LE 0908 copy - Leader Connections
LE 0908 copy - Leader Connections
LE 0908 copy - Leader Connections
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Excellence<br />
L E A D E R S H I P<br />
THE MAGAZINE OF <strong>LE</strong>ADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT, MANAGERIAL EFFECTIVENESS, AND ORGANIZATIONAL PRODUCTIVITY<br />
Jackie Freiberg<br />
<strong>Leader</strong>ship Consultant<br />
w w w . L e a d e r E x c e l . c o m<br />
SEPTEMBER 2008<br />
Lead Like<br />
a Sherpa<br />
Create a Culture<br />
of Urgency<br />
Link Learning<br />
and Performance<br />
Manage the<br />
Innovation Journey<br />
“<strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence is an exceptional<br />
way to learn and then apply the best and<br />
latest ideas in the field of leadership.”<br />
—WARREN BENNIS, AUTHOR AND<br />
USC PROFESSOR OF MANAGEMENT
Excellence<br />
L E A D E R S H I P<br />
THE MAGAZINE OF <strong>LE</strong>ADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT, MANAGERIAL EFFECTIVENESS, AND ORGANIZATIONAL PRODUCTIVITY<br />
VOL. 25 NO. 9 SEPTEMBER 2008<br />
JOHN KOTTER<br />
Shared Urgency<br />
Create a culture of<br />
urgency in six ways . . . . . 3<br />
JIM CHAMPY<br />
Great Companies<br />
They share five traits. . . . .4<br />
NELSON SOKEN AND B.<br />
KIM BARNES<br />
Innovation Journey<br />
Take a proven path<br />
through five phases . . . . . 5<br />
WARREN BENNIS,<br />
DANIEL GO<strong>LE</strong>MAN,<br />
AND JAMES O’TOO<strong>LE</strong><br />
Candor Killers<br />
Identify what impedes<br />
transparency. . . . . . . . . . . .6<br />
DENNIS A. KEL<strong>LE</strong>Y<br />
Are You a <strong>Leader</strong>?<br />
Sense of Urgency<br />
Having eagle eyes for early<br />
opportunities is just the first<br />
part to the excellence equation.<br />
You must then exercise your<br />
ambition by modeling urgent<br />
behaviors, thus hunting ideas<br />
for innovation and seizing the<br />
magic of the moment.<br />
To find out, answer<br />
seven questions. . . . . . . . .7<br />
RON CROSSLAND<br />
<strong>Leader</strong>ship Itch<br />
This is a poor way to<br />
develop leaders. . . . . . . . .8<br />
BILL GEORGE, ANDREW<br />
MC<strong>LE</strong>AN, NICK CRAIG<br />
Compass Center<br />
Build self-awareness<br />
and self-acceptance . . . . . 9<br />
MATT SCHUY<strong>LE</strong>R<br />
Future of Work<br />
Current trends shape it. . 10<br />
MARK AL<strong>LE</strong>N<br />
Wisdom Management<br />
Apply four principles . . .11<br />
MARSHALL GOLDSMITH<br />
AND PATRICIA WHEE<strong>LE</strong>R<br />
Coaching for Growth<br />
The best advice has four<br />
recurring themes . . . . . . .12<br />
KEVIN AND JACKIE<br />
FREIBERG<br />
Lead Like a Sherpa<br />
Everyone must embrace<br />
the summit goal. . . . . . . .13<br />
JOSEPH MICHELLI<br />
New Gold Standard<br />
Look to Ritz-Carlton<br />
for service excellence . . . 14<br />
KIM MARCIL<strong>LE</strong><br />
Create Momentum<br />
Amplify possibilities<br />
into realities . . . . . . . . . . .15<br />
DANIEL R. TOBIN<br />
Action Learning<br />
Make it part of your<br />
leadership program. . . . .16<br />
DEBBE KENNEDY<br />
Leading High Performance<br />
<strong>Leader</strong>ship influences<br />
positive outcomes. . . . . . 17<br />
RAM CHARAN<br />
<strong>Leader</strong>ship Potential<br />
Learn how to spot a leader<br />
at different stages . . . . . .18<br />
GARY HARPST<br />
Strategy Execution<br />
Grow your capacity<br />
to execute strategy. . . . . .19<br />
HOWARD M. GUTTMAN<br />
Onboarding Tips<br />
Learn from leaders who<br />
have met the challenge. .19<br />
MARY JO HUARD<br />
Creative <strong>Leader</strong>s<br />
Ideas are now the<br />
currency of success. . . . . 20
E<br />
Top 100+ People in LD<br />
. D . I . T . O . R’S N . O . T . E<br />
The field is ripe and ready to harvest.<br />
by Ken Shelton<br />
FOR EIGHT OF OUR 25 YEARS,<br />
we’ve published a list of<br />
top leadership development<br />
(LD) programs, but failed to mention the<br />
designers, directors or drill sergeants of<br />
these programs as top practitioners in the<br />
field. In this issue, we are naming names.<br />
Our selection is based on three criteria:<br />
1) These individuals led a LD program in a<br />
for-profit company, or had a key role in the<br />
design or implementation of the program;<br />
2) They prepared participants for and<br />
placed them in leadership positions; 3) positive<br />
business outcomes accrued to the organization<br />
as a result of the LD program.<br />
I was also influenced by a report by Kortny<br />
Williamson, CorpU Research Analyst, on “Six<br />
Personalities of a CLO.” With some irony, she<br />
writes: “Organizations need more leadership<br />
for the learning (LD) function.” Otherwise,<br />
“LD teams tend to focus more on delivering<br />
training programs than developing strategy,<br />
driving performance, and contributing to the<br />
bottom line.” She suggests assigning the task<br />
of LD to “seasoned executives who have<br />
strong business and relationship skills, and<br />
can leverage LD to achieve business results.”<br />
She notes that six competencies identify<br />
the CLO’s roles and responsibilities:<br />
Alan Malinchak - ManTech U.<br />
Alex Stiber - Schwan<br />
Alicia Mandel - USOC<br />
Alysa Parks, Maureen<br />
McDermott - CDW<br />
Andrea Johnson - Home Depot<br />
Andrew Noon - Mutual of Omaha<br />
Angella Rosata - St. Thomas Health<br />
Anne Nagy - Nationwide Ins.<br />
Arlene Ferebee - GlaxoSmithKline<br />
Audrey Goodman - Medco<br />
Barbara Amone - UBS<br />
Beau Parnell, Irada Sadykhova -<br />
Microsoft<br />
Beverly Momsen - Chevron<br />
Beverly Saunders - Atlantis Resort<br />
Bill Robinson - Ontario Power<br />
Bret Skousen - Black & Decker<br />
Brian Wallace - HSBC Bank<br />
Bryan Murphy, David Clark -<br />
Farmers Group<br />
Camille Mirshokrai - Accenture<br />
Carol Birt - Boise Cascade<br />
Carol Pledger - Goldman Sachs<br />
Cathy Gorman - Interstate Batteries<br />
Cedric Coco - Lowe’s<br />
Cherlz Franz - Pfizer, Inc.<br />
Chip Chesmore - John Deere<br />
Christa Centola, David Letts -<br />
Raytheon<br />
Clark Handy, Marianne Langlois -<br />
Convergys<br />
Claire Schooley - Forrester Research<br />
Cynthia McCague - Coca-Cola<br />
Cyrus Devere - Panda Resturants<br />
D'Anne Carpenter - Trinity Health<br />
Daisy Ng - Darden Restaurants<br />
Daniel J. Stewart - Kohls Corp.<br />
Dave DeFilippo - Bank of N.Y.<br />
Mellon Asset Mgt<br />
Dave Roberts - Western Union<br />
David Clark - Nike<br />
Deborah Exo, Elizabeth Rohlck -<br />
Herman Miller<br />
Denise Smith-Hams - Genetech<br />
Dermot O'Brien - TIAA-CREF<br />
Diana Oreck - Ritz-Carlton<br />
Diana Thomas - McDonald’s<br />
Eileen Rogers - Deloitte<br />
Elizabeth Vales - Allstate<br />
Technology & Operations<br />
Eric T. Hicks - JP Morgan Chase<br />
Fabio Tonolini - Tenaris Univ.<br />
Faye Richardson - Steelcase<br />
Franklin Shaffer - Cross Country<br />
Healthcare<br />
Gary Fisher, Peter Marchesini -<br />
InVentive Health<br />
Greg A. Lee - Motorola<br />
Heather Bock, Lori Berman - Howrey<br />
Horacio Rozanski-BoozAllenHamilton<br />
Janet Baker - Aflac<br />
Jayne Johnson, John Lynch -<br />
General Electric<br />
Jeannie Milan - InsureMe<br />
Jerry Moran, Tina Grove -<br />
Mohegan Sun<br />
Jim Brolley - Harley-Davidson<br />
Jim Heinz, Tim Fennell - Lockheed<br />
Martin<br />
1) Visionary—draws a blueprint how the<br />
development of leaders will create a competitive<br />
advantage; 2) Strategic Alliance Architect<br />
—LD requires many suppliers to provide<br />
training programs, technology, and services<br />
that meet business needs and serve its purposes;<br />
3) Master of Communication—heightens<br />
awareness of the strategic importance of LD<br />
and facilitates more purposeful communication,<br />
presenting a few key objectives that are<br />
easy-to-understand, and aligned with the<br />
company’s core values and strategies; 4)<br />
Relationship Engineer —builds relationships<br />
with internal and external partners, understands<br />
business issues, appreciates the cultural<br />
and environmental issues that impact<br />
performance, and influences other executives<br />
on the value of performance consulting; 5)<br />
Extreme Innovator— drives performance higher,<br />
using creativity to analyze problems and performance<br />
challenges, determine root causes,<br />
assess the cost of not intervening, and apply<br />
effective intervention tools; 6) Performance<br />
Consultant—meets with business unit leaders<br />
who know where the business is heading and<br />
its key strategies and priorities, understands<br />
where performance gaps exist and uncovers<br />
root causes of those gaps, and measures the<br />
costs and benefits of closing these gaps by<br />
applying resources to resolve problems.<br />
Here’s our list of the top 100+ players in<br />
the growth field of leadership development:<br />
Jim Phelan, Kathy Koressel -<br />
Merck<br />
John Christman - Genworth Financial<br />
John Congemi - Best Buy<br />
John Donnelly, Kathleen Goldreich -<br />
Citigroup<br />
John Rooney - U.S. Cellular<br />
John Schlembach - Aramco Services<br />
John Shepherd - Mars<br />
Jonathan Amy, Martha Brophy -<br />
Pricewaterhouse-Coopers<br />
Jose Conejos - Nokia<br />
Judi Affek, Vickie Canon - 7-Eleven<br />
Judith Edge - Fed Ex<br />
Julie-Ellen Acosta - Boeing<br />
Justin Lombardo - Northwestern<br />
Memorial Hospital<br />
Karie Willyerd - Sun Microsystems<br />
Karen Gay - Cirque du Soleil<br />
Kate Martine, Lanny Hoel - Trustmark<br />
Ken Kenner - BJ Services<br />
Kenny Kinder, Mark Searcy -<br />
Coverall Cleaning Concepts<br />
Kevin Peterson-ArcherDanielsMidland<br />
Kevin Wilde - General Mills<br />
Kimberly Kelly, Susan Berg - Paychex<br />
Ky C. Lewis III - Sharp Healthcare<br />
Leon Ronzana - American Honda<br />
Leslie Young - Bank of America<br />
Lesley Hoare - Kimberly-Clark<br />
Lisa Northup - Americredit<br />
Linda O’Connell - Mayo Clinic<br />
Lynne Zappone - InterContinental<br />
Marc Reed, Shawne Angelle -<br />
Verizon<br />
Marian Anderson - Washington<br />
Mutual<br />
Martha Soehren - Comcast<br />
Matt Schuyler, Capital One<br />
Matthew Bertman - Pulte Homes<br />
Michael Trusty - Rolls Royce<br />
Mike Stafford - Starbucks<br />
Moheet Nagrath - P&G<br />
Nancy Brennock - Trexton<br />
Pam Bilbrey - Baptist Health Care<br />
Pat Crull - Time Warner<br />
Patricia A. Bradford - Unisys<br />
Pru Sullivan - Green Mountain Coffee<br />
Ralph Schiavone - Malcolm Pirnie<br />
Randy Krug - Hormel<br />
Ray Stevens - Staples<br />
Rebecca Ray - Mastercard<br />
Richard Ames - Carnival<br />
Robert Russcoe - Unisys<br />
Ronald Glaser - Intl. Trade Admin.<br />
Sally Levell - Tenet HealthSystems<br />
Sari Brody - Ikea<br />
Sharon Smart - Mattress Giant<br />
Sherry Makely - Clarian Health<br />
Stephen Hadlock - Wheeler Machinery<br />
Susan Muehlbach - Northwest Airlines<br />
Susan Skara - Watson Labs<br />
Susan Suver - U.S. Steel<br />
Suzanne Scott - Cisco<br />
Tamar Elkeles - Qualcomm<br />
Tamara Patrick - Whirlpool<br />
Teresa Roche - Agilent<br />
Tim Galbraith - Yum!Brands<br />
Vicky Jones - GM Global LP<br />
Vicky Rogers - Jet Blue<br />
Volume 25 Issue 9<br />
<strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence (ISSN 8756-2308) is<br />
published monthly by Executive Excellence<br />
Publishing, LLC (dba <strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence),<br />
1806 North 1120 West, Provo, UT 84604.<br />
Editorial Purpose:<br />
Our mission is to promote personal and organizational<br />
leadership based on constructive values,<br />
sound ethics, and timeless principles.<br />
Basic Annual Rate:<br />
US $129 one year (12 issues)<br />
US $219 two years (24 issues)<br />
Canada add US $30 postage per year.<br />
All other non-U.S. add US $70 per year.<br />
Corporate Bulk Rates (to same address)<br />
US $190 each per year for 5 to 25<br />
US $99 each per year for 26 and up<br />
* Ask about logo and custom editions and<br />
foreign bulk rates.<br />
Article Reprints:<br />
For reprints of 100 or more, please contact the<br />
editorial department at 801-375-4060 or email<br />
custserv@eep.com. Back Issues: (print) US<br />
$25.00. Permission PDF US: $50.<br />
Internet Address: www.eep.com<br />
Submissions & Correspondence:<br />
All correspondence, articles, letters, and<br />
requests to reprint articles should be sent to:<br />
Editorial Department, Executive Excellence,<br />
1806 North 1120 West, Provo, Utah 84604;<br />
801-375-4060, or editorial@eep.com.<br />
Customer Service/Circulation:<br />
For information on products and services call<br />
1-877-250-1983 or email: custserv@eep.com.<br />
Executive Excellence Publishing:<br />
Ken Shelton, CEO, Editor-in-Chief<br />
Scott Spjut, Asst. Editor----<br />
Sarah Hayes, Circulation Manager<br />
Nancy Low, Marketing Manager<br />
Rob Kennedy, Business Manager<br />
Contributing Editors:<br />
Chip Bell, Warren Bennis, Dianna Booher,<br />
Kevin Cashman, Marshall Goldsmith, Howard<br />
Guttman, Jim Kouzes, Jim Loehr, Tom Peters,<br />
Norm Smallwood<br />
The table of contents art is a detail from<br />
SSoovveerreeiiggnn RReeppoossee (image cropped) © Daniel<br />
Smith, and is courtesy of the artist and art<br />
print publisher Greenwich Workshop.<br />
For additional information on artwork by<br />
Daniel Smith, please contact:<br />
Greenwich Workshop<br />
151 Main Street<br />
Saymour, CT 06483<br />
1-800-243-4246<br />
www.greenwichworkshop.com<br />
Full view of table of contents art.<br />
Copyright © 2008 Executive Excellence Publishing.<br />
No part of this publication may be reproduced or<br />
transmitted without written permission from the<br />
publisher. Quotations must be credited.<br />
2 September 2008 <strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence
PERFORMANCE URGENCY<br />
Shared Urgency<br />
Make it part of the culture.<br />
by John Kotter<br />
SUCCESSFUL CHANGE<br />
follows a basic pattern,<br />
starting with creating<br />
a sense of urgency. In fact, the biggest<br />
challenge leaders face in causing<br />
change comes right at the beginning—<br />
in creating a strong sense of urgency.<br />
Most leaders struggle to meet this<br />
challenge for two interrelated reasons:<br />
First, they miss important information.<br />
Most information is filtered before<br />
it gets to them, and much good information<br />
never gets to them. So, they<br />
don’t see the complacency that resides<br />
two levels down, or in a branch office.<br />
They can’t believe it, because they see<br />
their margins slipping and clearly communicate<br />
urgent priorities. They don’t<br />
understand why everyone doesn’t<br />
share a sense of urgency to deal with<br />
the dilemma or seize the opportunity.<br />
Some leaders remain out of touch<br />
because they’re overwhelmed with<br />
work, have a thousand messages coming<br />
at them daily, are internally<br />
focused, or have succeeded in the past<br />
and become arrogant.<br />
Second, they mistake<br />
energy and activity for real<br />
urgency. Top execs often<br />
see enormous activity:<br />
they see people running<br />
around, holding meetings,<br />
and starting projects, and<br />
so they look at me and say,<br />
“Look, we have a sense of<br />
urgency!” I find frenetic<br />
activity, usually driven by<br />
anxiety, but no sense of shared urgency.<br />
When people have a shared sense of<br />
real urgency, they tend to be extraordinarily<br />
alert. They move faster, launching<br />
initiatives that address the problems<br />
and opportunities they face. They listen<br />
better and cooperate more. When their<br />
agenda starts to fill with new tasks<br />
because they must run the current<br />
operations and leap into the future—<br />
they identify the low-priority items and<br />
either cancel them off their calendars or<br />
delegate them to others to free up time<br />
to handle new, more important tasks.<br />
They think, “This change may take us<br />
three years to complete, but every day<br />
we’ll make progress. We’ll redirect con-<br />
versation to the real issues and cancel<br />
unnecessary activities.”<br />
UUrrggeennccyy OOppttiioonnss aanndd MMiinnddsseett<br />
In effect, people face three options:<br />
Option 1: Complacency and anxiety.<br />
Many people believe that things are<br />
not perfect, but for them, they’re doing<br />
the right thing. At a feeling level, they<br />
are content with what they’re doing,<br />
even complacent. In fact, they may be<br />
critical of highly productive people.<br />
Their complacency is manifest in their<br />
behavior, as they continue doing what<br />
they did yesterday. They tend to postpone<br />
or procrastinate new behavior.<br />
Option 2: False urgency and frenetic<br />
activity. This is what many leaders<br />
often mistake for real urgency. False<br />
urgency is manifest in anxiety-driven,<br />
frenetic, unproductive behavior.<br />
Option 3: Real urgency with process<br />
and progress. At a feeling level, this is<br />
driven by a determination to move<br />
now, to win now. At a behavioral level,<br />
it’s seen as hyper-alertness to what’s<br />
happening on the outside (in the market),<br />
focused on the real issues, getting<br />
up every day with a commitment to<br />
make progress on those<br />
issues, without getting<br />
burned out, which happens<br />
if you fail to get rid<br />
of the junk and delegate.<br />
The urgency mindset is<br />
this: “There are great<br />
opportunities and hazards<br />
out there, and we must<br />
deal with them.” There’s<br />
enormous determination<br />
to make something happen<br />
now and win. And determination is<br />
different from frenetic activity, anxiety,<br />
contentment, and the complacency of<br />
showing up and doing the same thing.<br />
CCuullttuurree ooff UUrrggeennccyy<br />
You may find a sense of urgency in a<br />
person or a pocket with a company, but<br />
rarely do you find it through an entire<br />
culture. As a leader, you need to instill<br />
(not try to install) a sense of urgency in<br />
the culture. If you start building the<br />
best practices into your systems and<br />
structures, urgency will eventually seep<br />
into the culture. You need to identify<br />
and implement methods that increase<br />
urgency and build momentum. Soon<br />
these urgency practices become “the<br />
way we do things around here.”<br />
When I consult, I talk about two<br />
kinds of change—episodic and continuous—and<br />
ask, “What kind of change<br />
are you facing?” Historically, most leaders<br />
report facing episodic change—an<br />
IP changeover or new strategy implementation<br />
in Division X. It’s a specific<br />
thing that comes and goes. Now, more<br />
executives are facing continuous<br />
change. And I can’t imagine how they<br />
will cope, unless they can build a sense<br />
of shared urgency into their culture.<br />
