01.03.2013 Views

formal comments to the Board's proposed rule. - SEIU

formal comments to the Board's proposed rule. - SEIU

formal comments to the Board's proposed rule. - SEIU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Administrative Procedure Act exempts certain categories of <strong>rule</strong>s generally from notice-and-<br />

comment <strong>rule</strong>making requirements. Public comment is not required when an agency promulgates “<strong>rule</strong>s<br />

of ... procedure or practice.”<br />

34 The National Labor Relations Act itself does not require a showing of<br />

interest <strong>to</strong> accompany a petition for election, and thus does not address authorization card (or any<br />

requirement of handwritten signatures). Instead, <strong>the</strong> NLRB has imposed a showing of interest<br />

requirement administratively, and its Rules and Regulations and Statements of Procedure do not<br />

explicitly state that a union authorization card need include a hand-written signature. Section 101.17<br />

only states that evidence of representation “is usually in <strong>the</strong> form of cards, which must be dated,<br />

authorizing <strong>the</strong> labor organization <strong>to</strong> represent <strong>the</strong> employees or authorizing <strong>the</strong> petitioner <strong>to</strong> file a<br />

decertification petition.” Therefore, <strong>the</strong> Board should simply amend its Rules and Regulations and<br />

Statements of Procedure <strong>to</strong> specify methods of accepting and au<strong>the</strong>nticating electronic signatures <strong>to</strong><br />

support a showing of interest without going through <strong>the</strong> APA’s notice-and-comment <strong>rule</strong>making<br />

process.<br />

VII. Conclusion<br />

In conclusion, <strong>the</strong> <strong>proposed</strong> <strong>rule</strong>making is a modest first step in reforming a broken system that<br />

is currently tilted heavily in favor of employers. As it now stands, most workers who want <strong>to</strong> form a<br />

union will never get <strong>the</strong> chance. By protecting workers’ ability <strong>to</strong> participate in a fair and meaningful<br />

election and vote on <strong>the</strong>ir own futures, <strong>the</strong> NLRB is taking action <strong>to</strong> begin <strong>to</strong> res<strong>to</strong>re basic rights we’ve<br />

held dear in this country for decades. We hope <strong>the</strong> Board considers additional regulations <strong>to</strong> address <strong>the</strong><br />

many o<strong>the</strong>r problems in <strong>the</strong> NLRB election system.<br />

We encourage <strong>the</strong> Board <strong>to</strong> issue <strong>the</strong> <strong>proposed</strong> regulations as final regulations, with <strong>the</strong><br />

improvements discussed above, as quickly as possible.<br />

Respectfully Submitted,<br />

Mary Kay Hen Eliseo Medina<br />

President Secretary Treasurer<br />

134 usc §553(b)(3)(A).<br />

36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!