t-,/rrr',r47c

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Pl3te Vl Erpe mental pens showihs se arrte rrranqements of feedinp. weterine and droooin s collectiotr for e.ch experimental unit 90
L 2. l. 4. 5. 9l Overview for A- art ofCha 'fte defancd rice polishings gave comparabte prorein yield wili undefar€d. Ior oprimizing filnler femctrr4ion conditio$ defalred ricc polishinSs was Tle pretreahenr of substrate wirh acid did nor cause significanl imp.ovemcnr in prot€in yield, so h wd not uscd ir tunh.r rrials. The addilion ofmola3s.s at lyo lev.l ar 48d hour of fmenhion did nol Sive any signiticanl ifrprovement in protein yietd sd ws nolsupptemenGd ro the glowrh medium du.ing n.xt rriats. The addilion of com steep ljquof (CSL) ar 0.5% l€vel at 48,i hou of fementation also did not give significa improvemenr in prot€in yield. Howeler, the improvemenr in this case was bet|er as 6mpe@ ro mojsses supplem€nhtion- It wa! fierefore adopred during $e nexl datr. Carbon to nit oSen mrio of l0 : I gave significrnt impruvm.n ,n pole tr yield and was adopted durin8 rhc next tdals. Delaying of hNeslirs ft)e above 72 holrs did not give sjgnitior imprcvem.nt in prolein yield. The hadering rime of 72 hou6 was thercforc odoprcd becaus€ funhcr delay was unc@nomical.
Page 1 and 2:
t-,/rrr',r47c
Page 3 and 4:
To The Controller of Examlnations,
Page 5 and 6:
ACKNOWLEDCEMONTS . ll nnie5 lor All
Page 7 and 8:
PreDrmtio. oflooculum for Bt@iba.te
Page 9 and 10:
effecled by addition of I % nolasse
Page 11 and 12:
LIST OF FIGUERS Flturc Tltl. Prr. I
Page 13 and 14:
Chapter - I INTRODUCTION Tle grcwin
Page 15 and 16:
BrcvibrctetiM llavM. Bretibacteriw
Page 17 and 18:
Hc repon€d non signifi@l difcr.nc
Page 19 and 20:
under a sel of condilions: acid str
Page 21 and 22:
Asperyila Iufligarts.l\e @culture s
Page 23 and 24:
20h ofculturins md 44.3 % rne.4Eh f
Page 25 and 26:
ll tcchnique allowed r 54% incrcase
Page 27 and 28:
l5 nunber of yeast c.ll in 10-14 h
Page 29 and 30:
t1 Yogo er al. ( 1976) krmentql Cat
Page 31 and 32:
l9 dd yeasi exkact in con@nrntions
Page 33 and 34:
2l Mahmood ?/ at (1990) sludicd lhe
Page 35 and 36:
2J t'oda d al. ( | 971) Iirmented s
Page 37 and 38:
'neal 25 Ba.jrach.rya and Mudse( (1
Page 39 and 40:
27 Sandhu 4d woraich ( 1983) sludi
Page 41 and 42:
29 Ilashini (1987) srudied the prod
Page 43 and 44:
3l in.lbalion- ]l'ey obseNed that v
Page 45 and 46:
ll substrate in balrl n.dium ar pH
Page 47 and 48:
)5 Jin €r al. (1994) succeed€d
Page 49 and 50:
J7 nported lllat lhc f€mentation
Page 51 and 52: l9 Burgets (1994) dcveloped the mut
Page 53 and 54: Okmolo (1997) rcported that L-lipro
Page 55 and 56: 4i markedly inll €nced fic cGcuhu
Page 57 and 58: 45 Dods ed Kuns (f969) had5ted th.
Page 59 and 60: Ljpiosky and Litchfield (1974) repo
Page 61 and 62: srain of Cellulonore specie!. They
Page 63 and 64: 5l Enriquez and Rodriquez (1983) co
Page 65 and 66: 5l body weight gain werc rcduced ro
Page 67 and 68: 55 co'nnercial diet. Feed consumpri
Page 69 and 70: Chapter - 3 5l MATERIALS AND METHOD
