acumen when you see evidence<br />

that the person selects the right people<br />

and motivates them, gets them working<br />

well as a team, and diagnoses and<br />

fixes problems in coordination and relationship<br />

with groups of people.<br />

Real leaders enthusiastically select<br />

people who are better than they are to<br />

lift the organization. They motivate<br />

people and develop them as conditions<br />

change, retaining those who<br />

advance the business and<br />

deselect with dignity those<br />

who don’t. Such leaders<br />

show a repeated pattern of<br />

accurately identifying other<br />

leaders’ talents, helping<br />

them flourish, or easing<br />

them into other jobs where<br />

their talents fit better. You<br />

can often identify a true<br />

leader because the people<br />

working under that person are of high<br />

caliber, are energized, and have a natural<br />

affinity for the leader.<br />

<strong>Leader</strong>s with people acumen get the<br />

most out of their people by setting<br />

clear goals, then giving feedback and<br />

coaching judiciously to help them<br />

achieve them. Most use key performance<br />

indicators that measure progress in<br />

quantitative terms and influence<br />

behaviors. They watch for problems<br />

that might hinder achieving the KPIs<br />

and give people unvarnished feedback<br />

when someone is not up to the task.<br />

<strong>Leader</strong>s with people acumen anticipate<br />

problems. They size up the group<br />

dynamics, pinpoint simmering conflicts,<br />

draw them to the surface, and intervene<br />

when they detect behavior that disrupts<br />

performance. They also cultivate social<br />

networks that include not only subordinates,<br />

peers, and superiors but often<br />

extend to customers, suppliers, regulators,<br />

politicians, and interest groups.<br />

Business acumen. Every successful<br />

leader understands how the business<br />

makes money by managing the profit<br />

and loss (P&L) and balance sheet.<br />

Managing the P&L requires leaders to<br />

consider conflicting factors and incomplete<br />

or distorted information and<br />

make trade-offs with the goal of making<br />

money and generating cash on a<br />

sustained basis. <strong>Leader</strong>s intuitively<br />

understand the connections between<br />

customers, profits, money they borrow,<br />

and money they take in. They have a<br />

knack for making the right trade-offs<br />

and decisions to keep the cash flowing.<br />

You can see such acumen in some<br />

leaders at low levels and in early stages<br />

of their careers. They sense of how their<br />

company makes money, what it offers<br />

customers, and how it compares with<br />

competitors. They see the relationships<br />

between the variables, determine which<br />

are most important, and make decisions<br />

that deliver clear, measurable results.<br />

As the scope of a job increases, so<br />

do the variables, uncertainty, and complexity.<br />

The leader needs greater mental<br />

breadth and depth to cut through to<br />

the fundamentals and make decisions.<br />

The search for business acumen will<br />

help keep other traits and skills in perspective.<br />

Business acumen<br />

defines the substance of the<br />

message being communicated.<br />

Some young leaders<br />

can excite people to deliver<br />

on stretch goals, but can<br />

they define direction? Are<br />

they decisive? Can they sort<br />

through alternatives to find<br />

the right pathway forward?<br />

Can they use their acumen<br />

to choose the right goals and KPIs? With<br />

practice, any leader can improve, but<br />

some leaders are naturally better at it.<br />

HHooww ttoo SSppoott aa LLeeaaddeerr<br />

Look for actions, decisions, and behaviors<br />

that reveal leadership potential:<br />

Is her ambition clearly for a leadership<br />

role? Does she take pride in bringing<br />

together and motivating others to<br />

achieve goals? Is she curious about subjects<br />

outside her area of expertise? Does<br />

she grasp the business and basics of<br />

moneymaking? Can she articulate clearly<br />

the requirements for doing her boss’s<br />

job well? Is she continually learning?<br />

Does she deliver extraordinary results?<br />

Does she like to work with diverse,<br />

