ANALOG vs DIGITAL - Ultra High Fidelity Magazine
ANALOG vs DIGITAL - Ultra High Fidelity Magazine
ANALOG vs DIGITAL - Ultra High Fidelity Magazine
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
the original models — true? I can’t afford<br />
to buy an external DAC right now (I will<br />
sometime in near future), and from what<br />
I read, the Squeezebox Touch’s internal<br />
DAC is more than adequate for my<br />
listening needs. All I want at this point<br />
is a means to access music wirelessly<br />
and do justice to the quality of the files<br />
when connected directly to my amplifier/speakers.<br />
Music quality is of higher<br />
importance to me than is ease-of-use as I<br />
am accustomed to frigging with technology.<br />
Are you in a position to comment<br />
on where those two products are right<br />
now? Am I correct in my observation<br />
(mostly from Googling) that the Touch<br />
is the superior player in terms of music<br />
quality at this stage?<br />
John Allen<br />
KENSINGTON, PEI<br />
We have reviewed the Squeezebox,<br />
John, the one from — as you say — pre-<br />
Logitech days, and we generally liked it.<br />
Its built-in converter is not truly audiophile<br />
quality, but it wasn’t too shabby.<br />
And the screen on the Touch is a lot nicer<br />
and more informative than the two-line<br />
screen on the original.<br />
The Sonos Zoneplayer 90, which is<br />
the one we presume you’re looking at, is<br />
about $100 more than the Squeezebox<br />
Touch, and has no display at all. True,<br />
you can get an app for an iPhone, iPad<br />
or Android device for control, but if you<br />
already use one of these devices there<br />
is a simpler solution. Get Apple’s $99<br />
Airport Express. It has an optical output<br />
for an outboard DAC, which is the way<br />
we use it, but it has its own DAC as well,<br />
which will see you through until you can<br />
upgrade. It can be remote-controlled by<br />
the same portable devices.<br />
I’m using a 2009 Mac Mini and a<br />
Burson Audio Ha-160D DAC. The<br />
Burson accepts either RCA coaxial or<br />
USB for digital inputs. My music is<br />
stored on an external USB drive.<br />
I’ve read on a few websites that using<br />
the USB input and running an external<br />
USB drive together is not a good idea. So<br />
it seems I have a few options: 1. Scrap the<br />
external USB drive and put the music on<br />
the main drive and use USB. 2. Get an<br />
external Firewire drive for music storage<br />
and use USB. 3. Find a decent optical-<br />
to-coaxial converter (if one exists).<br />
This is not all cut and dried. Apparently,<br />
it’s not recommended to have your<br />
music stored on the internal drive, and<br />
then USB digital inputs on the DAC’s<br />
seem to be frowned upon as well.<br />
Ken Justice<br />
DAUPHIN, MB<br />
You could be right that a USB music<br />
drive and a USB cable to your digital-toanalog<br />
converter are a bad mix, Ken, but<br />
we don’t consider USB to be a desirable<br />
link anyway. At one time it was, but that<br />
was because computer devices offered<br />
no other options. Computers still don’t<br />
commonly sport coaxial digital outputs,<br />
and perhaps it’s just as well, because<br />
the coax lead makes a nice pipeline for<br />
system noise between your computer and<br />
your music system.<br />
That leaves optical, and in our tests<br />
it is superior to USB. We have found<br />
a pretty good optical cable, and the<br />
mini-TOSLINK adapter that lets us<br />
connect to the tiny digital outputs found<br />
Coming up in issue No. 92 of<br />
Small but potent loudspeakers.<br />
Inexpensive digital-to-analog converters.<br />
Pushing the envelope on computer music.<br />
Fresh reports from CES<br />
and T.H.E.Show in Vegas<br />
And much, much more!<br />
ULTRA HIGH FIDELITY <strong>Magazine</strong> 9