The leaders who do this best tend to<br />
be leading medium-sized and smaller<br />
companies. Some big companies that<br />
once had a shared sense of urgency now<br />
have arrogance and complacency. Even<br />
after being whacked hard by the competition,<br />
they are mostly engaged in frenetic<br />
activity—people are running around<br />
in circles like rats in a maze—not building<br />
a shared sense of urgency into the<br />
systems, structure, and culture.<br />
SSiixx WWaayyss ttoo PPrroommoottee UUrrggeennccyy<br />
A shared sense of urgency is not<br />
always the consequence of tough competition<br />
or harsh external conditions.<br />
Proactive leaders and lower-level managers<br />
create urgency in four ways:<br />
1. Bring the outside in. People on the<br />
inside tend to become disconnected<br />
from the world. Great leaders maintain<br />
a sense of urgency by reconnecting<br />
people with the outside world—by<br />
bringing the outside in, bringing information<br />
and outsiders in, at the right<br />
time and in the right way, realizing that<br />
change is a head/heart thing. It’s not<br />
just about how people think, but mostly<br />
about how they feel. And that means not<br />
hiring a big consulting company and<br />
having them dump a logical report on<br />
people at the wrong time and place.<br />
That practice only creates anxiety. The<br />
leader has to say, “Let’s look at the<br />
facts—we’ve got to move, now.”<br />
2. Send scouts out. One CEO told a<br />
high-potential employee that he wanted<br />
him to enroll in a university’s leadership<br />
development program, and<br />
then said, “Let me explain why. I think<br />
you have potential, and this program<br />
will accelerate your development. You<br />
will learn what’s going on and leave<br />
wanting to come back here and help<br />
others develop that same sense of<br />
urgency—to share with them in a way<br />
that captures their minds and hearts<br />
what you’ve gone through. That’s my<br />
primary objective.” So, sending a scout<br />
out is another way to bring the outside<br />
in and create a sense of urgency.<br />
3. Listen to your front-line sales and<br />
<strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence September 2008 3
service employees. Tell them, “You’re<br />
not only selling products—you’re supplying<br />
vital information about what’s<br />
going on.” And don’t send this information<br />
up seven levels of hierarchy or<br />
write meaningless reports. Senior leaders<br />
should seek these people out. Sam<br />
Walton would fly around in his prop<br />
plane, talking to store managers and<br />
staff associates alike, constantly asking,<br />
“What’s up? Don’t just tell me what<br />
people are buying—tell me when they<br />
smile, or frown. What are the trends?<br />
What cars are in the parking lot now?”<br />
His aim was to bring the outside in,<br />
and not do it in a dry, factual, everybody-forgets-it-in-15-minutes<br />
way.<br />
4. Find opportunity in crisis. When<br />
a crisis looms or appears, pause for a<br />
minute and ask, “Is there an opportunity<br />
here to help us get out of complacency<br />
and start feeling a strong sense<br />
of urgency?” Don’t assume there will<br />
be. In many cases, you must get in<br />
there and bail out the boat. But cultivate<br />
the mindset of looking for opportunity<br />
in every real or potential crisis.<br />
5. Behave urgent every day. Once at<br />
Harvard I met a CEO who bragged<br />
about one of his Indian managers who<br />
had become a beacon of urgency. He<br />
was constantly talking about what was<br />
happening in the industry and company,<br />
how their past success meant nothing,<br />
how they had to move faster, and<br />
then modeled moving faster. If holding<br />
a meeting was a low priority, he’d canceled<br />
it; if he held it, he would end<br />
every meeting by saying, “Next week,<br />
I’m going to do A, B and C as a result<br />
of this meeting.” He’d turn to the guy<br />
on his left and says, “How about<br />
you?” He tapped into their aspirations<br />
to do something great and win.<br />
6. Deal with the No-Nos. These are<br />
people who have some power, usually,<br />
who hate all change, and who won’t<br />
admit it. They present themselves<br />
appropriately, but they are relentless in<br />
keeping complacency up, creating fear<br />
and false urgency. When you find<br />
these people, you need to deal with<br />
them so they’re not in the way.<br />
To inspire a strong sense of shared<br />
urgency, you’ve got to win over the<br />
hearts and minds of people. Creating a<br />
sense of urgency is a life-and-death<br />
issue. If you don’t get your act together<br />
quickly, somebody will buy you up<br />
and then slice and dice you out of existence.<br />
If that image doesn’t engender a<br />
sense of urgency, nothing will. <strong>LE</strong><br />
John Kotter, HBS professor, is best-selling author of Our Iceberg<br />
Is Melting and a new book, A Sense of Urgency. Visit<br />
JohnKotter.com; for training call Greg Kaiser at 919-618-9955.<br />
ACTION: Create a sense of urgency in your culture.<br />
<strong>LE</strong>ADERSHIP GREATNESS<br />
Great Companies<br />
What are five shared traits?<br />
by Jim Champy<br />
FOR YEARS I’VE<br />
searched for great<br />
companies. Like many<br />
objectives, greatness is in the eye of the<br />
beholder. It’s an honorable aspiration.<br />
I’ve looked at over 1,000 high-growth<br />
companies and found many good ones.<br />
My search is driven by a desire to<br />
find companies that have new business<br />
models, delivering new products<br />
and services to customers and executing<br />
in new ways. I’ve written about<br />
my discoveries in Outsmart!. Although<br />
I could find no single formula for what<br />
creates a great company, I did find six<br />
shared characteristics.<br />
1. Culture. My ultimate test of the<br />
quality of a company is whether I<br />
would like to work there. The good<br />
news: I see many high-growth companies<br />
where I would work.<br />
One simple test for a great<br />
culture is how a company is<br />
experienced by its constituents—its<br />
customers,<br />
associates, owners, and<br />
business partners. The best<br />
companies treat all of their<br />
constituents well and, in<br />
their own unique ways,<br />
aspire to greatness.<br />
2. Ambition: The leaders<br />
of great companies have a great ambition<br />
for the company—one that<br />
addresses an unmet customer need.<br />
The ambition is not one of personal<br />
greed—it’s about building a company<br />
that delivers on its promise and does it<br />
with a unique quality. My experience<br />
is that it takes a great ambition to create<br />
even a good company. I’m inspired<br />
by the company Minute Clinic, whose<br />
ambition is to change how healthcare<br />
is delivered, for the benefit of everyone<br />
involved in the system.<br />
3. Customer: Every good company<br />
begins by meeting a customer need.<br />
That need is often deeply understood<br />
by the founders because they, themselves,<br />
experienced the need—and saw<br />
how that need was not being well met.<br />
Sometimes the founder delegates the<br />
management of the company to someone<br />
who operationalizes the idea. But<br />
that wasn’t the case in the example of<br />
Sonicbids, a company that saw the<br />
unmet needs of thousands of independent<br />
musicians and performers and<br />
whose founder has led the company to<br />
a unique position in the music business<br />
for independent performers—a $13 billion-a-year<br />
market that no one saw or<br />
organized until Sonic bids came along.<br />
4. Focus: Good companies stay<br />
focused on what they know and can<br />
do well. When companies search for<br />
new ideas, they often drift into<br />
unknown territory and get in trouble.<br />
Good companies just keep growing<br />
and expanding into familiar territory.<br />
Shutterfly is a wonderful example of a<br />
company that’s growing by expanding<br />
within the social expressions business,<br />
helping communities of people share<br />
photographs in hundreds of ways.<br />
Niches can be very large markets.<br />
5. Execution: Satisfying a customer<br />
requires relentless attention to execution.<br />
Building a company’s capability to<br />
deliver makes the difference between<br />
turning a great idea into a business or<br />
failure. But execution is not just about<br />
delivering a product—it’s also about<br />
service. Over the years, I’ve observed<br />
that technology companies are bad at<br />
recognizing and responding to the service<br />
needs of their customers.<br />
Counter-intuitively,<br />
high-tech requires a lot of<br />
high-touch. Partsearch is a<br />
company that knows what<br />
it’s doing with customer<br />
service, helping customers<br />
find what they need in an<br />
ocean of millions of parts<br />
and accessories for consumer<br />
electronic products.<br />
6. Inspiration: Smart<br />
companies engage all of their associates<br />
in building the business, from idea creation<br />
though delivery. Ideas may come<br />
tops-down, but they also come bottoms-up<br />
and from every other direction.<br />
Everyone in the company feels<br />
that they own a piece of the action and<br />
are accountable for performance. The<br />
inspiration for a company starts at the<br />
top, but good leadership drives that<br />
inspiration deep into the company by<br />
engaging people broadly in decisionmaking.<br />
People are more than mechanical<br />
parts of the enterprise, and the<br />
more they see customers, the better<br />
their business sensibilities.<br />
These six traits are common in great<br />
organizations, smart companies operating<br />
quite brilliantly. <strong>LE</strong><br />
Jim Champy, author of Outsmart! Reengineering the<br />
Corporation, X-Engineering, Reengineering Management, and<br />
The Arc of Ambition, is Chairman of Perot Systems’ consulting<br />
practice and head of strategy. Visit www.jimchampy.com.<br />
ACTION: Become a great organization.<br />
4 September 2008 <strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence
CHANGE INNOVATION<br />
Innovation Journey<br />
How can you lead and manage it?<br />
by Nelson Soken and B. Kim Barnes<br />
SUPPOSE THAT YOU’VE BEEN ASSIGNED<br />
to “accelerate innovation” and<br />
given a free hand to develop the strategy<br />
and operational plan. Where do<br />
you start? How can you achieve it?<br />
<strong>Leader</strong>s are under pressure to meet<br />
or exceed market expectations each<br />
quarter. Different approaches are touted<br />
as the road to success. Methods<br />
such as Six Sigma and Lean Sigma<br />
deliver results by improving bottomline<br />
performance through operational<br />
efficiency and effectiveness. In contrast,<br />
innovation, seen as a key means<br />
to achieve competitive advantage,<br />
delivers results by generating organic<br />
growth to the company’s top line.<br />
Innovation requires tapping people’s<br />
creativity and imagination and<br />
cultivating a culture that stimulates<br />
and supports innovation. Innovation<br />
is not the result of imposing specific<br />
processes and disciplines, but is an<br />
inherently human activity that<br />
requires a broad understanding of<br />
how people think and behave.<br />
Innovation differs from development<br />
efforts because it requires a degree<br />
of uncertainty and challenges to<br />
the status quo. Often, processes that<br />
drive improvement require repeatability<br />
and minimize variability. Innovation<br />
is about increasing variability and<br />
encouraging expansive and divergent<br />
thinking. Rather than the “drive for<br />
results” leadership that seeks quick<br />
alignment and efficient execution,<br />
innovation leaders ask people to look<br />
at problems from different perspectives,<br />
take unfamiliar positions, identify<br />
and test their assumptions, and take<br />
risks. Such leaders make room for<br />
experimentation, mistakes, and failures<br />
while requiring focus and discipline.<br />
JJoouurrnneeyy tthhrroouugghh FFiivvee PPhhaasseess<br />
We describe innovation as a journey—adventure<br />
travel with twists and<br />
turns, dead-ends, retracing of steps,<br />
accidents, surprises, dangers, and pos-<br />
sible failures. Success may seem like<br />
the result of good luck or timing; however,<br />
consistently successful innovation<br />
is not random. Effective innovation<br />
leaders and managers use a consistent<br />
pattern, moving through five phases. In<br />
the program Managing Innovation, we<br />
use the concept of avatars to describe<br />
personae that represent the mindsets<br />
and skill-sets that support each phase.<br />
Each avatar is an archetype—an embodiment<br />
of a set of qualities and skills.<br />
1. Searching: Hunting and gathering<br />
ideas and opportunities for innovation.<br />
In this phase, the Seeker is far-sighted,<br />
outward looking, curious, and ardent<br />
in looking for ideas and opportunities<br />
for innovation. When Searching, look<br />
inside and outside your organization<br />
and industry for ideas. Diversity of<br />
thinking is the mother of innovation.<br />
2. Exploring: Examining and testing<br />
ideas to discern their potential value. In<br />
this phase, the Alchemist is tireless,<br />
discovery-oriented, skeptical, and logical<br />
in exploring and investigating ideas<br />
when it is time to focus on those that<br />
are most promising. When Exploring,<br />
encourage constructive debate. Provide<br />
a forum where members of your team<br />
can challenge one another’s thinking in<br />
a respectful and productive way.<br />
3. Committing: Making clear decisions<br />
and commitments on how to<br />
move forward. In this phase, the Judge<br />
is wise and prudent, but also decisive<br />
and bold in making commitments to<br />
invest time, talent, and other resource<br />
in specific innovation efforts. When<br />
Committing, be prepared to kill ideas<br />
that are not chosen or are outmoded in<br />
order to provide resources for innovation.<br />
Do so skillfully and with compassion,<br />
but don’t hesitate to do it.<br />
4. Realizing: Delivering the innovation.<br />
The Director drives the innovation<br />
to completion; he or she is team-focused,<br />
results-oriented, and requires discipline<br />
and politically savvy to move toward<br />
implementation. When Realizing, be a<br />
“buffer” to protect your team from interference<br />
while they are driving for results.<br />
5. Optimizing: Maximizing the value<br />
created by the innovation. In this phase,<br />
the Magician—optimistic, creative,<br />
entrepreneurial, generous—makes the<br />
most of the innovation, creates maximum<br />
value for the team and the organization,<br />
even if the specific innovation<br />
fails (as many do). When Optimizing,<br />
ask, “How else can we use, improve,<br />
extend, or scale this idea” before moving<br />
on to the next big thing.<br />
TThhee LLeeaaddeerr’’ss RRoollee<br />
<strong>Leader</strong>s play a critical role in guiding<br />
innovation. As in any journey into<br />
unknown territory, fear and risk should<br />
be minimized. The traveler is more likely<br />
to succeed with a professional, seasoned,<br />
and prepared guide to facilitate<br />
the journey. As Louis Pasteur said:<br />
“Chance favors only the prepared mind.”<br />
Strong leaders help provision people<br />
for their journey. They communicate the<br />
vision of a strategic destination while at<br />
the same time leaving room for passion,<br />
excitement, spontaneity, and responsiveness<br />
to circumstances and opportunity.<br />
Innovation leaders deliberately<br />
manage the journey with its inevitable<br />
variability in a way that optimizes the<br />
outcome while maintaining focus on a<br />
timely arrival at the destination—even<br />
if the destination changes en route.<br />
Such leadership and management<br />
demand high flexibility. Each phase of<br />
the journey requires different mindsets<br />
and skill-sets, though many skills are<br />
useful in more than one phase. Most<br />
people are more comfortable in one or<br />
two of the phases of the journey and<br />
tend to stay in their “comfort zone”<br />
longer than necessary. <strong>Leader</strong>s and<br />
managers must either learn how to<br />
“morph” from one to another or identify<br />
others who can represent and call<br />
forth the required mindsets and skillsets<br />
at each phase. Since innovation is<br />
an untidy process, you need to know<br />
when to move back and forth.<br />
As you begin your innovation journey,<br />
“provision” yourself with these<br />
insights. Ultimately, innovation is<br />
about people and psychology, behavior<br />
and attitudes—not just good intentions<br />
and well-defined processes. Innovation<br />
leadership and management give you<br />
a competitive advantage. <strong>LE</strong><br />
B. Kim Barnes is CEO of Barnes & Conti Assoc. (visit<br />
www.barnesconti.com) and co-developer with David Francis,<br />
Ph.D., of Managing Innovation. Nelson Soken, Ph.D., is senior<br />
manager at Medtronic and facilitator of Managing Innovation.<br />
ACTION: Lead and manage innovation.<br />
<strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence September 2008 5
ETHICS CANDOR<br />
Candor Killers<br />
What impedes transparency?<br />
by Warren Bennis, Dan Goleman<br />
and James O’Toole<br />
IN A RATIONAL UNIVERSE, <strong>LE</strong>ADERS<br />
would embrace transparency on ethical<br />
and practical grounds, as the state<br />
in which it is easiest to accomplish<br />
goals. But that is rarely the case.<br />
Powerful countervailing forces tend to<br />
stymie candor and transparency.<br />
Here are four such forces:<br />
1. <strong>Leader</strong>s routinely hoard or mishandle<br />
information. A common malady<br />
among insiders is hoarding information.<br />
This is one way information gets<br />
stuck and is kept from flowing to those<br />
who need it to make solid decisions.<br />
Wholesale classification keeps information<br />
away from the frontline people<br />
who actually manage the business and<br />
serve customers. Small cliques of insiders<br />
tend to hoard information because<br />
they want to know things that others<br />
do not. Some executives seem to take<br />
an almost juvenile pleasure in knowing<br />
the “inside dope” and keeping it away<br />
from their underlings. In some organizations,<br />
knowledge is seen as the ultimate<br />
executive perk, not unlike the<br />
company jet, kept solely for the use<br />
and delight of the elite. This stance is<br />
costly in terms of efficiency and morale.<br />
2. Structure or system impediments<br />
hamper information flow and bungle<br />
decision making. The U.S. declaration<br />
of war on Iraq was largely based on<br />
seriously flawed data from America’s<br />
