25.02.2013 Views

View - State of Iowa

View - State of Iowa

View - State of Iowa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ch 1, p.30 CIVIL PROCEDURE December 2010<br />

(2) That the discovery may be had only on specified terms and conditions, including a designation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the time or place.<br />

(3) That the discovery may be had only by a method <strong>of</strong> discovery other than that selected by the<br />

party seeking discovery.<br />

(4) That certain matters not be inquired into, or that the scope <strong>of</strong> the discovery be limited to certain<br />

matters.<br />

(5) That discovery be conducted with no one present except persons designated by the court.<br />

(6) That a deposition after being sealed be opened only by order <strong>of</strong> the court.<br />

(7) That a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial information not<br />

be disclosed or be disclosed only in a designated way.<br />

(8) That the parties simultaneously file specified documents or information enclosed in sealed<br />

envelopes to be opened as directed by the court.<br />

b. Shall limit the frequency <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> the methods described in rule 1.501(1) if it determines that<br />

any <strong>of</strong> the following applies:<br />

(1) The discovery sought is unreasonably cumulative or duplicative, or is obtainable from some<br />

other source that is more convenient, less burdensome, or less expensive.<br />

(2) The party seeking discovery has had ample opportunity by discovery in the action to obtain<br />

the information sought.<br />

(3) The burden or expense <strong>of</strong> the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit, taking into<br />

account the needs <strong>of</strong> the case, the amount in controversy, the parties’ resources, the importance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

issues at stake in the litigation, and the importance <strong>of</strong> the proposed discovery in resolving the issues.<br />

1.504(2) A party need not provide discovery <strong>of</strong> electronically stored information from sources<br />

that the party identifies as not reasonably accessible because <strong>of</strong> undue burden or cost. On motion<br />

to compel discovery or for a protective order, the party from whom discovery is sought must show<br />

that the information is not reasonably accessible because <strong>of</strong> undue burden or cost. If that showing<br />

is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows<br />

good cause, considering the limitations <strong>of</strong> rule 1.504(1)(b). The court may specify conditions for the<br />

discovery.<br />

1.504(3) If the motion for a protective order is denied in whole or in part, the court may, on such<br />

terms and conditions as are just, order that any party or person provide or permit discovery. The<br />

provisions <strong>of</strong> rule 1.517(1)(d) apply to the award <strong>of</strong> expenses incurred in relation to the motion.<br />

[Report 1943; amendment 1965; amendment 1970; amendment 1973; October 31, 1997, effective January<br />

24, 1998; November 9, 2001, effective February 15, 2002; February 14, 2008, effective May 1, 2008]<br />

Rule 1.505 Sequence and timing <strong>of</strong> discovery. Unless the court upon motion orders otherwise for<br />

the convenience <strong>of</strong> parties and witnesses and in the interests <strong>of</strong> justice, methods <strong>of</strong> discovery may<br />

be used in any sequence and the fact that a party is conducting discovery, whether by deposition or<br />

otherwise, shall not operate to delay any other party’s discovery.<br />

[Report 1943; amendment 1957; amendment 1973; November 9, 2001, effective February 15, 2002]<br />

Rule 1.506 Stipulations regarding discovery procedure. Unless the court orders otherwise, the<br />

parties may by written stipulation do the following:<br />

1.506(1) Provide that depositions may be taken before any qualified person, at any time or place,<br />

upon any notice, and in any manner and when so taken may be used like other depositions.<br />

1.506(2) Modify the procedures provided by these rules for other methods <strong>of</strong> discovery.<br />

[Report 1975; amended by 66GA, ch 259, §1; amendment 1976; October 31, 1997, effective January 24,<br />

1998; November 9, 2001, effective February 15, 2002]<br />

COMMENT: As parties rarely enter into formal stipulations extending the times to answer interrogatories or respond to production<br />

requests, the requirement for formal stipulations is removed. Formal stipulations remain required for extensions <strong>of</strong> time for responding<br />

to requests for admissions. The final phrase <strong>of</strong> the rule clarifies the time within which a response is required in the event the court<br />

supersedes a stipulation. Consistent with rule 1.502, the requirement that discovery stipulations be filed, including those regarding<br />

responses to requests for admissions, is deleted.<br />

Rule 1.507 Discovery conference.<br />

1.507(1) At any time after commencement <strong>of</strong> an action, the court may direct the attorneys for the<br />

parties to appear before it for a conference on the subject <strong>of</strong> discovery. The court shall do so upon<br />

motion by the attorney for any party if the motion includes:<br />

a. A statement <strong>of</strong> the issues as they then appear.<br />

b. A proposed plan and schedule <strong>of</strong> discovery.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!