ANALOG vs DIGITAL - Ultra High Fidelity Magazine
ANALOG vs DIGITAL - Ultra High Fidelity Magazine
ANALOG vs DIGITAL - Ultra High Fidelity Magazine
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Software<br />
Feedback<br />
track 10, Wheels Within Wheels once<br />
more.<br />
This Christmas (Blu-ray)<br />
Michael McDonald<br />
Eagle Rock<br />
Gerard Rejskind: There’s classic rock,<br />
and then there’s nostalgia. Nostalgia<br />
doesn’t have to be great or even good,<br />
it just has to remind you of a time when<br />
you were happier, or in any case younger.<br />
Where Michael McDonald fits in, I shall<br />
leave to you. He comes from way back,<br />
having been a member of Steely Dan,<br />
and then the Doobie Brothers.<br />
Now, just as Captain Kangaroo<br />
wasn’t actually a kangaroo, so the<br />
Doobie Brothers weren’t brothers, and<br />
they weren’t named Doobie. A “doobie”<br />
is in a fact a toke. You could look it up.<br />
The original Doobies had a bad boy<br />
image, wore leather, and were favorites of<br />
the Hell’s Angels in the 70’s. McDonald<br />
took them into another era, ditching the<br />
electric guitars in favor of keyboards,<br />
horns and saxes, with Motown-style<br />
backup singers. Indeed, back in the 80’s,<br />
McDonald did a lot of covers of Motown<br />
classics…or parodies some would say.<br />
McDonald hasn’t been a Doobie for<br />
15 years, but he starts off what is billed as<br />
a Christmas album with Doobie songs.<br />
They are not notable as anything but<br />
possibly nostalgia, and McDonald has<br />
even less of a voice than he once may<br />
have had. He has impenetrable diction,<br />
and he has to force himself into lower<br />
registers. The result is not pretty. When<br />
74 ULTRA HIGH FIDELITY <strong>Magazine</strong><br />
he gets into actual Christmas music, the<br />
result is all but unbearable. He does a<br />
duet with one of his background vocalists,<br />
Drea Rhenee, and the best advice<br />
I have for her is that she should stop<br />
smoking. Yes she does, you can hear it.<br />
McDonald does get into the Christmas<br />
kitsch, with the worst version I’ve<br />
yet heard of I’ll Be Home for Christmas,<br />
and White Christmas. I’m only glad he<br />
didn’t include The Little Drummer Boy.<br />
After the applause for Christmas on<br />
the Bayou, McDonald says, “Thank you,<br />
you’re too kind.” I couldn’t agree more.<br />
Superman II, The Richard Donner<br />
Cut (Blu-ray)<br />
Christopher Reeve, Margo Kidder<br />
Warner Bros.<br />
Gerard Rejskind: Clearly I haven’t been<br />
keeping up. The remarkable version<br />
of Superman with Christopher Reeve<br />
was released on Blu-ray years ago, and<br />
I’ve been waiting impatiently for the<br />
second film to get the high-resolution<br />
treatment. Here it is, finally, but …<br />
wait a minute. The Richard Donner cut?<br />
Wasn’t it Richard Lester who directed<br />
Superman II?<br />
It was indeed, but the plot thickens.<br />
Donner was the director of the first film,<br />
and he was hired for the second one as<br />
well. Since Warner was sure there would<br />
be a sequel, Donner even shot some key<br />
scenes at the same time as the first film,<br />
because it was more convenient (read:<br />
cheaper) to do it that way. Once the first<br />
film had proved a success and shooting<br />
had begun on the second film, creative<br />
differences emerged. On the evidence,<br />
Warner wanted more of a comic book<br />
feel to the film, something the younger<br />
crowd would like. Donner was fired, and<br />
Lester was hired instead.<br />
Now, Warner could have done worse.<br />
Lester had directed some well-regarded<br />
films, having worked on the Goon Shows<br />
and also with the Beatles (A Hard Day’s<br />
Night), not to mention the two Musketeer<br />
films. He picked up the footage shot<br />
during the original film, but he discarded<br />
some of the new Donner footage. He<br />
then completed the film according to his<br />
vision, with — once again — Mario Puzo<br />
of Godfather fame writing the scenario.<br />
Now you can compare them side by<br />
side, the new one on Blu-ray, the other<br />
on DVD. (Random thought: would it<br />
have busted Warner’s budget to put the<br />
two on the same disc?)<br />
I was disappointed, since referring<br />
to Donner’s “vision” is doing him<br />
undeserved honor. There’s a lot wrong<br />
with the Lester version, but it turns<br />
out that the mistakes originated with<br />
Donner. For example, the super powers<br />
possessed by Superman and other survivors<br />
of Krypton are well established,<br />
and it is absurd to invent new ones,<br />
such as the ability to fire a ray from the<br />
end of a finger that causes levitation.<br />
Making up random powers is a failure<br />
of imagination.<br />
There are changes that seem arbitrary.<br />
We know that, in Superman II,<br />
Lois Lane discovers her caped friend’s<br />
secret identity. In the Donner version,<br />
she discovers it in a completely different<br />
way. Not better, not worse. Well, perhaps<br />
a little worse.<br />
The dumbest element in the otherwise<br />
very good first movie was the<br />
idea that, if Superman flies around the<br />
earth fast enough, he can turn back<br />
time. That’s beneath contempt. So what<br />
would he have done if he had directed the<br />
second film? Why, he would have used<br />
exactly the same device. Bravo!<br />
I was tempted to conclude that<br />
Warner should do a Blu-ray version of<br />
the Richard Lester version. However I<br />
viewed that version for the purpose of<br />
this review, and it was a lot poorer than I<br />
remembered. Even the flying sequences,<br />
so spectacular in the first film, are