high-caliber people? How driven and<br />

passionate is she about leading? Is she<br />

dealing with complex and uncertain situations<br />

and using occasional failure as<br />

a chance to learn? Does she continue to<br />

build new skills and hone her personality<br />

traits to achieve her dream?<br />

Finding leaders can’t be left to<br />

chance or to mechanical processes that<br />

create false confidence that the company<br />

is developing leaders and succession<br />

candidates. To build great leaders at all<br />

levels, you must first find them. <strong>LE</strong><br />

Ram Charan is coauthor of Execution and The Game Changer<br />

(Crown Business). Visit www.ram-charan.com.<br />

ACTION: Recognize your leadership talent.<br />

18 September 2008 <strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence


PERFORMANCE EXECUTION PEOP<strong>LE</strong> ONBOARDING<br />

Strategy Execution<br />

Go with a complete program.<br />

by Gary Harpst<br />

HOW CAN YOU CONsistently<br />

execute<br />

your strategy? You need<br />

a complete program. Piecemeal attempts<br />

don’t last. Sustainability, the capacity to<br />

maintain the necessary balance between<br />

strategy and execution, and doing so<br />

while overcoming hurdles, requires a<br />

program consisting of four elements:<br />

1. Repeatable methodology to drive<br />

learning and understanding. To balance<br />

strategy and execution,<br />

you need to have a welldefined,<br />

repeatable methodology<br />

that includes strategy, planning,<br />

organizing, execution,<br />

innovation, and learning. The<br />

purpose is to accelerate the<br />

continuous learning of proven<br />

best practices. Without a stepby-step<br />

approach, learning<br />

becomes an endless process of missteps,<br />

trial and error, and firefighting.<br />

2. Accountability coaching to nurture<br />

and nudge and stay the course.<br />

Accountability is required because<br />

someone needs to be off the field to be<br />

objective about what’s going on. The<br />

need for coaching never stops. Coaches<br />

help people improve the details and<br />

direction of their performance.<br />

An accountability coach is trained<br />

and certified in the repeatable methodology<br />

and guides its use. The coach<br />

provides insight on where to start,<br />

how fast to go, and what to do next;<br />

the coach also provides encouragement<br />

and advice, and brings a broader<br />

perspective, drawing on years of<br />

experience working with other teams.<br />

The law of entropy holds that any<br />

closed system will eventually decline<br />

or become disorganized unless more<br />

energy is put into the system. Disorganized<br />

companies drift into entropy,<br />

lacking strong self-discipline and a<br />

systematic approach. They need the<br />

benefit of some outside energy: an<br />

experienced, veteran coach who provides<br />

accountability and perspective.<br />

Accountability coaching is most<br />

effective when it’s done face-to-face.<br />

We believe this is because successful<br />

coaching relationships are based on a<br />

high level of trust. This must be someone<br />

who you believe has your best<br />

interest at heart and will tell you the<br />

truth. This kind of relationship is only<br />

developed over time and in person.<br />

This view is absolutely contrary to the<br />

trend in today’s Internet world,<br />

toward increased self-service, or a doit-yourself<br />

mentality.<br />

3. Execution system to engage everyone,<br />

everyday, in real-time alignment.<br />

A well-defined approach with the right<br />

people in the room produces high<br />

engagement among the leaders. But<br />

those who are not involved in the<br />

strategic planning process aren’t nearly<br />

so engaged. As we experimented with<br />

ways for increasing total engagement,<br />

we realized that everyone needs to be<br />

involved in the planning (to an appropriate<br />

degree) and connect his or her<br />

activities with the strategic plans of the<br />

company. We realized that we could<br />

use technology to help workers<br />

make real-time decisions<br />

about what work they should<br />

do, in what order, and how to<br />

prioritize interruptions and<br />

unexpected requests for their<br />

time and attention. An execution<br />