intelligence community. Later internal<br />
investigations brought a structural<br />
problem to light. Inadvertently, the<br />
system of information flow had been<br />
designed to foster poor decisions by<br />
depriving key decision-makers of crucial<br />
data. The main flaw lay in the different<br />
mandates of two divisions at<br />
the CIA: the operations directorate,<br />
which gathers intelligence data from<br />
around the world, and the intelligence<br />
directorate, which sifts through that<br />
raw information to draw conclusions.<br />
To protect their sources’ identities,<br />
the operations people did not reveal<br />
their own assessments of the reliability<br />
of the source of specific data. As a<br />
result, sources with low credibility<br />
introduced information that was later<br />
found to be wrong. Analysts should<br />
not be put in the position of making a<br />
judgment on crucial issues without full<br />
understanding of the reliability and<br />
source of the relevant information.<br />
Businesses tend to operate with less<br />
openness about mistakes—and fewer<br />
full-scale investigations—than does a<br />
democratic government, and so examples<br />
from government are easier to<br />
find. But any time an organization<br />
makes a seriously wrong decision, its<br />
leaders should call for an intensive<br />
postmortem. Such learning opportunities<br />
are often overlooked. Sadly, leaders<br />
tend to call on the PR department<br />
to spin the matter, to make another<br />
inadequately thought-out decision,<br />
and perhaps to scapegoat, even fire, a<br />
few staff members. Because most leaders<br />
cover up their mistakes, systemic<br />
flaws in information flow tend to remain<br />
to do their damage another day.<br />
3. The “shimmer factor” impedes the<br />
free flow of information. The public and<br />
precipitous fall of many celebrity CEOs<br />
has dimmed the once-shining image of<br />
executives. But despite the discrediting<br />
of many executives, leaders still tend to<br />
be perceived by many as demigods.<br />
And that perception still deters followers<br />
from telling those leaders essential<br />
but awkward truths. As everyone<br />
knows, there’s a far different standard<br />
for scrutiny of the CEO’s expense<br />
account from that of a file clerk. In too<br />
many organizations, one of the privileges<br />
of rank is a tendency to get automatic<br />
approval of behavior that would<br />
be questioned in the less exalted. Many<br />
leaders encourage this godlike view of<br />
themselves in countless nonverbal<br />
ways—from the cost and spotlessness<br />
of their desks to the size and isolation of<br />
their homes. We often hear tales of leaders<br />
who do something outrageous,<br />
undeterred by those who should be<br />
watching but who fail to speak up.<br />
The best antidote to the shimmer<br />
effect is the behavior of the leader. The<br />
wisest leaders seek broad counsel, not<br />
because they are so enlightened but<br />
because they need it. Power does not<br />
confer infallibility. There’s a compelling<br />
reason to become more open to information<br />
from people at every level: those<br />
close to the action usually know more<br />
about what’s actually going on with<br />
clients, production or customer service,<br />
than do those on the top floors.<br />
Effective leaders find their own ways to<br />
elicit many points of view, believing<br />
“None of us is as smart as all of us.”<br />
The CEO of Pacific Rim bank, for<br />
instance, schedules 20 days each year to<br />
meet with groups of his top 800 people,<br />
40 at a time. Aware that isolation in a<br />
corner office may weaken his ability to<br />
make good decisions, he regularly seeks<br />
frank feedback from many sources.<br />
Beyond asking for the counsel of<br />
others, leaders have to hear and heed<br />
it. Reflect on how receptive you are to<br />
the suggestions and opinions of others<br />
and alternate points of view.<br />
4. Sheer hubris hinders the flow of<br />
information. One motive for turning a<br />
deaf ear to what others have to say<br />
seems to be sheer hubris: leaders often<br />
believe they are wiser than all those<br />
around them. The literature on executive<br />
narcissism tells us that the selfconfidence<br />
of top executives can easily<br />
blur into a blind spot, an unwillingness<br />
to turn to others for advice.<br />
In extreme cases, narcissism can<br />
cause leaders to refuse to hear what<br />
others say. <strong>Leader</strong>s can suffer from<br />
“tired ears.” The CEO of one international<br />
organization, for instance,<br />
decried the lack of an informal pipeline<br />
within the company—he felt that the<br />
executive summaries he received daily<br />
from his direct reports were being sanitized<br />
for him. Yet he could not imagine<br />
himself turning to anyone lower in the<br />
ranks for a private conversation—let<br />
alone cultivating a nonpowerful confidant—because<br />
it might be seen as a<br />
sign of weakness on his part.<br />
Address these and other impediments<br />
to transparency. <strong>LE</strong><br />
Warren Bennis, Dan Goleman, and James O’Toole are coauthors<br />
of Transparency (Jossey-Bass). Visit www.josseybass.com.<br />
ACTION: Address the candor killers at your work.<br />
6 September 2008 <strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence
<strong>LE</strong>ADERSHIP TEAMS<br />
Are You a <strong>Leader</strong>?<br />
Answer seven questions to find out.<br />
by Dennis A. Kelley<br />
<strong>LE</strong>ADERS TODAY MUST<br />
balance many<br />
responsibilities and<br />
roles. They are pulled in many different<br />
directions and can get caught<br />
between what they need to do in<br />
order to create a winning team and<br />
keeping all their constituencies happy.<br />
<strong>Leader</strong>ship requires quick action and<br />
the need to juggle multiple priorities<br />
that may cause leaders to lose focus<br />
on the development of their team.<br />
One big mistake a leader can make<br />
is to believe that developing their team<br />
isn’t their top priority. The best-run<br />
companies devote much time and<br />
resources to developing the skill, values,<br />
beliefs and identity of their team.<br />
No single person can accomplish<br />
everything that must be done for a<br />
business to grow and prosper. That is<br />
where the team comes in. A leader<br />
with a strong team will see exponentially<br />
greater results. A leader has no<br />
greater responsibility than to recruit,<br />
train, develop, coach, recognize and<br />
reward the people who are responsible<br />
for the success of the leader’s business.<br />
AAsskk SSeevveenn QQuueessttiioonnss<br />
To ensure you devote the time and<br />
effort necessary to build a winning<br />
team, ask yourself these seven questions<br />
and see how well you stack up.<br />
Does your team clearly understand<br />
your vision? A vision is useless empty<br />
rhetoric unless the people responsible<br />
for delivering it through the company’s<br />
products and services know,<br />
understand, and live the vision. As a<br />
leader, you must have a laser focus on<br />
your vision. You must communicate it<br />
to the entire team and then reinforce it<br />
through coaching, at meetings, and<br />
through your recognition and reward<br />
programs. Ensure that your vision is<br />
clearly connected with your strategic<br />
plan and that a specific cause is tied to<br />
it. A vision should be connected to an<br />
action plan that makes the vision come<br />
to life. When you communicate the<br />
vision to your team, connect the vision<br />
to the cause so your team will understand<br />
how it influences what they do.<br />
Paint a picture with your words.<br />
Speak it, write it, even draw it if necessary<br />
to ensure the team understands it.<br />
Your team will respond much better to<br />
the work they do when they clearly<br />
understand why they are doing it and<br />
how it helps the company. People want<br />
to feel meaning in the work they do.<br />
When they understand the company<br />
vision and how their job fits into it,<br />
they will feel connected and valued.<br />
Does your team have clear, specific,<br />
measurable goals that support the<br />
vision? Once you communicate the<br />
vision and your team understands how<br />
they fit into it, you must ensure they<br />
have specific goals to measure their<br />
progress. Goals enable the leader to<br />
measure how the team is progressing<br />
toward the vision. You can reward team<br />
members who contribute to the success<br />
of the team, and provide support to<br />
those who don’t. Goals bring accountability<br />
to the leadership process. Your<br />
team will thank you for creating equity<br />
within the team. It destroys morale and<br />
frustrates team members when weak<br />
performers and strong performers are<br />
all treated the same. Goals allow you to<br />
easily separate the weak from the<br />
strong and manage them accordingly.<br />
Just make sure goals are set fairly and<br />
equitably, are meaningful and connected<br />
to the vision. They must be specific<br />
and measure progress against the goal.<br />
The more clearly you define the goals,<br />
the more likely your team will achieve<br />
them. The goals should make team<br />
members stretch and grow to achieve<br />
them, and yet the goals must be achievable—or<br />
the team may just give up.<br />
Does the team understand the system<br />
of rewards and consequences? Strong<br />
leaders ensure that team members<br />
understand the consequences of their<br />
performance. Develop and communi-<br />
cate clear systems for handling team<br />
performance. It destroys morale and<br />
creates mediocre performance when<br />
team members sense that no matter<br />
how hard they work—or how little<br />
they achieve—they’ll be treated the<br />
same as everyone else. Why work<br />
harder or do more than expected if<br />
there’s no reward? Your team must<br />
understand the consequences—both<br />
good and bad—to their performance.<br />
<strong>Leader</strong>s must communicate the<br />
reward system in place as well as the<br />
corrective action systems. Rewards do<br />
not always have to be monetary. There<br />
are many ways to reward your team<br />
that are low cost or no cost. Find the<br />
right ones for your situation and apply<br />
them consistently—your team will<br />
respond. And with poor performance,<br />
make sure the team understands the<br />
consequences for not contributing and<br />
consistently apply them.<br />
Do you pull the weeds when you<br />
need to? Your team will respect you<br />
and perform better for you when you<br />
remove the weak members from the<br />
team (pull the weeds). In gardens,<br />
weeds show up. They start to grow,<br />
and soon they are choking the flowers.<br />
As more weeds grow, more flowers<br />
disappear. When you have a team<br />
member who does not perform or creates<br />
conflict you must deal with the<br />
problem—not pretend it will get better<br />
or hope the person leaves. One major<br />
mistake leaders make is to let these<br />
non-performers pull the team down.<br />
Strong performers know who isn’t<br />
performing, and they respect you<br />
more when you deal with problems.<br />
Does your team receive regular<br />
communication, coaching, and development?<br />
Once you communicate the<br />
vision, provide clear goals and communicate<br />
the consequences, you can’t<br />
kick back and take it easy. Strong<br />
leaders are also great coaches. They<br />
communicate regularly as conditions<br />
change and make adjustments to the<br />
strategy. The team must be kept<br />
abreast of updates and issues impacting<br />
their roles. In your coaching role,<br />
find out what is working and what<br />
isn’t. Where they are succeeding and<br />
where they are struggling. Ask questions<br />
and listen to what they say. Find<br />
out how they feel about their performance<br />
and abilities. Determine if they<br />
are confident in their ability to<br />
achieve the goals or if they need<br />
training or help. When you show you<br />
care and provide the support they<br />
need, they will follow your lead.<br />
Does your team fear the “F” word?<br />
Teams that fear failure in their attempts<br />
<strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence September 2008 7
to become better will become paralyzed<br />
by that fear. They will fail to<br />
take action without first checking<br />
with you, even on trivial points.<br />
Winning teams do whatever it takes<br />
to get the job done and take reasonable<br />
business risks. As a leader, you<br />
must support this risk-taking. Trust<br />
your hiring decisions and your coaching<br />
talents and let them do their job<br />
with minimal interference. The only<br />
failure is the failure to participate. If<br />
they take action and make a mistake,<br />
they should learn from it and become<br />
better for it. Your team will achieve<br />
high success more quickly by failing<br />
than by always playing it safe and<br />
running to you for permission or to<br />
make all their decisions for them. If<br />
you and the team communicate regularly<br />
and you are coaching effectively,<br />
your risk will be minimal, and their<br />
development will soar.<br />
Does your team trust you and<br />
respect you? When customers like<br />
you, trust you and believe you, they<br />
will buy from you. As a leader, realize<br />
that you are selling your team every<br />
day on what you need them to do<br />
and why they should do it. If your<br />
team does not trust you or respect<br />
you, they won’t buy what you are<br />
telling them. When you lose their<br />
trust and respect, you must fight to<br />
get it back—and it will have a negative<br />
impact on their performance. Do<br />
what you say you will do—even if it<br />
is not popular. Be fair, honest and ethical<br />
in your dealings with them, and<br />
they will follow your lead. Never<br />
compromise your ethics or tell your<br />
team simply what they want to hear.<br />
Confidentiality may prohibit you<br />
sharing everything with them, but do<br />
not hold it over their head. Deal with<br />
them honestly and keep their trust—it<br />
will pay big dividends.<br />
CCrreeaattee aa SSttrroonngg TTeeaamm<br />
If you are strong in all seven areas,<br />
you deserve congratulations—as you<br />
are well on your way to leadership<br />
success. If you still need to work on<br />
some of these areas, make a commitment<br />
to yourself and your team to get<br />
started today. As a leader, your primary<br />
role is to create a strongest team.<br />
The more successful the team, the<br />
more successful you will be. Get the<br />
RIGHT people on your team, doing<br />
the RIGHT things, and work hard to<br />
develop your team. <strong>LE</strong><br />
Dennis A. Kelley is President of The D. Kelley Group and<br />
author of Achieving Unlimited Success. Visit<br />
www.AchievingUnlimitedSuccess.com.<br />
ACTION: Ask yourself these seven questions.<br />
<strong>LE</strong>ADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT<br />
<strong>Leader</strong>ship Itch<br />
It’s a bad way to develop people.<br />
by Ron Crossland<br />
ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE<br />
is down or flat. Labor<br />
relation tensions are up.<br />
Competitors create new products faster.<br />
Turnover increases. Wall Street snubs<br />
you. The C-suite team becomes querulous.<br />
Factions appear. Satisfaction is low.<br />
<strong>Leader</strong>ship development is now seen<br />
as a key strategy for preventing or reducing<br />
the effects of these ailments and has<br />
become a standard feature in companies.<br />
What mistakes do companies make<br />
in creating a LD strategy? The biggest<br />
one is scratching the leadership itch.<br />
Have you ever had an itch that irritated<br />
you constantly? A rash, hive, or<br />
bug bite that controlled your attention<br />
and soured your mood? You want to<br />
scratch or medicate it until it goes away.<br />
You get temporary relief,<br />
but the itch returns, causing<br />
you to scratch harder and<br />
longer and overuse the itch<br />
creams, potions, and tablets.<br />
Many companies have<br />
an itch and then focus their<br />
LD program or process on<br />
relieving the itch, not on<br />
maintaining a healthy body.<br />
Two cases come to mind.<br />
One company was criticized<br />
in the media for its unethical behavior.<br />
The company was called a soulless machine<br />
that concentrated only on market domination<br />
without regard to means. Its answer<br />
was to develop a set of values and drive a<br />
values-based LD process, without placing<br />
the values in a larger context.<br />
A second company enjoyed an enviable<br />
market position. It had no serious<br />
competitors and had good financial<br />
returns, but was not growing. It’s<br />
emphasis for LD was to focus on strategy.<br />
All other leadership issues were<br />
either lightly addressed or ignored.<br />
This itch response is a poor way to<br />
develop leaders. Senior managers are<br />
simply viewing the tiers of leaders and<br />
managers beneath them as functional<br />
cogs to be focused on current problems.<br />
They use training and development to<br />
focus attention. Over time, participants<br />
realize that many aspects of leadership<br />
are being ignored and that their development<br />
is a guise for scratching.<br />
My advice? If you have an itch,<br />
scratch it. But treat it as an itch, and<br />
don’t equate scratching with having a<br />
healthy LD regimen. When you have a<br />
healthy LD system, itches occur rarely,<br />
and you can build the health of the<br />
company, not just react to irritations.<br />
There are three things you should<br />
do that may prevent itching altogether.<br />
1. Eat healthy, exercise, and get plenty<br />
of rest. These healthy habits maintain<br />
physical, emotional, and mental<br />
health and reduce the odds for suffering<br />
from many ailments. Likewise, a<br />
LD process that provides a broad base<br />
of development across all leadership<br />
domains is like eating healthy. If this is<br />
accompanied by job rotation, career<br />
management opportunities, or frequent,<br />
rigorous, mandatory training<br />
programs, you have the exercise component.<br />
Getting plenty of rest means<br />
keeping an eye on time for personal<br />
reflection, conversation, sabbaticals,<br />
and appropriate work-life balance.<br />
2. Senior team involvement and<br />
coaching. No counselor would advise<br />
parents: “Ensure your kids are well fed,<br />
do their homework, and get plenty of<br />
sleep. After that, leave everything to the<br />
school system, television,<br />
social networks, and random<br />
opportunities.” So<br />
