April 2011 - Centre for Civil Society - University of KwaZulu-Natal
April 2011 - Centre for Civil Society - University of KwaZulu-Natal
April 2011 - Centre for Civil Society - University of KwaZulu-Natal
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
NOAM CHOMSKY: Yeah.<br />
AMY GOODMAN: Noam Chomsky, pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> linguistics, Massachusetts<br />
Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology, world-renowned political dissident. Stay with us.<br />
[break]<br />
AMY GOODMAN: Our guest <strong>for</strong> the hour is Noam Chomsky. He has authored<br />
over a hundred books; his latest, Hopes and Prospects, among others.<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Chomsky, I want to ask you about <strong>for</strong>mer President Ronald<br />
Reagan. A very big deal is made <strong>of</strong> him now on the hundredth anniversary <strong>of</strong><br />
his birth. Last year President Obama signed legislation establishing a<br />
commission to mark the centennial.<br />
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: President Reagan helped, as much as any<br />
president, to restore a sense <strong>of</strong> optimism in our country, a spirit that<br />
transcended politics, that transcended even the most heated arguments <strong>of</strong><br />
the day.<br />
AMY GOODMAN: Noam Chomsky, your response?<br />
NOAM CHOMSKY: This deification <strong>of</strong> Reagan is extremely interesting and a<br />
very—it’s scandalous, but it tells a lot about the country. I mean, when<br />
Reagan left <strong>of</strong>fice, he was the most unpopular living president, apart from<br />
Nixon, even below Carter. If you look at his years in <strong>of</strong>fice, he was not<br />
particularly popular. He was more or less average. He severely harmed the<br />
American economy. When he came into <strong>of</strong>fice, the United States was the<br />
world’s leading creditor. By the time he left, it was the world’s leading<br />
debtor. He was fiscally totally irresponsible—wild spending, no fiscal<br />
responsibility. Government actually grew during the Reagan years.<br />
He was also a passionate opponent <strong>of</strong> the free market. I mean, the way he’s<br />
being presented is astonishing. He was the most protectionist president in<br />
post-war American history. He essentially virtually doubled protective<br />
barriers to try to preserve incompetent U.S. management, which was being<br />
driven out by superior Japanese production.<br />
During his years, we had the first major fiscal crises. During the ’50s, ’60s<br />
and ’70s, the New Deal regulations were still in effect, and that prevented<br />
financial crises. The financialization <strong>of</strong> the economy began to take <strong>of</strong>f in<br />
the ’70s, but with the deregulation, <strong>of</strong> course you start getting crises.<br />
Reagan left <strong>of</strong>fice with the biggest financial crisis since the Depression: the<br />
home savings and loan.<br />
I won’t even talk about his international behavior. I mean, it was just<br />
abominable. I mean, if we gained our optimism by killing hundreds <strong>of</strong><br />
thousands <strong>of</strong> people in Central America and destroying any hope <strong>for</strong><br />
democracy and freedom and supporting South Africa while it killed about a<br />
million-and-a-half people in neighboring countries, and on and on, if that’s<br />
the way we get back our optimism, we’re in bad trouble.<br />
Well, what happened after Reagan left <strong>of</strong>fice is that there was the<br />
beginnings <strong>of</strong> an ef<strong>for</strong>t to carry out a kind <strong>of</strong>—this Reagan legacy, you know,<br />
to try to create from this really quite miserable creature some kind <strong>of</strong><br />
deity. And amazingly, it succeeded. I mean, Kim Il-sung would have been<br />
impressed. The events that took place when Reagan died, you know, the<br />
Reagan legacy, this Obama business, you don’t get that in free societies. It<br />
would be ridiculed. What you get it is in totalitarian states. And I’m waiting<br />
to see what comes next. This morning, North Korea announced that on the