Mamta Kalia

Mamta Kalia Mamta Kalia

hindivishwa.org
from hindivishwa.org More from this publisher
25.02.2013 Views

I first met Bhanwari in Mumbai’s Birla Kreeda Kendra, where Kiran Bedi was felicitating her in a programme organised by a women’s organisation. She was a thin dusky figure huddled in a chair. When asked to speak on the mike, she spontaneously sang a song in Rajasthani. That time her hair were black. But the trauma of the past seven years--the judgement against her and the hostility of her own people after the film--has turned her life upside down. Her now silver hair are witness to this. A woman who had never wanted and never dreamt that she should be the subject of plays and novels, that films and documentaries be made on her life, suddenly found herself in the limelight because of these series of demonstrations. All she had desired was that the accused should be punished and she should be able to live a normal life away from media glare. Unfortunately the reverse has happened after the film. I blame myself also as a co-writer of this film as much as the film’s producer for her plight. When Jagmohan Mundra had started research for the film in January 1999, Bhanwari’s case files were gathering dust. I agreed to write the film in spite of opposition from my well-wishers. They had seen his cheap formula films like ‘monsoon’ but I had only seen ‘Kamla’(scripted by Vijay Tendulkar) which impressed me. There is no dearth of film writers but I thought I will be able to do more justice to Bhanwari’s character. But I was misguided. The film as a medium belongs to the producer and director. A writer is never allowed to be a part of it. I gave a brief draft of the film to Mundra in March ‘99.When he told me 140 :: April-June 2010 to write a full version, I thought he had taken my work seriously. When I went to my daughter’s house in America, in June ’99, my briefcase was full of write-ups and reports on Bhanwari. I remained in touch with Mundra through e-mail and wrote the whole screenplay along with complete dialogues. This took more than a year. The script was near completion when Mundra said that he was ‘hiring’ another writer who had won that year’s National Award and he would improvise my script. This was a blow to me. I had taken this film as my moral responsibility, working ceaselessly on it for more than a year. Then he asked me to write a couple of scenes which were not acceptable to me. One was a scene in which the women activists were shown to be exploiting Bhanwari’s name for their own end. I argued vehemently on this point. Bhanwari’s case had gained prominence because of the active support from women’s groups and showing them in a dark light would not only distort their image but also disturb focus of the film. I was forgetting that every director had his own vision . If that vision is prejudiced, it will become evident in one scene or another. Since I had given a lot of my time in writing this film , I wanted him to consult me if any changes were made during the shooting. But he did not keep in touch after the full script reached him. Later I came to know that he had ‘hired’ someone else for dialogue writing. After the writing of the film, I was posted a long agreement which stated that the script was now the property of the director and I could not get it published etc etc. I refused to sign saying that my name should not appear in the

credits of the film. Jagmohan’s elder brother Brijmohan Mundhra was an old acquaintance and he convinced me to sign just a week before the press show of the film in Goregaon Film City. I saw the preview along with my senior journalist friends Lajpat Rai (well known for his anti-BJP columns in Midday), and Asha Panemanglore. I was extremely disappointed with the film, especially some scenes which were very loud and made mockery of the sensitivity of the film. The long-stretched scene of the hawaldar dancing to a song on radio with a ‘lehenga’ in hand, the frivolous conversation of the women activists in Bhanwari’s unrealistically beautiful ‘made up ’ house and the indecent dialogues of women constables were unbearable. But what worried me the most was the narration of the film through the eyes of two foreign journalists--a film tailor made for international audience. Is this called ‘returning to one’s roots?’ Seeing me almost on the verge of tears Lajpat Rai was amused and started giving me tips on film writing-“Take your money and forget the rest. If you are so emotional then just write stories where your characters are in your control and not puppets on the director’s fingers ”. Asha Panemanglore, a Marxist worker, was trying to console me-“ Try to see this film from the point of view of the average viewer, you will like the film .” My expectations had been belied. I was analysing the film from Bhanwari’s point of view and feeling the burden of guilt. After the film release, I told Mundra to deposit my remaining one-fourth remuneration as screenplay writer in Bhanwari’s account. Was this token donation enough for me to get rid of my guilt ? The film was released internationally and garnered considerable attention. Nandita Das even got the best actress award in a festival in France. She was invited by several women’s organisations for film’s shows abroad. Jagmohan Mundhra wanted to change his image as maker of soft porn films and he finally succeeded. But in India the film got stuck in censor board for some time. The music release function of the film was held at J 49, a pub in Juhu on 22nd October, 2001. Vishwamohan Bhatt and Rekha were posing for the shutterbugs in beautiful silk attires. The premier of the film was held on 21 st November with great fanfare. The newspapers were full of press conference photos of Mundhra and Nandita Das. I did not attend these functions. The invitation card on the artistic handmade paper, seemed to be teasing me. Even Vishwamohan Bhatt’s soothing music failed to uplift my spirits. Once I had praised ‘Bandit Queen’ to the skies, had opposed the protests of women organisations and stated that this film was like a nude sculpture, which if installed in art galleries seems a touchstone of high art but deserves to be covered if put on a crossroad in a slum. But now why had my aesthetic sense been paralyzed? Was it because for me Bhanwari was a flesh and blood woman whose struggles were very close to my heart . Phoolan on the other hand was a dacoit, a villain, a third person, whose film I could see with objectivity. Mundhra told me that several women’s organisations had invited him along with Bhanwari for a talk and film screening. He said, “I told Bhanwari to come with me and see Europe but she refused.”Before I could ask anything he said, “She is April-June 2010 :: 141