why would you do this<br />
when developing leaders?<br />
C-suite leaders and senior<br />
managers should be<br />
involved in attending programs,<br />
teaching participants,<br />
and touching base<br />
through conference calls or<br />
in-class visits, even if for<br />
only 30 minutes at a time. If all a senior<br />
manager does for LD is write the check<br />
and delegate responsibility to HR, then<br />
kill the program and save the money.<br />
Coaching can double the impact of<br />
LD processes. So, to amp up your LD<br />
process with only marginal financial<br />
investment, add coaching and train<br />
your managers in coaching practices.<br />
3. Raise graduate entrance expectations.<br />
A good LD program provides<br />
basic education and coaching for all<br />
managers. But advanced LD or “highpotential”<br />
programs should be tough<br />
to enter and stay in. Everyone should<br />
have a shot, but invest extra resources<br />
in those who make the grade. About 60<br />
percent of VP-level managers don’t<br />
aspire to go higher. Invest in people<br />
who do and facilitate their progress. <strong>LE</strong><br />
Ron Crossland is Chairman of Bluepoint <strong>Leader</strong>ship Development,<br />
and co-author of The <strong>Leader</strong>’s Voice, and The<br />
<strong>Leader</strong>ship Experience. Email info@bluepointleadership.com.<br />
ACTION: Have a healthy LD regimen.<br />
8 September 2008 <strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence
<strong>LE</strong>ADERSHIP SELF-AWARENESS<br />
Compass Center<br />
Build your self-awareness.<br />
by Bill George, Andrew McLean<br />
and Nick Craig<br />
YOU DISCOVER YOUR AUTHENTIC <strong>LE</strong>ADership<br />
by developing yourself. All<br />
leaders face challenges in staying<br />
aligned with their True North—their<br />
most deeply held beliefs, values, and<br />
principles—as they cope with the<br />
pressures and seductions of leading.<br />
You will need a compass to guide<br />
you on your journey. At the center of<br />
the True North compass is the theme of<br />
this article: Build your self-awareness.<br />
To the north: live your values. To the<br />
east: use your motivated capabilities.<br />
To the south: build your support team.<br />
To the west: lead an integrated life.<br />
These five points of the compass<br />
enable you to stay focused on your<br />
True North while coping with and<br />
overcoming challenges. You must take<br />
responsibility for your own development,<br />
using this compass to guide you.<br />
BBuuiilldd YYoouurr SSeellff--AAwwaarreenneessss<br />
Self-awareness is at the center of<br />
the True North compass. A compass<br />
needle orients itself to Earth’s magnetic<br />
field. To do so, it pivots on the fixed<br />
point of a tiny fulcrum. Your selfawareness<br />
is the pivot on which your<br />
balanced development and your orientation<br />
to your True North depend.<br />
With self-awareness, you know<br />
when something is authentic for you<br />
and when it is not. You can’t be truly<br />
self-aware without honest and direct<br />
feedback from others. So, enlist the<br />
assistance of trusted peers, mentors,<br />
and friends, reflect on their feedback<br />
and explore what changes it suggests<br />
in your life and leadership.<br />
When you review your feedback,<br />
you may find that your self-assessment<br />
differs from the assessments you<br />
receive from others. Explore these discrepancies.<br />
How and why does your<br />
perspective differ from that of others?<br />
You can’t be authentic without being<br />
aware of your core strengths, your<br />
weaknesses, and your underdeveloped<br />
areas. You also need to develop<br />
an understanding of your blind spots,<br />
areas of resilience, and vulnerabilities.<br />
We all know inauthentic leaders<br />
who represent themselves in one way<br />
and then behave in the opposite manner.<br />
You may have been guilty of this<br />
as well. However, authenticity is not<br />
about being or pretending to be perfect.<br />
Those leaders who can speak openly<br />
about their weaknesses, blind spots,<br />
and vulnerabilities permit others to do<br />
the same. If you can do this, you create<br />
deep trust and commitment in your<br />
relationships. Thus you<br />
will be living with the<br />
humble truth of owning<br />
and accepting all of who<br />
you are—both the gifts and<br />
the challenges.<br />
We each have many<br />
aspects that we present to<br />
the world in layered succession.<br />
Like an onion, we<br />
have many layers. Outer<br />
layers are expressions of<br />
our external identity to the<br />
world. These are the first signals to<br />
others about who we are and what lies<br />
beneath. They are also forms of protection;<br />
they prevent the world from<br />
intruding on our core selves.<br />
Underneath the outer layer are deeper<br />
layers: our strengths and weaknesses,<br />
our needs and desires. These are the<br />
elements from which we operate.<br />
Deeper still lie our values and motivations,<br />
the criteria that define our own<br />
sense of success and fulfillment.<br />
Most hidden of all are our shadow<br />
sides, our vulnerabilities and our blind<br />
spots. We all have them, whether or<br />
not we’re aware of them or acknowledge<br />
them. Often others see these<br />
“blind spots,” even if we do not. These<br />
deeper layers are difficult to identity<br />
unless we are brutally honest with<br />
ourselves or invite others to give us<br />
feedback about such vulnerable places.<br />
At the core of our being lies our<br />
authentic self—our true and genuine<br />
nature. If we can “own” all aspects of<br />
who we are, we can live in harmony<br />
with our authentic selves and present<br />
our true self to others and to the world<br />
around us. Our True North comes<br />
from this authentic place, from which<br />
we find our calling to leadership.<br />
Why is the outer skin of our onion<br />
so tough? For fear of being judged or<br />
rejected by others, we are understandable<br />
reluctant to expose our deeper<br />
layers. We want to display our<br />
strengths, not expose our weaknesses.<br />
We want to state our desires, but naturally<br />
we are concerned about the<br />
power others gain over us when they<br />
see our needs. Deeper down, our values<br />
and motivations are important<br />
sources of authentic leadership.<br />
As a result of our fears, we often try<br />
to cover up the core where our vulnerabilities,<br />
weaknesses, blind spots, and<br />
shadow sides reside. We may be so good<br />
at covering them that we’re unaware of<br />
them. We may be in denial about them<br />
until we are forced into situations<br />
where they are suddenly exposed.<br />
The paradox underlying the showing<br />
of only parts of ourselves while<br />
hiding others is that our<br />
vulnerabilities, shadow<br />
sides, and blind spots are<br />
also the parts of us most<br />
starved for expression,<br />
acceptance, and integration.<br />
When we do not<br />
acknowledge them as<br />
being just as critical to<br />
who we are as our<br />
strengths, they cause us to<br />
behave in inauthentic<br />
ways. Only when we<br />
embrace these aspects can we become<br />
fully authentic as leaders and people.<br />
AAcccceepptt WWhhoo YYoouu AArree<br />
None of us can be the best at everything.<br />
Each of us has a set of strengths<br />
that come naturally, talents we have<br />
developed over time, and things we<br />
are never going to be good at. What<br />
enables us to be authentic and effective<br />
leaders is maximizing the use of<br />
our strengths—not focusing on our<br />
weaknesses—and surrounding ourselves<br />
with others whose strengths<br />
complement our own and fill in for<br />
our gaps. The ability to accept yourself<br />
as you are is a gift that leads not only<br />
to self-acceptance but to true freedom.<br />
Accepting and loving yourself for<br />
who you are requires compassion. For<br />
you to acknowledge your weakness<br />
and shadow sides, you have to accept<br />
the things you like least about yourself<br />
as integral to who you are.<br />
The goal of self-awareness is selfknowledge,<br />
and ultimately self-acceptance<br />
as the leader you are and the<br />
leader you are capable of becoming. <strong>LE</strong><br />
Bill George, Andrew McLean, and Nick Craig are coauthors of<br />
Finding Your True North: A Personal Guide (Jossey-Bass). Visit<br />
www.truenorthleaders.com.<br />
ACTION: Boost your self-awareness as a leader.<br />
<strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence September 2008 9
MANAGEMENT TRENDS<br />
Future of Work<br />
Today’s trends shape it.<br />
by Matt Schuyler<br />
EMERGING TRENDS ARE<br />
changing the nature<br />
of knowledge work,<br />
demanding new options. Business<br />
cycles create more intensity, complexity,<br />
and uncertainty—demanding high productivity.<br />
Also, the balance of power is<br />
shifting from individual contributors<br />
to cross-functional, networked teams;<br />
and technology is accelerating the pace<br />
and scope of change. Work is more<br />
complex, collaborative, distributed in<br />
time and place, less predictable, and<br />
more demanding. To remain viable,<br />
leaders need to respond to trends with<br />
flexibility, speed, and innovative, costeffective<br />
solutions.<br />
WWoorrkkffoorrccee TTrreennddss<br />
Retiring Baby Boomers could soon<br />
lead to a scarcity of knowledge workers.<br />
If these retiring workers can’t be<br />
replaced, more work may be offshored,<br />
or companies may need to<br />
bring back retired workers on a parttime<br />
basis. Also, some companies are<br />
experiencing a breakdown in the<br />
employer-employee bond as pensions<br />
disappear, benefits become portable,<br />
job sites increase or become mobile,<br />
and employee churn rises.<br />
The millennial generation, or Gen<br />
Y, is altering employee expectations.<br />
For example, most millennials would<br />
prefer to work for companies that give<br />
them opportunities to contribute their<br />
talents to nonprofits on company<br />
time. A company’s commitment to<br />
social responsibility can determine<br />
whether millennials will accept a job<br />
offer. And they are more likely to pick<br />
an area to live that suits their lifestyle.<br />
Work models and patterns that enable<br />
people to work when it’s convenient to<br />
them and when they’re most productive<br />
are popular. Gen Y expects work to<br />
mirror the college experience with flexibility<br />
in work hours. Gen Xers also<br />
value flexible work hours and locations<br />
that enable them care for children or<br />
continue their education. Baby Boomers<br />
too are vocal about wanting more flexible<br />
work practices that allows for elder<br />
care, exercise, or personal growth.<br />
TTeecchhnnoollooggiiccaall TTrreennddss<br />
The rate and reach of technological<br />
change also impact the workplace. The<br />
infrastructure is now widely available<br />
to give employees access to information<br />
anywhere and anytime. Soon, highspeed<br />
Internet and wireless access will<br />
grow more robust and ubiquitous and<br />
become an expected amenity, while<br />
mobile devices quickly converge into a<br />
single, fully-integrated tool. Traditional<br />
brick-and-mortar offices may no longer<br />
be the focus of work efforts as meetings<br />
are conducted in cyberspace.<br />
Technological advances also introduce<br />
uncertainty and risk. Consumers<br />
expect faster transaction speeds and<br />
greater accuracy, while more marketing<br />
channels make reaching the consumer<br />
harder. Regulatory compliance,<br />
information security, and privacy issues<br />
will create added risk and uncertainty<br />
for both companies and consumers.<br />
BBuussiinneessss PPrroocceessss TTrreennddss<br />
Future enterprises will be more dispersed<br />
in terms of markets and suppliers,<br />
and expand their dependence on<br />
multiple extended partners. Businesses<br />
will focus on improving productivity<br />
with shorter product cycles. “Faster,<br />
better, cheaper” will remain the mantra.<br />
Uncertainty will drive structure churn,<br />
while environmental regulations will<br />
create economic uncertainty. Flexibility,<br />
adaptability and ideation will be success<br />
factors. Global risks will intensify<br />
due to the threat of terrorism, financial<br />
shocks, and natural disasters.<br />
TToommoorrrrooww’’ss WWoorrkkppllaaccee<br />
The workplace will need to be flexible.<br />
In some cases, companies will<br />
have to create new spaces to enhance<br />
concentration and focus, privacy and<br />
security, and yet allow for spontaneous<br />
interaction. Workspaces will become<br />
increasingly diverse, some co-located,<br />
some virtual, and some both. Web<br />
2.0—the use of the Internet as a collaborative<br />
platform to maximize creativity<br />
and productivity—social networking<br />
and social computing will be the conference<br />
rooms and workspaces of the<br />
future. Employers need to increase the<br />
usable workspace in the office.<br />
Tomorrow’s workplace needs to be<br />
vibrant and energizing, with a focus on<br />
natural daylight, sustainable healthy<br />
space, natural landscaping, open space<br />
to maximize views from windows, creative<br />
office construction, low panels<br />
between offices, open desking, and<br />
glazed walls to make activity apparent<br />
and expose inefficient use of space.<br />
Mobile technologies help eliminate the<br />
need for brick and mortar, or reduce<br />
costs for energy or real estate.<br />
TThhrreeee PPhhaasseess ooff CChhaannggee<br />
The key to coping with change is<br />
actively managing the change process<br />
while enabling people to move through<br />
three phases of the change curve:<br />
1. Awareness. In this phase, leaders<br />
build cognizance that change is coming.<br />
Common emotions include denial, anxiety,<br />
and shock. Productivity and morale<br />
may decline. <strong>Leader</strong>s should help people<br />
understand the new direction and<br />
what options are available to them.<br />
Employees may begin to feel fear, anger,<br />
frustration, and confusion.<br />
2. Acceptance. During this phase,<br />
leaders and employers begin to make<br />
decisions regarding the new change.<br />
This is often a stressful period. People<br />
may engage in approach-avoidance<br />
behavior—they may recognize and<br />
even wish to embrace change, but fear<br />
the negative consequences of giving up<br />
their old way of working. Morale and<br />
productivity dip, but will soon rebound.<br />
3. Adoption. In this phase, employee<br />
skepticism turns to hope, energy, and<br />
enthusiasm, and morale and productivity<br />
are restored. <strong>Leader</strong>s should help<br />
employees explore their new work<br />
behaviors, commit to a new way of<br />
working, and institutionalize the new<br />
ways by ensuring that the company’s<br />
mission, leadership alignment, and<br />
goals support the desired changes.<br />
By focusing on trends in technology,<br />
the workplace and business processes,<br />
leaders can adapt to the new future of<br />
work and enjoy market success. <strong>LE</strong><br />
Matt Schuyler is the Chief HR Officer at Capital One Financial<br />
Corporation. Visit www.capitalone.com.<br />
ACTION: Adapt to the future of work.<br />
10 September 2008 <strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence
<strong>LE</strong>ADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT<br />
Wisdom Management<br />
Link learning and performance.<br />
by Mark Allen<br />
WE’VE EVOLVED FROM<br />
from talking of<br />
continuous learning<br />
and knowledge work to managing<br />
and sharing knowledge. So why aren’t<br />
we seeing more productivity? Why<br />
does learning have a flurry of activity<br />
but a shortage of meaningful results?<br />
Research shows that 60 to 90 percent<br />
of job-related skills and knowledge<br />
acquired in programs are not<br />
being implemented on the job. If 75<br />
percent of the $60 billion U.S. training<br />
investment is being wasted, we’re<br />
wasting $45 billion a year!<br />
This happens because of a failure to<br />
employ wisdom management—a failure<br />
to manage how knowledge is used.<br />
Wisdom management is a planned and<br />
systematic process for managing how people<br />
use and apply their knowledge and<br />
skills in ways that benefit the organization.<br />
TThhrreeee VViittaall LLiinnkkss<br />
To cultivate wisdom management,<br />
make these three vital links:<br />
1. Link learning and wisdom. A corporate<br />
university conducts activities<br />
that cultivate learning, knowledge, and<br />
wisdom. While most CUs focus on<br />
learning and knowledge, few cultivate<br />
wisdom. I advocate that the CU be the<br />
locus for WM. Beyond giving people<br />
knowledge and skills—we need to<br />
ensure that they are being utilized.<br />
2. Link design and results. It’s not<br />
enough to ensure that learning takes<br />
place. Learning without behavior<br />
change doesn’t affect performance. We<br />
want people to do things differently.<br />
And behavior changes should produce<br />
positive results, not negative<br />
results or no change. Training is predicated<br />
on a desire to improve performance.<br />
To know whether training is<br />
beneficial, we need to measure performance<br />
improvement.<br />
When we know a training program<br />
will be evaluated (we’ll measure<br />
whether it improves results), we’re<br />
more likely to design the training in a<br />
way that gets us the results we want.<br />
By building the evaluation in up front,<br />
we help to ensure meeting our goals in<br />
the design and delivery phases. Evalua-<br />
tion is something you build in up front.<br />
To get measurable results, fist define<br />
clearly what success would be—articulate<br />
precisely what results you want<br />
before you design the training. You can<br />
then focus on achieving those results.<br />
Beyond creating a program that delivers<br />
the learning people need to achieve<br />
goals, you need to ensure that the learning<br />
becomes behaviors.<br />
3. Link learning and action. The best<br />
programs ensure transfer of knowledge<br />
and skills to behaviors that enhance<br />
performance and achieve desired results.<br />
Of course, approaches to learning<br />
that try to link coursework to real-work<br />
aren’t new (action learning is predicated<br />
on this concept). What is new is the<br />
idea that all development efforts should<br />
be linked directly to real-world application—and<br />
this process should be man-<br />
aged by the corporate university.<br />
FFoouurr CCoorree PPrriinncciipplleess ooff WWMM<br />
For years we’ve excoriated companies<br />
for not investing in the development<br />
of their people and growing the<br />