system provides a<br />

process for marrying company<br />

plans with individual<br />

management of daily activities.<br />

4. Community learning to share and<br />

reinforce best practices and accelerate<br />

learning. This element helps address<br />

the breadth of expertise and the economic<br />

barriers required for implementation.<br />

Community learning derives its<br />

synergy from the other three elements.<br />

The rate of learning accelerates when a<br />

group of people share a repeatable<br />

methodology, use the same terms and<br />

techniques, and when accountability<br />

coaches pool their experiences in<br />

applying the methodology to different<br />

business scenarios.<br />

The goal of these four elements is to<br />

engage every worker, every day, in<br />

proactively making more aligned decisions,<br />

rather than relatively fixing misalignments<br />

later. This, too, is a learning<br />

objective for the entire company. Each<br />

function becomes a type of learning<br />

community inside a larger community.<br />

Repeatable methodology is a blueprint<br />

for adopting best-practices. Accountability<br />

coaching, execution system, and community<br />

learning are how the organization<br />

implements and sustains practice of the<br />

methodology. These four components<br />

form the complete program for growing<br />

your capacity to execute strategy. <strong>LE</strong><br />

Gary Harpst is the author of Six Disciplines Execution<br />

Revolution. Visit www.GaryHarpst.com.<br />

ACTION: Execute your business strategy.<br />

Onboarding Tips<br />

Learn these from great leaders.<br />

by Howard M. Guttman<br />

HOW DO YOU KEEP UP<br />

the momentum for<br />

high-performance in the<br />

face of the rapidly revolving door?<br />

About one in four employees departs<br />

for other pastures every year—and<br />

that doesn’t include those who are<br />

fired. Add to that the number of internal<br />

transfers and the repercussions of<br />

mergers and acquisitions, and churn<br />

becomes a major challenge.<br />

One way to keep the revolving door<br />

from spinning out of control is have an<br />

exciting long-term strategy and business<br />

prospects, with effective operations,<br />

and progressive HR policies. Even<br />

so, you can’t stop turnover, since highperformers<br />

are targets of headhunters.<br />

Turnover puts high priority on finding<br />

the best way to bring in new players<br />

and integrate them into the culture.<br />

Onboarding within a high-performing<br />

culture is challenging. Newcomers tend<br />

to feel as if they’re entering a brave<br />

new world in which all the axioms that<br />

worked for them in hierarchical organizations<br />

are suddenly up for grabs.<br />

Alignment is not only about reconstituting<br />

the performance context—<br />

strategy, goals, roles, accountabilities,<br />

and ground rules for decision making—but<br />

about reshaping business<br />

relationships. The alignment process<br />

creates a powerful, shared experience<br />

in which leaders and players learn to<br />

show up “for real”: to be candid,<br />

depersonalize, confront one another,<br />

and hold one another accountable.<br />

TTaakkee TThheessee FFoouurr TTiippss<br />

Here are four tips from leaders who<br />

have met the onboarding challenge:<br />

1. Start at the beginning with the<br />

interview process. Let candidates know<br />

what to expect. In his initial contact<br />

with candidates for executive positions<br />

at Chico’s, CEO Scott Edmonds explains<br />

the horizontal model and the company’s<br />

commitment to it. He tells them<br />

that working at Chico’s will differ from<br />

their past experience: that they will be<br />

held accountable by both their leaders<br />

and peers, that they’ll be expected to<br />

deliver on commitments or explain<br />

why they can’t, that a big part of their<br />

<strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence September 2008 19


compensation is based on teamwork.<br />

He then probes for “fit and feel.”<br />

The mindset of great players includes:<br />

thinking like a director, putting the team<br />

first, embracing accountability, and<br />

being comfortable with discomfort. Use<br />

these attributes to screen candidates. To<br />

what extent do they measure up? Does<br />