credits of the film. Jagmohan’s elder<br />

brother Brijmohan Mundhra was an old<br />

acquaintance and he convinced me to<br />

sign just a week before the press show<br />

of the film in Goregaon Film City.<br />

I saw the preview along with my<br />

senior journalist friends Lajpat Rai (well<br />

known for his anti-BJP columns in<br />

Midday), and Asha Panemanglore. I was<br />

extremely disappointed with the film,<br />

especially some scenes which were very<br />

loud and made mockery of the sensitivity<br />

of the film. The long-stretched scene<br />

of the hawaldar dancing to a song on<br />

radio with a ‘lehenga’ in hand, the frivolous<br />

conversation of the women activists in<br />

Bhanwari’s unrealistically beautiful ‘made<br />

up ’ house and the indecent dialogues<br />

of women constables were unbearable.<br />

But what worried me the most was the<br />

narration of the film through the eyes<br />

of two foreign journalists--a film tailor<br />

made for international audience. Is this<br />

called ‘returning to one’s roots?’ Seeing<br />

me almost on the verge of tears Lajpat<br />

Rai was amused and started giving me<br />

tips on film writing-“Take your money<br />

and forget the rest. If you are so emotional<br />

then just write stories where your<br />

characters are in your control and not<br />

puppets on the director’s fingers ”. Asha<br />

Panemanglore, a Marxist worker, was<br />

trying to console me-“ Try to see this<br />

film from the point of view of the average<br />

viewer, you will like the film .” My<br />

expectations had been belied. I was<br />

analysing the film from Bhanwari’s point<br />

of view and feeling the burden of guilt.<br />

After the film release, I told Mundra<br />

to deposit my remaining one-fourth<br />

remuneration as screenplay writer in<br />

Bhanwari’s account. Was this token<br />

donation enough for me to get rid of<br />

my guilt ?<br />

The film was released internationally<br />

and garnered considerable attention.<br />

Nandita Das even got the best actress<br />

award in a festival in France. She was<br />

invited by several women’s organisations<br />

for film’s shows abroad. Jagmohan<br />

Mundhra wanted to change his image<br />

as maker of soft porn films and he finally<br />

succeeded. But in India the film got stuck<br />

in censor board for some time. The music<br />

release function of the film was held<br />

at J 49, a pub in Juhu on 22nd October,<br />

2001. Vishwamohan Bhatt and Rekha<br />

were posing for the shutterbugs in<br />

beautiful silk attires. The premier of the<br />

film was held on 21 st November with<br />

great fanfare. The newspapers were full<br />

of press conference photos of Mundhra<br />

and Nandita Das. I did not attend these<br />

functions. The invitation card on the<br />

artistic handmade paper, seemed to be<br />

teasing me. Even Vishwamohan Bhatt’s<br />

soothing music failed to uplift my spirits.<br />

Once I had praised ‘Bandit Queen’ to<br />

the skies, had opposed the protests of<br />

women organisations and stated that this<br />

film was like a nude sculpture, which<br />

if installed in art galleries seems a<br />

touchstone of high art but deserves to<br />

be covered if put on a crossroad in<br />

a slum. But now why had my aesthetic<br />

sense been paralyzed? Was it because<br />

for me Bhanwari was a flesh and blood<br />

woman whose struggles were very close<br />

to my heart . Phoolan on the other<br />

hand was a dacoit, a villain, a third<br />

person, whose film I could see with<br />

objectivity.<br />

Mundhra told me that several women’s<br />

organisations had invited him along with<br />

Bhanwari for a talk and film screening.<br />

He said, “I told Bhanwari to come with<br />

me and see Europe but she refused.”Before<br />

I could ask anything he said, “She is<br />

April-June 2010 :: 141

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!