Mamta Kalia
Mamta Kalia
Mamta Kalia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ack insulted & a loser . She was<br />
socially boycotted, her rapists went scot<br />
free, and were even garlanded on stage<br />
in front of a crowd of seven thousand<br />
people amidst slogan shouting. Phoolan<br />
extracted twenty lakhs from the film<br />
makers by objecting to the film’s entry<br />
in the Oscars. Bhanwari on the other<br />
hand has not got even a single penny<br />
for her film. All she could claim was<br />
a token 101 rupee which the film’s<br />
producer-director placed on her palm<br />
after she tied ‘rakhi’ to him. This moment<br />
was captured in a photo and was well<br />
publicized in the promos of the film.<br />
The film ‘Bawandar’ was released on<br />
21 st November,2001.The film director<br />
Jagmohan Mundra, gave several<br />
interviews in the newspapers claiming<br />
that he had given three thousand pounds<br />
to Bhanwari and would give two and<br />
a half thousand dollars more to buy<br />
land for her. It might seem unbelievable<br />
but nothing has reached Bhanwari till<br />
now. So much so, the cheque of three<br />
thousand pounds given by a women’s<br />
group in London after the film screening<br />
has been deposited in a Jaipur bank<br />
in an account held jointly by Bhanwari<br />
and a Mumbai-based friend of the<br />
director. The pass book and cheque book<br />
are with him and according to him the<br />
money is in safe hands. Now that friend<br />
refuses to forego that money. I called<br />
him up and introduced myself before<br />
going to Jaipur. The moment I talked<br />
of the bank account, he was livid, “I<br />
will go to Jaipur after Diwali, tell her<br />
to meet me then. I cannot be at her<br />
beck and call. And I don’t want you<br />
journalists to trouble me. I have spoken<br />
to Jagmohan, he does not know anybody<br />
by the name of Sudha.”<br />
I recalled his earlier statement, “<br />
I want to return to my roots. I belong<br />
to Rajasthan and I want to make<br />
meaningful cinema. I have made many<br />
films ; earned a lot of money, but now<br />
I want to work for my own satisfaction.<br />
I am taking a big risk. It is possible<br />
that the film may incur heavy losses,<br />
but I want that people should see it<br />
and give justice to Bhanwari.” This<br />
double-faced attitude of Jagmohan<br />
Mundhra disturbed me . But I learnt<br />
the lesson that cinema of any kind-mainstream,<br />
or low budget parallel--is<br />
at bottom pure business and lies and<br />
deceit are often used as stepping stones<br />
to money and fame.<br />
This incident happened in January<br />
1999.Jagmohan Mundra had procured<br />
all the documents regarding Bhanwari’s<br />
case from the Jaipur session court. He<br />
also collected clippings from Hindi,<br />
English and regional newspapers. I had<br />
also written about Bhanwari in Mahanagar,<br />
Jansatta and other newspapers, especially<br />
after the November 1995 decision against<br />
her. The opposition was very active in<br />
defaming her. The local MLAs exploited<br />
this opportunity to the hilt to create<br />
a Gujjar vote bank. They staged a rally<br />
of seven thousand people in Jaipur where<br />
Bhanwari and other women activists were<br />
liberally abused. Renowned activist from<br />
Jaipur — Kavita Shrivastava’s reports<br />
on Bhanwari were forwarded to Pramila<br />
tai (Pramila Dandvate).All women’s<br />
organisation under the banner of ‘Mahila<br />
Atyachaar Virodhi Kriti Samiti’ took out<br />
a rally in Azad Maidan....but all in vain.<br />
When Nikhil Wagle wrote strongly against<br />
the judgement, Judge Jagpal Singh filed<br />
a case of defamation against him. For<br />
four years Wagle had to appear in the<br />
Jaipur court until the case was finally<br />
dismissed without any hearing.<br />
April-June 2010 :: 139