April 2011 - Centre for Civil Society - University of KwaZulu-Natal
April 2011 - Centre for Civil Society - University of KwaZulu-Natal April 2011 - Centre for Civil Society - University of KwaZulu-Natal
efore has Italy seemed as divided as it is now, between the real country grappling with pressing economic problems and the political world which discusses and clashes over the notorious parties in the PM’s villa and celebrations for the 150th anniversary of the unity of Italy. To explain all of this, some questions need to be asked. How has Italy, which, notwithstanding everything, is one of the most industrialised countries on the planet, fallen into this situation? How could a cement and television entrepreneur (Silvio Berlusconi) have come out of the political and criminal undergrowth to become the unchallenged arbiter in Italian politics for the last 20 years? How could the strongest communist party in the West sink into a never-ending crisis which has now transformed it into a gelatinous political amoeba? Berlusconi enters politics The international changes at the end of the 1980s contributed to the crisis of the Italian political system. Added to that were the conflicts caused by widespread corruption at every level. The big mass parties, which had represented the main government (Christian Democrats) and opposition (Communist Party) forces, dissolved, along with their lesser satellites, and left behind an enormous political vacuum. Both the capitalist class and the working class were orphaned by their traditional political points of reference. In this situation, Berlusconi, who until then had been a parvenu businessman who was never accepted into the “good circles” of Italian finance capital and was burdened with debts and legal problems, had the idea of using his organisational, financial and media resources to fill the vacuum left by the Christian Democrats (DC). By launching unknown people into politics, many of them from his own companies, he managed to win the 1994 general election and to consolidate a real reactionary social bloc around his party and himself. The very name of his party - Forza Italia (‘Come on Italy’) - was directed at non-political layers in Italian society, steeped in football and television. It managed to replace the DC and occupy its political space. Even though it was the creature of one of the richest capitalists in the country, Forza Italia (FI) managed to break through to the small and medium bourgeoisie whom the DC had always reached with the a clear message: “Of course, our government has to impose many taxes but, as long as we are in power, you don’t have to pay them!”. Leaning on the middle classes’ fear of petty crime – blown up by the media – the DC kept the support of those layers and, at the same time, did not punish their illegal tax evasion. In fact, in Italy, 90% of taxes come from employed workers while other social groups get away with widespread evasion. Support for Berlusconi The second pillar which had guaranteed the dominance of the DC in the preceding decades was the open and unconditional support of the Catholic Church. At first sight, the dissolute and libertine lifestyle of the current prime minister seems clearly at odds with the teachings of the Catholic Church. But despite appearances, the Pope and Cardinals seem quite happy with a prime minister who has been prepared to pass medieval laws on civil rights and to finance Catholic schools, exempting them from taxes. The third pillar is the relationship with the bosses. Berlusconi is one himself and he has totally adopted their programme. Up until the 1970s, Italian industry developed spectacularly, led by the chemical, car, construction and light engineering sectors. Italian capitalism, despite
suffering from a lack of raw materials and being quite dispersed, exported its products all over the world. It was aided by low labour costs and a weak currency which, if necessary, could be weakened further. Small businesses with few workers and low wages sprung up like mushrooms in former agricultural areas. (“Small but beautiful” was the employers’ slogan in the 1980s). This system became blocked even before the current economic crisis broke. Entry into the Euro put an end to the often-used tactic of periodic devaluations of the Lira. Production costs, however low, have suffered devastating competition from Eastern Europe and Asia. In this situation, the only perspective which the bosses considered practical was to attack wages and to support a government which promised to reduce taxes, at the cost of cutting public services. Electoral alliances To govern the country, Berlusconi needed an electoral support which would give him a solid majority in parliament. Without any scruples he set out to tie two other forces to his party - both of