History of experimental psychology from an Estonian perspective
History of experimental psychology from an Estonian perspective
History of experimental psychology from an Estonian perspective
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Psychological Research (2006)<br />
DOI 10.1007/s00426-006-0051-9<br />
ORIGINAL ARTICLE<br />
Jüri Allik<br />
<strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>experimental</strong> <strong>psychology</strong> <strong>from</strong> <strong>an</strong> Estoni<strong>an</strong> <strong>perspective</strong><br />
Received: 2 February 2005 / Accepted: 29 November 2005<br />
© Springer-Verlag 2006<br />
Abstract A short review <strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> <strong>experimental</strong><br />
<strong>psychology</strong> <strong>from</strong> <strong>an</strong> Estoni<strong>an</strong> <strong>perspective</strong> is presented.<br />
The Wrst rector after the reopening <strong>of</strong> the<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Dorpat (Tartu) in 1802, Georg Friedrich<br />
Parrot (1767–1852) was interested in optical phenomena<br />
which he attempted to explain by introducing the concept<br />
<strong>of</strong> unconscious inferences, <strong>an</strong>ticipating a similar<br />
theory proposed by Herm<strong>an</strong> von Helmholtz 20 years<br />
later. One <strong>of</strong> the next rectors, Alfred Wilhelm Volkm<strong>an</strong>n<br />
(1800–1878) was regarded by Edwin Boring as one <strong>of</strong><br />
the founding fathers <strong>of</strong> the <strong>experimental</strong> <strong>psychology</strong>.<br />
Georg Wilhelm Struve (1793–1864) played <strong>an</strong> essential<br />
part in solving the problem <strong>of</strong> personal equations.<br />
Arthur Joachim von Oettingen (1836–1920) developed a<br />
theory <strong>of</strong> music harmony, which stimulated his student<br />
Wilhelm Friedrich Ostwald (1853–1932) to study colour<br />
harmony. Emil Kraepelin (1856–1926), the founder <strong>of</strong><br />
modern psychiatry, is by far the most import<strong>an</strong>t <strong>experimental</strong><br />
psychologist who has worked in Estonia. His<br />
successor Wladimir von Tchisch (1855–1922), <strong>an</strong>other<br />
student <strong>of</strong> Wilhelm Wundt, continued Kraepelin’s work<br />
in <strong>experimental</strong> <strong>psychology</strong>. The lives <strong>of</strong> Wolfg<strong>an</strong>g<br />
Köhler (1887–1967), who was born in Reval (Tallinn),<br />
<strong>an</strong>d Oswald Külpe (1862–1915), who graduated <strong>from</strong><br />
the University <strong>of</strong> Dorpat, extended the link between the<br />
history <strong>of</strong> <strong>experimental</strong> <strong>psychology</strong> <strong>an</strong>d Estonia. Karl<br />
Gustav Girgensohn (1875–1925), the founder <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Dorpat School <strong>of</strong> the <strong>psychology</strong> <strong>of</strong> religion, stretched<br />
the use <strong>of</strong> <strong>experimental</strong> methods to the study <strong>of</strong> religious<br />
experience.<br />
J. Allik<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Psychology, The Estoni<strong>an</strong> Centre<br />
<strong>of</strong> Behavioural <strong>an</strong>d Health Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Tartu,<br />
Tiigi 78, Tartu, 50410, Estonia<br />
E-mail: juri.allik@ut.ee<br />
Tel.: +372-7-375905<br />
Fax: +372-7-375900<br />
Introduction<br />
Perhaps it was not pure ch<strong>an</strong>ce that <strong>an</strong> event like the<br />
Germ<strong>an</strong>–Estoni<strong>an</strong> symposium on <strong>experimental</strong> <strong>psychology</strong><br />
was possible at all, <strong>an</strong>d that it took place on one <strong>of</strong><br />
the most idyllic places in Estonia, the isl<strong>an</strong>d <strong>of</strong> Hiiumaa.<br />
My goal in this article is to demonstrate that m<strong>an</strong>y scholars<br />
who were born, lived or worked in Estonia took <strong>an</strong><br />
active part in the birth <strong>of</strong> <strong>experimental</strong> <strong>psychology</strong> in the<br />
nineteenth century <strong>an</strong>d in its later development. From a<br />
historical point <strong>of</strong> view, Estonia’s geographical location<br />
is far <strong>from</strong> fortunate. The fact that such a small nation<br />
with <strong>an</strong> obscure non-Europe<strong>an</strong> l<strong>an</strong>guage survived after<br />
all appears almost as a demographic accident. From <strong>an</strong><br />
intellectual viewpoint, however, the location <strong>of</strong> Estonia<br />
may even have had some adv<strong>an</strong>tages. Its marginal position<br />
set Estonia into a situation where the dialogue<br />
between diVerent l<strong>an</strong>guages <strong>an</strong>d viewpoints was not only<br />
<strong>an</strong> expression <strong>of</strong> intellectual sophistication but also a<br />
matter <strong>of</strong> survival. The history <strong>of</strong> <strong>experimental</strong> <strong>psychology</strong><br />
clearly demonstrates that the remote corner as to<br />
which Estonia had to be seen constituted <strong>an</strong> inseparable<br />
part <strong>of</strong> the Germ<strong>an</strong> speaking academic world. Herm<strong>an</strong>n<br />
von Helmholtz in his inaugural lecture as Rector <strong>of</strong> the<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Berlin talked about the academic freedom<br />
<strong>of</strong> Germ<strong>an</strong> universities <strong>an</strong>d stressed that one m<strong>an</strong>ifestation<br />
<strong>of</strong> it was a complete freedom <strong>of</strong> movement for the<br />
students between all universities <strong>of</strong> the Germ<strong>an</strong> tongue,<br />
<strong>from</strong> Dorpat to Zurich, Vienna, <strong>an</strong>d Graz (Helmholtz,<br />
1896, p. 201).<br />
Georg Friedrich Parrot <strong>an</strong>d the theory <strong>of</strong> unconscious<br />
inferences<br />
Although the University <strong>of</strong> Tartu was founded in 1632<br />
by the decree <strong>of</strong> the Swedish King Gustavus II Adolphus,<br />
it ceased to exist in 1710 after the Swedish defeat at<br />
Poltava when two Baltic provinces, Livl<strong>an</strong>d <strong>an</strong>d Estl<strong>an</strong>d<br />
(Drechsler & Kattel, 2000), were incorporated into
Russi<strong>an</strong> empire. The University <strong>of</strong> Tartu again, then<br />
known as Dorpat, was reopened by a decree <strong>of</strong> Alex<strong>an</strong>der<br />
I, issued April 12, 1801, <strong>an</strong>d Georg Friedrich Parrot<br />
(1767–1852) became the Wrst rector <strong>of</strong> the Imperial University<br />
<strong>of</strong> Dorpat, being elected by the University Council<br />
consisting <strong>of</strong> all chaired pr<strong>of</strong>essors.<br />
Although Parrot’s brilli<strong>an</strong>t administrative skills outweighed<br />
his achievements in physics, he was <strong>an</strong> adv<strong>an</strong>ced<br />
theoretical physicist. During his lifetime, the line between<br />
physics <strong>an</strong>d <strong>psychology</strong> was very thin. In the second volume<br />
<strong>of</strong> his textbook <strong>of</strong> theoretical physics he described,<br />
within the framework <strong>of</strong> optical phenomena, problems,<br />
which without a doubt belong to the category <strong>of</strong> hum<strong>an</strong><br />
perception (Parrot, 1811). For example, one <strong>of</strong> his<br />
favourite subjects was a mech<strong>an</strong>ism by which the dist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
<strong>of</strong> objects could be estimated. Parrot also discussed<br />
a method by which the duration <strong>of</strong> visual impression c<strong>an</strong><br />
be measured. The method by itself was not new <strong>an</strong>d was<br />
earlier known to Ibn al-Hayatam (Alhazen) <strong>an</strong>d<br />
Leonardo da Vinci (Wade, 1998, p. 195). If one rotates a<br />
rod glowing at one end with suYcient speed, the perceived<br />
trace <strong>of</strong> light seemed to form <strong>an</strong> uninterrupted circle.<br />
