April 2011 - Centre for Civil Society - University of KwaZulu-Natal

April 2011 - Centre for Civil Society - University of KwaZulu-Natal April 2011 - Centre for Civil Society - University of KwaZulu-Natal

ccs.ukzn.ac.za
from ccs.ukzn.ac.za More from this publisher
26.02.2013 Views

2010 Democracy Perception Barometer Democracy Perception barometer 4 April 2011 What does democracy mean to ordinary citizens and how does it improve their lives? How do citizens think democracy is working for them and their communities? How do citizens think their local elected leaders and municipalities are doing and do they trust them? Is democracy becoming more entrenched in the communities in which they live? Is there a difference in citizens? views about how national government is doing compared to the local sphere of municipal government? Is the ballot used as an instrument of accountability or do citizens vote for other reasons? How do citizens feel about voicing dissent? And what does this all mean for the local government elections of 18th May 2011? These and other questions form the basis of the 2010 Democracy Perception barometer. The study engages and interprets the views of 330 ordinary citizens who classify themselves as poor. It is their voices that are typically lost in national polls. They live in 6 rural communities (Nxamalala, Gezubuso, Mafakatini, KwaMpande, Ndaleni and Trust Feed) which are administered by 3 different local municipalities (Msunduzi Local Municipality, Richmond Local Municipality and uMshwathi Local Municipality) and fall under the uMgungundlovu District Municipality. All of the six communities have been the site of major political violence, struggle and repression leading up to the 1994 National General Elections and other ruptures subsequent to this date. Moreover, the historical context of these areas (barring Ndaleni) has meant that the voices of citizens who reside in these areas have typically been culturally inhibited. The perceptions reflected in this report, offer surprising boldness and suggest that the situation in which our communities exist is becoming serious; with high levels of unhappiness about how democracy is being practised and what it is delivering. The key findings which emerge from the 2010 Democracy Perception barometer are: • The democratic state has succeeded in removing any uncertainty in the electorate around the holding of regular and free and fair elections. This democratic stability should be celebrated. However, although our respondents consider it important to vote and indicated that they would continue to do so; our respondents see democracy as much more than just being able to vote. Indeed, only 4% our respondents isolated the meaning of democracy to the ballot. The majority wanted more than a chance to choose where to put their crosses every five years. • In the run up to the 2011 Local Government Elections we are seeing a lot of unrest based on unhappiness around the processes of appointment of candidates. Here we see a different understanding of democratic process, from the right of a party to appoint their preferred candidates to ordinary, not necessarily card-carrying members wanting to have a far greater say in this appointment. This raises questions regarding how a liberal democratic

structure normally operates and suggests that the distinction between party and community has become blurred in the minds of local voters. • Our study found that how democracy is defined and what is demanded of it is primarily determined by where citizens sit in relation to socio-economic advancements. Their socio-economic context determines what they need democracy to do for them. Hence, our respondents understand and find value in democracy in its classical sense but they primarily define democracy by the socio-economic outcomes which it delivers. For example, if citizens do not have a job and struggle to feed their families then the freedom to go where they want to go and say what they want to say doesn?t mean very much. They seek material transformation in democracy. • Almost two-thirds (64%) of our respondents are dissatisfied with the direction South Africa is going. They are particularly worried about unemployment, low levels of job creation, poverty, the widening gap between rich and poor. These worries are positioned on a fault line of too many young people not in jobs or in further education. These socio-economic challenges hold within themselves the possibility of making democracy unsustainable. • Our respondents have highlighted that one of the most important components of democracy is an accountable state. • In a liberal democracy, the space to remove and replace governments is typically achieved through the ballot. Our respondents do not appear to use the ballot as an instrument of accountability or dissent. The way the ballot is used; to affirm historical and cultural affiliation to the African National Congress has meant that accountability is sought through other avenues, particularly local elected leaders and municipalities, which have cascaded downward pressure onto these the closer levers of state. • Our respondents have voiced serious concerns about how they are represented, how services and development is delivered at the local sphere, and how oversight and leadership occurs at the national sphere. About a third (32%) of respondents felt that their municipality had performed well over the past year, compared to 56% who disapproved. In addition, more than half (52%) of all respondents indicated that service delivery was very poor or poor. • There is a crisis in confidence and very low levels of public trust in local democratic structures. For example, 53% of respondents feel that their local elected leaders are not accountable. The ANC, it appears, has underestimated how strategically important the lowest levers of democracy are in fostering democratic stability. The structure, functioning and performance of local instruments of democracy demands urgent attention and possibly very serious refashioning. • The municipalities in our study face acute vulnerabilities in functionality. Differential municipal spatial characteristics and localised challenges have resulted in porous service delivery and development. The migration of most of the basic service delivery competencies to the local sphere has contributed to exacerbating the local spheres tenuousness. Poor performance and low levels of functionality have heightened citizen