them on the right and apparently irreconcilable. They were the Lega Nord - racist, separatist and rooted only in the rich northern regions - and Alleanza Nazionale (AN) - inheritor of the neo-fascist MSI and based mainly in the South. Exploiting the weaknesses of both parties - the limited potential expansion of the former and the isolation of the latter, because of its links with fascism - Berlusconi got a relatively solid parliamentary majority. (This remains despite the recent defection of a part of the former AN - which had merged with FI to form the PDL - led by Gianfranco Fini.) Not content with that, he got an electoral law passed which is unique in Europe. It has a threshold of 4% for any party to get into parliament, it gives extra seats to a winning party or coalition which assures it an absolute majority and it includes a block list system which gives the leaders of each electoral alliance or party the power to decide which candidates will be in parliament. It enables a party with a minority of votes the possibility of getting a firm control in parliament. Ineffective opposition It has been the opposition, however, whose role it should be to fight Berlusconi, that has been the real reason why he has lasted so long. Faced with this social bloc, centred on a rough but clear programme, the opposition is gathered around the Democratic Party (PD), (which includes forces from the former Communist Party and the Christian Democrats). The PD has always carefully avoided building an alternative mass movement, preferring to follow the government in courting the bosses and the middle class. When in 2002 Berlusconi decided that the time had come to attack workers’ rights head on by proposing to abolish Article 18 of the ‘Workers Statute’ (which gives workers in larger factories some protection against dismissal), an impressive mass movement developed, led by the CGIL trade union federation. This culminated in one of the biggest trade union demonstrations in Italian history on 23 March, 2002, and forced the government to withdraw its proposals. Instead of taking advantage of this opportunity to defeat the government, the opposition parties preferred to let the movement ebb rather than risk governing on the wave of a workers’ victory. In this case it would have been difficult to get the support of Confindustria (the employers’ federation). In fact, the victory of the ‘centre-left’ four years later took place in the
- Page 67 and 68: is not being used to push for finan
- Page 69 and 70: [6] Shaxson, Nicholas. 2011. Treasu
- Page 71 and 72: Before officially declaring insolve
- Page 73 and 74: allow for direct democracy to exist
- Page 75 and 76: nationalisation has the potential t
- Page 77 and 78: 7. http://www.sacsis.org.za/site/ar
- Page 79 and 80: Exporting crops for overseas consum
- Page 81 and 82: The World Trade Organisation (WTO)
- Page 83 and 84: Special Issue (July), p. 36. [3] Br
- Page 85 and 86: stations, agronomists, extensionist
- Page 87 and 88: discount. The pilot AMC of $1.5 bil
- Page 89 and 90: egan to explode and melt down. The
- Page 91 and 92: climatic impacts of nuclear warfare
- Page 93 and 94: them into electricity? Why not use
- Page 95 and 96: expansion in the Gulf of Guinea des
- Page 97 and 98: uling classes and imperialist power
- Page 99 and 100: The death of Nigerian progressive p
- Page 101 and 102: egion and the oil-bearing Niger reg
- Page 103 and 104: another essay when the election res
- Page 105 and 106: March 22, when Obama arrives for a
- Page 107 and 108: population blindly following one po
- Page 109 and 110: faced an economic crisis upon takin
- Page 111 and 112: Shanghai Jiaotong University but wh
- Page 113 and 114: okuvezwe ngenyanga edlule kwiWikiLe
- Page 115 and 116: Iyona-ke indlela uSaif ebexhaphaza
- Page 117: on for their livelihoods through oi
- Page 121 and 122: the only big trade union organisati
- Page 123 and 124: tearing aside the façade of rapaci
- Page 125 and 126: BEE was wrapped up in a hopelessly
- Page 127 and 128: other words, cutting up the capital
- Page 129 and 130: part of the class struggle and that
- Page 131 and 132: In similar vein, U.S. trade represe
- Page 133 and 134: ethnic/racial identities, and gener
- Page 135 and 136: convinced that Greece’s debts are
- Page 137 and 138: parents rather than their own. This
- Page 139 and 140: y the present revolutionary wave an
- Page 141 and 142: Gaddafi himself has admitted that
- Page 143 and 144: Massan d’Almeida First Published
- Page 145 and 146: Most of the violence reported to da
- Page 147 and 148: Peace & Justice Movement Should Opp
- Page 149 and 150: ELIZABETH TAN: I think for the—ce
- Page 151 and 152: divert attention from the struggles
- Page 153 and 154: Bush failed to find any country in