Because the glowing tip <strong>of</strong> the rod c<strong>an</strong>not be in all<br />
places simult<strong>an</strong>eously, it must me<strong>an</strong> that the duration <strong>of</strong><br />
sensory impression lasts until the rod makes the full turn.<br />
Thus, Parrot concluded, it is possible to determine the<br />
duration <strong>of</strong> sensory impressions. According to Parrot’s<br />
observations, the duration <strong>of</strong> sensory impression is<br />
about a quarter <strong>of</strong> the second in the dark <strong>an</strong>d about 1/<br />
6th <strong>of</strong> the second in the light (Parrot, 1820), which is one<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Wrst indications that the perceptual latency<br />
depends on overall illumination. This last value is very<br />
close to a Wgure reported by the Chevalier Patrice d‘Arcy<br />
(1725–1775), who did similar experiments in 1765<br />
(Ramul, 1963; Wade, 1998, p. 196). Both values correspond<br />
closely to those obtained later with much more<br />
sophisticated <strong>experimental</strong> devices.<br />
In September 1839, Parrot published a short note<br />
about a peculiar visual phenomenon he had observed in<br />
a fast-moving train commuting between Pavlovsk <strong>an</strong>d<br />
St. Petersburg, namely the relative diminishing <strong>of</strong> the size<br />
<strong>of</strong> external objects, situated at a relatively small dist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
<strong>from</strong> the train window (Parrot, 1839). As Parrot<br />
observed, this apparent reduction <strong>of</strong> the size <strong>of</strong> objects<br />
depended upon the speed <strong>of</strong> their movement. When the<br />
speed <strong>of</strong> the train attained its ordinary maximum, wardhouses<br />
<strong>an</strong>d men, situated close to the train, seemed to<br />
have only half <strong>of</strong> their regular size, <strong>an</strong>d one might have<br />
the impression, as Parrot put it Wguratively, <strong>of</strong> being<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>sported through a l<strong>an</strong>d <strong>of</strong> dwarfs. As the speed <strong>of</strong> the<br />
train lowered, the men <strong>an</strong>d buildings grew in size, <strong>an</strong>d<br />
when the speed was 10 or 15 ft per second, the objects<br />
appeared approximately in their ordinary size. It seems<br />
that Parrot’s observations were never conWrmed by other<br />
researchers, but the expl<strong>an</strong>ation he gave to the str<strong>an</strong>ge<br />
perceptual phenomenon contained a pr<strong>of</strong>ound insight<br />
(Allik & Konstabel, 2005).<br />
Parrot beg<strong>an</strong> his expl<strong>an</strong>ation with reference to the<br />
size const<strong>an</strong>cy mech<strong>an</strong>ism: although the size <strong>of</strong> the<br />
retinal image is known to decrease proportionally to the<br />
viewing dist<strong>an</strong>ce, the perceived size remains unaltered.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the mech<strong>an</strong>isms by which the dist<strong>an</strong>ce c<strong>an</strong> be<br />
measured is to count the objects between the object <strong>an</strong>d<br />
the eye. It seems that for Parrot it was self-evident that<br />
the perceived size was a result <strong>of</strong> syllogistic reasoning:<br />
<strong>from</strong> the recorded retinal size <strong>an</strong>d dist<strong>an</strong>ce (minor premise)<br />
<strong>an</strong>d the inverse proportion rule <strong>of</strong> retinal projection<br />
(major premise), <strong>an</strong> inference about the size c<strong>an</strong> be<br />
made. This decision is made very rapidly <strong>an</strong>d subjectively;<br />
we consider the time necessary for these operations<br />
to be inWnitely short, so we are not even aware <strong>of</strong><br />
their very existence. According to Parrot, the soul does<br />
not have the time to judge the dist<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>an</strong>d visual <strong>an</strong>gle<br />
with the required accuracy. Due to the rapid movement<br />
<strong>of</strong> the locomotive the soul c<strong>an</strong>not distinguish all the<br />
external objects that are required for the reliable estimation<br />
<strong>of</strong> dist<strong>an</strong>ce. Thus, the judgment that our soul makes<br />
with regard to the size <strong>of</strong> the objects in these extreme<br />
conditions is based on a preliminary false judgment—the<br />
minor <strong>of</strong> two premises is false. In other words, it is evident<br />
Parrot was formulating, here, the concept <strong>of</strong> unconscious<br />
inferences which is better known as the concept <strong>of</strong><br />
unbewusster Schluss formulated by Herm<strong>an</strong>n von<br />
Helmholtz—the psychic activities that lead us to infer<br />
that in front <strong>of</strong> us, at a certain place, there is a certain<br />
object <strong>of</strong> a certain character (Helmholtz, 1910). However,<br />
in the year <strong>of</strong> Parrot’s publication, Helmholtz was<br />
only 18 years old <strong>an</strong>d would write his H<strong>an</strong>dbuch der<br />
Physiologischen Optik only 20 years later. According to<br />
Boring, Helmholtz obviously adopted the idea <strong>of</strong> unconscious<br />
inferences while he was in Königsberg <strong>an</strong>d<br />
exposed its essentials in a lecture that was published in<br />
1855 (Boring, 1957, p. 315). Although the hypothesis <strong>of</strong><br />
unconscious inferences was implicit in this paper, it was<br />
not named as such <strong>an</strong>d was later elaborated by Wilhelm<br />
Wundt in his Beiträge zur Theorie der Sinneswahrnehmung<br />
(Wundt, 1858).<br />
Parrot was not the Wrst to suggest the existence <strong>of</strong> the<br />
involuntary reasoning-like operations in order to reach a<br />
satisfactory expl<strong>an</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> certain phenomena in the<br />
hum<strong>an</strong> perception (HatWeld, 2002). For example, Alhazen’s<br />
theory <strong>of</strong> “unconscious inferences” resembles<br />
Helmholtz’ theory <strong>of</strong> unbewusster Schluss practically in<br />
all import<strong>an</strong>t details (Bauer, 1911). According to Alhazen,<br />
perceptual judgments occur in <strong>an</strong> extremely short<br />
interval <strong>of</strong> time. The faculty <strong>of</strong> perceptual judgment does<br />
not syllogize by ordering <strong>an</strong>d composing words, that faculty<br />
perceived the conclusion without need for words or<br />
for repeating <strong>an</strong>d ordering premises (II 26b) (Sabra,<br />
1989, p. xxcvi–xcvii).<br />
One remarkable aspect <strong>of</strong> Parrot’s article was a proposed<br />
pl<strong>an</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong> experiment by which it is possible to<br />
determine the time that the soul uses to form its ideas<br />
<strong>an</strong>d make judgments. The idea was to make systematic<br />
observations on the apparent size <strong>of</strong> locomotives moving<br />
at a given speed <strong>an</strong>d placing objects at diVerent<br />
measured dist<strong>an</strong>ces. This <strong>experimental</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>, irrespective<br />
<strong>of</strong> its actual accomplishment, clearly recognises the
possibility <strong>of</strong> subjecting psychological processes to<br />
<strong>experimental</strong> study, contrary to K<strong>an</strong>t’s inXuential opinion<br />
that no such thing is possible (HatWeld, 1998).<br />
So, although the notion <strong>of</strong> unconscious inference was<br />
conceptualised nine centuries earlier by Alhazen <strong>an</strong>d<br />
independently became re-invented by Parrot m<strong>an</strong>y years<br />
before Helmholtz <strong>an</strong>d Wundt articulated <strong>an</strong>d coined the<br />
doctrine <strong>of</strong> unconscious inferences, it is Helmholtz <strong>an</strong>d<br />
Wundt who are usually credited for the achievement <strong>an</strong>d<br />
not Alhazen. Aside <strong>from</strong> the concept <strong>of</strong> unconscious<br />
inferences itself, Parrot had the idea that the speed <strong>of</strong><br />