2010 Democracy Perception Barometer<br />

Democracy Perception barometer 4 <strong>April</strong> <strong>2011</strong><br />

What does democracy mean to ordinary citizens and how does it improve<br />

their lives? How do citizens think democracy is working <strong>for</strong> them and their<br />

communities? How do citizens think their local elected leaders and<br />

municipalities are doing and do they trust them? Is democracy becoming<br />

more entrenched in the communities in which they live? Is there a<br />

difference in citizens? views about how national government is doing<br />

compared to the local sphere <strong>of</strong> municipal government? Is the ballot used<br />

as an instrument <strong>of</strong> accountability or do citizens vote <strong>for</strong> other reasons?<br />

How do citizens feel about voicing dissent? And what does this all mean <strong>for</strong><br />

the local government elections <strong>of</strong> 18th May <strong>2011</strong>?<br />

These and other questions <strong>for</strong>m the basis <strong>of</strong> the 2010 Democracy<br />

Perception barometer. The study engages and interprets the views <strong>of</strong> 330<br />

ordinary citizens who classify themselves as poor. It is their voices that are<br />

typically lost in national polls. They live in 6 rural communities<br />

(Nxamalala, Gezubuso, Mafakatini, KwaMpande, Ndaleni and Trust Feed)<br />

which are administered by 3 different local municipalities (Msunduzi Local<br />

Municipality, Richmond Local Municipality and uMshwathi Local<br />

Municipality) and fall under the uMgungundlovu District Municipality. All <strong>of</strong><br />

the six communities have been the site <strong>of</strong> major political violence,<br />

struggle and repression leading up to the 1994 National General Elections<br />

and other ruptures subsequent to this date. Moreover, the historical<br />

context <strong>of</strong> these areas (barring Ndaleni) has meant that the voices <strong>of</strong><br />

citizens who reside in these areas have typically been culturally inhibited.<br />

The perceptions reflected in this report, <strong>of</strong>fer surprising boldness and<br />

suggest that the situation in which our communities exist is becoming<br />

serious; with high levels <strong>of</strong> unhappiness about how democracy is being<br />

practised and what it is delivering.<br />

The key findings which emerge from the 2010 Democracy Perception<br />

barometer<br />

are:<br />

• The democratic state has succeeded in removing any uncertainty in the<br />

electorate around the holding <strong>of</strong> regular and free and fair elections. This<br />

democratic stability should be celebrated. However, although our<br />

respondents consider it important to vote and indicated that they would<br />

continue to do so; our respondents see democracy as much more than just<br />

being able to vote.<br />

Indeed, only 4% our respondents isolated the meaning <strong>of</strong> democracy to the<br />

ballot. The majority wanted more than a chance to choose where to put<br />

their<br />

crosses every five years.<br />

• In the run up to the <strong>2011</strong> Local Government Elections we are seeing<br />

a lot <strong>of</strong> unrest based on unhappiness around the processes <strong>of</strong> appointment<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

candidates. Here we see a different understanding <strong>of</strong> democratic process,<br />

from the right <strong>of</strong> a party to appoint their preferred candidates to ordinary,<br />

not necessarily card-carrying members wanting to have a far greater say in<br />

this appointment. This raises questions regarding how a liberal democratic

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!