capabilities of their employees. Even<br />
worse is when companies invest<br />
money to develop people, but see no<br />
return. While the company that does<br />
nothing gets nothing, at least it doesn’t<br />
waste money. Companies that do it<br />
poorly also get little return, but they’re<br />
also wasting money and time (people<br />
hate sitting in training classes that<br />
have no value, and fail to complete<br />
valueless e-learning programs).<br />
Wisdom management refers to processes<br />
designed to ensure ROI in developing<br />
people. To ensure a successful<br />
WM application, take these four steps:<br />
1. Define the developmental needs of<br />
your organization and its people. I<br />
often see managers using a shotgun<br />
approach to training and development.<br />
They throw a bunch of stuff out<br />
there and hope that something sticks.<br />
My ability to evaluate the effectiveness<br />
of training or development programs<br />
depends on the answer to the question,<br />
“What are you trying to achieve<br />
with this program?” Many people<br />
struggle to answer this question. If you<br />
don’t know what you are trying to do,<br />
I can’t tell you if you succeed. When<br />
you clearly articulate what you are trying<br />
to accomplish, you have a much<br />
better chance of measuring it and succeeding<br />
at it. If you can’t define it, you<br />
can’t achieve it.<br />
2. Determine the best means of giving<br />
people the required knowledge, skills,<br />
and experience. People used to think of<br />
CUs as a catalogue of classes, but there<br />
are many methods for developing people<br />
beyond classroom training. Select<br />
from the menu of choices (the best solution<br />
may be a combination), and try to<br />
execute as well as possible.<br />
3. Translate the development initiative<br />
into behaviors that impact performance.<br />
Whether you choose classroom<br />
training, e-learning, coaching, mentoring,<br />
job rotation, or puppet shows as<br />
your means of development, good<br />
execution means there is some means<br />
of translating that activity into behaviors<br />
that matter. Although I advocate<br />
detailed measurement, the goal is not<br />
evaluation—it is implementation. By<br />
specifying the desired outcomes,<br />
you’re more likely to achieve them. So<br />
the goal is not “spend three months<br />
with a coach” or “take a class for two<br />
weeks.” The goal is, “reduce the number<br />
of employee grievances to zero” or<br />
“create a marketing plan that complements<br />
the strategy.” Clearly stated<br />
goals with measurable outcomes will<br />
get you the results you want.<br />
4. Always ask, What do I need to do<br />
to ensure this developmental activity<br />
delivers the behaviors I want to see<br />
and the results we need to see? If you<br />
keep asking this question, you’ll focus<br />
more on delivering the behaviors and<br />
results and less on activities. The key<br />
is not designing a great curriculum<br />
and getting a terrific instructor—it is<br />
getting results. If you develop this discipline<br />
and change the focus to this<br />
question, you’ll shift the mindset to<br />
one of WM—and consistently achieve<br />
desired results. <strong>LE</strong><br />
Mark Allen, Ph.D. is an educator, consultant, author, speaker,<br />
and faculty member at Pepperdine’s Graziadio School of Business<br />
and Management, and editor of The Next Generation of<br />
Corporate Universities (Pfeiffer) and The Corporate University<br />
Handbook (Amacom). Email mallen@pepperdine.edu.<br />
ACTION: Take four steps of wisdom management.<br />
<strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence September 2008 11
PEOP<strong>LE</strong> GROWTH<br />
Coaching for Growth<br />
This is the best advice you’ll ever get.<br />
by Marshall Goldsmith and Patricia Wheeler<br />
THE BEST COACHING ADVICE YOU’LL<br />
ever receive in life comes from a<br />
wise old person. Listen carefully:<br />
First, take a deep breath. Now,<br />
imagine that you are 95 years old and<br />
about to die. Before you take your last<br />
breath, you are given a wonderful,<br />
beautiful gift: the ability to travel back<br />
in time and talk with the person you<br />
are today. The 95-year-old you has the<br />
chance to help the you of today to<br />
have a great career and a great life.<br />
The 95-year-old you knows what<br />
was really important and what wasn’t;<br />
what really mattered and what<br />
didn’t; what really counted and what<br />
didn’t count at all. What advice does<br />
the wise “old you” have for you? Take<br />
your time. Jot down the answers on<br />
two levels: personal advice and professional<br />
advice. And once you write<br />
down these words, take them to heart.<br />
In a world of performance appraisals,<br />
this may well be the one that matters<br />
most. At the end of life, if the old<br />
you thinks that you did the right thing,<br />
you probably did. If the old you thinks<br />
that you screwed up, you probably<br />
did. At the end of life, you don’t have<br />
to impress anyone else—just the person<br />
you see in the mirror.<br />
FFoouurr RReeccuurrrriinngg TThheemmeess<br />
When a friend once talked with old<br />
people facing death and asked them<br />
what advice they would have given<br />
themselves, their answers were filled<br />
with wisdom—and four themes:<br />
1. Take time to reflect on life and find<br />
happiness and meaning now. A frequent<br />
comment runs along these lines: “I got<br />
so wrapped up in looking at what I<br />
didn’t have that I missed what I did<br />
have. I had almost everything. I wish I<br />
had taken more time to appreciate it.”<br />
2. Look to the present. The great<br />
disease of “I will be happy when…” is<br />
sweeping the world. You know the<br />
symptoms. You start thinking: I’ll be<br />
happy when I get that . . . BMW . . .<br />
promotion . . . status . . . money. The<br />
only way to cure the disease is to find<br />
happiness and meaning now.<br />
3. Don’t get so lost in pleasing the<br />
people who don’t care that you neglect<br />
the people who do—your friends and<br />
family. You may work for a wonderful<br />
company and believe that your contribution<br />
is important. But when you’re<br />
95 and on your death bed, very few of<br />
your fellow employees will be waving<br />
goodbye! Your friends and family will<br />
likely be the only people who care.<br />
4. Give it a try—follow your dreams.<br />
Older people who tried to achieve their<br />
dreams were happier with their lives.<br />
None of us will ever achieve all of our<br />
dreams. If we do, we will just make up<br />
new ones! If we go for it, we can at<br />
least say at the end, “I tried!” instead<br />
of, “Why didn’t I at least try?”<br />
When we interview high-potential<br />
leaders worldwide and ask them: “If<br />
you stay in this company, why will<br />
you stay?”, we hear the same answers:<br />
“I’m finding meaning and happiness<br />
now.” “The work is exciting, and I love<br />
what I am doing.” “I like the people<br />
here. They are my friends. This feels<br />
like a team—like a family. I might<br />
make more money if I left, but I don’t<br />
want to leave the people here.” “I can<br />
follow my dreams. This organization<br />
gives me the chance to grow and do<br />
what I really want to do in life.”<br />
To make a new beginning in life or<br />
in your leadership, look ahead to the<br />
end and then decide what to do.<br />
GGrroowwiinngg IInnttoo SSuucccceessss<br />
Why do some people reach their<br />
creative potential early while equally<br />
talented peers don’t? We’ve all seen the<br />
near-misses: people who have talent to<br />
spare but never quite make it; and<br />
those, like the tortoise in Aesop’s fable,<br />
who enjoy eventual success that once<br />
seemed out of reach to most observers.<br />
If you believe you are born with all<br />
the smarts and gifts you’ll ever have,<br />
you tend to approach life with a fixed<br />
mind-set. However, those who believe<br />
that their abilities can expand over<br />
time live with a growth mind-set—and<br />
they’re much more innovative.<br />
As coaches, we encounter people<br />
who have a stellar track record, off-thechart<br />
IQ, great technical expertise, and<br />
a track history of success—but who<br />
then reach a career plateau. In contrast,<br />
we work with individuals who,<br />
despite a rather pedestrian early track<br />
record, lack of Ivy League pedigree,<br />
surpass those who appear to be the<br />
“chosen ones.” How does this happen—and<br />
what can you do about it?<br />
This is good news for those who do<br />
not grow up feeling chosen or special.<br />
Feeling much more like the tortoise<br />
than the hare, you may stumble along<br />
while others seem to sail through life<br />
easily and successfully—or so it seems.<br />
In reality, the pampered and pedigreed<br />
are often the ones who stumble,<br />
due to adopting a fixed mindset. We’ve<br />
all seen folks who were tapped as stars<br />
early in life. Cheered on by doting,<br />
praise-lavishing parents, they develop<br />
the sense that their talents are Godgiven<br />
qualities that they can count on<br />
for future success.<br />
What’s the problem with this? They<br />
feel entitled to succeed and become riskavoidant,<br />
fearing the embarrassment of<br />
failure. They deal with obstacles by giving<br />
up, feigning disinterest or blaming<br />
others. Or, having enjoyed so many<br />
early wins, they keep on doing what<br />
made them successful, despite all the<br />
changes around them—not a great<br />
recipe for ongoing success.<br />
Mark was a bright, results-oriented<br />
VP in his company and yet he offended<br />
his peers with his brusque style and<br />
impatience. His manager doubted that<br />
he could, or would, change. And Mark<br />
had no patience with fluff. He needed<br />
a clear business case for making any<br />
behavior change. Once he understood<br />
that listening more and increasing his<br />
patience would lead to better buy-in<br />
from others and improve his department’s<br />
product, he embraced the<br />
change enthusiastically. Mark implemented<br />
his development plan diligently<br />
with great results—to the<br />
astonishment of his manager.<br />
What propelled Mark’s progress? He<br />
embraced a mindset of growth. Never<br />
a natural star or charismatic presence,<br />
he’s a regular guy who approached<br />
12 September 2008 <strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence
challenges with curiosity and saw<br />
roadblocks as signs that he needed to<br />
change strategy, increase effort, stretch<br />
himself, or try new behaviors (high<br />
emotional intelligence).<br />
In our early meetings, Mark took a<br />
learner’s approach to his 360-degree<br />
feedback. Although surprised with the<br />
negatives, he didn’t deflect or blame<br />
his stakeholders. Although a very private<br />
man, he faced his fear of disclosing<br />
more about himself to others to<br />
enhance his leadership. In other<br />
words, he embraced the possible.<br />
You can adopt an attitude that<br />
enables you to grow and change.<br />
First, listen to yourself—to the<br />
internal music and lyrics that you hear<br />
inside your head? Are you telling yourself<br />
to give up? That your challenges<br />
are the fault of others, less wonderful,<br />
less “enlightened” people? Or do you<br />
tell yourself that you can figure out<br />
what abilities you need to grow or<br />
stretch toward to succeed? These belief<br />
systems are the underpinning of the<br />
success—and failure—of many.<br />
Second, create a regular time and<br />
space to reflect on who you are—your<br />
beliefs, your vision, your inner dialogue.<br />
This will be unfamiliar and<br />
uncomfortable for those who value<br />
speed and are used to a track record of<br />
stardom. My advice: do it anyway.<br />
Third, find a partner to serve as<br />
“spotter” and dialogue partner as you<br />
grow. This could be a trusted colleague<br />
or an experienced executive coach.<br />
They’ll help you leverage your<br />
strengths and stay out of the way of<br />
your blind spots.<br />
Recently, Mark described how he<br />
now observed patterns in meetings.<br />
“Now that I know myself better,” he<br />
said, “I see how other people use different<br />
behaviors to manage stress. I’m<br />
less impatient with them because I<br />
know what they’re trying to do, and I<br />
don’t let it get to me.” In fact, Mark<br />
now uses his new knowledge in developing<br />
and mentoring others. His<br />
department is delivering results more<br />
effectively, and other leaders are asking<br />
him and his team to participate in<br />
highly visible and strategic projects.<br />
So what started out as a simple selfimprovement<br />
project by an ordinary<br />
guy has turned into a big win for his<br />
company—largely because he has a<br />
mindset of growth. <strong>LE</strong><br />
Marshall Goldsmith is best selling author of What Got You Here<br />
Won’t Get You There. Visit www.MarshallGoldsmithLibrary.com.<br />
Patricia Wheeler is an executive and team coach and Managing<br />
Partner in the Levin Group. E-mail Patricia@TheLevinGroup.com<br />
or call 404 377-9408.<br />
ACTION: Cultivate a mindset of growth.<br />
PERFORMANCE INSPIRATION<br />
Lead Like a Sherpa<br />
Inspire your team to the summit.<br />
by Kevin and Jackie Freiberg<br />
IF YOU BELIEVE THAT AN ORGANIZATION’S<br />
success is as much the will of the<br />
people as it is the will of the leader,<br />
then we as leaders must do whatever<br />
it takes to inspire success.<br />
What plagues most businesses<br />
today? The data on employee engagement,<br />
satisfaction, loyalty and commitment<br />
is shocking! Most people today<br />
feel stuck, stalled, bored, or frustrated—and<br />
some are even actively disengaged<br />
when they come to work.<br />
Problem: There are far too many<br />
Dead People Working today. DPWs are<br />
physically present but psychologically,<br />
emotionally and intellectually<br />
checked-out at work.<br />
This is a big problem because<br />
DPWs won’t provide<br />
your company with the<br />
intellectual and emotional<br />
capital that you need to get<br />
ahead and stay ahead.<br />
Solution: It is time to<br />
think and act like a Sherpa.<br />
We learned some powerful<br />
lessons from the Sherpas<br />
who skillfully and courageously guide<br />
teams to summit Mount Everest. While<br />
preparing for a program for Intel, we<br />
met Dave Arnett, a Director at Intel,<br />
who summited Mount Everest on May<br />
21, 2007. Fewer than 3,000 people have<br />
made it to the summit of Everest, and<br />
Dave is one of them. Last year seven<br />
people died trying, and Dave knew<br />
four of them. It is a daunting journey,<br />
even for the bravest of the brave! Dave<br />
humbly noted that his success in summiting<br />
Everest had everything to do<br />
with the support he gained from his<br />
family, his team, and the gifted Sherpas.<br />
Family. It’s hard to imagine saying<br />
yes to an adventure that could leave<br />
you widowed and all alone to raise two<br />
young daughters, yet Dave had unconditional<br />
support from this family.<br />
Dave’s wife and children were fully<br />
supportive of this crazy journey. They<br />
were with him in spirit and prayer<br />
every step of the way! Is your family<br />
fully supportive of your journey? Are<br />
they willing to give financially, emotionally,<br />
and unselfishly so you can do<br />
whatever it takes to achieve a challenging<br />
professional goal, a dream or even a<br />
personal passion? Maybe you’re not<br />
trying to summit Everest, but what are<br />
you trying to summit? A new project, a<br />
career transition, a personal health or<br />
wellness goal? Part of our ability to<br />
accomplish big things is to know we<br />
have the unconditional love and support<br />
of our family and friends at home.<br />
Your team at home must be your<br />
biggest fans, allies and supporters.<br />
Team. You cannot climb or summit<br />
Everest on your own—it takes a team.<br />
Summiting Everest is about knowing<br />
and trusting members of your team to<br />
be there whenever and wherever you<br />
need them. Do you know and trust<br />
your team inside and out? Do you<br />
know who you can count on in a<br />
pinch? Do you know who provides<br />
intellectual support when the going<br />
gets tough, and who provides emotional<br />
support when things get frustrating?<br />
Who is willing and capable of<br />
doing whatever it takes under stress<br />
and extreme pressure? Is your team<br />
worthy of your trust? Are<br />
you worthy of their trust?<br />
Sherpas. Dave says the<br />
Sherpas are without a<br />
doubt tactical experts and<br />
athletic wonders. However,<br />
after seeing the Sherpas in<br />
action, Dave thinks what<br />
really makes them great is<br />
their ability to truly understand<br />
the dynamics of the<br />
team. Sherpas have to be<br />
gutsy! There are times when a Sherpa<br />
has to make a tough call and tell a<br />
climber that they are a liability to the<br />
team, and that if they continue the<br />
team could die. Are you a liability to<br />
your team? Do you have the guts to act<br />
like a Sherpa and call out the liabilities?<br />
DPWs are serious liabilities. If you are<br />
a DPW or know of one, be a Sherpa—<br />
remind your team of the importance of<br />
team and teamwork.<br />
Every summit, every program,<br />
every project, every new goal must be<br />
embraced by everyone! An organization’s<br />
success is as much the will of the<br />
people as it is the will of the leader. If<br />
people choose not to engage, and<br />
become a liability, everyone suffers. Is<br />
it time to invite people to step up and<br />
be players or stop the climb? <strong>LE</strong><br />
Dr. Kevin and Dr. Jackie Freiberg are speakers, thought leaders<br />
and authors of the best-seller NUTS!, GUTS! and BOOM! Visit<br />
www.freibergs.com or call 619-624-9691.<br />
ACTION: Inspire your team to the summit.<br />
<strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence September 2008 13
PERFORMANCE STANDARD<br />
New Gold Standard<br />
Five factors lead to sustained success.<br />
by Joseph Michelli<br />
WHEN IT COMES TO<br />
refined service<br />
and award-winning<br />
hospitality, The Ritz Carlton Hotel Co.<br />
sets the standard of excellence. With<br />
unyielding attention to detail, staff<br />
members consistently create memorable<br />
experiences for their guests.<br />
As I studied this company, I identified<br />
five factors in its sustained success:<br />
1. Define and refine. Simon Cooper,<br />
president, noted, “You can’t put the<br />
veneer of quality on a business that<br />
lacks a sound foundation. The Gold<br />
Standards, and the disciplined business<br />
