28.02.2013 Views

Building Design and Construction Handbook - Merritt - Ventech!

Building Design and Construction Handbook - Merritt - Ventech!

Building Design and Construction Handbook - Merritt - Ventech!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

9.106 SECTION NINE<br />

The advantages of counterfort walls are the large effective depth for the cantilever<br />

reinforcement <strong>and</strong> concrete efficiently concentrated in the counterfort. For<br />

very tall walls, where an alternative cantilever wall would require greater thickness<br />

<strong>and</strong> larger quantities of reinforcing steel <strong>and</strong> concrete, the savings in material will<br />

exceed the additional cost of forming the counterforts. Accurate design is necessary<br />

for economy in important projects involving large quantities of material <strong>and</strong> requires<br />

refinement of the simple assumptions in the definition of counterfort walls. The<br />

analysis becomes complex for determination of the division of the load between<br />

one-way horizontal slab <strong>and</strong> vertical cantilever action.<br />

See also Art. 6.7 (F. S. <strong>Merritt</strong>, ‘‘St<strong>and</strong>ard H<strong>and</strong>book for Civil Engineers,’’<br />

McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, New York.)<br />

9.72 RETAINING WALLS SUPPORTED ON FOUR<br />

SIDES<br />

For walls more than 10 in thick, the ACI 318 <strong>Building</strong> Code requires two-way<br />

layers of bars in each face. Two-way slab design of this reinforcement is required<br />

for economy in basement walls or subsurface tank walls supported as vertical spans<br />

by the floor above <strong>and</strong> the footing below, <strong>and</strong> as horizontal spans by stiff pilasters,<br />

interior cross walls, or end walls.<br />

This type of two-way slab is outside the scope of the specific provisions in the<br />

Code. Without an ‘‘exact’’ analysis, which is seldom justified because of the uncertainties<br />

involved in the assumptions for stiffnesses <strong>and</strong> loads, a realistic design<br />

can be based on the simple two-way slab design method of Appendix A, Method<br />

2, of the 1963 ACI 318 <strong>Building</strong> Code.<br />

FOUNDATIONS<br />

<strong>Building</strong> foundations should distribute wall <strong>and</strong> column loads to the underlying soil<br />

<strong>and</strong> rock within acceptable limits on resulting soil pressure <strong>and</strong> total <strong>and</strong> differential<br />

settlement. Wall <strong>and</strong> column loads consist of live load, reduced in accordance with<br />

the applicable general building code, <strong>and</strong> dead load, combined, when required, with<br />

lateral loads of wind, earthquake, earth pressure, or liquid pressure. These loads<br />

can be distributed to the soil near grade by concrete spread footings, or to the soil<br />

at lower levels by concrete piles or drilled piers.<br />

9.73 TYPES OF FOUNDATIONS<br />

A wide variety of concrete foundations are used for buildings. Some of the most<br />

common types are illustrated in Fig. 9.41.<br />

Spread wall footings consist of a plain or reinforced slab wider than the wall,<br />

extending the length of the wall (Fig. 9.41a). Plain- or reinforced-concrete individual-concrete<br />

spread footings consist of simple, stepped, or sloped two-way concrete<br />

slabs, square or rectangular in plan (Fig. 9.41b to d). For two columns close<br />

together, or an exterior column close to the property line so that individual spread<br />

or pile-cap footings cannot be placed concentrically, a reinforced-concrete, spread

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!