April 2011 - Centre for Civil Society - University of KwaZulu-Natal
April 2011 - Centre for Civil Society - University of KwaZulu-Natal
April 2011 - Centre for Civil Society - University of KwaZulu-Natal
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A Corporate Coup d’Etat<br />
George Monbiot 14 February <strong>2011</strong><br />
“I would love to see tax reductions,” David Cameron told an interviewer at<br />
the weekend, “but when you’re borrowing 11 per cent <strong>of</strong> your GDP, it’s<br />
not possible to make significant net tax cuts. It just isn’t.”(1) Oh no? Then<br />
how come he’s planning the biggest and crudest corporate tax cut in living<br />
memory?<br />
If you’ve heard nothing <strong>of</strong> it, you’re in good company. The obscure<br />
adjustments the government is planning to the tax acts <strong>of</strong> 1988 and 2009<br />
have been missed by almost everyone(2,3). They are, anyway, almost<br />
impossible to understand without expert help. But as soon as you grasp the<br />
implications, you realise that a kind <strong>of</strong> corporate coup d’etat is taking<br />
place. Like the dismantling <strong>of</strong> the NHS and the sale <strong>of</strong> public <strong>for</strong>ests, no<br />
one voted <strong>for</strong> these measures, as they weren’t in the manifestos. While<br />
Cameron insists that he occupies the centre ground <strong>of</strong> British politics, that<br />
he shares our burdens and feels our pain, he has quietly been plotting with<br />
banks and businesses to engineer the greatest transfer <strong>of</strong> wealth from the<br />
poor and middle to the ultra-rich that this country has seen in a century.<br />
The latest heist has been explained to me by the <strong>for</strong>mer tax inspector,<br />
now a Private Eye journalist, Richard Brooks and current senior tax staff<br />
who can’t be named. Here’s how it works.<br />
At the moment tax law ensures that companies based here, with branches<br />
in other countries, don’t get taxed twice on the same money. They have to<br />
pay only the difference between our rate and that <strong>of</strong> the other country. If,<br />
<strong>for</strong> example, Dirty Oil PLC pays 10% corporation tax on its pr<strong>of</strong>its in<br />
Oblivia, then shifts the money over here, it should pay a further 18% in the<br />
UK, to match the corporate tax rate <strong>of</strong> 28%. But under the new proposals,<br />
companies will pay nothing at all in this country on money made by their<br />
<strong>for</strong>eign branches.<br />
Foreign means anywhere. If these proposals go ahead, the UK will be only<br />
the second country in the world to allow money that has passed through<br />
tax havens to remain untaxed when it gets here. The other is Switzerland.<br />
The exemption applies solely to “large and medium companies”(4): it is<br />
not available <strong>for</strong> smaller firms. The government says it expects “large<br />
financial services companies to make the greatest use <strong>of</strong> the exemption<br />
regime”(5). The main beneficiaries, in other words, will be the banks.<br />
But that’s not the end <strong>of</strong> it. While big business will be exempt from tax on<br />
its <strong>for</strong>eign branch earnings, it will, amazingly, still be able to claim the<br />
expense <strong>of</strong> funding its <strong>for</strong>eign branches against tax it pays in the UK. No<br />
other country does this. The new measures will, as we already know,<br />
accompany a rapid reduction in the <strong>of</strong>ficial rate <strong>of</strong> corporation tax: from<br />
28% to 24% by 2014. This, a Treasury minister has boasted, will be the<br />
lowest rate “<strong>of</strong> any major Western economy”(6). By the time this<br />
government is done, we’ll be lucky if the banks and corporations pay<br />
anything at all. In the Sunday Telegraph David Cameron said “what I want<br />
is tax revenue from the banks into the Exchequer, so we can help rebuild<br />
this economy.”(7) He’s doing just the opposite.<br />
These measures will drain not only wealth but also jobs from the UK. The<br />
new legislation will create a powerful incentive to shift business out <strong>of</strong> this<br />
country and into nations with lower corporate tax rates. Any UK business<br />
which doesn’t outsource its staff or funnel its earnings through a tax haven<br />
will find itself with an extra competitive disadvantage. The new rules also