Design specific variation in pattern transfer by via/contact etch ...
Design specific variation in pattern transfer by via/contact etch ...
Design specific variation in pattern transfer by via/contact etch ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Approximation of “Th<strong>in</strong> Polymer” Layer<br />
� Rate of generation of active precursors on SiO2 surface <strong>by</strong><br />
ions penetrated the adsorbed layer is much higher than the<br />
rate of their disappearance <strong>by</strong> means of <strong>etch</strong> reactions<br />
� Rate of the reaction between silicon and fluor<strong>in</strong>e atoms is<br />
faster than the rate of reactions of polymer formation. ( ) ⎟⎟<br />
M k′<br />
Γ<br />
C D CF2<br />
H ≈<br />
C<br />
ρ S kRΓO<br />
+ k<strong>etch</strong><br />
C ⎛ k ′ Γ ⎞<br />
<strong>etch</strong>k<br />
D CF<br />
≈ Γ ⎜<br />
2<br />
ER K <strong>etch</strong>k<br />
D CF 1− 2 ⎜<br />
C<br />
ηΓi<br />
E0<br />
kRΓO<br />
+ k<strong>etch</strong><br />
Polymer Polymer thickness thickness (nm) (nm)<br />
Polymer thickness (nm)<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
Exp<br />
Cal<br />
O2=8 cc<br />
0<br />
0 500 1000 1500<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
Exp<br />
Cal<br />
Ion Energy (eV)<br />
O2=8 cc<br />
0<br />
0.00E+00 1.00E+17 2.00E+17 3.00E+17<br />
CF2 flux (cm-2 s-1)<br />
ER of SiO2 (nm/m<strong>in</strong>)<br />
ER of SiO2 (nm/m<strong>in</strong>)<br />
600<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
Exp<br />
Cal<br />
O2=8 cc<br />
0<br />
0 500 1000 1500<br />
600<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
Exp<br />
Ion Energy (eV)<br />
O2=8 cc<br />
Cal Tatsumi, T., Hikosaka, Y., Morishita,<br />
S., Matsui, M., and Sek<strong>in</strong>e, M., “Etch<br />
rate control <strong>in</strong> a 27 MHz reactive ion<br />
<strong>etch</strong><strong>in</strong>g system for ultralarge scale<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegrated circuit process<strong>in</strong>g,” J. Vac.<br />
Sci. Technol. A 17, 1562-1569 (1999).<br />
0<br />
0.00E+00 1.00E+17 2.00E+17 3.00E+17<br />
CF2 flux (cm-2 s-1)<br />
⎝<br />
Copyright ©2008, Mentor Graphics.<br />
17<br />
⎠