mental processes is not inWnitely high <strong>an</strong>d that in principle,<br />
it c<strong>an</strong> be determined by systematic observations <strong>of</strong><br />
phenomena <strong>of</strong> the type he observed in the moving train.<br />
His way <strong>of</strong> thinking is in harmony with Fechner,<br />
Helmholtz <strong>an</strong>d Wundt, who all, in one or <strong>an</strong>other way,<br />
demonstrated that sensory judgments c<strong>an</strong> be qu<strong>an</strong>tiWed,<br />
that a measurable qu<strong>an</strong>tity <strong>of</strong> time is required for their<br />
execution, <strong>an</strong>d that they are related to events in the physical<br />
environment in a me<strong>an</strong>ingful way. Parrot shared the<br />
conviction <strong>of</strong> the founding fathers <strong>of</strong> <strong>psychology</strong> that it<br />
is possible to study the phenomena <strong>of</strong> mind in the same<br />
general way that the physical world is studied <strong>an</strong>d c<strong>an</strong> be<br />
described in terms <strong>of</strong> either mech<strong>an</strong>ical or mathematical<br />
laws (Allik & Konstabel, 2005).<br />
The personal equation <strong>an</strong>d Friedrich Struve<br />
In 1811, Parrot org<strong>an</strong>ised a special stipend for a talented<br />
philology graduate, Friedrich Georg Wilhelm Struve<br />
(1793–1864), to continue his studies in a completely new<br />
direction—mathematics <strong>an</strong>d astronomy. Only a few<br />
years later, in 1813, Struve had became the director <strong>of</strong><br />
the Dorpat observatory, <strong>an</strong>d exactly in the same year a<br />
new observatory was erected in Königsberg under the<br />
supervision <strong>of</strong> Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel (1784–1846). In<br />
order to improve the precision <strong>of</strong> astronomical observations,<br />
Bessel proposed to calibrate observers by establishing<br />
their, as it came to be called, personal equations.<br />
In 1820, Bessel performed at Königsberg one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />
import<strong>an</strong>t experiments in the whole history <strong>of</strong> <strong>experimental</strong><br />
<strong>psychology</strong>. He <strong>an</strong>d his assist<strong>an</strong>t Walbeck Wrst<br />
selected ten stars, <strong>an</strong>d then they independently observed<br />
the tr<strong>an</strong>sit <strong>of</strong> Wve <strong>of</strong> them in one night <strong>an</strong>d <strong>of</strong> the remaining<br />
Wve in the following night, <strong>an</strong>d so on, for Wve nights.<br />
Bessel was always found to observe the tr<strong>an</strong>sit earlier<br />
th<strong>an</strong> Wallbeck. The two observers diVered systematically<br />
by about 1 s, a time diVerence that was even larger th<strong>an</strong><br />
that found between the observations <strong>of</strong> the Astronomer<br />
Royal Nevil Maskelyne <strong>an</strong>d his assist<strong>an</strong>t David Kinnebrook,<br />
particip<strong>an</strong>ts in one <strong>of</strong> the most famous incidents<br />
in the prehistory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>experimental</strong> <strong>psychology</strong><br />
(Boring, 1957). In 1823, Bessel had <strong>an</strong> opportunity to<br />
repeat a similar comparison with <strong>an</strong>other assist<strong>an</strong>t Argel<strong>an</strong>der.<br />
Again, a systematic diVerence was found between<br />
the two observers. This convinced Bessel that there are<br />
irreducible individual diVerences between observers.<br />
Even if a given observer was consistent with himself on<br />
diVerent trials, his me<strong>an</strong> judgment time systematically<br />
disagrees with the same judgment made by <strong>an</strong>other<br />
observer. To verify these observations, Bessel was especially<br />
eager to compare himself with Struve in Dorpat,<br />
who already had earned a reputation as being one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
best astronomical observers. Having no opportunity for<br />
a direct comparison, Bessel sent three <strong>of</strong> his assist<strong>an</strong>ts<br />
Walbeck 1 , Argel<strong>an</strong>der 2 <strong>an</strong>d Knorre to Dorpat in 1821,<br />
1823 <strong>an</strong>d 1825, respectively, to compare their observation<br />
data with Struve. Through them, Bessel established<br />
indirectly the relation between the personal observation<br />
times between himself <strong>an</strong>d Struve. Only in 1834 did Bessel<br />
<strong>an</strong>d Struve Wnd <strong>an</strong> opportunity to compare themselves<br />
directly <strong>an</strong>d conWrm the indirect predictions<br />
(Boring, 1957, p. 137). 3<br />
The further history <strong>of</strong> this problem is well known: in<br />
1861, Wilhelm Wundt constructed his famous pendulum,<br />
also known as Wundt’s complication clock, that swung<br />
across a scale <strong>an</strong>d caused a spring to give a click at a<br />
given point <strong>of</strong> excursion. The basic design reproduced<br />
essential properties <strong>of</strong> Bradley’s “eye <strong>an</strong>d ear” method<br />
(cf. Boring, 1957, p. 135) that was used for astronomical<br />
measurements. The Wrst series <strong>of</strong> experiments on compound<br />
reaction (Boring, 1957, p. 324) were conducted by<br />
Max Friedrich in the Wrst psychological laboratory<br />
founded by Wundt in 1879 (Dom<strong>an</strong>ski, 2004).<br />
There is no evidence about Friedrich Struve’s direct<br />
contribution to the problem <strong>of</strong> the personal equations<br />
besides the practical use <strong>of</strong> it. However, it was the communication<br />
between Königsberg <strong>an</strong>d Dorpat that helped<br />
to discover measurable individual diVerences between<br />
hum<strong>an</strong> observers, which belongs, despite <strong>of</strong> its seeming<br />
triviality, to one <strong>of</strong> the most consequential discoveries in<br />
the whole history <strong>of</strong> <strong>psychology</strong>.<br />
Alfred Volkm<strong>an</strong>n <strong>an</strong>d Weber’s Law<br />
Gustav Theodor Fechner’s Elemente der Psychophysics,<br />
published in 1860, established a solid foundation for<br />
<strong>experimental</strong> <strong>psychology</strong>. As Boring noticed, “with<br />
Fechner it was born, quite as old, <strong>an</strong>d also quite as<br />
1 In 1821, H. J. Walbeck (1794–1823) was <strong>an</strong> astronomer in Turku,<br />
Finl<strong>an</strong>d <strong>an</strong>d he died only 2 years later at the age <strong>of</strong> 29. In 1819, he<br />
calculated dimensions <strong>of</strong> the Earth which were very close to the correct<br />
values known today.<br />
2 Friedrich Wilhelm August Argel<strong>an</strong>der (1799–1875) later became<br />
director <strong>of</strong> the observatory at the University <strong>of</strong> Bonn.<br />
3 There are few errors in the name index <strong>of</strong> otherwise accurate Boring’s<br />
<strong>History</strong> (Boring, 1957). He is referring to Struve as O.W. Struve<br />
which is certainly wrong. The correct reference should be Friedrich<br />
Georg Wilhelm Struve whose son Otto Wilhelm was not even born<br />
when the Wrst personal equation was determined. The reverse error<br />
has happened with regard to Knorre. Boring erroneously thinks that<br />
Bessel wrote about Ernst Christoph Friedrich Knorre (1759–1810)<br />
who was also <strong>an</strong> astronomer, but he had died 15 years ago when his<br />
son Karl Freidrich Knorre visited Königsberg in 1825 (cf. Petrov &<br />
Pinigin, 2002).
young, as a baby” (Boring 1957, p. 275). Fechner had, <strong>of</strong><br />
course, predecessors including Ernst Weber after whom<br />
Fechner named “Weber’s law”. Ernst Heinrich Weber<br />
(1795–1878) was a pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong>atomy <strong>an</strong>d physiology<br />
at Leipzig <strong>from</strong> 1818 <strong>an</strong>d thereafter. Fechner considered<br />
Weber’s law as a cornerstone <strong>from</strong> which he could move<br />
forward to derive his psychophysical law simply by logical<br />
