26.02.2013 Views

April 2011 - Centre for Civil Society - University of KwaZulu-Natal

April 2011 - Centre for Civil Society - University of KwaZulu-Natal

April 2011 - Centre for Civil Society - University of KwaZulu-Natal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

committed around $40 million to DNDi. It demanded a board position, but<br />

DNDi refused.<br />

But such instances <strong>of</strong> refusing to bow to big philanthropy are rare. "It's a<br />

crisis <strong>of</strong> accountability today," says Shiva. "It's no more accountability <strong>of</strong><br />

corporations or philanthropists alone; the government too has a lot to<br />

answer.".<br />

http://bit.ly/ebYA9Z<br />

Website: http://www.gmwatch.org<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>iles:http://www.powerbase.info/index.php/GM_Watch:_Portal<br />

Twitter: http://twitter.com/GMWatch<br />

Facebook:<br />

http://www.facebook.com/pages/GMWatch/276951472985?ref=nf<br />

George Monbiot's nuclear mistakes<br />

Jim Green Sunday 28 March <strong>2011</strong><br />

Children are scanned <strong>for</strong> radiation exposure outside Fukushima, March 12.<br />

Prominent British columnist George Monbiot announced in the British<br />

Guardian on March 21 that he now supports nuclear power. That isn't a<br />

huge surprise ? having previously opposed nuclear power, he announced<br />

himself ?nuclear-neutral? in 2009.<br />

As recently as March 16, Monbiot declared himself neutral while saying<br />

that he would not oppose nuclear power if four conditions were met:<br />

1. Its total emissions from mine to dump are taken into account, and<br />

demonstrate that it is a genuinely low-carbon option.<br />

2. We know exactly how and where the waste is to be buried.<br />

3. We know how much this will cost and who will pay.<br />

4. There is a legal guarantee that no civil nuclear materials will be<br />

diverted <strong>for</strong> military purposes.<br />

See also: Clean and green ... or nuclear?<br />

Along with renewables, nuclear meets the first condition it is a low-carbon<br />

energy source.<br />

The other three conditions have not been met. No country has established<br />

a burial site <strong>for</strong> high-level nuclear waste and it is not<br />

clear how much waste disposal programs will cost nor who will pay.<br />

And there is no meaningful legal guarantee against diversion <strong>of</strong> materials<br />

from peaceful nuclear programs to weapons programs.<br />

So Monbiot's position hasn't changed as a result <strong>of</strong> his four conditions being<br />

met. Indeed there is no mention <strong>of</strong> them in his March<br />

21 column. Instead, Monbiot has become a nuclear supporter as a result <strong>of</strong><br />

the Fukushima nuclear accidents.<br />

He said on March 21: A crappy old plant with inadequate safety features<br />

was hit by a monster earthquake and a vast tsunami. The<br />

electricity supply failed, knocking out the cooling system. The reactors

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!