their background reveal clues to how<br />

successful they’ll be? Question carefully.<br />

For example, ask, “What is the biggest<br />

mistake you have made professionally?”<br />

If the answer comes back, “I’m an<br />

overachiever,” or “My standards are too<br />

high,” be wary. A candidate who substitutes<br />

disguised strengths for weaknesses<br />

may not accept accountability—much<br />

less hold peers and leaders accountable.<br />

2. Stay close to new hires by putting<br />

in place a weekly feedback session to<br />

answer questions and address needs<br />

and concerns. Include new hires in<br />

their team’s reassessment and skill<br />

development sessions. At Chico’s, all<br />

employees who have joined the company<br />

in the preceding half year attend<br />

an off-site meeting devoted to continuing<br />

the horizontal integration process.<br />

3. Role-model. Years ago, a team of<br />

sociologists studied the behavior of<br />

straight-out-of-the-academy police<br />

officers. They were brimming with<br />

pride and enthusiasm; however, this<br />

quickly turned to cynicism once they<br />

joined the police force. The behavior<br />

role-modeled by supervisors and peers<br />

was decisive in their change of heart.<br />

David Greenberg, senior VP of HR<br />

for L’Oréal, notes: “When you join our<br />

team and see all members role-modeling<br />

certain behaviors, you quickly see<br />

how to do it. You see that everyone<br />

has a voice, that disagreement is okay,<br />

that conflict is dealt with by depersonalizing.<br />

If someone is marching in a<br />

different direction, you see them being<br />

held accountable. This sets up and<br />

makes clear what the expectation is.”<br />

4. Provide mentors. Mars Inc. finds<br />

mentoring to be effective in bringing new<br />

hires into the performance culture. Each<br />

member is “adopted” by another player,<br />

who takes responsibility for daily reinforcement<br />

of high-performing behaviors.In<br />

another organization, senior<br />

leaders are paired with up-and-comers.<br />

Bringing on new talent regenerates<br />

an organization by importing new talent,<br />

skills, perspectives, and energy. Harnessing<br />

these “gifts” early is a challenge.<br />

Manage this resource-for-renewal effectively<br />

to achieve standout performance. <strong>LE</strong><br />

Howard M. Guttman is principal of Guttman Development<br />

Strategies and author of Great Business Teams (Wiley). Email<br />

hmguttman@guttmandev.com or visit www.guttmandev.com.<br />

ACTION: Improve your onboarding of new talent.<br />

<strong>LE</strong>ADERSHIP CREATIVITY<br />

Creative <strong>Leader</strong>s<br />

Their followers say, “Let’s go.”<br />

by Mary Jo Huard<br />

PROACTIVE, CREATIVE<br />

leaders often recognize<br />

opportunity, step<br />

into it, use public media, keep the message<br />

simple, and repeat it often to set a<br />

change agenda. <strong>Leader</strong>s don’t merely<br />

study people—they change their lives,<br />

mixing them up in new ways, pushing<br />

them into new arrangements, persuading<br />

them that they can transcend their limits.<br />

We recognize their leadership, but<br />

how do we account for it while recognizing<br />

their differences? Some are calculating;<br />

others are free spirits. Some<br />

seek power; others seeks service and<br />

experience. Some want to reorder society<br />

according to their plan; others seek<br />

to discover societies and learn from<br />

them. Consider these five principles.<br />

Principle 1: We recognize leaders by<br />

their followers. We identify<br />

people as leaders because<br />

of how others behave. We<br />

have seen others falling<br />

into step behind these leaders—to<br />

adopt their goals,<br />

follow their plan, cite their<br />

ideas as the right ones, and<br />

make choices for themselves<br />

based on what the<br />

leader has said or done.<br />

Principle 2: Followers<br />

give permission to lead, not superiors.<br />

Some leaders aren’t appointed to their<br />

positions of leadership—they are chosen.<br />

Their ideas on various subjects—<br />

culture, learning, change, growth—are<br />

accepted by those who follow them.<br />

Principle 3: Since leaders are chosen<br />

by followers, they may be found anywhere.<br />