practices that emerge from them,<br />
create the platform for our achievements.”<br />
The Gold Standards can be<br />
found on a pocket-sized card carried<br />
as part of the uniform of Ritz-Carlton<br />
employees. The Standards reflect the<br />
service values, credo, motto and three<br />
steps of service each employee is to<br />
use as guidelines for the care they<br />
provide one another and guests.<br />
These values are reinforced daily in<br />
“line-ups” where all employees hear<br />
stories of service excellence in the context<br />
of the mission and culture. <strong>Leader</strong>s<br />
define their culture through their Credo<br />
card, Line-up and Gold Standards, and<br />
they refine their products and service<br />
delivery methods in accord with changing<br />
customer needs. New hotel designs<br />
reflect the uniqueness of the locale and<br />
personal service delivery.<br />
2. Empower through trust. Ritz-Carlton<br />
leaders have created a culture of trust<br />
that begins with a methodical selection<br />
process that assesses and measures the<br />
talents of prospects against the talent<br />
levels of high performers. Once selected,<br />
leaders extensively train new hires<br />
in the operational aspects of their jobs<br />
and in the desired outcomes they want<br />
their employees to produce for customers.<br />
Once staff members understand<br />
those outcomes (memorable<br />
guest experiences and customer<br />
engagement), leaders step back and<br />
allow the frontline to create those outcomes<br />
for the customer. This is evidenced<br />
in the $2,000 per day, per guest<br />
authority given to every staff member,<br />
enabling them to do whatever is nec-<br />
essary to enhance a guest’s stay or<br />
recover service without seeking the<br />
approval of a supervisor.<br />
3. It’s not about you. Since the 1990s,<br />
Ritz-Carlton executives looked outside<br />
their business to drive internal process<br />
innovation. They sought input from<br />
other world-class businesses through<br />
the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality<br />
Award evaluation process. Ritz-Carlton<br />
leadership not only benchmarks other<br />
businesses, but they invest heavily in<br />
systematic listening to their staff, customers<br />
and investors.<br />
Extensive data is secured<br />
from these sources and performance<br />
is measured<br />
against the engagement<br />
level of guests and staff.<br />
<strong>Leader</strong>s understands that<br />
the more they listen to the<br />
needs of those they serve,<br />
the more likely their staff<br />
will be to listen to the needs<br />
of the guests.<br />
4. Deliver WOW. Ritz-Carlton leaders<br />
define the desired memorable and<br />
emotional connection of a guest as a<br />
“Wow” experience. Staff members are<br />
encouraged to personally affect guests<br />
in pursuit of this emotional intensity.<br />
The idea of a “Wow” experience hinges<br />
on delivering service that appeals to<br />
both the thinking and feeling aspects of<br />
the consumer. Twice a week, “wow<br />
stories” are presented during the lineup<br />
process. These stories range from<br />
herculean efforts made by staff to serve<br />
customers (such as constructing a<br />
ramp on their off time so a guest in a<br />
wheelchair could enjoy a sunset on the<br />
beach) to more subtle or smaller acts of<br />
care and concern. In all cases, excellent<br />
service is a reward unto itself. Whether<br />
a staff member works alone or with a<br />
team, service gives back to the giver—<br />
and those acts of giving are held up as<br />
examples of how well-defined values<br />
come alive through the efforts of staff<br />
each day. <strong>Leader</strong>s celebrate and cement<br />
culture by the stories they tell.<br />
5. Leave a lasting footprint. From the<br />
onset, leaders at Ritz-Carlton sought to<br />
build a company with an enduring<br />
legacy. Social responsibility was not a<br />
trendy add-on but a component of its<br />
early mission statements. In addition to<br />
formal giving programs such as<br />
Community Footprints, The Ritz-<br />
Carlton has developed the <strong>Leader</strong>ship<br />
Center to provide training programs in<br />
quality focus and service excellence to<br />
individuals from businesses large and<br />
small. Also, Ritz-Carlton leadership<br />
partners with hotel guests, vendors, and<br />
key account reps to celebrate those relationships<br />
and enable those individuals<br />
to participate with leadership in community<br />
outreach programs.<br />
Consistent application of these leadership<br />
principles has led to legendary<br />
customer service and memorable and<br />
transformational experiences for all<br />
who come in contact with The Ritz-<br />
Carlton, thus setting The New Gold<br />
Standard of excellence.<br />
SShhrriinnkk NNoott——AAddjjuusstt tthhee SSaaiill<br />
While cost-cutting may be inevitable<br />
in tighter economic cycles,<br />
the leaders at Ritz-Carlton<br />
avoid a scarcity mentality<br />
in challenging times:<br />
1. When consumers face<br />
economic challenges, they<br />
often place a greater<br />
emphasis on value. While<br />
many customers will<br />
“pinch pennies” and “clip<br />
coupons” to address financial<br />
hardships, they will<br />
still look for opportunities to “treat”<br />
themselves. When consumers do<br />
spend money freely they will want to<br />
experience true quality and not a<br />
watered-down or corporately scaledback<br />
version of quality.<br />
2. Focused excellence prevails. If cutbacks<br />
are necessary, companies can<br />
and should reallocate resources toward<br />
their core areas of excellence. To be<br />
“excellent” means resisting the urge to<br />
overreach into areas where your products<br />
or service will be mediocre. Doing<br />
a few things expertly beats doing<br />
many things adequately.<br />
3. Inspire staff to focus on purpose and<br />
outcomes, not fulfillment and procedures.<br />
All business is personal. While most<br />
hotel companies that compete for this<br />
market segment have exquisitely clean<br />
and well-appointed facilities, the primary<br />
driver for guest loyalty emerges from<br />
the personal attention and caring of<br />
staff. From the onset of their employee<br />
selection process, leadership at Ritz-<br />
Carlton looks for underlying talent in<br />
service characteristics. They then train<br />
and certify the skills necessary for the<br />
new hires to do their jobs while constantly<br />
linking job function to the overarching<br />
purpose of the business—<br />
namely to provide for “the genuine care<br />
and comfort” of their guest.<br />
14 September 2008 <strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence
4. Empowering the front-line saves<br />
money. While many leaders talk about<br />
their empowered workforce, few put<br />
money behind the hype. Since staff<br />
members (Ladies and Gentlemen) at Ritz-<br />
Carlton, are given the authority to<br />
spend up to $2,000 per day per guest,<br />
without seeking the approval of their<br />
supervisors, front-line workers can<br />
immediately resolve service breakdowns<br />
for guests or simply engage<br />
guests by doing something unexpected<br />
that will make the hotel stay memorable.<br />
The cost-saving nature of this<br />
financial empowerment is derived<br />
from the morale and loyalty of employees,<br />
the clear cost savings of resolving<br />
problems immediately, and the impact<br />
that an empowered workforce has on<br />
customers. Empowered employees<br />
transform satisfied customers into<br />
fully-engaged brand loyalists who<br />
spend more and refer family and<br />
friends to the business.<br />
Rather than contracting or adopting<br />
a defensive posture during economic<br />
uncertainty, The Ritz-Carlton leadership<br />
stays the course. By clearly “defining”<br />
the core components of the company’s<br />
values, quality standards, and service<br />
tradition, Ritz-Carlton communicates<br />
the path by which a guest’s experience<br />
can be elevated, how the staff member<br />
can purposefully add value and the<br />
means by which the company will<br />
thrive. By having every staff member<br />
take time every day at every hotel<br />
worldwide to participate in a process<br />
called line-up, Ritz-Carlton leadership<br />
re-engages staff in a discussion of the<br />
overarching mission they all share.<br />
Further, by being attentive to the need<br />
to “refine” the brand so that it remains<br />
relevant in changing economic times,<br />
for evolving customer segments and in<br />
diverse international markets, leadership<br />
builds on their well-defined culture.<br />
The “It’s not about you” principle<br />
reflects the disciplined practice of listening<br />
to staff, customers, vendors and<br />
all stakeholders to constantly assure<br />
that business does not principally serve<br />
the needs and preferences of leadership.<br />
By adopting a penchant for listening<br />
to stated and unstated needs while<br />
maintaining a passion for service, great<br />
leaders produce businesses that<br />
endure. From the customer’s perspective,<br />
these businesses are extensions of<br />
themselves and not commodities.<br />
Learn from Ritz-Carlton and adjust<br />
to arrive at your desired destination. <strong>LE</strong><br />
Joseph A. Michelli, Ph.D., is a speaker, consultant and author<br />
of THE NEW GOLD STANDARD (McGraw-Hill) and The<br />
Starbucks Experience. Email joseph@themichelliexperience.com.<br />
ACTION: Set your own gold standard.<br />
<strong>LE</strong>ADERSHIP MOMENTUM<br />
Create Momentum<br />
Amplify possibility into reality.<br />
by Kim Marcille<br />
ESCALATING PRICES OF<br />
oil and gas will have<br />
a ripple effect. People<br />
will spend even less, as the price of<br />
heating their homes, getting to work,<br />
and buying groceries bite further into<br />
their stressed budgets. Businesses will<br />
spend less trying to meet their numbers.<br />
Are you ready for the ripple effect?<br />
If not, take heart: By starting now,<br />
you can prepare—and protect your<br />
business from future threat—by applying<br />
the concept of quantum physics<br />
called decoherence where all possibilities<br />
are available at the same time. It’s<br />
the universe’s method for amplifying<br />
specific quantum possibilities while<br />
suppressing others, for turning quantum<br />
possibility into reality.<br />
The key is in choosing the specific,<br />
positive possibilities that<br />
you want to amplify into<br />
reality—such as filling the<br />
sales pipeline with quality<br />
leads—while suppressing<br />
negative possibilities, such<br />
as running out of cash.<br />
How can you amplify the<br />
positive possibilities and<br />
suppress the negative? A<br />
quantum possibility must<br />
possess specific characteristics<br />
in order to be amplified into reality.<br />
Your business possibilities must<br />
have the same characteristics.<br />
When applying decoherence, consider<br />
two main things: 1) the possibilities<br />
that get amplified are robust,<br />
meaning a lot of information exists<br />
about them; and 2) the possibilities<br />
that get amplified are stable, meaning<br />
they remain consistent over time.<br />
The desired possibilities for your<br />
business must be robust and have lots<br />
of stable information about them. You<br />
can create four types of records:<br />
1. Thought records. Do you have a<br />
vision for what you would like your<br />
business to look like by the end of the<br />
year? In five years? How clear is that<br />
vision? Define the specific possibilities<br />
you want to turn into reality.<br />
2. Verbal records. Whom have you<br />
told about your vision? Do your people<br />
clearly understand the vision?<br />
Sharing the vision will create align-<br />
ment. Telling associates may connect<br />
you with resources you might not<br />
have imagined on your own. Telling<br />
your family and friends will set their<br />
expectations and garner their support.<br />
3. Written records. Now that you<br />
know where you’re going, do you have<br />
a written plan to get there? The plan<br />
will help you break down the achievement<br />
of your vision into monthly<br />
goals. For example, how many<br />
prospects must you touch to develop<br />
enough hot leads to result in the number<br />
of closed deals you need to meet<br />
your goals? Does a new compensation<br />
plan need to be written for your salespeople<br />
to drive the right behavior, perhaps<br />
rewarding them for new<br />
business? Writing down your vision is<br />
helpful, as you can refer back to it regularly<br />
to ensure you and your people<br />
are still working toward that target.<br />
4. Action records. If you were to act<br />
as if your vision was definitely going to<br />
become reality, how would your day<br />
be different? Prioritize the actions that<br />
are focused on the creation of your<br />
vision. Would you write a business<br />
plan to raise capital, set an appointment<br />
with a banker to present that<br />
plan, speak at more functions,<br />
buy a targeted list of<br />
prospects, or seek the<br />
advice of a mentor.<br />
Determine which actions<br />
you can you take today in<br />
support of amplifying your<br />
vision into reality.<br />
Remember to believe in<br />
your vision and in your<br />
ability to create what you<br />
envision. There are two<br />
places when you may have trouble<br />
applying decoherence: at the beginning—when<br />
the fear of commitment<br />
prevents you from getting started—<br />
and in the middle—when it sometimes<br />
seems as if nothing is happening. Once<br />
you begin your decoherence plan,<br />
you’re halfway there. By persisting,<br />
even when it seems useless, you’ll see<br />
your vision decohere—become real.<br />
TTaakkee AAccttiioonn oonn YYoouurr PPllaann<br />
To create stability in your desired<br />
business possibilities, continue to generate<br />
new information about your<br />
vision every day. Get it out there!<br />
Think about it, write about it, talk<br />
about it, and take action on it to create<br />
momentum and ride the wave. <strong>LE</strong><br />
Kim Marcille is a speaker, consultant, founder of Possibilities<br />
Amplified, and author of Amp It Up! Secrets from Science for<br />
Creating the Life of Your Dreams. Visit PossibilitiesAmplified.com<br />
or e-mail Kim@possibilitiesamplified.com.<br />
ACTION: Amplify possibilities into reality.<br />
<strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence September 2008 15
COMPETENCY <strong>LE</strong>ARNING<br />
Action Learning<br />
Use it to develop leaders.<br />
by Daniel R. Tobin<br />
ONCE I MET A SENIOR<br />
partner at a large<br />
consulting firm. He<br />
proudly told me about how they planned<br />
to send 2,000 of their brightest associates,<br />
in groups of 200, to two days of lectures<br />
by a leadership guru at a leading business<br />
school. I asked how they would follow up<br />
on the training to ensure that people<br />
applied what they learned to their jobs. He<br />
said, “Oh, they’re all very bright people.<br />
They’ll figure is out.” Right! And more<br />
than $1 million down the drain!<br />
In building leadership pipelines,<br />
many leaders spend much money<br />
providing leadership education to<br />
selected high-potentials. Some employees<br />
may be sent to multi-week executive<br />
development programs at leading<br />
business schools. Others may be sent<br />
for a few days or a week to a seminar<br />
from a training firm. Still other companies<br />
develop their own LD programs,<br />
using internal trainers and<br />
company leaders to provide instruction<br />
or bringing in professors or consultants<br />
from the outside.<br />
Most of these LD efforts don’t give<br />
participants the chance to try out their<br />
new skills within a safe environment<br />
at work. As one executive told me<br />
after returning from a multi-week program<br />
at a business school, “I learned<br />
and changed a lot, but I got back to<br />
my office and nothing there had<br />
changed. Plus, I was backed up in my<br />
work because of my absence. I haven’t<br />
met with my manager to discuss what<br />
I learned or how I might apply it.”<br />
Without a chance to use what was<br />
learned, the investment in an individual’s<br />
education may be wasted if it<br />
makes no difference in the achievement<br />
of personal and organizational goals.<br />
What if this employee’s manager<br />
met with her before the program and<br />
discussed the outline—what topics the<br />
manager felt were most important,<br />
and what she would be expected to<br />
apply to her work once she returned<br />
from the program? What if, on returning<br />
from the program, she met with<br />
her manager to debrief the experience<br />
and develop an action plan for apply-<br />
ing what she learned? And what if<br />
they together defined an action learning<br />
project, with a timeline, milestones,<br />
and a reporting mechanism?<br />
If these steps had been taken before<br />
starting the education program, she<br />
likely would be using what she<br />
learned. Action learning projects ensure<br />
that what is learned gets put to use.<br />
AA SSuucccceessssffuull PPrrooggrraamm DDeessiiggnn<br />
I once designed a two-year LD program<br />
for 35 mid-level managers designated<br />
as having high potential for<br />
future leadership positions. The program<br />
had three core components:<br />
1. A series of two-day educational<br />
sessions were presented quarterly by<br />
business school faculty or consultants<br />
on a variety of topics.<br />
2. At the conclusion of each session,<br />
participants were given an actionlearning<br />
assignment, sometimes as<br />
teams and sometimes as individuals.<br />
3. At the beginning of the next quarterly<br />
session, participants presented<br />
their results and lessons learned to a<br />
panel of senior company executives.<br />
The action-learning assignment<br />
served three purposes: 1) Participants<br />
immediately got to apply some of what<br />
they learned in the education session,<br />
transforming the information they<br />
received into their personal knowledge.2)<br />
Senior executives, in reviewing<br />
the presentations, got to view a number<br />
of people who would not normally<br />
have been in their direct line of sight.<br />
And 3) The executives were able to see<br />
who took leadership positions on the<br />
teams and how effectively participants<br />
worked as part of the ad hoc teams.<br />
What made a good action-learning<br />
project? Since participants all had fulltime<br />
jobs, the projects could not require<br />
more than 15 percent of their time; they<br />
had to be done within the three months<br />
before the next program; and they had<br />
