t-,/rrr',r47c

l0
They reporled $at supplementation of fie slop wirh 0.2% (NHrzSOr dd l-5 yo
c.ne molas*s improved rhe yeasr @llyi€ld, significandy.
Yoso ?r 4l (19?5) comparcd difte€nr yqt @Is tor prcducrion of sinSte
cell protein on m€dium containing Stucose, glacrose or f.uclose, glyc€rol. MeOIt.
EIOH. HOAC. They .eponed $ar whcn Cadidd MOy,657 ws culrwcd wilh
shaking l0'C for 48 houB on a m.diurn at pH 6.0, it produced yeasr mass
conlainine 55.5% c.ude prolein, whi.h was 313% jn rems ofM.olt.
ElAshwah., a/. (1978) delehiD.d rhe cfiecr of motGscycom slep tiquor
on yield aod piotein concenb.iioD of thc fungi. They repofted thar medium
.o.taining only molasses could nol suppon adequatc tungal 8rofth, bu( rddido, of
com sreep liqDor rsultod in a narked iDdease in tnycelial yietd and protein
concenuation. It was filtttx.r r(ted tttrit Spicorio cbaaN, Ctado4oi$ sp. and
Clad$potiw .kdosporiodes produced crude prolcin 34.06, 26.69 a^d 2:J.4s Vo,
Pa@nml e/ dl (1978) ferncnlaled tyi alkatiprerre.&d hadwood sawd$l
lq 48 hou6 sr an initat pH of7.O{Enrr5.0sd.r 37,C tcmp€mrue ed obseded
12.5olo 6rudc prolein in rhe biomss. Thcy atso rcponed thar lhe addition ofgtucosc
@ 0.5% naRedly incrcased rh.prctcin yietd.
LaNford d! dl (1979) used cane ,nolases s source of 8row$ limitinS
carbon in rh€ fermenrarion media ior rhe prodncrion of sinste e prorin using
Cdhdido trtilit NRI(L y,900. Ar one percenl level of reducing sugr wi$ $e
addition of zinc powder, 6utt€d in an increse in biom6$ producrivir, ircm L? ro
2.6 g/t/h wifr rhe elo*,th yield of 0.559 dry biorrB /g rcducrng srge utilizcd at $e
naximum dilution rale. t he ye!$ biomass contained 5G55 o/o prolein_
Rosl*ova (1979) compared fE biomrss yicld of two y€,st slrains viz
Catdida ttain 2672 ed 2671M on acerst. and m.rhanot medim lnder o imun
condnions. Maximum yield ofbiomass for srrain 2672 was 56.5% dried yeast after