01.03.2013 Views

d(GC) - Association of Biotechnology and Pharmacy

d(GC) - Association of Biotechnology and Pharmacy

d(GC) - Association of Biotechnology and Pharmacy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Current Trends in <strong>Biotechnology</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Pharmacy</strong><br />

Vol. 6 (2) 241-254 April 2012, ISSN 0973-8916 (Print), 2230-7303 (Online)<br />

was added <strong>and</strong> were kept for 2 h on rocker<br />

shaker for equilibration. The resin was allowed<br />

to settle <strong>and</strong> the supernatant was used to quantify<br />

for GSH content. The resin was washed twice<br />

with the equilibration buffer. Adsorbed GSH was<br />

calculated by subtracting amt obtained in<br />

supernatant from the initial sample <strong>of</strong> the same<br />

pH. Thus, bound percentage was calculated<br />

using the following formula.<br />

Total GSH content <strong>of</strong> bound<br />

% BOUND = X 100 (4)<br />

Total GSH content in loaded<br />

The pH with maximum binding was binding pH,<br />

<strong>and</strong> that with least binding can be used as elution<br />

pH. The resins were regenerated with 0.5 M<br />

NaOH <strong>and</strong> reused.<br />

Determination <strong>of</strong> static binding capacity <strong>and</strong><br />

further purification by column<br />

chromatography: Different dilutions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

filtered sample containing different<br />

concentrations <strong>of</strong> GSH (0.5 to 3.5 mg/mL) were<br />

prepared using phosphate buffer <strong>of</strong> pH 7. These<br />

dilutions were loaded to 0.5 mL <strong>of</strong> Amberlite IR<br />

120 H previously equilibrated with binding buffer<br />

at 25±2 °C) <strong>and</strong> kept for equilibration. After<br />

equilibration it was allowed to settle; the<br />

supernatant was removed <strong>and</strong> quantified for<br />

GSH. The isotherms obtained by plotting<br />

concentrations <strong>of</strong> GSH adsorbed (q*) as (µg/mL<br />

<strong>of</strong> resin) vs corresponding equilibrium<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> GSH in the supernatant (C*) (i.e.<br />

unadsorbed concentration; µg/mL), this signify<br />

the nature <strong>of</strong> adsorption. The amt <strong>of</strong> GSH bound<br />

to the adsorbent q * 1<br />

*<br />

q<br />

k d 1 1<br />

= × + *<br />

q max C q max<br />

was calculated as the<br />

difference between the total amt <strong>of</strong> GSH loaded<br />

<strong>and</strong> that present in the supernatant after 2 h <strong>of</strong><br />

equilibration. Maximum adsorption capacity qmax was determined from the plot <strong>of</strong> q* vs C*<br />

(isotherm) <strong>and</strong> the type <strong>of</strong> isotherm was found<br />

by plotting a graph <strong>of</strong> 1/q* vs 1/C*.<br />

Adsorption isotherm equation:<br />

Enhanced Production <strong>of</strong> Glutathione<br />

Where k d = Langmuir isotherm constant.<br />

Rearranging Eq. (5), we get,<br />

(5)<br />

(6)<br />

245<br />

Value <strong>of</strong> k d can be determined from straightline<br />

plot <strong>of</strong> 1/q* against 1/C*. The intercept <strong>of</strong><br />

such plots on the 1/q* axis is at 1/q max <strong>and</strong> slope<br />

is k d /q max .<br />

A batch study was carried out on strong<br />

cation exchange resin Amberlite IR 120H packed<br />

in column <strong>of</strong> diameter 1.1 cm, with bed height<br />

5.7 mL. The headspace <strong>of</strong> the column was filled<br />

with buffer completely to avoid any air gap <strong>and</strong><br />

then equilibrated with acetate buffer (pH 4.0).<br />

Supernatant obtained after ammonium sulphate<br />

precipitation was mixed with buffer <strong>and</strong> loaded<br />

on the column until exhaustion point.<br />

Concentration <strong>of</strong> GSH to be loaded was<br />

calculated according to static binding capacity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the resin. The pH <strong>of</strong> the sample was kept at 4<br />

to ensure binding <strong>of</strong> the GSH to the matrix.<br />

Volumetric flow rate <strong>of</strong> 0.5 mL /min was<br />

maintained by peristaltic pump. Washing with<br />

same equilibrating buffer to remove the unbound<br />

or weakly bound was done.<br />

Three different elution strategies were<br />

employed to elute the adsorbed GSH from<br />

Amberlite IR 120H resin, as elution with 1.5 M<br />

NaCl, elution by changing the buffer pH <strong>and</strong><br />

elution with 1 %. Each time volumetric flow rate<br />

was maintained at 0.5 mL/min <strong>and</strong> 3 mL fractions<br />

were collected at a time <strong>and</strong> analyzed for GSH<br />

concentration by alloxan method.<br />

Results <strong>and</strong> Discussion<br />

Media optimization by one factor at-a-time<br />

method<br />

Effects <strong>of</strong> pH: At an initial pH 6.0, maximum<br />

production <strong>of</strong> GSH, 62.18 mg/L (biomass, 5.55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!