deduction. Therefore, it was the greatest import<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
to establish the universality <strong>of</strong> the Weber’s law beyond<br />
tactual perception <strong>from</strong> where it was established Wrst.<br />
At the time when young Fechner got his degree in<br />
medicine in 1822, <strong>an</strong>other young m<strong>an</strong>, Alfred Wilhelm<br />
Volkm<strong>an</strong>n (1800–1878) enrolled as a student <strong>of</strong> medicine<br />
at Leipzig in 1821. Together with Rudolph Herm<strong>an</strong>n<br />
Lotze (1817–1881) Fechner <strong>an</strong>d Volkm<strong>an</strong>n formed a<br />
small intellectual group, which dissolved only in 1837<br />
when Volkm<strong>an</strong>n received his pr<strong>of</strong>essorship in Dorpat<br />
(Boring, 1957, p. 277). Four years earlier, in 1833,<br />
Fechner had married Volkm<strong>an</strong>n’s sister.<br />
The role <strong>of</strong> Volkm<strong>an</strong>n in the development <strong>of</strong> psychophysics<br />
is generally acknowledged. Usually it is mentioned<br />
that “in co-operation with Volkm<strong>an</strong>n, Fechner<br />
developed the method <strong>of</strong> “average error” (already in use<br />
in astronomy) for use in visual <strong>an</strong>d tactual measurement”<br />
(Murphy, 1964, p. 90). It is, however, import<strong>an</strong>t to<br />
note that the role <strong>of</strong> Volkm<strong>an</strong>n was not only to assist<br />
Fechner, but in 1864, Volkm<strong>an</strong>n also reported independently<br />
that the threshold for length discrimination<br />
increases with the increase <strong>of</strong> the reference length. This<br />
was one <strong>of</strong> the Wrst demonstrations <strong>of</strong> Weber’s law in the<br />
visual domain. This fundamental Wnding about dist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
judgment—Weber’s law for spatial intervals—has been<br />
replicated repeatedly since then, for a variety <strong>of</strong> stimuli<br />
<strong>an</strong>d response modes, <strong>an</strong>d was proved to be one <strong>of</strong> the few<br />
Wrmly established <strong>an</strong>d replicable facts <strong>of</strong> <strong>psychology</strong> (cf.<br />
Burbeck & Hadden, 1993). Volkm<strong>an</strong>n, like Fechner<br />
before him, was also interested in the tr<strong>an</strong>sfer <strong>of</strong> training.<br />
Fechner was one <strong>of</strong> the Wrst who reported data showing<br />
that learning to write with one h<strong>an</strong>d facilitates the same<br />
activity with the other h<strong>an</strong>d. In his studies, he was again<br />
able to relay on previous studies done by Volkm<strong>an</strong>n who<br />
demonstrated <strong>experimental</strong>ly that the reduction <strong>of</strong> the<br />
“two-point” threshold in certain regions through training<br />
lowered the threshold in other regions as well (cf.<br />
Murphy 1964, p. 241). He also determined the speed <strong>of</strong><br />
eye movements <strong>an</strong>d constructed the Wrst prototype <strong>of</strong> the<br />
tachistoscope (Volkm<strong>an</strong>n, 1859). Volkm<strong>an</strong>n also wrote a<br />
section on vision in Wagner’s. 4 H<strong>an</strong>dwörterbuch der<br />
Physiologie, which became a st<strong>an</strong>dard textbook for the<br />
next half <strong>of</strong> a century. Among other observations, he<br />
repeated his earlier expl<strong>an</strong>ation to upright vision: the<br />
most natural expl<strong>an</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> upright vision is that it does<br />
not require <strong>an</strong> expl<strong>an</strong>ation (Volkm<strong>an</strong>n, 1836, p. 41).<br />
Perhaps Volkm<strong>an</strong>n’s most import<strong>an</strong>t contribution to<br />
<strong>experimental</strong> <strong>psychology</strong> concerns not only visual physi-<br />
4 Rudolf Wagner’s son, Adolf Wagner (1835–1917) was a pr<strong>of</strong>essor<br />
<strong>of</strong> Dorpat University (1865–1868) known as the central theorist <strong>of</strong><br />
‘state socialism’ (Drechsler, 1997).<br />
ology but also principles <strong>of</strong> operation <strong>of</strong> the whole nervous<br />
system. In 1832, he published in Müller’s Archiv, a<br />
study in which he demonstrated the inhibitory role <strong>of</strong> the<br />
vagus nerve on cardiac activity. Usually the discovery <strong>of</strong><br />
a entirely new kind <strong>of</strong> nervous action—inhibition—is<br />
credited to Volkm<strong>an</strong>n’s teachers in Leipzig University,<br />
the Weber brothers (Fulton, 1930, p. 276; Singer &<br />
Underwood, 1962, p. 331). It was claimed that Volkm<strong>an</strong>n<br />
just “missed <strong>an</strong> import<strong>an</strong>t opportunity”. Volkm<strong>an</strong>n himself<br />
never regarded the observed eVect as some technical<br />
error or <strong>an</strong> uninteresting observation. He realised the<br />
import<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> his discovery despite the domin<strong>an</strong>t belief<br />
that activation could only lead to the increase <strong>of</strong> nervous<br />
activity (Käbin, 1986, p. 79).<br />
Helmholtz paid respect to Volkm<strong>an</strong>n <strong>an</strong>d cited his<br />
work in his H<strong>an</strong>dbook <strong>of</strong> Physiological Optics (1867) 58<br />
times (Piper, 2000). Therefore, it is not surprising that<br />
Boring listed Volkm<strong>an</strong>n beside Helmholtz <strong>an</strong>d Fechner<br />
as one <strong>of</strong> the “founding fathers” <strong>of</strong> the <strong>experimental</strong> <strong>psychology</strong><br />
(Boring, 1957, p. 384).<br />
Arthur Joachim von Oettingen <strong>an</strong>d the system <strong>of</strong> harmony<br />
Arthur Joachim von Oettingen (1836–1920) was the oldest<br />
<strong>of</strong> the six Oettingen brothers. Like his two other<br />
brothers, he became a pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Tartu University at<br />
age 31. Besides physics, which was his main subject, he<br />
was particularly interested in music <strong>an</strong>d held a special<br />
course on the perception <strong>of</strong> music. He summarised his<br />
explorations in a book called Das Harmoniesystem in<br />
duale Entwicklung which was recognised by musical theorists<br />
at that time (Oettingen, 1866). Herm<strong>an</strong>n von<br />
Helmholtz, for example, was particularly interested in<br />
Oettingen’s report according to which the old modal<br />
song tradition was still alive <strong>an</strong>d strong among<br />
Estoni<strong>an</strong>s; they had diYculties to master the Protest<strong>an</strong>t<br />
plainsong, common in Europe, because <strong>of</strong> its high leading<br />
tone (Ross, 1991). It is interesting that in the principal<br />
dispute between August Seebeck 5 <strong>an</strong>d Helmholtz,<br />
concerning the question whether the perceived pitch is<br />
determined by the objective Fourier components or not,<br />
Oettingen rather took the position <strong>of</strong> his countrym<strong>an</strong><br />
rather th<strong>an</strong> Helmholtz’s. In his theory <strong>of</strong> conson<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>an</strong>d<br />
disson<strong>an</strong>ce Oettingen, like Seebeck before him, proposed<br />
that higher harmonics c<strong>an</strong> collaborate in the creation <strong>of</strong><br />
the perceived pitch which could depart <strong>from</strong> the physically<br />
present or absent fundamental tone. Ernst Mach,<br />
for example, used Oettingen’s harmony theory as a<br />
5 August Seebeck’s farther, Thomas Seebeck (1770–1831) was born<br />
in Tallinn <strong>an</strong>d, despite the fact that he spent the most part <strong>of</strong> his life<br />
in Germ<strong>an</strong>y, was estimated by his contemporaries as belonging to<br />
the Baltic Germ<strong>an</strong> elite not only due to his famous career as a physicist<br />
but also due to his close friendship with Goethe. Thomas Seebeck<br />
is known in the history <strong>of</strong> physics with his seminal works in<br />
thermo-electricity. He also discovered several new entoptic color<br />
phenomena (Ross, 1991).
