27.02.2013 Views

The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog

The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog

The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1893.] THE LOCOMOTIVE. 173<br />

defects, l)iit they failed to remedy tliein. In all these 43 cases, if proper examiiiatious<br />

had been made by competent persons, and the defects discovered and pointed out had<br />

been remedied, the explosions would have been prevented; but it follows that in order to<br />

be really effective the examination of boilers must be undertaken by competent persons<br />

at sutticieutly frequent intervals.<br />

*»<br />

"<strong>The</strong> remaining 14 explosions were attributed to the following causes: To short-<br />

ness of water and consequent overheating, 6 ; to absence of safety-valves, or defects therein,<br />

and consequent over pressure, 6; to a safety-valve that had been wedged down. 1; to<br />

faulty construction, 1.<br />

"<strong>The</strong>se investigations have been conducted in public, and reports of the proceed-<br />

ings have appeared in the local newspapers. <strong>The</strong> commissioners' reports have dealt<br />

exhaustively not only with the cause of the explosion in each case, but with all the<br />

attendant circumstances, including the operations of the insurance companies. It is<br />

beyond question that the publicity given to the judgments of the commissioners as to<br />

the relations between the insurance companies and the owners of boilers, and the culpa-<br />

bility of the various parties whose conduct has been called in question during these<br />

investigations, must have a beneficial effect in directing increased attention to the obliga-<br />

tions resting upon all concerned. <strong>The</strong> Commissioners have throughout adhered firmly<br />

to the principle of holding the owners or users of boilers responsible for their safe work-<br />

ing condition, and also for the acts of their servants. Owners or users of boilers have<br />

accordingly been found to blame in 48 cases.<br />

"It is fair to say that many owners are chargeable with ignorance or thoughtlessness<br />

rather than with willful negligence in failing to have their boilers examined by compe-<br />

tent persons. <strong>The</strong>y have bought boilers and used them without a thought as to their<br />

working condition, and this has been proved over and over again by the fact that small<br />

users of steam have been working with their employes in the vicinity of the boiler when<br />

it exploded, and in several instances the owners themselves fired, fed, and worked the<br />

boilers. <strong>The</strong> risks thus incurred may be well illustrated by citing the facts of one<br />

or two cases. A miller had used a boiler for many years without examination. <strong>The</strong><br />

mill faced a village green across which children passed on their way to and from school.<br />

<strong>The</strong> boiler exploded a very short time before the school hour, the mill was wrecked, and<br />

the green was covered with bricks. One child was killed, but had the boiler exploded<br />

a few minutes later, when the children, were passing in greater numbers, the loss of life<br />

would have been terrible. This was a case of simple ignorance. <strong>The</strong> miller merely<br />

acted as the rest of his neighbors had done, for it was proved at the investigation that it<br />

was a common practice in the neighborhood to work boilers for twelve or thirteen years<br />

without any examination. In another case a respectable timber merchant worked a<br />

boiler for forty years without any examination by a competent person. He assumed<br />

that the boiler would work safely until it was worn out, and he continued working it<br />

until it exploded and caused very serious injuries to the attendant Tvho had been in<br />

charge of it for the whole period. In another case a miller worked a boiler for thirtytwo<br />

years w^ithout any proper examination, believing that so long as he could generate<br />

steam in it the boiler was in a safe condition, an opinion shared by many other owners<br />

in the neighborhood whose boilers were never examined. <strong>The</strong> boiler, in places, became<br />

reduced to the thickness of paper; and it exploded and killed the attendant.<br />

"In the cases investigated seventeen boilers were insured and forty were not<br />

insured. <strong>The</strong> relations between the owners and users of boilers and the companies that<br />

insure them, have naturally been a prominent feature of these inquiries. It has been<br />

found, as might have been anticipated, that owners of boilers endeavor to relieve them-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!