26.02.2013 Views

April 2011 - Centre for Civil Society - University of KwaZulu-Natal

April 2011 - Centre for Civil Society - University of KwaZulu-Natal

April 2011 - Centre for Civil Society - University of KwaZulu-Natal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

a meeting with him at the US embassy:<br />

“Jibril welcomed American companies, universities and hospitals to<br />

participate in this endeavour [<strong>of</strong> restructuring the economy]... According<br />

to Jibril, there are 11,000 development projects in Libya... The NEDB’s<br />

role in these projects is to ‘pave the way’ <strong>for</strong> private sector development,<br />

and to create a strategic partnership between private companies and the<br />

government.” (Full cable: 09TRIPOLI386)<br />

Omar Mokhtar El-Hariri has been made Minister <strong>of</strong> Military Affairs. He was<br />

involved in the initial 1969 coup against the monarchy that brought<br />

Gaddafi to power. However, he was also involved in a plot to overthrow<br />

Gaddafi in 1975, a clear attempt to stop Gaddaf’s programme <strong>of</strong><br />

nationalisations. After the coup failed, he was arrested, served 15 years in<br />

prison until 1990 when he was placed under house arrest. When the revolt<br />

erupted he sided with the rebels in the east.<br />

As we can see, the lawyers and community activists, youth and so on, who<br />

were part <strong>of</strong> the initial Interim Council seem to have been pushed to one<br />

side. Of the four ministers so far announced we have two from the Gaddafi<br />

camp, two from the reactionary part <strong>of</strong> the opposition, but all <strong>of</strong> them<br />

stooges <strong>of</strong> imperialism. Some <strong>of</strong> them hark back to the early days <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Gaddafi regime, when it was an openly bourgeois military dictatorship.<br />

None <strong>of</strong> these can even be classed as “genuine democrats”. These are all<br />

people whom the US “know and trust”. All these people are direct agents<br />

<strong>of</strong> imperialism and are against the revolution.<br />

It is precisely this change within the opposition, with its direct appeals to<br />

imperialist powers, that has strengthened Gaddafi. We have seen reports<br />

<strong>of</strong> people saying that they are against Gaddafi the tyrant, but if <strong>for</strong>eign<br />

powers bomb Libya they will stop fighting against him and join him in the<br />

fight against the imperialist aggressor. A recent report in The Independent<br />

explains that, “The conduct <strong>of</strong> those who should be allies nearer home is<br />

also causing problems <strong>for</strong> the rebels. At some towns and villages, residents<br />

turned against them and fought alongside loyalist troops.”<br />

Imperialism manoeuvres behind scenes to defend its own interests<br />

It is clear that imperialism has been manoeuvring behind the scenes to<br />

place trusted stooges in positions <strong>of</strong> command in the areas that have been<br />

liberated from Gaddafi’s <strong>for</strong>ces. In all this the initial revolution has been<br />

snuffed out. We are no longer dealing here with a revolution to overthrow<br />

Gaddafi. It has become a pure imperialist aggression to remove one<br />

reactionary regime and replace it with a more pliant one.<br />

If the government in the east should successfully come to power in the<br />

whole country it will not produce the regime that the masses wanted. It is<br />

sufficient to look at the Karzai regime in Afghanistan or the Maliki regime<br />

in Iraq to see what kind <strong>of</strong> regime we could expect to see in Libya. Any<br />

regime that comes to power on the back <strong>of</strong> imperialist bayonets cannot be<br />

a regime that solves the burning social and economic problems <strong>of</strong> the<br />

working masses. It cannot even guarantee genuine “bourgeois democracy”.<br />

It would be a regime in which the different factions and groupings,<br />

including the various tribal leaders, would vie <strong>for</strong> power and influence. It<br />

would be a corrupt regime, no better than that <strong>of</strong> Gaddafi’s.<br />

The idea has been raised by some that this is a “war <strong>for</strong> oil”. Oil is a factor<br />

in the situation, but to limit one’s analysis to this would be simplistic to<br />

say the least, as imperialism already had access to Libyan oil, as the many<br />

lucrative contracts granted by the Gaddafi regime to <strong>for</strong>eign multinational<br />

oil corporations testify.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!