We may find them in any profession<br />

or occupation. <strong>Leader</strong>s are found<br />

not just in managerial suites but anywhere<br />

one person has a chance to influence<br />

others. <strong>Leader</strong>ship doesn’t even<br />

require face-to-face contact: leaders can<br />

influence through arts and media—television,<br />

books, music, dance. We must<br />

help people understand whether and<br />

how they may want to lead, what kind<br />

of leadership is needed in a situation,<br />

and how selected leaders currently perform.<br />

We can support a chosen or aspiring<br />

leader in achieving outcomes that<br />

benefit all of us. We can encourage the<br />

person, provide feedback, share the<br />

effort and mentor and offer opportunities<br />

for the person to lead.<br />

Principle 4: <strong>Leader</strong>ship needs are met<br />

to the extent the group capitalizes on<br />

its own diverse talents and interests.<br />

The more diverse a group, the more<br />

likely it is to succeed. When diversity<br />

is valued, the group openly accepts<br />

contributions from all members, and<br />

leading and following are seen as<br />

equally important roles.<br />

Principle 5: Putting people first<br />

means letting people lead. It means<br />

inviting, recognizing, celebrating, and<br />

rewarding leadership and followership<br />

all the time—not looking at leadership<br />

as a static set of traits or style. The<br />

“command and control” mentality of<br />

the pyramid structure is collapsing.<br />

Until we clearly understand the<br />

dynamic, relational and multi-dimensional<br />

aspects of leadership, our “decision-makers”<br />

will remain barriers to<br />

developing the effective leaders and<br />

committed followers. As Warren<br />

Bennis said: “Management is getting<br />

people to do what needs to be done.<br />

<strong>Leader</strong>ship is getting people to want to<br />

do what needs to be done. Managers<br />

push—leaders pull. Managers command—leaderscommunicate.”<br />

WWaanntteedd:: CCrreeaattiivvee LLeeaaddeerrss<br />

To maintain world leadership,<br />

you must reconceptualize<br />

your business.<br />

Better quality and service<br />

are essential, but they are<br />

not enough. Creativity and<br />

innovation are the only<br />

engines that will drive lasting<br />

success. Using a set of proven tools<br />

can advance creativity and innovation.<br />

Edward de Bono coined the phrase<br />

Lateral Thinking, defined as “A way of<br />

thinking that seeks the solution to<br />

intractable problems through unorthodox<br />

methods or elements which would<br />

normally be ignored in logical thinking.”<br />

TQM and downsizing—doing more<br />

with less—are necessary but insufficient.<br />

You need creativity to find better ways<br />

of doing things. When you have wrung<br />

out all the fat, excess, and expense,<br />

you won’t get any more benefit out<br />

your efforts without creativity.<br />

Investing in creativity is inexpensive<br />

compared to anything else—and the<br />

results will be dramatic. As Edward de<br />

Bono said, Ideas are the currency of success<br />

—they separate you from your competition. <strong>LE</strong><br />

Mary Jo Huard, founder of Southwest Training Institute, specializes<br />

in team and leadership development. Call 888-978-6632,<br />

email mjhuard@swtinstitute.com or visit www.swtinstitute.com.<br />

ACTION: Invest in creativity.<br />

20 September 2008 <strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence


Get Started<br />

Today!<br />

<strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence<br />

Celebrating 25 Years of Excellence<br />

Team <strong>Leader</strong>ship<br />

($10/month)<br />

<strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence<br />

brings together the best<br />

thinking in the world, from<br />

all the top practioners, in a<br />

time-effective format.<br />

Self <strong>Leader</strong>ship<br />

($8/month)<br />

Personal Excellence<br />

focuses on seven dimensions<br />

of personal development<br />

and leadership.<br />

<strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence<br />

■ 1-year (12 issues) $129<br />

■ 2-year (24 issues) $219<br />

■ 3-year (36 issues) $269<br />

Recent contributors include: Marshall Goldsmith, Jim Collins, Tom Peters, Anne Mulcahy,<br />

