View - State of Iowa

Ch 32, p.72 RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT May 2012
responsibility by providing financial support to organizations providing free legal services to persons
of limited means. Such financial support should be reasonably equivalent to the value of the hours
of service that would have otherwise been provided. In addition, at times it may be more feasible to
satisfy the pro bono responsibility collectively, as by a firm’s aggregate pro bono activities.
[10] Because the efforts of individual lawyers are not enough to meet the need for free legal
services that exists among persons of limited means, the government and the profession have
instituted additional programs to provide those services. Every lawyer should financially support
such programs, in addition to either providing direct pro bono services or making financial
contributions when pro bono service is not feasible.
[11] Law firms should act reasonably to enable and encourage all lawyers in the firm to provide
the pro bono legal services called for by this rule.
[12] The responsibility set forth in this rule is not intended to be enforced through disciplinary
process.
[Court Order April 20, 2005, effective July 1, 2005]
Rule 32:6.2: ACCEPTING APPOINTMENTS
A lawyer shall not seek to avoid appointment by a tribunal to represent a person except for
good cause, such as:
(a) representing the client is likely to result in violation of the Iowa Rules of Professional
Conduct or other law;
(b) representing the client is likely to result in an unreasonable financial burden on the
lawyer; or
(c) the client or the cause is so repugnant to the lawyer as to be likely to impair the
client-lawyer relationship or the lawyer’s ability to represent the client.
Comment
[1] A lawyer ordinarily is not obliged to accept a client whose character or cause the lawyer
regards as repugnant. The lawyer’s freedom to select clients is, however, qualified. All lawyers have
a responsibility to assist in providing pro bono publico service. See rule 32:6.1. An individual lawyer
fulfills this responsibility by accepting a fair share of unpopular matters or indigent or unpopular
clients. A lawyer may also be subject to appointment by a court to serve unpopular clients or persons
unable to afford legal services.
Appointed Counsel
[2] For good cause a lawyer may seek to decline an appointment to represent a person who cannot
afford to retain counsel or whose cause is unpopular. Good cause exists if the lawyer could not
handle the matter competently, see rule 32:1.1, or if undertaking the representation would result in
an improper conflict of interest, for example, when the client or the cause is so repugnant to the
lawyer as to be likely to impair the client-lawyer relationship or the lawyer’s ability to represent
the client. A lawyer may also seek to decline an appointment if acceptance would be unreasonably
burdensome, for example, when it would impose a financial sacrifice so great as to be unjust.
[3] An appointed lawyer has the same obligations to the client as retained counsel, including the
obligations of loyalty and confidentiality, and is subject to the same limitations on the client-lawyer
relationship, such as the obligation to refrain from assisting the client in violation of the rules.
[Court Order April 20, 2005, effective July 1, 2005]
Rule 32:6.3: MEMBERSHIP IN LEGAL SERVICES ORGANIZATION
A lawyer may serve as a director, officer, or member of a legal services organization, apart
from the law firm in which the lawyer practices, notwithstanding that the organization serves
persons having interests adverse to a client of the lawyer. The lawyer shall not knowingly
participate in a decision or action of the organization:
(a) if participating in the decision or action would be incompatible with the lawyer’s
obligations to a client under rule 32:1.7; or
(b) where the decision or action could have a material adverse effect on the representation