subst<strong>an</strong>tial evidence against Helmholtz’ acoustic theory<br />
(Mach, 1922, p. 222).<br />
It is certainly not a coincidence that one <strong>of</strong> Oettingen’s<br />
students Wilhelm Friedrich Ostwald (1853–1932)<br />
winner <strong>of</strong> the Nobel Prize in chemistry in 1909 was also<br />
interested in the <strong>an</strong>alysis <strong>of</strong> music <strong>an</strong>d art. As Ostwald<br />
writes in his memories he attended Oettingen’s lectures<br />
on <strong>psychology</strong> <strong>of</strong> music <strong>an</strong>d was particularly inspired by<br />
his theory <strong>of</strong> harmony, which contained several fundamental<br />
discoveries. Although Ostwald found Harmoniesystem<br />
inspiring it was in his opinion written in such<br />
obscure m<strong>an</strong>ner that nobody has really m<strong>an</strong>aged to read<br />
it, except the author himself <strong>an</strong>d the typesetter. Inspired<br />
by Oettingen’s lectures Ostwald himself tried to apply<br />
qu<strong>an</strong>titative methods to the <strong>an</strong>alysis <strong>of</strong> Beethoven’s<br />
pi<strong>an</strong>o sonatas (Ostwald, 1926). Unfortunately, Ostwald’s<br />
studies in musical harmony are not widely known <strong>an</strong>d<br />
have been overshadowed by his more celebrated studies<br />
on colour harmony (Ostwald, 1918). In 1927, Ostwald<br />
even lectured in the Bauhaus School <strong>of</strong> art <strong>an</strong>d made a<br />
strong impression on Wassily K<strong>an</strong>dinsky (Ball, 2003).<br />
Emil Kraepelin <strong>an</strong>d <strong>experimental</strong> <strong>psychology</strong><br />
Emil Kraepelin (Neustrelitz, Germ<strong>an</strong>y, 1856—München,<br />
1926) is by far the most import<strong>an</strong>t <strong>experimental</strong> psychologist<br />
who has been associated with Estonia. The founder<br />
<strong>of</strong> modern psychiatry he became pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> psychiatry<br />
at Dorpat University in 1886 when he was 30 years old<br />
(Steinberg & Angermeyer, 2001). It was Wundt who suggested<br />
to his favourite student about medical vocation<br />
instead <strong>of</strong> the uncertainties <strong>of</strong> being a psychologist. In his<br />
Memoirs Kraepelin summarises his years in Tartu in the<br />
following way: “...besides my clinical training I was able<br />
to hold quite a number <strong>of</strong> independent lectures about<br />
criminal <strong>psychology</strong>, forensic psychiatry, about the conscience<br />
<strong>an</strong>d its disorders <strong>an</strong>d <strong>experimental</strong> <strong>psychology</strong>.<br />
There was never lack <strong>of</strong> students for these lectures. I considered<br />
psychological discussions, based on Wundt’s<br />
model, to be specially import<strong>an</strong>t <strong>an</strong>d I made the students<br />
make reports on individual problems” (Kraepelin, 1987,<br />
p. 42). As he later confessed, <strong>experimental</strong> work appealed<br />
to him much more th<strong>an</strong> clinical work (Kraepelin, 1987, p.<br />
42). There were two main reasons to be not satisWed with<br />
his clinical work: the Wrst was the l<strong>an</strong>guage barrier 6 <strong>an</strong>d<br />
the second was the insuYcient number <strong>of</strong> patients.<br />
Therefore, fortunately to <strong>psychology</strong>, he concentrated on<br />
<strong>psychology</strong>. He wrote about it:<br />
The conditions for starting a school <strong>of</strong> <strong>psychology</strong> in<br />
Dorpat were favourable. The distinguished physiologist,<br />
6 His knowledge <strong>of</strong> Estoni<strong>an</strong> was quite enough to make a tremendous<br />
impression on the personell <strong>of</strong> the Ist<strong>an</strong>bul’s mental asylum he<br />
visited during one <strong>of</strong> his frequent travels. During his visit a patient<br />
was shown, whose origin was unclear, as he spoke a completely unknown<br />
l<strong>an</strong>guage. The Estoni<strong>an</strong> sailm<strong>an</strong> was, <strong>of</strong> course, very happy<br />
to Wnd someone, who could speak at least few words <strong>of</strong> his mother<br />
tongue with him (Kraepelin, 1987, p. 82).<br />
Alex<strong>an</strong>der Schmidt, had placed a room in his new institute<br />
at our disposal, which was <strong>of</strong> great help, as the clinic was<br />
too far away <strong>an</strong>d had no spare room. The university<br />
mech<strong>an</strong>ics Schulze proved to be <strong>an</strong> exceptionally skilled<br />
<strong>an</strong>d underst<strong>an</strong>ding helper <strong>an</strong>d produced a number <strong>of</strong> well<br />
invented <strong>an</strong>d carefully pl<strong>an</strong>ned machines for various investigations.<br />
Luckily, I found a lot <strong>of</strong> keen, self-sacriWcing<br />
students prepared to devote m<strong>an</strong>y, m<strong>an</strong>y months’ work<br />
solely to their doctorate theses. Thus, studies were made,<br />
which brought import<strong>an</strong>t new Wndings with them; for<br />
example the work by Michelson on the depth <strong>of</strong> sleep, individual<br />
<strong>psychology</strong> by Oehrn, time sense by Eyner, contrast<br />
sensitivity with perception <strong>of</strong> space by Higier <strong>an</strong>d the<br />
diversion <strong>of</strong> attention by Bertels. DiYculties to overcome<br />
on the technical side were <strong>of</strong>ten considerable <strong>an</strong>d I const<strong>an</strong>tly<br />
admired the patience <strong>of</strong> the youngsters in withst<strong>an</strong>ding<br />
all these obstacles. Sometimes, the physicist<br />
Arthur von Oettingen gave us his kind advice.” (Kraepelin,<br />
1987, pp. 44–45).<br />
Kraepelin found the general scientiWc life in Dorpat<br />
stimulating, as there were always a number <strong>of</strong> younger<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essors present, who worked with enthusiasm. He<br />
wrote that with the university very near, the university<br />
members had active contact with one <strong>an</strong>other in <strong>an</strong><br />
atmosphere <strong>of</strong> unconditional equality (Kraepelin,<br />
1987, p. 47). In these conditions, Kraepelin pursued<br />
diVerent lines <strong>of</strong> investigation, including word<br />
associations:<br />
I had set up my own equipment for the measurement <strong>of</strong><br />
mental reactions <strong>an</strong>d carried out tests on aphasic <strong>an</strong>d other<br />
suitable psychiatric patients <strong>an</strong>d on m<strong>an</strong>ic patients. I made<br />
the surprising discovery that the association’s times were<br />
by no me<strong>an</strong>s shorter, but were <strong>of</strong>ten longer <strong>an</strong>d very irregular.<br />
This fact led me to underst<strong>an</strong>d that the Xight <strong>of</strong> ideas<br />
was not the accelerated consequence <strong>of</strong> mental images, but<br />
were volatile <strong>an</strong>d instable emerging processes in the conscience”<br />
(p. 44).<br />
Among psychological problems, however, the subject<br />
<strong>of</strong> Kraepelin’s special interest was fatigue. He regarded<br />
his established work curve as his chief contribution.<br />
W. Weyg<strong>an</strong>dt, who wrote <strong>an</strong> elaborate obituary in Psychologische<br />
Arbeiten, revealed that Kraepelin had hoped<br />
to receive the Nobel award not for dementia praecox or<br />
his nosological classiWcation but for his results on the<br />
work curve (Roback, 1961, p. 308).<br />
It is not surprising that today, almost a century later<br />
<strong>of</strong> his innovative studies, he remains one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />
cited behavioural scientists <strong>of</strong> all times. According to the<br />
Social Sciences Citation Index Kraepelin was cited 6,618<br />
times in the period <strong>from</strong> 1972 to 2005 (November) more<br />
th<strong>an</strong> 200£ every year.<br />
Along with the intensive RussiWcation campaign<br />
launched in 1889, the autonomy <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong><br />
Dorpat was considerably reduced: rector, de<strong>an</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essors were not elected <strong>an</strong>y more but appointed by<br />
the Minister <strong>of</strong> Education (the appointment <strong>of</strong> the rector<br />
required approval by the czar himself). Besides<br />
diminishing the role <strong>of</strong> Baltic Germ<strong>an</strong>s, one <strong>of</strong> the goals<br />
<strong>of</strong> these reforms was to prevent people <strong>from</strong> lower
strata to study at the university. In order to achieve this<br />
goal, the study fee was increased <strong>from</strong> 10 to 50 roubles<br />
per year. Typically for the Russi<strong>an</strong> Empire, then <strong>an</strong>d<br />
later, strict quotas <strong>of</strong> Jews admitted by the universities<br />