Page 71 and 72: 3. Preparation of in oc|uhm for Ara
Page 73 and 74: 4.4 Setting CarboD to Nit.ogen Rati
Page 75 and 76: I'hrr L Sl,oni'r I lr'csll culfo.c
Page 77 and 78: 65 Alter 48 houls it€ nrmb€r of
Page 79 and 80: 6,1 Autoclaved Vs UnNutoclaved Firs
Page 81 and 82: 69 X:-Xr gP = Fx YPlx q, = p xYx/s,
Page 83 and 84: 1l rll $. rariom werc.djuied accord
Page 85 and 86: 1J opetrirr8 rheir abdomisal cavili
Page 87 and 88: '15 A. TO OPTIMIZE THE GROWTH CONDI
Page 89 and 90: ablc 5. Mo t SE lde p.or€in produ
Page 91 and 92: 3. DetermiDation of Optimum L€yel
Page 93 and 94: EI I1*as obs€Ned tat !t l% levcl
Page 95 and 96: 83 periods during fmenlatioo fo! pr
Page 97 and 98: E5 Phac lI1. Showib rotrrv lhrker p
Page 99 and 100: 87 candido utilis and ewn dqty linc
Page 101: 89 Plat€ V. Showins fermcntalion
Page 105 and 106: t] biomass harvested unde. two cond
Page 107 and 108: 95 haN*ted aner 72 houB of ferm€n
Page 109 and 110: O.,4dvrm in srnerghn wirh the yeasr
Page 111 and 112: 99 averae. true protein valu4 of th
Page 113 and 114: 0l Growth Kinetics For l}te explan.
Page 115 and 116: I ; 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 3 2 1 0 -1
Page 117 and 118: 105 C. NUTRITIONAL EVALUATION OF BI
Page 119 and 120: lnniring diDo acid es wa rcported b
Page 121 and 122: t09 Similar ro fed consumpriotr the
Page 123 and 124: 2.5 Protein Elliciency Ratio (PER)
Page 125 and 126: I tl l'hte Vlll Showi'rg cxperincnr
Page 127 and 128: ||5 SUMMARY Rice polishings is a by
Page 129 and 130: |7 Dds lbdned was 0.5 ed 0.7013 for
Page 131 and 132: lt9 BIBLIOGRAPHY AbdelHanreed,N.A.A
Page 133 and 134: l2l Beneke,E.S. 1955. M€dical Myc
Page 135 and 136: l2J Daghir,N.J. and J-L.SeX. 1962_
Page 137 and 138: 125 Cimnl,R.F.. M.ElSawy, E.M.R.mad
Page 139 and 140: 127 I lubbell.C.H. I 990 Feed Stuff
Page 141 and 142: 129 .ohp.$r&. Appl.Miqobiol.Biot ch
Page 143 and 144: llt Panaiobv,K.ll., A.Ar.v, L.Damyd
Page 145 and 146: ShojaoBdati.S-A. .nd M.N.chazlj. 19
Page 147 and 148: 135 V"[OS$ !?3.. Pldir dt br of nrt
Page 149 and 150: NuEicn crudc Fibr. EIbE;d N.F.E C.l
Page 151 and 152: oil !5.00 ":oo lz0o 3300 2200 2500
Page 153 and 154:
A!?.dir-vl ADlti. of n l@.fin turtl
Page 155 and 156:
. sbdfqd (Pd.ot) IrlS Ald)rir of v.
Page 157 and 158:
t45 AFadix-X: Ad'tndv'.ic.ofd-dwirr
Page 159 and 160:
147 Alp.ldix-Xll ADdrrir of!{drn .
Page 161 and 162:
App6dix-XIV: Aidyrk ofwidc. oflh. d
Page 163 and 164:
ADFft-XU: A!.Bd. ortrlF turhr.&.r o
Page 165 and 166:
Apt odit-xvle Arttn of whE ofrbdr-o
Page 167 and 168:
I5J Ap'codtx.lo( A.d}n ofyrirE ofdd
Page 169 and 170:
t57 Ar!.odir-)Ofil ofrrttt4. oftb d
Page 171 and 172:
. 3i9i6cd1(P4.0t) z 0.ml 159 0.631
Page 173 and 174:
I6l isnir.d in lhc numc tumac€ a(
Page 175 and 176:
3, Eslidlr|iotr ofcrrbotr l6! 'nc f
Page 177 and 178:
165 4. Estimation ofTrue Protein (T
Page 179 and 180:
t67 (5 mL) m'C for 15 ninurq and ca
Page 181:
169 added and lhe volurnes werc mad
show all

t-,/rrr',r47c

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?