April 2011 - Centre for Civil Society - University of KwaZulu-Natal
April 2011 - Centre for Civil Society - University of KwaZulu-Natal
April 2011 - Centre for Civil Society - University of KwaZulu-Natal
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
However, this would be a mistake and would not solve the main question –<br />
the political independence <strong>of</strong> the party. In fact the events at the<br />
Polokwane congress <strong>of</strong> the ANC, where Thabo Mbeki was toppled as leader,<br />
shows that it is completely possible <strong>for</strong> the SACP to mobilize the ranks <strong>of</strong><br />
the ANC on a radical basis and thus win the political leadership <strong>of</strong> the<br />
organization.<br />
The Bolshevik party worked in many different organizations, even in the<br />
black reactionary state unions. For them the main issue was not which<br />
organizations to work, but whether there were workers there to win to<br />
revolutionary socialism, while at the same time maintaining strict political<br />
independence.<br />
Even when participating in the tsarist Duma they maintained full political<br />
independence and went as far as they legally could in exposing the<br />
reactionary character <strong>of</strong> the tsarist regime. And what they could not<br />
legally say in public they underlined in writing in their underground<br />
papers.<br />
For communists one principle must stand above all others. We are<br />
communists no matter where we are, whether in parliament, government<br />
or in the ANC, and we must hold to our communist principles. When a<br />
communist stands <strong>for</strong> any leading position it is his duty to honestly and<br />
frankly put <strong>for</strong>ward his Marxist views and not accept any position unless he<br />
is free to act on those policies. Of course it is permissible at times to take<br />
some positions <strong>for</strong> tactical reasons, but only if those positions serve to<br />
build the party and spread the ideas <strong>of</strong> communism.<br />
But the manner in which leading communists like Nzimande, Cronin and<br />
others are now participating in the structures <strong>of</strong> the ANC, parliament and<br />
government – that is without an independent communist line – is only<br />
serving to confuse the masses and drive them away from a party that they<br />
see as being connected with unemployment, poverty and police<br />
suppression <strong>of</strong> workers' struggles.<br />
It should be made completely clear to all the ranks <strong>of</strong> the ANC that the<br />
communists are fundamentally different to the other ANC leaders who are<br />
happy to limit their actions within the confines <strong>of</strong> the capitalist system.<br />
This, un<strong>for</strong>tunately, is not the case today. The vast majority <strong>of</strong> the masses<br />
see no fundamental differences between Communist Party and re<strong>for</strong>mist<br />
ANC leaders. If the communists were seen as a real alternative it would<br />
provide them with the opportunity <strong>of</strong> winning over the majority <strong>of</strong> the ANC<br />
and thus the masses, who are not at all satisfied with their current<br />
leaders, to communist policies.<br />
If the Communist Party were to break with the ANC and stand independent<br />
candidates it would not be the end <strong>of</strong> the world – although it would be a<br />
mistake <strong>for</strong> it would serve to isolate the party from the wider masses – but<br />
it would not solve the main question, that is, that <strong>of</strong> political<br />
independence, as the party would not have solved the key question <strong>of</strong><br />
which programme to put <strong>for</strong>ward. The problem is not the party's presence<br />
within the ANC, but its lack <strong>of</strong> a clear, revolutionary socialist programme.<br />
The question <strong>of</strong> leadership<br />
There are big possibilities <strong>for</strong> the SACP. To all those comrades who<br />
complain about the “bad objective situation”, “low consciousness <strong>of</strong> the<br />
masses” “unfavourable balance <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>ces” we must say: in reality the<br />
situation has never been so favourable as now. If they won't accept our<br />
words <strong>for</strong> it they can dust down their history books and study past