were imposed (Siilivask, 1982, p. 258). Russi<strong>an</strong> became<br />
the oYcial l<strong>an</strong>guage <strong>of</strong> teaching <strong>an</strong>d all Germ<strong>an</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essors<br />
who were not able or willing to lecture in Russi<strong>an</strong><br />
had to leave Tartu. Among those who had to leave<br />
Dortpat, or Jurjev, as it was renamed, were Oettingen,<br />
Ostwald, <strong>an</strong>d Kraepelin.<br />
Wladimir Tchisch as a successor <strong>of</strong> Kraepelin<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the Wrst Russi<strong>an</strong> students <strong>of</strong> Wundt, Wladimir<br />
Tchisch (1855–1922) 7 was appointed as a successor <strong>of</strong><br />
Kraepelin. When Tchisch arrived at Leipzig in 1884, he<br />
naturally was appointed to work with Wundt’s pendulum<br />
<strong>an</strong>d complication reaction. He noticed in particular<br />
that in some cases a click could be heard before the pendulum<br />
actually reached the spring; in other cases the<br />
click appeared later when the pendulum had already<br />
passed the spring (Tchisch, 1885). Since then diVerent<br />
time paradoxes fascinated philosophers as well as psychologists<br />
(cf. Dennett, 1991). For example, the apparent<br />
lagging behind <strong>of</strong> a moving object in relation to a short<br />
sound or Xash was repeatedly rediscovered <strong>an</strong>d has<br />
recently become known under the name <strong>of</strong> the Flash–<br />
Lag EVect (Nijhaw<strong>an</strong>, 1994; Kreegipuu & Allik, 2004).<br />
Concerning his teaching, Tchisch regularly held<br />
courses on <strong>experimental</strong> <strong>psychology</strong> <strong>an</strong>d supervised<br />
doctoral dissertations that had a clear <strong>experimental</strong>–<br />
psychological orientation (Ramul, 1974). From the<br />
titles <strong>of</strong> dissertations supervised by Tchisch the following<br />
c<strong>an</strong> be named: experiments concerning spatial<br />
memory <strong>of</strong> the skin (E. Loewenton, 1893); memory <strong>of</strong><br />
active movements (F. Schneider, 1894); the sense<br />
<strong>of</strong> location <strong>an</strong>d its memory (B. Barth, 1894); memory<br />
<strong>of</strong> visual perceptions (K. Zaborovsky, 1894); comparative<br />
study <strong>of</strong> tactile <strong>an</strong>d gustatory sensitivity <strong>of</strong> women<br />
<strong>from</strong> diVerent social classes (W.V. Dehm, 1894); the<br />
ch<strong>an</strong>ge <strong>of</strong> pulse <strong>an</strong>d aspiration during diVerent psychical<br />
states (G. Hirsch, 1899); <strong>an</strong> <strong>experimental</strong> study <strong>of</strong><br />
the skin sensitivity (G. Hildebr<strong>an</strong>d, 1899) (Ramul,<br />
1974, p. 107).<br />
The list <strong>of</strong> these studies characterises Tchisch’s somewhat<br />
unsystematic interests which nevertheless kept the<br />
tradition <strong>of</strong> <strong>experimental</strong> psychological investigations<br />
alive at Tartu University. Some <strong>of</strong> them, especially the<br />
inXuence <strong>of</strong> social factors on perception, <strong>an</strong>ticipated the<br />
popularity <strong>of</strong> these problems in the subsequent history <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>psychology</strong>.<br />
7 Sometimes in Russi<strong>an</strong> (me<strong>an</strong>s ‘siskin’) is also tr<strong>an</strong>scribed<br />
into the Latin alphabet as Chizh. William James’ Principles referred<br />
to him as Tschisch (James, 1890).<br />
Two <strong>experimental</strong>ists with Estoni<strong>an</strong> connections<br />
It is impossible to avoid mentioning the two psychologists<br />
who never practised their pr<strong>of</strong>ession in Estonia but<br />
were nevertheless connected to Estonia. They are<br />
Wolfg<strong>an</strong>g Köhler (1887–1967) <strong>an</strong>d Oswald Külpe (1862–<br />
1915)<br />
Wolfg<strong>an</strong>g Köhler (1887–1967), the main theoretici<strong>an</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> gestalt <strong>psychology</strong>, was born in Tallinn (Reval) in his<br />
parents residence Toomkooli 4 (Schulgasse 9) on the 21st<br />
<strong>of</strong> J<strong>an</strong>uary, 1887 (Lõo, 2004). His farther, Fr<strong>an</strong>z Köhler,<br />
was the Headmaster <strong>of</strong> the Germ<strong>an</strong> Gymnasium (Domschule)<br />
<strong>an</strong>d his residence was just across the street. His<br />
mother, Wilhelmine Girgensohn, was a daughter <strong>of</strong> luther<strong>an</strong><br />
priest. When Köhler was about 6, the family moved<br />
to Germ<strong>an</strong>y. The main reason for leaving Estonia was<br />
again the campaign <strong>of</strong> RussiWcation which put <strong>an</strong> end to<br />
education in other l<strong>an</strong>guages rather th<strong>an</strong> Russi<strong>an</strong>.<br />
There is no need to reiterate the import<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> Wolfg<strong>an</strong>g<br />
Köhler, one <strong>of</strong> the most distingushed psychologists<br />
<strong>of</strong> the twentieth century. Besides his illustrious pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
career he is <strong>an</strong> example <strong>of</strong> extraordinary personal<br />
integrity. Only few Germ<strong>an</strong> scientists <strong>an</strong>d intellectuals<br />
had the courage to protest against the dismissal <strong>of</strong> Jewish<br />
scientists after the Nazis took power in J<strong>an</strong>uary 1933.<br />
Köhler was <strong>an</strong> exception. With the dismissal <strong>of</strong> James<br />
Fr<strong>an</strong>ck, the physicist <strong>an</strong>d Nobel Prize winner in 1925,<br />
Köhler made a public statement. On April 28, 1933 he<br />
wrote for the Deutsches Allgemeine Zeitung, the last <strong>an</strong>tinazi<br />
article to be published under the Nazi regime. In this<br />
article he wrote that Fr<strong>an</strong>ck’s dismissal “shows the deepest<br />
reason why all these people are not joining the Party:<br />
they feel moral imposition. They believe that only the<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> hum<strong>an</strong> being should determine his worth, that<br />
intellectual achievement, character, <strong>an</strong>d obvious contribution<br />
to Germ<strong>an</strong> culture retain their signiWc<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
whether a person is Jewish or not” (Henle, 1978; Ash,<br />
1995, p. 326 V.).<br />
Oswald Külpe, the founder <strong>of</strong> the Würzburg School,<br />
was born near the Baltic coast in Courl<strong>an</strong>d which is now<br />
Latvia. He beg<strong>an</strong> his studies <strong>of</strong> <strong>psychology</strong> under Wundt<br />
in Leipzig but then went to Berlin for a semester to study<br />
history instead. Afterwards he returned to <strong>psychology</strong><br />
again <strong>an</strong>d studied three semesters in Göttingen with<br />
G.E. Müller who had succeeded Lotze (Boring, 1957,<br />
pp. 397–398). In 1885, however, he left Göttingen <strong>an</strong>d<br />
went to Tartu for a whole year in order to graduate as <strong>an</strong><br />
art histori<strong>an</strong>. After receiving his degree, he returned to<br />
Leipzig where he wrote, as <strong>an</strong> assist<strong>an</strong>t <strong>of</strong> Wundt, <strong>an</strong><br />
introductory textbook (Külpe, 1893). Wundt, as it is well<br />
known, was very skeptical about the possibility <strong>of</strong> studying,<br />
in a scientiWcally sound way, <strong>an</strong>ything more intricate<br />
th<strong>an</strong> elementary sensations <strong>an</strong>d simple motor responses.<br />
More complex phenomena, like feelings <strong>an</strong>d thoughts,<br />
are too Wrmly enclosed by the boundaries <strong>of</strong> the subject<br />
<strong>an</strong>d their causes are generally hidden <strong>from</strong> objective<br />
investigation. Külpe, in turn, states in his textbook that<br />
in principle there is no topic <strong>of</strong> psychological inquiry
which c<strong>an</strong>not be approached by the <strong>experimental</strong><br />
method. And <strong>experimental</strong> <strong>psychology</strong> is therefore fully<br />
within its rights when it claims to be the general <strong>psychology</strong><br />
(Külpe, 1893). In Wundt’s view, Külpe’s approach to<br />
<strong>psychology</strong> was based on <strong>an</strong> erroneous overestimation <strong>of</strong><br />
the scope <strong>of</strong> natural science <strong>an</strong>d reduces <strong>psychology</strong> to a<br />
kind <strong>of</strong> “applied physiology” (D<strong>an</strong>ziger, 1979, p. 211). In<br />
<strong>an</strong>y case, Külpe was unwilling to follow Wundt’s recommendations<br />
<strong>an</strong>d like Ebbinghaus, who had brought<br />
memory as <strong>an</strong>other specimen <strong>of</strong> the “higher mental processes”,<br />
