t-,/rrr',r47c

52
pror€ir efliciency mrio. Thc biom8 was rich in sllph€r @ntaining amino acids.
which w€r. abov. FAO stddsr*,
Su.dhiiska €r 4t (t984) fcd nix.d feds wirh o. wirhoui blcleriat prcr.in
(cultrtred on mcthanol) 4. E and 12% reptacing soybean oil meat ro day otd broit.r
clickcns lill J6 doys. h w.s found thal mean final w€ighi *6 l9lj, t9t2, 1745 and
17218 resperivcty ed t.d iltake 2.39,2.42,2.57 ud 2.60 l(8/kg f.in
Ba(yuzhevskil e/ d/. (1985) obtained biomass after fenentatioD oflpirit and
liquor indusrry by-products with s.lectcd srains of microo.ganisms. Th. biomN
had 50 to 7trlo crude prctcin and was low in me$ionine. In a fesding l.iat whcn
100% rcllacemcnl of feed yeasl yith biomass protein wss Irade, tEre wa! found
ro difference in weiSht gain belween cortol ed experimental eroups of p€kin
du.ks, white leghom hens and tukey hens.
Petukhova er ?i. (t985) in firsr dpedmena rcptaced mep.in (a midobiat
prot€in) ir dier Sivq 1o tcns 57 ro 390 days ar lone o. 10, 20, 25 dd 30% of
normalprotein requiremenr Respective avemge daily feed intake was 104.3. 108.4,
I I0.3, 109.9 dd I08.8g. In th€ s€cond exp€dment replacement pu €15 from 70 lo
310 days old were givcn a diet wirh meprin added ro rcFace none or 5, 10, 15, 20
and 25% of the protcin. Avcragc daity int tc of f€sd wss 91.J, 9t.5, 83.6, 85.1,
88.8 and 98.88, reslecrively. The bd resulrs werc obta,ned wnh mcprin al l0 of
200 .
Richrd er aa (19E5) f€d shndard feed mixrurc to qSed whir. lcg hom tayer
as aloio (control) o. ar lhe cxpeD$ ofsoybenn oil mcat, fish mcal ed sutfire liquor
y€ai wnh 5, 7.5 o. t5% femosin yc61. tn 8€neration 2 snd 3 the f€n6iD
'nixlurcs wcre supptem€nted with Dl-mcrhionine. Wirh femosin rl l5ol0 level, fecd
inrakc ad fed .ffc cncy ofnost layirg p€rfomancc exclu.ting .gg guatity and