to relate to an organizational goal.<br />
Potential projects came from the<br />
company’s executive committee members.<br />
We suggested that they look at<br />
their meeting minutes from the past<br />
several years and to identify issues that<br />
kept arising, but were never deemed<br />
critical enough to dedicate human and<br />
monetary resources to solve – these<br />
were ideal projects for the LD program.<br />
JJuuddggiinngg PPrroojjeecctt PPeerrffoorrmmaannccee<br />
When we first proposed the actionlearning<br />
projects as part of the program<br />
design, several questions and<br />
concerns were raised:<br />
• What if a team member didn’t pull his<br />
or her weight on the project? We expected<br />
this to occasionally happen, and<br />
wouldn’t we be better off discovering<br />
this about a participant before he or she<br />
was promoted or given greater responsibility?<br />
• What if a participant or team can’t complete<br />
the project in the time allotted? This<br />
was a test of the participants’ planning<br />
and project management skills.<br />
• What if a participant or team tried a new<br />
approach to a problem and failed? When<br />
this happened, we asked participants to<br />
focus their presentation on why the project<br />
failed, what they would do differently<br />
if they were to try it again, and<br />
what they learned from the experience.<br />
Sometimes, more learning comes from a<br />
failed project than a successful one.<br />
When projects were presented to the<br />
executives, judgments were made not<br />
just on the success of the project, but<br />
also on the participants’ roles in each<br />
project: Who led and who followed?<br />
Who put in extra effort and who<br />
slacked off? How well did the team<br />
work together? What were the attitudes<br />
of the participants toward their<br />
projects and their accomplishments?<br />
In one round of the program, two<br />
teams presented their projects, both<br />
with excellent results. At the end of the<br />
first team’s presentation, the team<br />
leader challenged the senior executives:<br />
“Now that we have done all this excellent<br />
work, what are YOU going to do to<br />
ensure that this project doesn’t die, that<br />
the great work we have done gets disseminated<br />
across the company?” When<br />
the second team completed its presentation,<br />
they told the executives: “What<br />
we have demonstrated in this project<br />
can benefit the company more than we<br />
were able to accomplish in three<br />
months. We have already developed a<br />
kit of materials so that others can repli-<br />
16 September 2008 <strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence
cate what we have done in their local<br />
areas. We have sent the kit to key managers<br />
worldwide and told them that<br />
the members of our team are available<br />
to answer questions and to coach them<br />
through the process.”<br />
If you were on the executive panel,<br />
to which of these two teams would you<br />
look to fill a vacant leadership position?<br />
RReettuurrnn oonn IInnvveessttmmeenntt<br />
When we proposed the LD program,<br />
one executive team member asked if<br />
we had done a ROI analysis to justify<br />
the investment. We said that we had<br />
not and would not. We reminded him<br />
of a painful episode in the company’s<br />
history: two years earlier, a product line<br />
wasn’t doing well. The senior executive<br />
who led this product line left the company.<br />
The CEO promoted a mid-level<br />
manager, who had built a good track<br />
record in the two years he’d been with<br />
the company, to fill the vacancy.<br />
The appointment was a disaster. The<br />
person came in “knowing all the<br />
answers” without asking any questions,<br />
and wouldn’t listen to the ideas of anyone<br />
else in the product line. He issued<br />
orders and wouldn’t abide questions or<br />
objections. Within a year, several key<br />
personnel had resigned and market<br />
share eroded even more. Eventually,<br />
this high potential individual was fired,<br />
but the damage was done.<br />
When asked how we could justify<br />
the investment in the LD program, I<br />
asked the executives to consider what<br />
this errant promotion had cost the company.<br />
What would it be worth, I asked,<br />
to be able to test these high-potential<br />
employees before promoting them and<br />
to develop their skills before they were<br />
put into a leadership position? The losses<br />
to the company from that one errant<br />
promotion were many times what the<br />
LD program would cost.<br />
Whether building your LD program,<br />
sending individuals to an external<br />
program, or bringing in leadership<br />
education session from a third-party<br />
provider, your chances of success<br />
improve greatly when you tie actionlearning<br />
projects to the education<br />
effort to ensure that what gets learned<br />
in the classroom gets applied to the<br />
participants’ work. Action learning<br />
projects also provide opportunities to<br />
judge the strengths and weaknesses of<br />
high-potentials before promoting them<br />
into important leadership positions. <strong>LE</strong><br />
Dan Tobin is VP of design and development for the American<br />
Management Association, author of five books on corporate<br />
learning strategies, and coauthor with Margaret Pettingell of<br />
The AMA Guide To Management Development (AMACOM).<br />
ACTION: Tie action learning to your LD program.<br />
PERFORMANCE DIVERSITY<br />
Leading High<br />
Performance<br />
Diversity accelerates innovation.<br />
by Debbe Kennedy<br />
IN EVERY DIRECTION WE<br />
look, a siren is sounding,<br />
calling for new<br />
ideas, innovative thinking, and a<br />
courageous leadership that brings out<br />
the best in all of us to deliver higher<br />
performance, achievement, and contribution.<br />
The urgency asks for more<br />
than traditional top-down or bottomup<br />
approaches. The needs are greater,<br />
the stakes higher, and nature of our<br />
organizations has upped the ante. Us<br />
and them won’t do it. The response<br />
must be a collective one. We can’t opt<br />
out as a cynic, victim, or bystander. All<br />
leaders must show up and step out to<br />
solve pressing problems.<br />
Putting our differences<br />
to work is the most powerful<br />
accelerator for generating<br />
new ideas, creating<br />
innovative solutions, executing<br />
strategies, and<br />
engaging everyone. It is<br />
the renewable source of<br />
energy—fuel for the engine<br />
of growth and prosperity.<br />
The breakthrough is the<br />
element of diversity, as real<br />
value lies at the intersection of our differences.<br />
This encompasses our thinking<br />
styles, problem-solving methods,<br />
experiences, competencies, work<br />
habits, management styles, ethnic origins,<br />
cultural backgrounds, and generational<br />
insight. Our differences give<br />
each of us a unique perspective.<br />
As Dr. Shirley Ann Jackson said:<br />
“Innovation is advanced by chance,<br />
challenge, choices, and informed coincidence.<br />
It is nourished and powered<br />
by the full breadth of diversity and by<br />
the quest for excellence.”<br />
The magic begins when we come together.<br />
The secret is learning how, when,<br />
and where to tap into all the wealth of<br />
insight, wisdom, and new thinking to<br />
solve problems, create new products<br />
and services, and build stronger communities<br />
that benefit everyone.<br />
I once visited with 550 leaders at an<br />
online <strong>Leader</strong>ship Forum to pinpoint<br />
problems standing in the way of inno-<br />
vation, change, and growth; address gaps<br />
between leaders and employees; and<br />
decide how to put differences to work<br />
to innovate and boost performance.<br />
See if these sound familiar to you<br />
and what other truths you might add:<br />
• Our culture isn’t open to new<br />
ideas; process is more important. There<br />
is little interest in change and innovation.<br />
Everyone sees the need; no one<br />
wants to take the risk.<br />
• Gender, race, and age still play a<br />
role in acceptance of new ideas. If you<br />
think differently or ask too many questions,<br />
you lose the respect of leaders.<br />
• Senior leaders take ideas and present<br />
them as their own. The focus is on<br />
executing strategy; they forget that people<br />
are leading the execution and show<br />
little interest in what people have to say.<br />
These issues prohibit putting our<br />
differences to work. They erode trust,<br />
productivity, and achievement. Are<br />
you leaving similar impressions?<br />
You don’t want to have members of<br />
your team thinking this way, but it isn’t<br />
what you think you are doing that matters—it<br />
isn’t what you’ve said, think<br />
you’ve said, or wish you’d said: it’s what<br />
others perceive and receive from you that<br />
may restrict them from<br />
delivering the results, innovation,<br />
and performance.<br />
TThhrreeee IIddeeaass ttoo GGeett SSttaarrtteedd<br />
Today we can all influence<br />
positive outcomes—<br />
this is leadership. The<br />
landscape for how we do<br />
this continues to expand<br />
across differences, distance,<br />
culture, technology.<br />
Here are three powerful ways for<br />
leaders to put differences to work:<br />
• Consciously choose your words. Cut<br />
the buzzwords and jargon. They are<br />
empty and meaningless. Be aware of<br />
your spoken and written words. Aim<br />
to connect the people you serve.<br />
• Take time to get to know people.<br />
Develop a curiosity about people and<br />
their unique experience, perspective,<br />
and differences. This knowledge will<br />
help tap into the talent they possess, so<br />
they can accomplish great things.<br />
• Create a perpetual practice of rich<br />
communication. Make checking in with<br />
one another a routine way of boosting<br />
performance. Ask a few questions:<br />
What’s going well? What isn’t? What<br />
are we going to do about it? Listen.<br />
Let’s put our differences to work. <strong>LE</strong><br />
Debbe Kennedy is CEO of the Global Dialogue Center and<br />
<strong>Leader</strong>ship Solutions and author of Putting Our Differences to<br />
Work. Visit www.puttingourdifferencestowork.com.<br />
ACTION: Put your differences to work.<br />
<strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence September 2008 17
<strong>LE</strong>ADERSHIP RECOGNITION<br />
<strong>Leader</strong>ship Potential<br />
How can you best recognize it?<br />
by Ram Charan<br />
EVEN THE BEST<br />
coaches can’t build<br />
championship teams if<br />
they pick the wrong players. So, learn<br />
to spot high-potential leaders early,<br />
treat them as such, and be clear about<br />
the earmarks of leadership potential.<br />
Do you know a leader when you see<br />
one? If you have the wrong notion of<br />
what a leader really is and does and<br />
focus on the wrong people, all your<br />
development efforts can’t deepen the<br />
leadership pool. Brilliant strategists,<br />
creative geniuses, financial engineers,<br />
hard workers, and other bright people<br />
command our attention and respect.<br />
Unaware of their shortcomings and<br />
driven to succeed, such experts may<br />
push for leadership jobs, persuading—even<br />
intimidating—their bosses<br />
to promote them. But many lack<br />
essential leadership traits. And without<br />
a natural ability to lead, they’re<br />
unlikely to succeed as high-level leaders<br />
outside their domains of expertise.<br />
What do natural leaders look like at<br />
25 or 45? Attempts to answer that<br />
question take the form of lists of qualities;<br />
however, these can be misleading.<br />
PPeeooppllee aanndd BBuussiinneessss AAccuummeenn<br />
One way to think about the talent<br />
or inner engine of a leader is to think<br />
of two strands of a helix: people acumen<br />
(the ability to harness people’s<br />
energy) and business acumen (knowing<br />
how a business makes money).<br />
These strands are largely in place in<br />
individuals by their twenties. After<br />
that, we can test for people and business<br />
acumen and expand these capabilities,<br />
but we can’t implant them in<br />
mature people who lack them entirely.<br />
People acumen. <strong>Leader</strong>ship is predicated<br />
on the ability to mobilize others<br />
to accomplish a vision, goal, or task.<br />
<strong>Leader</strong>s can’t do everything; they get<br />
other people to do things by managing.<br />
They increase their capacity—the<br />
ability to get more done—through delegation<br />
combined with follow-through.<br />
They set expectations, get the best people<br />
to do what needs to be done, and<br />
oversee relationships to ensure that<br />
destructive or self-interested behaviors<br />
don’t subvert the common purpose.<br />
You know you have a leader with<br />
people acumen when you see evidence<br />
that the person selects the right people<br />
and motivates them, gets them working<br />
well as a team, and diagnoses and<br />
fixes problems in coordination and relationship<br />
with groups of people.<br />
Real leaders enthusiastically select<br />
people who are better than they are to<br />
lift the organization. They motivate<br />
people and develop them as conditions<br />
change, retaining those who<br />
advance the business and<br />
deselect with dignity those<br />
who don’t. Such leaders<br />
show a repeated pattern of<br />
accurately identifying other<br />
leaders’ talents, helping<br />
them flourish, or easing<br />
them into other jobs where<br />
their talents fit better. You<br />
can often identify a true<br />
leader because the people<br />
working under that person are of high<br />
caliber, are energized, and have a natural<br />
affinity for the leader.<br />
<strong>Leader</strong>s with people acumen get the<br />
most out of their people by setting<br />
clear goals, then giving feedback and<br />
coaching judiciously to help them<br />
achieve them. Most use key performance<br />
indicators that measure progress in<br />
quantitative terms and influence<br />
behaviors. They watch for problems<br />
that might hinder achieving the KPIs<br />
and give people unvarnished feedback<br />
when someone is not up to the task.<br />
<strong>Leader</strong>s with people acumen anticipate<br />
problems. They size up the group<br />
dynamics, pinpoint simmering conflicts,<br />
draw them to the surface, and intervene<br />
when they detect behavior that disrupts<br />
performance. They also cultivate social<br />
networks that include not only subordinates,<br />
peers, and superiors but often<br />
extend to customers, suppliers, regulators,<br />
politicians, and interest groups.<br />
Business acumen. Every successful<br />
leader understands how the business<br />
makes money by managing the profit<br />
and loss (P&L) and balance sheet.<br />
Managing the P&L requires leaders to<br />
consider conflicting factors and incomplete<br />
or distorted information and<br />
make trade-offs with the goal of making<br />
money and generating cash on a<br />
sustained basis. <strong>Leader</strong>s intuitively<br />
understand the connections between<br />
customers, profits, money they borrow,<br />
and money they take in. They have a<br />
knack for making the right trade-offs<br />
and decisions to keep the cash flowing.<br />
You can see such acumen in some<br />
leaders at low levels and in early stages<br />
of their careers. They sense of how their<br />
company makes money, what it offers<br />
customers, and how it compares with<br />
competitors. They see the relationships<br />
between the variables, determine which<br />
are most important, and make decisions<br />
that deliver clear, measurable results.<br />
As the scope of a job increases, so<br />
do the variables, uncertainty, and complexity.<br />
The leader needs greater mental<br />
breadth and depth to cut through to<br />
the fundamentals and make decisions.<br />
The search for business acumen will<br />
help keep other traits and skills in perspective.<br />
Business acumen<br />
defines the substance of the<br />
message being communicated.<br />
Some young leaders<br />
can excite people to deliver<br />
on stretch goals, but can<br />
they define direction? Are<br />
they decisive? Can they sort<br />
through alternatives to find<br />
the right pathway forward?<br />
Can they use their acumen<br />
to choose the right goals and KPIs? With<br />
practice, any leader can improve, but<br />
some leaders are naturally better at it.<br />
HHooww ttoo SSppoott aa LLeeaaddeerr<br />
Look for actions, decisions, and behaviors<br />
that reveal leadership potential:<br />
Is her ambition clearly for a leadership<br />
role? Does she take pride in bringing<br />
together and motivating others to<br />
achieve goals? Is she curious about subjects<br />
outside her area of expertise? Does<br />
she grasp the business and basics of<br />
moneymaking? Can she articulate clearly<br />
the requirements for doing her boss’s<br />
job well? Is she continually learning?<br />
Does she deliver extraordinary results?<br />
Does she like to work with diverse,<br />
high-caliber people? How driven and<br />
passionate is she about leading? Is she<br />
dealing with complex and uncertain situations<br />
and using occasional failure as<br />
a chance to learn? Does she continue to<br />
build new skills and hone her personality<br />
traits to achieve her dream?<br />
Finding leaders can’t be left to<br />
chance or to mechanical processes that<br />
create false confidence that the company<br />
is developing leaders and succession<br />
candidates. To build great leaders at all<br />
levels, you must first find them. <strong>LE</strong><br />
Ram Charan is coauthor of Execution and The Game Changer<br />
(Crown Business). Visit www.ram-charan.com.<br />
ACTION: Recognize your leadership talent.<br />
18 September 2008 <strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence
PERFORMANCE EXECUTION PEOP<strong>LE</strong> ONBOARDING<br />
Strategy Execution<br />
Go with a complete program.<br />
by Gary Harpst<br />
HOW CAN YOU CONsistently<br />
execute<br />
your strategy? You need<br />
a complete program. Piecemeal attempts<br />
don’t last. Sustainability, the capacity to<br />
maintain the necessary balance between<br />
strategy and execution, and doing so<br />
while overcoming hurdles, requires a<br />
program consisting of four elements:<br />
1. Repeatable methodology to drive<br />
learning and understanding. To balance<br />
strategy and execution,<br />
you need to have a welldefined,<br />
repeatable methodology<br />
that includes strategy, planning,<br />
organizing, execution,<br />
innovation, and learning. The<br />
purpose is to accelerate the<br />
continuous learning of proven<br />
best practices. Without a stepby-step<br />
approach, learning<br />