under the scrutiny <strong>of</strong> <strong>experimental</strong> methods,<br />
decided to bring thought into the laboratory as well<br />
(Boring, 1957, p. 402). This basic idea marked the beginning<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Würzburg School <strong>an</strong>d the breakdown <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>an</strong>other barrier on the way <strong>of</strong> <strong>experimental</strong> <strong>psychology</strong>.<br />
Dorpat School <strong>of</strong> <strong>psychology</strong> <strong>of</strong> religion<br />
Karl Gustav Girgensohn (1875–1925) was a cousin <strong>of</strong><br />
Wolfg<strong>an</strong>g Köhler’s mother, Wilhelmine Girgensohn<br />
(Lõo, 2004). In 1903, Girgensohn returned to Dorpat<br />
after studies in Germ<strong>an</strong>y for defending his Master Thesis<br />
“The religion, its psychical form <strong>an</strong>d its central idea”<br />
(Die Religion, ihre psychischen Formen und ihre Zentralidee).<br />
Seven years later, in 1910, he obtained his doctoral<br />
degree <strong>from</strong> Berlin University. At the same year <strong>an</strong><br />
import<strong>an</strong>t event happened which ch<strong>an</strong>ged his life. He<br />
Wnally found <strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>swer to a question that had puzzled<br />
him: is it possible by me<strong>an</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the modern science to<br />
explain the nature <strong>of</strong> Christi<strong>an</strong>ity? A colleague at Dorpat<br />
University introduced Girgensohn to the revolutionary<br />
work <strong>of</strong> the Würzburg School (WulV, 1991, p. 554). In<br />
1910 he accepted Külpe’s invitation to spend a term with<br />
him at Bonn. Girgensohn soon became a convinced<br />
adherent <strong>of</strong> the Würzburg School procedures. He<br />
believed that the method <strong>of</strong> <strong>experimental</strong> introspection<br />
suits ideally to the study <strong>of</strong> religious experiences <strong>an</strong>d c<strong>an</strong><br />
resolve the debate <strong>of</strong> the psychological nature <strong>of</strong> religion.<br />
In 1911 Girgensohn beg<strong>an</strong> his experiments by laboriously<br />
recording the observations <strong>of</strong> 14 individuals,<br />
including himself. He presented to his subjects not very<br />
well known texts <strong>from</strong> various theological writers, <strong>an</strong>d<br />
recorded the thoughts <strong>an</strong>d feelings as they arose in his<br />
subjects while they were reading the texts. Girgensohn<br />
not only recorded the associations <strong>of</strong> his subject, but also<br />
interviewed them in order to further explore their<br />
responses to the texts. In this Wrst experiment, each particip<strong>an</strong>t<br />
was tested on 26 diVerent texts. The work lasted<br />
for 2 years <strong>an</strong>d the Wrst results <strong>of</strong> the Wrst <strong>experimental</strong><br />
study <strong>of</strong> religious experience were summarised in 1913.<br />
In 1921 his monumental book containing more th<strong>an</strong> 700<br />
pages was published (Girgensohn, 1921). Girgensohn’s<br />
ideas inspired m<strong>an</strong>y people <strong>an</strong>d as WulV (1991, p. 16)<br />
wrote: “Students <strong>an</strong>d visiting scholars found their way to<br />
Dorpat <strong>an</strong>d, after 1919, to Greifswald <strong>an</strong>d then to Leipzig,<br />
in order to work with Girgensohn”. This group <strong>of</strong><br />
people formed <strong>an</strong> intellectual unity which is still called<br />
the Dorpat School <strong>of</strong> religious <strong>psychology</strong> (WulV, 1985).<br />
After Girgensohn’s unexpected death in 1925, Werner<br />
Gruehn (1887–1961) became the leader <strong>of</strong> the Dorpat<br />
schoool. The full program <strong>of</strong> the Dorpat School is represented<br />
in the large h<strong>an</strong>dbook Contemporary Piety<br />
(Gruehn, 1956). David WulV’s (1991) most comprehensive<br />
treatise on <strong>psychology</strong> <strong>of</strong> religion devotes <strong>an</strong> entire<br />
chapter to Girgensohn <strong>an</strong>d the Dorpat School.<br />
The history <strong>of</strong> <strong>psychology</strong> c<strong>an</strong> be seen as a struggle<br />
for a deWnition <strong>of</strong> the borderline separating psychological<br />
issues allowing for <strong>an</strong> <strong>experimental</strong> approach <strong>an</strong>d<br />
issues that do not. K<strong>an</strong>t’s pessimistic dictum that “no<br />
other thinking subject c<strong>an</strong> be subjected to our experiments<br />
in accord<strong>an</strong>ce with purpose” still captivated the<br />
minds <strong>of</strong> most psychologists (Ramul, 1960). M<strong>an</strong>y areas,<br />
including that <strong>of</strong> hum<strong>an</strong> thought which Wundt believed<br />
to remain terra incognita forever, were already em<strong>an</strong>cipated<br />
<strong>from</strong> K<strong>an</strong>t’s moratorium. Religious experience, as<br />
attacked by the Dorpat School, certainly belonged to<br />
those topic least expected to the subject <strong>of</strong> systematic<br />
<strong>experimental</strong> <strong>an</strong>alysis.<br />
Concluding remarks<br />
In 1919, after Estonia had obtained independence, Tartu<br />
University became a national university with instruction<br />
l<strong>an</strong>guage being primarily Estoni<strong>an</strong>. The Wrst pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>psychology</strong> was Konst<strong>an</strong>tin Ramul (1879–1975) who is<br />
primarily known as a histori<strong>an</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>psychology</strong> (Ramul,<br />
1963; Ramul, 1974; Ramul, 1960). In 1921, one <strong>of</strong><br />
Ramul’s assist<strong>an</strong>ts Juh<strong>an</strong> Tork (1889–1980) 8 spent one<br />
semester in Leipzig where he attended, among the others,<br />
lectures <strong>of</strong> Wilhelm Wundt. Returning <strong>from</strong> Germ<strong>an</strong>y,<br />
he brought with him equipment that was needed to<br />
launch a laboratory <strong>of</strong> <strong>experimental</strong> <strong>psychology</strong>.<br />
Although this laboratory mainly served for teaching purposes,<br />
it played, together with Ramul’s general theoretical<br />
attitudes (cf. Ramul, 1929), <strong>an</strong> essential constituent in<br />
keeping the <strong>experimental</strong> research tradition alive even<br />
during the period <strong>of</strong> Soviet occupation (Allik, 1992).<br />
Without this tradition it would have been absolutely<br />
improbable that in 2003, 48 articles were published in<br />
Journals <strong>an</strong>d other sources indexed by the PsychINFO<br />
database with at least one author having <strong>an</strong> Estoni<strong>an</strong><br />
aYliation. Divided by the number <strong>of</strong> population it gives<br />
36.3 articles per million <strong>of</strong> population which is, for example,<br />
only slightly less th<strong>an</strong> the same indicator <strong>of</strong><br />
Germ<strong>an</strong>y (42.7) but a little bit more th<strong>an</strong> that <strong>of</strong> Fr<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
(28.8). 9<br />
8 Juh<strong>an</strong> Tork is <strong>an</strong> author <strong>of</strong> the most import<strong>an</strong>t psychological study<br />
that was carried out between two wars. In 1940, he published doctoral<br />
dissertation (Tork, 1940) on the intelligence <strong>of</strong> Estoni<strong>an</strong> children<br />
based on the study <strong>of</strong> 6,000 schoolchildren (cf. Must, Must, &<br />
Raudik, 2003).<br />
9 There were 3,527 <strong>an</strong>d 1,732 articles <strong>of</strong> which one author either had<br />
Germ<strong>an</strong> or French aYliation, respectively.
Acknowledgements I would like to th<strong>an</strong>k Dirk Vorberg <strong>an</strong>d a reviewer<br />
for valuable comments <strong>an</strong>d suggestions.<br />
References<br />
Allik, J. (1992). Psychology in Estonia. News From EFPPA, 6, 7–10.<br />
Allik, J., & Konstabel, K. (2005). G. F. Parrot <strong>an</strong>d the theory <strong>of</strong> unconscious<br />
inferences. Journal <strong>of</strong> the <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Behavioral Sciences,<br />
41, 317–330.<br />
Ash, M. G. (1995). Gestalt <strong>psychology</strong> in Germ<strong>an</strong> culture 1890–1967:<br />
Holism <strong>an</strong>d the quest <strong>of</strong> objectivity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge<br />
University Press.<br />
Ball, P. (2003). Chemist Wilhelm Ostwald added colour to the art<br />
work. Nature, 425, 904.<br />
Bauer, H. (1911). Die Psychologie Alhazens. Beiträge Zur Geschichte<br />
Der Philosophie Des Mittelalters, 10, 29–32.<br />
Boring, E. G. (1957). A history <strong>of</strong> <strong>experimental</strong> <strong>psychology</strong>. New<br />
