April 2011 - Centre for Civil Society - University of KwaZulu-Natal
April 2011 - Centre for Civil Society - University of KwaZulu-Natal
April 2011 - Centre for Civil Society - University of KwaZulu-Natal
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Because the wealth <strong>of</strong> the existing biodiversity is the basis <strong>for</strong> the future<br />
<strong>of</strong> agricultural Africa, it is essential that those who care about this wealth,<br />
and work toward improving its potential <strong>for</strong> use, are acknowledged. The<br />
‘African Biodiversity Stewardship Recognition Award’ (ABSRA) proposes to<br />
fulfill this goal, as an African initiative <strong>for</strong> recognizing those who make<br />
contributions towards the conservation and sustainable use <strong>of</strong> African<br />
biodiversity wealth.<br />
A component <strong>of</strong> the award will finance the sharing, across the continent,<br />
<strong>of</strong> the knowledge and processes <strong>for</strong> which the award was granted. Other<br />
African communities learning about appropriate responses to particular<br />
agricultural threats will stimulate replication and mainstreaming such<br />
practices and systems – successful alternatives to the ravages <strong>of</strong> industrial<br />
monoculture.<br />
ABSRA is a continental response to yet another outsider intervention<br />
bringing inappropriate high-cost technology under the auspices <strong>of</strong> AGRA.<br />
The logic, goals, and economic and legal premises <strong>of</strong> the two could not be<br />
more different.<br />
AGRA's approach focuses on increasing yields above any other agronomic<br />
characteristic, while ABSRA promotes the idea that food biodiversity can<br />
provide more nutrition than monoculture. AGRA works to privatise<br />
knowledge as quickly as possible through the patenting <strong>of</strong> processes as well<br />
as end products. Its ‘green revolution’ mentality refuses to honour farmers<br />
as plant breeders or scientists, while ABSRA encourages smallholder<br />
farmers, recognising both their farmers' rights to exchange and propagate<br />
seeds and their scientific innovations <strong>for</strong> sustaining biodiversity.<br />
Outdated and disproven ways from 20th century agriculture continue, <strong>for</strong><br />
they pr<strong>of</strong>it those with scientific and financial power. African smallholder<br />
farmers, however, are already demonstrating what a recent international<br />
assessment <strong>of</strong> agriculture stated in rejecting green revolutions: ‘Business<br />
as usual is no longer an option.’[11] African agronomists and scientists<br />
have answers <strong>for</strong> how to feed growing numbers <strong>of</strong> people nutritious food,<br />
rather than feeding cars or corporate pr<strong>of</strong>its. What industrialised countries<br />
need is ‘aid’ from Africa, in the <strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> shared knowledge and technology<br />
to preserve global food biodiversity <strong>for</strong> future generations.<br />
www.pambazuka.org<br />
BROUGHT TO YOU BY PAMBAZUKA NEWS<br />
Carol Thompson is pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Political Economy, Northern Arizona<br />
<strong>University</strong>, USA.<br />
Andrew Mushita is the director <strong>of</strong> the Community Technology<br />
Development Trust, Zimbabwe.<br />
Please send comments to editor@pambazuka.org or comment online at<br />
Pambazuka News.<br />
Reference<br />
[1] InterAcademy Council (2003) 'Realising the Promise and Potential <strong>of</strong><br />
African Agriculture: Science and technology strategies <strong>for</strong> improving<br />
agricultural productivity and food security in Africa', Amsterdam, p. xviii.<br />
http://www.interacademycouncil.net<br />
[2] GRAIN (2007) 'The New Scramble <strong>for</strong> Africa', Seedling – Agr<strong>of</strong>uels