25.02.2013 Views

Mamta Kalia

Mamta Kalia

Mamta Kalia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

information because of media’s binary<br />

structure of question and answer that<br />

programmes all responses through<br />

opinion polls, exit polls, game shows<br />

and reality shows- there the structured<br />

questions expect structured answers (e.g.<br />

the audience/readers have only restricted<br />

choices). In Indian case, in Kaun Banega<br />

Crorepati?(KBC), Dus Ka Dum, Kya Aap<br />

Panchavi Pass Hain? and other game<br />

shows, most of the questions related<br />

to mythology (that was often shown as<br />

real history), fashion, styles and so on.<br />

For instance, in the game show of Dus<br />

Ka Dum one question (asked by filmstar<br />

Salman Khan) was: what percentage of<br />

Indian women use their ‘aanchal’ (front<br />

of saree) for different purposes? Or how<br />

many males were caught red handed<br />

cheating their girlfriends? Obviously these<br />

superficial questions are not relevant<br />

but only if their responses match with<br />

the pre-determined answers, the players<br />

get a huge amount as reward. Thus real<br />

questions and real information get<br />

replaced by such non-serious and<br />

hyperreal questions. That is why<br />

Baudrillard rightly avers that while the<br />

real is produced, hyperreal is reproduced<br />

– it is a reproduced real, the real as<br />

‘the generation by models of a real without<br />

origin or reality’, constituted from<br />

miniatured units, from matrices, memory<br />

banks and command models- ‘ a<br />

meticulous reduplication of the real,<br />

preferably through another reproductive<br />

medium’. He is of the view that in the<br />

hyperreal the idea of representation has<br />

become irrelevant, and labour<br />

production, the political, everything<br />

persists but lacks all referentiality and<br />

is reduced to the status of meaningless<br />

sign.<br />

But all assumptions of Baudrillard<br />

cannot be accepted. I tend to agree with<br />

Mark Poster, Craig Calhoun as well as<br />

S. Best and Douglas Kellner who criticise<br />

Baudrillard on following grounds:<br />

a) he does not define terms like ‘code’<br />

and his writing style is ‘hyperbolic<br />

and declarative’, often ‘lacking<br />

sustained, systematic analysis’;<br />

b) he totalises his insights and does<br />

not qualify and delimit his claims;<br />

c) he paints a very bleak view of<br />

the world simply basing on<br />

television images, ignoring social<br />

(race, gender), political (state)<br />

and economic situations in the<br />

real life world;<br />

d) he ignores the positive side of<br />

media – e.g. providing vital<br />

information about wars,<br />

communal/caste violence and so<br />

on;<br />

e) he often takes contemporary<br />

trends as finalities;<br />

f) since there is a substantial internal<br />

differentiation among ‘ the<br />

masses’, hence it needs to be<br />

studied by focusing on cultural<br />

variation.<br />

Frederic Jameson makes an important<br />

observation that the boundaries or<br />

April-June 2010 :: 77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!