- Page 155 and 156: who are ready to listen to us’. P
- Page 157 and 158: created to really come out of the c
- Page 159 and 160: Iraq Looking eastward from Libya to
- Page 161 and 162: the Wisconsin capital, Madison, 70,
- Page 163 and 164: and Benghazi reached Al Jazeera the
- Page 165 and 166: Ben Ali and Mubarak were little mor
- Page 167 and 168: evealed a correlation between chole
suffering from a lack <strong>of</strong> raw materials and being quite dispersed, exported<br />
its products all over the world. It was aided by low labour costs and a weak<br />
currency which, if necessary, could be weakened further.<br />
Small businesses with few workers and low wages sprung up like<br />
mushrooms in <strong>for</strong>mer agricultural areas. (“Small but beautiful” was the<br />
employers’ slogan in the 1980s). This system became blocked even be<strong>for</strong>e<br />
the current economic crisis broke. Entry into the Euro put an end to the<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten-used tactic <strong>of</strong> periodic devaluations <strong>of</strong> the Lira. Production costs,<br />
however low, have suffered devastating competition from Eastern Europe<br />
and Asia. In this situation, the only perspective which the bosses<br />
considered practical was to attack wages and to support a government<br />
which promised to reduce taxes, at the cost <strong>of</strong> cutting public services.<br />
Electoral alliances<br />
To govern the country, Berlusconi needed an electoral support which<br />
would give him a solid majority in parliament. Without any scruples he set<br />
out to tie two other <strong>for</strong>ces to his party - both <strong>of</strong> them on the right and<br />
apparently irreconcilable. They were the Lega Nord - racist, separatist and<br />
rooted only in the rich northern regions - and Alleanza Nazionale (AN) -<br />
inheritor <strong>of</strong> the neo-fascist MSI and based mainly in the South. Exploiting<br />
the weaknesses <strong>of</strong> both parties - the limited potential expansion <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>for</strong>mer and the isolation <strong>of</strong> the latter, because <strong>of</strong> its links with fascism -<br />
Berlusconi got a relatively solid parliamentary majority. (This remains<br />
despite the recent defection <strong>of</strong> a part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>for</strong>mer AN - which had<br />
merged with FI to <strong>for</strong>m the PDL - led by Gianfranco Fini.)<br />
Not content with that, he got an electoral law passed which is unique in<br />
Europe. It has a threshold <strong>of</strong> 4% <strong>for</strong> any party to get into parliament, it<br />
gives extra seats to a winning party or coalition which assures it an<br />
absolute majority and it includes a block list system which gives the<br />
leaders <strong>of</strong> each electoral alliance or party the power to decide which<br />
candidates will be in parliament. It enables a party with a minority <strong>of</strong><br />
votes the possibility <strong>of</strong> getting a firm control in parliament.<br />
Ineffective opposition<br />
It has been the opposition, however, whose role it should be to fight<br />
Berlusconi, that has been the real reason why he has lasted so long. Faced<br />
with this social bloc, centred on a rough but clear programme, the<br />
opposition is gathered around the Democratic Party (PD), (which includes<br />
<strong>for</strong>ces from the <strong>for</strong>mer Communist Party and the Christian Democrats).<br />
The PD has always carefully avoided building an alternative mass<br />
movement, preferring to follow the government in courting the bosses and<br />
the middle class.<br />
When in 2002 Berlusconi decided that the time had come to attack<br />
workers’ rights head on by proposing to abolish Article 18 <strong>of</strong> the ‘Workers<br />
Statute’ (which gives workers in larger factories some protection against<br />
dismissal), an impressive mass movement developed, led by the CGIL trade<br />
union federation. This culminated in one <strong>of</strong> the biggest trade union<br />
demonstrations in Italian history on 23 March, 2002, and <strong>for</strong>ced the<br />
government to withdraw its proposals.<br />
Instead <strong>of</strong> taking advantage <strong>of</strong> this opportunity to defeat the government,<br />
the opposition parties preferred to let the movement ebb rather than risk<br />
governing on the wave <strong>of</strong> a workers’ victory. In this case it would have<br />
been difficult to get the support <strong>of</strong> Confindustria (the employers’<br />
federation).<br />
In fact, the victory <strong>of</strong> the ‘centre-left’ four years later took place in the