27.02.2013 Views

SATS 2009 Final Program - Scandinavian Association for Thoracic ...

SATS 2009 Final Program - Scandinavian Association for Thoracic ...

SATS 2009 Final Program - Scandinavian Association for Thoracic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

S06:4<br />

IN VITRO COMPARISON OF THE NEW IN-LINE MONITOR BMU 40 VS. THE CONVENTIONAL<br />

LABORATORY ANALYSER ABL 700<br />

Grosse F. Oliver 1 , Holzhey David 2 , Falk Volkmar 2 , Schaarschmidt Jan 1 , Kraemer Klaus 1 , Mohr Friedrich Wilhelm 1<br />

1) University of Leipzig - Heart Center, Germany 2) University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland<br />

Background<br />

Reliable in<strong>for</strong>mation about different blood parameters is essential maintaining haemodynamics, perfusion and gas<br />

exchange during CPB. For this purpose a precise and continuous monitoring is needed. The objective of this in vitro<br />

study was to compare a novel continuous in-line blood parameter monitoring system (CIBPMS) vs. a reference<br />

laboratory analyser.<br />

Methods<br />

The study was conducted as an in vitro prospective experimental study during a CPB simulation. The reliability of<br />

BMU 40 was tested in monitoring the pO2, SO2 and Hct under physiological and extreme conditions with regards<br />

to temperature, oxygenation and blood concentration. Four different tests were per<strong>for</strong>med and conducted with five<br />

sensors each. Correlation analyses and Bland-Altman analyses were per<strong>for</strong>med.<br />

Results<br />

A total of 350 measurement points were compared. All monitored values of blood parameters correlated highly with<br />

laboratory values (all r values > 0.90). Test 1: Biases of pO2(act) vary from -3.24 (±6.86) up to 6.0 (±17.89). The<br />

biases of pO2(37°C) ranged from -3.08 (±5.53) up to 68.8 (±67.82). Test 2: The biases (SD) <strong>for</strong> Hct ranged from<br />

-0.35 (±0.79) up to 2.35 (±0.91). The biases (SD) <strong>for</strong> SO2 vary from -0.45 (±0.86) up to 0.85 (±1.01). Test 3: The<br />

biases (SD) of Hct ranged from -0.67 (±1.49) up to -1.00 (±1.84). Test 4: The biases (SD) <strong>for</strong> SO2 vary from -0.36<br />

(±1.60) up to 0.48 (±0.90).<br />

Conclusions<br />

The BMU 40 is a reliable device in measuring the pO2, SO2 and Hct under normal physiological and extreme<br />

conditions with regards to temperature, oxygenation and blood concentration in simulation of CPB. The algorithm to<br />

calculate pO2(37°) under hypothermic conditions need to be adjusted.*<br />

*In the meantime a new software version of the BMU 40 has been developed. The algorithm to calculate pO2(37°)<br />

under hypothermic conditions has been improved and the miscalculation eliminated.<br />

S06:5<br />

CLINICAL EVALUATION OF THE NEW BMU 40 IN-LINE BLOOD ANALYSIS MONITOR<br />

Schaarschmidt Jan 1 , Borger Michael Andrew 1 , Seeburger Joerg 1 , Grosse Frank Oliver 1 ,<br />

Kraemer Klaus 1 , Mohr Friedrich Wilhelm 1<br />

1) University of Leipzig, Heart Center, Germany<br />

Background<br />

Accurate in<strong>for</strong>mation about different blood parameters is essential in maintaining haemodynamics, perfusion and<br />

gas exchange during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). For this purpose a precise and continuous measurement and<br />

monitoring, which is preferably visually available, is needed. The objective of this clinical study was to compare<br />

the newly developed continuous in-line blood parameter monitoring system (CIBPMS) BMU 40, based on optical<br />

luminescence and reflectance technology, with a reference laboratory analyser with regards to the precision of blood<br />

parameters measurement.<br />

Methods<br />

Thirty adult patients underwent elective cardiac surgery utilizing CPB and mild hypothermia (32°C). At five<br />

predetermined time points (S1 – S5) arterial and venous blood samples were analysed using the BMU 40 <strong>for</strong> five<br />

different parameters (paO2(37°C), paO2(act.), SvO2, Hb(ven) and Hct(ven)) and these results were compared to<br />

the gold standard laboratory analyser ABL 700.<br />

Results<br />

A total of 150 paired blood samples were included to compare means, to analyse correlation, to calculate measures<br />

of bias, precision, limits of agreement and 95% confidence intervals. Results revealed good agreement between the<br />

two devices <strong>for</strong> all parameters. Bias ± precision of S2 – S5 paO2(37°C) were 2.17 ± 9.61; paO2(act) 2.58 ± 9.54;<br />

SvO2 -1.44 ± 2.35; Hb(ven) 0.01 ± 0.42; Hct(ven) 0.04 ± 1.29. Statistically significant differences were detected<br />

<strong>for</strong> SvO2 (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!