becomes an endless process of missteps,<br />
trial and error, and firefighting.<br />
2. Accountability coaching to nurture<br />
and nudge and stay the course.<br />
Accountability is required because<br />
someone needs to be off the field to be<br />
objective about what’s going on. The<br />
need for coaching never stops. Coaches<br />
help people improve the details and<br />
direction of their performance.<br />
An accountability coach is trained<br />
and certified in the repeatable methodology<br />
and guides its use. The coach<br />
provides insight on where to start,<br />
how fast to go, and what to do next;<br />
the coach also provides encouragement<br />
and advice, and brings a broader<br />
perspective, drawing on years of<br />
experience working with other teams.<br />
The law of entropy holds that any<br />
closed system will eventually decline<br />
or become disorganized unless more<br />
energy is put into the system. Disorganized<br />
companies drift into entropy,<br />
lacking strong self-discipline and a<br />
systematic approach. They need the<br />
benefit of some outside energy: an<br />
experienced, veteran coach who provides<br />
accountability and perspective.<br />
Accountability coaching is most<br />
effective when it’s done face-to-face.<br />
We believe this is because successful<br />
coaching relationships are based on a<br />
high level of trust. This must be someone<br />
who you believe has your best<br />
interest at heart and will tell you the<br />
truth. This kind of relationship is only<br />
developed over time and in person.<br />
This view is absolutely contrary to the<br />
trend in today’s Internet world,<br />
toward increased self-service, or a doit-yourself<br />
mentality.<br />
3. Execution system to engage everyone,<br />
everyday, in real-time alignment.<br />
A well-defined approach with the right<br />
people in the room produces high<br />
engagement among the leaders. But<br />
those who are not involved in the<br />
strategic planning process aren’t nearly<br />
so engaged. As we experimented with<br />
ways for increasing total engagement,<br />
we realized that everyone needs to be<br />
involved in the planning (to an appropriate<br />
degree) and connect his or her<br />
activities with the strategic plans of the<br />
company. We realized that we could<br />
use technology to help workers<br />
make real-time decisions<br />
about what work they should<br />
do, in what order, and how to<br />
prioritize interruptions and<br />
unexpected requests for their<br />
time and attention. An execution<br />
system provides a<br />
process for marrying company<br />
plans with individual<br />
management of daily activities.<br />
4. Community learning to share and<br />
reinforce best practices and accelerate<br />
learning. This element helps address<br />
the breadth of expertise and the economic<br />
barriers required for implementation.<br />
Community learning derives its<br />
synergy from the other three elements.<br />
The rate of learning accelerates when a<br />
group of people share a repeatable<br />
methodology, use the same terms and<br />
techniques, and when accountability<br />
coaches pool their experiences in<br />
applying the methodology to different<br />
business scenarios.<br />
The goal of these four elements is to<br />
engage every worker, every day, in<br />
proactively making more aligned decisions,<br />
rather than relatively fixing misalignments<br />
later. This, too, is a learning<br />
objective for the entire company. Each<br />
function becomes a type of learning<br />
community inside a larger community.<br />
Repeatable methodology is a blueprint<br />
for adopting best-practices. Accountability<br />
coaching, execution system, and community<br />
learning are how the organization<br />
implements and sustains practice of the<br />
methodology. These four components<br />
form the complete program for growing<br />
your capacity to execute strategy. <strong>LE</strong><br />
Gary Harpst is the author of Six Disciplines Execution<br />
Revolution. Visit www.GaryHarpst.com.<br />
ACTION: Execute your business strategy.<br />
Onboarding Tips<br />
Learn these from great leaders.<br />
by Howard M. Guttman<br />
HOW DO YOU KEEP UP<br />
the momentum for<br />
high-performance in the<br />
face of the rapidly revolving door?<br />
About one in four employees departs<br />
for other pastures every year—and<br />
that doesn’t include those who are<br />
fired. Add to that the number of internal<br />
transfers and the repercussions of<br />
mergers and acquisitions, and churn<br />
becomes a major challenge.<br />
One way to keep the revolving door<br />
from spinning out of control is have an<br />
exciting long-term strategy and business<br />
prospects, with effective operations,<br />
and progressive HR policies. Even<br />
so, you can’t stop turnover, since highperformers<br />
are targets of headhunters.<br />
Turnover puts high priority on finding<br />
the best way to bring in new players<br />
and integrate them into the culture.<br />
Onboarding within a high-performing<br />
culture is challenging. Newcomers tend<br />
to feel as if they’re entering a brave<br />
new world in which all the axioms that<br />
worked for them in hierarchical organizations<br />
are suddenly up for grabs.<br />
Alignment is not only about reconstituting<br />
the performance context—<br />
strategy, goals, roles, accountabilities,<br />
and ground rules for decision making—but<br />
about reshaping business<br />
relationships. The alignment process<br />
creates a powerful, shared experience<br />
in which leaders and players learn to<br />
show up “for real”: to be candid,<br />
depersonalize, confront one another,<br />
and hold one another accountable.<br />
TTaakkee TThheessee FFoouurr TTiippss<br />
Here are four tips from leaders who<br />
have met the onboarding challenge:<br />
1. Start at the beginning with the<br />
interview process. Let candidates know<br />
what to expect. In his initial contact<br />
with candidates for executive positions<br />
at Chico’s, CEO Scott Edmonds explains<br />
the horizontal model and the company’s<br />
commitment to it. He tells them<br />
that working at Chico’s will differ from<br />
their past experience: that they will be<br />
held accountable by both their leaders<br />
and peers, that they’ll be expected to<br />
deliver on commitments or explain<br />
why they can’t, that a big part of their<br />
<strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence September 2008 19
compensation is based on teamwork.<br />
He then probes for “fit and feel.”<br />
The mindset of great players includes:<br />
thinking like a director, putting the team<br />
first, embracing accountability, and<br />
being comfortable with discomfort. Use<br />
these attributes to screen candidates. To<br />
what extent do they measure up? Does<br />
their background reveal clues to how<br />
successful they’ll be? Question carefully.<br />
For example, ask, “What is the biggest<br />
mistake you have made professionally?”<br />
If the answer comes back, “I’m an<br />
overachiever,” or “My standards are too<br />
high,” be wary. A candidate who substitutes<br />
disguised strengths for weaknesses<br />
may not accept accountability—much<br />
less hold peers and leaders accountable.<br />
2. Stay close to new hires by putting<br />
in place a weekly feedback session to<br />
answer questions and address needs<br />
and concerns. Include new hires in<br />
their team’s reassessment and skill<br />
development sessions. At Chico’s, all<br />
employees who have joined the company<br />
in the preceding half year attend<br />
an off-site meeting devoted to continuing<br />
the horizontal integration process.<br />
3. Role-model. Years ago, a team of<br />
sociologists studied the behavior of<br />
straight-out-of-the-academy police<br />
officers. They were brimming with<br />
pride and enthusiasm; however, this<br />
quickly turned to cynicism once they<br />
joined the police force. The behavior<br />
role-modeled by supervisors and peers<br />
was decisive in their change of heart.<br />
David Greenberg, senior VP of HR<br />
for L’Oréal, notes: “When you join our<br />
team and see all members role-modeling<br />
certain behaviors, you quickly see<br />
how to do it. You see that everyone<br />
has a voice, that disagreement is okay,<br />
that conflict is dealt with by depersonalizing.<br />
If someone is marching in a<br />
different direction, you see them being<br />
held accountable. This sets up and<br />
makes clear what the expectation is.”<br />
4. Provide mentors. Mars Inc. finds<br />
mentoring to be effective in bringing new<br />
hires into the performance culture. Each<br />
member is “adopted” by another player,<br />
who takes responsibility for daily reinforcement<br />
of high-performing behaviors.In<br />
another organization, senior<br />
leaders are paired with up-and-comers.<br />
Bringing on new talent regenerates<br />
an organization by importing new talent,<br />
skills, perspectives, and energy. Harnessing<br />
these “gifts” early is a challenge.<br />
Manage this resource-for-renewal effectively<br />
to achieve standout performance. <strong>LE</strong><br />
Howard M. Guttman is principal of Guttman Development<br />
Strategies and author of Great Business Teams (Wiley). Email<br />
hmguttman@guttmandev.com or visit www.guttmandev.com.<br />
ACTION: Improve your onboarding of new talent.<br />
<strong>LE</strong>ADERSHIP CREATIVITY<br />
Creative <strong>Leader</strong>s<br />
Their followers say, “Let’s go.”<br />
by Mary Jo Huard<br />
PROACTIVE, CREATIVE<br />
leaders often recognize<br />
opportunity, step<br />
into it, use public media, keep the message<br />
simple, and repeat it often to set a<br />
change agenda. <strong>Leader</strong>s don’t merely<br />
study people—they change their lives,<br />
mixing them up in new ways, pushing<br />
them into new arrangements, persuading<br />
them that they can transcend their limits.<br />
We recognize their leadership, but<br />
how do we account for it while recognizing<br />
their differences? Some are calculating;<br />
others are free spirits. Some<br />
seek power; others seeks service and<br />
experience. Some want to reorder society<br />
according to their plan; others seek<br />
to discover societies and learn from<br />
them. Consider these five principles.<br />
Principle 1: We recognize leaders by<br />
their followers. We identify<br />
people as leaders because<br />
of how others behave. We<br />
have seen others falling<br />
into step behind these leaders—to<br />
adopt their goals,<br />
follow their plan, cite their<br />
ideas as the right ones, and<br />
make choices for themselves<br />
based on what the<br />
leader has said or done.<br />
Principle 2: Followers<br />
give permission to lead, not superiors.<br />
Some leaders aren’t appointed to their<br />
positions of leadership—they are chosen.<br />
Their ideas on various subjects—<br />
culture, learning, change, growth—are<br />
accepted by those who follow them.<br />
Principle 3: Since leaders are chosen<br />
by followers, they may be found anywhere.<br />
We may find them in any profession<br />
or occupation. <strong>Leader</strong>s are found<br />
not just in managerial suites but anywhere<br />
one person has a chance to influence<br />
others. <strong>Leader</strong>ship doesn’t even<br />
require face-to-face contact: leaders can<br />
influence through arts and media—television,<br />
books, music, dance. We must<br />
help people understand whether and<br />
how they may want to lead, what kind<br />
of leadership is needed in a situation,<br />
and how selected leaders currently perform.<br />
We can support a chosen or aspiring<br />
leader in achieving outcomes that<br />
benefit all of us. We can encourage the<br />
person, provide feedback, share the<br />
effort and mentor and offer opportunities<br />
for the person to lead.<br />
Principle 4: <strong>Leader</strong>ship needs are met<br />
to the extent the group capitalizes on<br />
its own diverse talents and interests.<br />
The more diverse a group, the more<br />
likely it is to succeed. When diversity<br />
is valued, the group openly accepts<br />
contributions from all members, and<br />
leading and following are seen as<br />
equally important roles.<br />
Principle 5: Putting people first<br />
means letting people lead. It means<br />
inviting, recognizing, celebrating, and<br />
rewarding leadership and followership<br />
all the time—not looking at leadership<br />
as a static set of traits or style. The<br />
“command and control” mentality of<br />
the pyramid structure is collapsing.<br />
Until we clearly understand the<br />
dynamic, relational and multi-dimensional<br />
aspects of leadership, our “decision-makers”<br />
will remain barriers to<br />
developing the effective leaders and<br />
committed followers. As Warren<br />
Bennis said: “Management is getting<br />
people to do what needs to be done.<br />
<strong>Leader</strong>ship is getting people to want to<br />
do what needs to be done. Managers<br />
push—leaders pull. Managers command—leaderscommunicate.”<br />
WWaanntteedd:: CCrreeaattiivvee LLeeaaddeerrss<br />
To maintain world leadership,<br />
you must reconceptualize<br />
your business.<br />
Better quality and service<br />
are essential, but they are<br />
not enough. Creativity and<br />
innovation are the only<br />
engines that will drive lasting<br />
success. Using a set of proven tools<br />
can advance creativity and innovation.<br />
Edward de Bono coined the phrase<br />
Lateral Thinking, defined as “A way of<br />
thinking that seeks the solution to<br />
intractable problems through unorthodox<br />
methods or elements which would<br />
normally be ignored in logical thinking.”<br />
TQM and downsizing—doing more<br />
with less—are necessary but insufficient.<br />
You need creativity to find better ways<br />
of doing things. When you have wrung<br />
out all the fat, excess, and expense,<br />
you won’t get any more benefit out<br />
your efforts without creativity.<br />
Investing in creativity is inexpensive<br />
compared to anything else—and the<br />
results will be dramatic. As Edward de<br />
Bono said, Ideas are the currency of success<br />
—they separate you from your competition. <strong>LE</strong><br />
Mary Jo Huard, founder of Southwest Training Institute, specializes<br />
in team and leadership development. Call 888-978-6632,<br />
email mjhuard@swtinstitute.com or visit www.swtinstitute.com.<br />
ACTION: Invest in creativity.<br />
20 September 2008 <strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence
Get Started<br />
Today!<br />
<strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence<br />
Celebrating 25 Years of Excellence<br />
Team <strong>Leader</strong>ship<br />
($10/month)<br />
<strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence<br />
brings together the best<br />
thinking in the world, from<br />
all the top practioners, in a<br />
time-effective format.<br />
Self <strong>Leader</strong>ship<br />
($8/month)<br />
Personal Excellence<br />
focuses on seven dimensions<br />
of personal development<br />
and leadership.<br />
<strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence<br />
■ 1-year (12 issues) $129<br />
■ 2-year (24 issues) $219<br />
■ 3-year (36 issues) $269<br />
Recent contributors include: Marshall Goldsmith, Jim Collins, Tom Peters, Anne Mulcahy,<br />
Warren Bennis, Michael Porter, Margaret Wheatley, Patrick Lencioni, and many others!<br />
Sales/Service <strong>Leader</strong>ship<br />
($5/month)<br />
Sales & Service Excellence<br />
covers seven dimensions of<br />
sales, marketing, and service<br />
excellence.<br />
Master of Excellence <strong>Leader</strong>ship Package<br />
• 1-year <strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence<br />
• Your choice of 1-year Sales & Service<br />
Excellence or Personal Excellence<br />
• 20-Year Instant Consultant leadership<br />
library CD<br />
• 3-book package on leadership*<br />
■ $329 (save over $150)**<br />
Sales & Service Excellence<br />
■ 1-year (12 issues) $59<br />
■ 2-year (24 issues) $99<br />
■ 3-year (36 issues) $139<br />
Recent contributors include: Tom Hopkins, Jim Rohn, Dianna Booher, Oren Harari, Debbie<br />
Allen, Adrian Gostick, T. Scott Gross, Brian Tracy, Jeff Thull, and many others!<br />
“Sales and Service Excellence is crisp, succinct, and actionable—a nice change from<br />
Harvard Business Review, whose articles are interesting but too academic to be useful.”<br />
—PETER G. BALBUS, CEO & MANAGING DIRECTOR OF PRAGMAXIS<br />
Personal Excellence<br />
■ 1-year (12 issues) $99<br />
■ 2-year (24 issues) $129<br />
■ 3-year (36 issues) $199<br />
Recent contributors include: Laura Schlessinger, Tony Alessandra, Tom DeCotiis, Kurt<br />
DuNard, Bob Davies, Marshall Goldsmith, Wayne Dyer, Peter Block, and many others!<br />
“Personal Excellence is the only reading you’ll need to do for continual self-improvement<br />
both personally and professionally!”<br />
—SHAR<strong>LE</strong>NE HAWKES, FORMER MISS AMERICA, AWARD-WINNING ESPN BROADCASTER<br />
Fax this form to 801-377-5960, call 1-877-250-1983,<br />
email custserv@eep.com or visit www.<strong>Leader</strong>Excel.com<br />
For 25 years, our three monthly magazines<br />
have been the source for the best and<br />
brightest insights from all the top consultants,<br />
coaches, authors, and executives.<br />
Use our FREE Development Tools:<br />
• Personal Excellence Plan, an easy-to-use<br />
guide designed to help you create and implement<br />
vision, mission, goals, and priorities.<br />
• Excellence Worksheet, the perfect way to<br />
bring Excellence into your personal study<br />
or team meeting.<br />
20-Year Instant<br />
Consultant<br />
CD archive: comprehensive,<br />
searchable database<br />
of the best<br />
ideas and strategies<br />
on management,<br />
leadership, and productivity.<br />
Instantly access the perfect article<br />
for your presentation, meeting, or personal<br />
study with over 3,200 articles by<br />
best-selling authors, leadership experts,<br />
coaches, and consultants.<br />
CD or Online Access:<br />
■ $199<br />
Please start my subscription!<br />
Please sign me up for the item(s) checked.<br />
Name ___________________________<br />
Company_________________________<br />
Address __________________________<br />
_________________________________<br />
_________________________________<br />
Phone ___________________________<br />
Email ____________________________<br />
■ Visa ■ MC ■ Amex ■ Disc ■ Bill me<br />
# ______________________ exp. _____<br />
Signature _________________________<br />
<strong>LE</strong>ADERSHIP<br />
PERFORMANCE SYSTEM<br />
*Books may be different than shown. ** For Canadian and International subscriptions, add $20 U.S. postage per year—all three publications include <strong>Leader</strong>ship Excellence, Sales and Service Excellence, and Personal Excellence.