Warren Bennis, Michael Porter, Margaret Wheatley, Patrick Lencioni, and many others!<br />

Sales/Service <strong>Leader</strong>ship<br />

($5/month)<br />

Sales & Service Excellence<br />

covers seven dimensions of<br />

sales, marketing, and service<br />

excellence.<br />

Master of Excellence <strong>Leader</strong>ship Package<br />

• 1-year <strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence<br />

• Your choice of 1-year Sales & Service<br />

Excellence or Personal Excellence<br />

• 20-Year Instant Consultant leadership<br />

library CD<br />

• 3-book package on leadership*<br />

■ $329 (save over $150)**<br />

Sales & Service Excellence<br />

■ 1-year (12 issues) $59<br />

■ 2-year (24 issues) $99<br />

■ 3-year (36 issues) $139<br />

Recent contributors include: Tom Hopkins, Jim Rohn, Dianna Booher, Oren Harari, Debbie<br />

Allen, Adrian Gostick, T. Scott Gross, Brian Tracy, Jeff Thull, and many others!<br />

“Sales and Service Excellence is crisp, succinct, and actionable—a nice change from<br />

Harvard Business Review, whose articles are interesting but too academic to be useful.”<br />

—PETER G. BALBUS, CEO & MANAGING DIRECTOR OF PRAGMAXIS<br />

Personal Excellence<br />

■ 1-year (12 issues) $99<br />

■ 2-year (24 issues) $129<br />

■ 3-year (36 issues) $199<br />

Recent contributors include: Laura Schlessinger, Tony Alessandra, Tom DeCotiis, Kurt<br />

DuNard, Bob Davies, Marshall Goldsmith, Wayne Dyer, Peter Block, and many others!<br />

“Personal Excellence is the only reading you’ll need to do for continual self-improvement<br />

both personally and professionally!”<br />

—SHAR<strong>LE</strong>NE HAWKES, FORMER MISS AMERICA, AWARD-WINNING ESPN BROADCASTER<br />

Fax this form to 801-377-5960, call 1-877-250-1983,<br />

email custserv@eep.com or visit www.<strong>Leader</strong>Excel.com<br />

For 25 years, our three monthly magazines<br />

have been the source for the best and<br />

brightest insights from all the top consultants,<br />

coaches, authors, and executives.<br />

Use our FREE Development Tools:<br />

• Personal Excellence Plan, an easy-to-use<br />

guide designed to help you create and implement<br />

vision, mission, goals, and priorities.<br />

• Excellence Worksheet, the perfect way to<br />

bring Excellence into your personal study<br />

or team meeting.<br />

20-Year Instant<br />

Consultant<br />

CD archive: comprehensive,<br />

searchable database<br />

of the best<br />

ideas and strategies<br />

on management,<br />

leadership, and productivity.<br />

Instantly access the perfect article<br />

for your presentation, meeting, or personal<br />

study with over 3,200 articles by<br />

best-selling authors, leadership experts,<br />

coaches, and consultants.<br />

CD or Online Access:<br />

■ $199<br />

Please start my subscription!<br />

Please sign me up for the item(s) checked.<br />

Name ___________________________<br />

Company_________________________<br />

Address __________________________<br />

_________________________________<br />

_________________________________<br />

Phone ___________________________<br />

Email ____________________________<br />

■ Visa ■ MC ■ Amex ■ Disc ■ Bill me<br />

# ______________________ exp. _____<br />

Signature _________________________<br />

<strong>LE</strong>ADERSHIP<br />

PERFORMANCE SYSTEM<br />

*Books may be different than shown. ** For Canadian and International subscriptions, add $20 U.S. postage per year—all three publications include <strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence, Sales and Service Excellence, and Personal Excellence.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!