01.03.2013 Views

formal comments to the Board's proposed rule. - SEIU

formal comments to the Board's proposed rule. - SEIU

formal comments to the Board's proposed rule. - SEIU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

With <strong>the</strong>se changes, it would no longer be necessary for <strong>the</strong> Casehandling Manual <strong>to</strong> provide that<br />

<strong>the</strong> union au<strong>to</strong>matically receive time <strong>to</strong> use <strong>the</strong> post-direction or post-agreement voter eligibility list<br />

because <strong>the</strong> union would have access <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> relevant information earlier in <strong>the</strong> process. Given <strong>the</strong><br />

current practice of requiring ten days following receipt of <strong>the</strong> list before scheduling <strong>the</strong> election, <strong>the</strong><br />

regulations should state explicitly that <strong>the</strong> Regional Direc<strong>to</strong>r shall not impose any minimum time period<br />

during which <strong>the</strong> non-employer parties must have <strong>the</strong> list in <strong>the</strong>ir possession. Where, however, <strong>the</strong> postdirection<br />

or post-agreement list includes employees besides those listed on <strong>the</strong> preliminary list, any non-<br />

employer party, upon its prompt request after receiving <strong>the</strong> list, should be able <strong>to</strong> obtain a postponement<br />

of <strong>the</strong> election <strong>to</strong> a date no later than 10 days after <strong>the</strong> party’s receipt of <strong>the</strong> list in order <strong>to</strong> have time <strong>to</strong><br />

talk <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> newly included employees.<br />

8. Waiver of <strong>the</strong> Requirement That an Election Not Be Held Until 10- days<br />

After Provision of <strong>the</strong> Excelsior List<br />

While no specific language <strong>to</strong> this effect is contained in <strong>the</strong> <strong>proposed</strong> <strong>rule</strong>s, <strong>the</strong> NPRM at 36826<br />

indicates that <strong>the</strong> Board would permit <strong>the</strong> waiver by parties whose name appears on <strong>the</strong> ballot, of <strong>the</strong><br />

existing practice, reflected in Model Interiors, Inc.<br />

requirement that an election not be scheduled for a date less than 10-days after provisions of <strong>the</strong> voter<br />

88 and Casehandling Manual § 11302.1, of <strong>the</strong><br />

list. We believe that allowance of such a waiver can facilitate <strong>the</strong> holding of timely elections so long as<br />

it is clear that a party may never waive provision of <strong>the</strong> list itself. It would be beneficial <strong>to</strong> clarify that<br />

Rule 102.62(d) only permits <strong>the</strong> parties in an election agreement <strong>to</strong> agree <strong>to</strong> a different timeframe for<br />

provision of <strong>the</strong> list, and does not permit <strong>the</strong> waiver of <strong>the</strong> list itself or any of its contents. This is<br />

consistent with Section 11312.1 of <strong>the</strong> Casehandling Manual which provides <strong>the</strong> “[t]he Board will not<br />

permit waivers of <strong>the</strong> Excelsior <strong>rule</strong> with respect <strong>to</strong> furnishing ei<strong>the</strong>r names or addresses.”<br />

However, in general, ra<strong>the</strong>r than a waiver, we would prefer <strong>the</strong> provisions described in section 7,<br />

above, in which <strong>the</strong> employer would provide a preliminary list within two days of <strong>the</strong> petition’s filing,<br />

and post-direction or post-agreement a non-employer party could obtain additional time <strong>to</strong> communicate<br />

with employees newly identified on <strong>the</strong> final list.<br />

9. Time Period for Posting Final Notice <strong>to</strong> Employees of Elections<br />

Proposed Rule 102.67(i) provides for a reduction from 3 days <strong>to</strong> 2 days in <strong>the</strong> minimum posting<br />

period for <strong>the</strong> Final Notice <strong>to</strong> Employees of Elections. We believe that this adjustment is reasonable and<br />

will work no prejudice <strong>to</strong> any employee or <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> parties, particularly in light of <strong>the</strong> Rule’s requirement<br />

324 NLRB 164 (1997).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!