York: Appleton Century Cr<strong>of</strong>ts.<br />
Burbeck, C. A., & Hadden, S. (1993). Scaled position integration areas—accounting<br />
for Weber Law for separation. Journal <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Optical Society <strong>of</strong> America: A-Optics Image Science <strong>an</strong>d Vision,<br />
10, 5–15.<br />
D<strong>an</strong>ziger, K. (1979). The positivist repudiation <strong>of</strong> Wundt. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
the <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Behavioral Science, 15, 205–230.<br />
Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness explained. Boston: Little,<br />
Brown <strong>an</strong>d Comp<strong>an</strong>y.<br />
Dom<strong>an</strong>ski, C. W. (2004). A biographical note on Max Friedrich (1856–<br />
1887), Wundt’s Wrst PhD student in <strong>experimental</strong> <strong>psychology</strong>. Journal<br />
<strong>of</strong> the <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Behavioral Sciences, 40 (3), 311–317.<br />
Drechsler, W. (1997). State socialism <strong>an</strong>d political philosophy. In J.<br />
G. Backhaus (Ed.), Essays on social security <strong>an</strong>d taxation. Marburg:<br />
Metropolis Verlag.<br />
Drechsler, W., & Kattel, R. (2000). Karl Bücher in Dorpat. In J. G.<br />
Backhaus (Ed.), Karl Bücher: Theory, history, <strong>an</strong>thropoly, non<br />
market economics (pp. 11–72). Marburg: Metropolis Verlag.<br />
Fulton, J. F. (1930). Selected readings in the history <strong>of</strong> physiology.<br />
SpringWeld: Thomas.<br />
Girgensohn, K. (1921). Der Seelisches Aufbau des Religiösen Erlebens.<br />
Eine religionpsychologishe Untersuchung auf <strong>experimental</strong>ler<br />
Grundlage. Lepzig: Hirzel.<br />
Gruehn, W. (1956). Die Frömmigkeit der Gegenwart: Grundatsachen<br />
der empirischen Psychologie. Const<strong>an</strong>ce: Friedrich Bahn.<br />
HatWeld, G. (1998). K<strong>an</strong>t <strong>an</strong>d empirical <strong>psychology</strong> in the 18th Century.<br />
Psychological Science, 9, 423–428.<br />
HatWeld, G. (2002). Perception as unconscious inference. In M. Heyer,<br />
& R. M<strong>an</strong>sfeld (Eds.), Perception <strong>an</strong>d the physical world: Psychological<br />
<strong>an</strong>d philosophical issues (pp. 115–143). New York: Wiley.<br />
Helmholtz, H. v. (1896). Über die academische Freiheit der Deutschen<br />
Univärsität. In H. v. Helmholtz (Ed.), Vorträge und Reden,<br />
Vol. 2 (4th ed., pp. 191–212). Braunschweig: Vieweg.<br />
Helmholtz, H. v. (1910). H<strong>an</strong>dbuch der Physiologischen Optik. Hamburg:<br />
Leopold Voss.<br />
Henle, M. (1978). One m<strong>an</strong> against the Nazis—Wolfg<strong>an</strong>g Köhler.<br />
Americ<strong>an</strong> Psychologist, 33, 939–944.<br />
James, W. (1890). The principles <strong>of</strong> <strong>psychology</strong> (2 vols.). New York:<br />
Henry Holt.<br />
Käbin, I. (1986). Die medizinische Forschung und Lehre <strong>an</strong> der Universität<br />
Dorpat/Tartu 1802–1940. Lüneburg: Nordostdeutsches<br />
Kulturwerk.<br />
Kraepelin, E. (1987). Memoirs. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.<br />
Kreegipuu, K., & Allik, J. (2004). Confusion <strong>of</strong> space <strong>an</strong>d time in the<br />
Flash–Lag EVect. Perception, 33, 293–306.<br />
Külpe, O. (1893). Grundriss der Psychologie. Auf experimenteller<br />
Grundlage dargestellt. Lepzig: Wilhelm Engelm<strong>an</strong>n.<br />
Lõo, K. (2004). Wolfg<strong>an</strong>g Köhleri seosed Eestiga [Wolfg<strong>an</strong>g Köhler’s<br />
connections with Estonia] (Unpublished Bachelor Thesis). Tartu:<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> Tartu.<br />
Mach, E. (1922). Die Analyse der EmpWndungen und das Verhältnis<br />
des Physischen zum Psychischen. Jena: Gustav Fischer.<br />
Murphy, G. (1964). Historical introduction to modern <strong>psychology</strong>.<br />
London: Routlage <strong>an</strong>d Keg<strong>an</strong> Paul.<br />
Must, O., Must, A., & Raudik, V. (2003). The secular rise in IQs: In<br />
Estonia, the Flynn EVect is not a Jensen EVect. Intelligence, 31,<br />
461–471.<br />
Nijhaw<strong>an</strong>, R. (1994). Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature, 370,<br />
256–257.<br />
Oettingen, A. J. v. (1866). Harmoniesystem in dualer Entwicklung:<br />
Studien zur Theorie der Musik. Dorpat-Leipzig: W. Gläser.<br />
Ostwald, W. (1918). Die Harmonie der Farben. Leipzig: Unesma.<br />
Ostwald, W. (1926). Lebenslinien: Eine Selbstbiographie, Vol. 1. Berlin:<br />
Klasing.<br />
Parrot, G. F. (1811). Grundriss der theoretischen Physik zum Gebrauche<br />
für Vorlesungen. Dorpat.<br />
Parrot, G. F. (1820). Entretiens sur la physique. Dorpat: Schünm<strong>an</strong>n.<br />
Parrot, G. F. (1839). Notice sur un phénomène d’optique observé sur<br />
les chemins de fer. Bulletin ScientiWque Publié Par L’Académie<br />
Impériale Des Sciences De Saint-Pétersbourg, 6 (9–10), 138–141.<br />
Petrov, G. M., & Pinigin, G. I. (2002). Karl Knorre, the Wrst astronomer<br />
<strong>of</strong> Nikolaev Observatory (on the occasion <strong>of</strong> his Bicentenary).<br />
Astronomische Nachrichten, 323, 559–561.<br />
Piper, H.-F. (2000). Alfred Wilhelm Volkm<strong>an</strong>n (1801–1877)—as sensory<br />
physiologist: Blamed, appraised, remembered. XVIIIth<br />
Convention <strong>of</strong> the Julius-Hirschberg-Gesellschaft. Innsbruck.<br />
Ramul, K. (1929). Ueber nichtempirische Psychologie [Non-empirical<br />
<strong>psychology</strong>]. Archiv Für Die Gesamte Psychologie, 73, 369–406.<br />
Ramul, K. (1960). The problem <strong>of</strong> measurement in the <strong>psychology</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
the eighteenth century. Americ<strong>an</strong> Psychologist, 15, 256–265.<br />
Ramul, K. (1963). Some early measurements <strong>an</strong>d ratings in <strong>psychology</strong>.<br />
Americ<strong>an</strong> Psychologist, 18, 653–659.<br />
Ramul, K. (1974). Iz istorij psikhologii [From history <strong>of</strong> <strong>psychology</strong>].<br />
Tartu: Tartu Riiklik Ülikool.<br />
Roback, A. A. (1961). <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>psychology</strong> <strong>an</strong>d psychiatry. London:<br />
Vision.<br />
Ross, J. (1991). Seebeck, Helmholtz, <strong>an</strong>d Oettingen: Some brief remarks<br />
to the history <strong>of</strong> modern psychoacoustics. In M. Kõiv<br />
(Ed.), Jahrbuch der Estnischen Goethe-Gesellscahft (pp. 103–105).<br />
Tartu: Estnische Goethe-Gesellschaft.<br />
Sabra, A. I. (1989). The Optics <strong>of</strong> Ibn al-Hayatham, Books I-III. On<br />
direct vision. Vol. 1: Tr<strong>an</strong>slation. London: The Warburg Institute,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> London.<br />
Siilivask, K. Ed. (1982). Tartu Ülikooli ajalugu, II (1798–1918) [<strong>History</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> Tartu University, Vol. II (1798–1918)]. Tallinn: Eesti Raamat.<br />
Singer, C., & Underwood, E. (1962). A short history <strong>of</strong> medicine. Oxford:<br />
Clarendon Press.<br />
Steinberg, H., & Angermeyer, M. C. (2001). Emil Kraepelin’s years<br />
at Dorpat as Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Psychiatry in nineteenth-century Russia.<br />
<strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> Psychiatry, 12, 297–327.<br />
Tchisch, W. v. (1885). Ueber die Zeitverhältnisse der Apperception<br />
einfacher und zusammengesetzter Vorstellungen, untersucht mit<br />
Hülfe der Complications-methode [On the time relationships involved<br />
in the apperception <strong>of</strong> simple <strong>an</strong>d combined Vorstellungen,<br />
investigated with the aid <strong>of</strong> the complication method].<br />
Philosophische Studien, 2, 603–634.<br />
Tork, J. (1940). Eesti laste intelligents [The intelligence <strong>of</strong> Estoni<strong>an</strong><br />
children]. Tartu: Koolivara.<br />
Volkm<strong>an</strong>n, A. W. (1836). Neue Beiträge zur Physiologie des Gesichtssinnes.<br />
Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.<br />
Volkm<strong>an</strong>n, A. W. (1859). Das Tachistoscop, ein Instrument, welches<br />
bei Untersuchung des moment<strong>an</strong>en Sehens des Gebrauch des<br />
elektrischen Funkens ersetz. Berichte Über Die Verh<strong>an</strong>dlungen<br />
Der Königlichen Sächsischen Akedemie Der Vissenschaften Mathematische-Naturwissenscaftlichte<br />
Klassen, 2, 90–98.<br />
Wade, N. J. (1998). A natural history <strong>of</strong> vision. Cambridge, MA:<br />
Bradford.<br />
WulV, D. M. (1985). Experimental introspection <strong>an</strong>d religious experience:<br />
The Dorpat School <strong>of</strong> religious <strong>psychology</strong>. Journal for<br />
the <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Behavioral Sciences, 21, 131–150.<br />
WulV, D. M. (1991). Psychology <strong>of</strong> religion. Classics <strong>an</strong>d contemporary<br />
views. New York: Wiley.<br />
Wundt, W. (1858). Beiträge zur Theorie der Sinneswahrnehmung.<br />
Leipzig.