25.02.2013 Views

2010 American Heart Association

2010 American Heart Association

2010 American Heart Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

S834 Circulation November 2, <strong>2010</strong><br />

The pregnant uterus can compress the inferior vena cava,<br />

impeding venous return and thereby reducing stroke volume and<br />

cardiac output. Reports of noncardiac arrest parturients indicate<br />

that left-lateral tilt results in improved maternal hemodynamics<br />

of blood pressure, cardiac output, and stroke volume 96,98,104 ; and<br />

improved fetal parameters of oxygenation, nonstress test, and<br />

fetal heart rate. 100–102<br />

Although chest compressions in the left-lateral tilt position are<br />

feasible in a manikin study, 105 they result in less forceful chest<br />

compressions than are possible in the supine position. 106 Two<br />

studies found no improvement in maternal hemodynamic or fetal<br />

parameters with 10° to 20° left-lateral tilt in patients not in<br />

arrest. 107,108 One study reported more aortic compression at 15°<br />

left-lateral tilt compared with a full left-lateral tilt. 97 In addition,<br />

aortic compression has been found at �30° of tilt, 109 however<br />

the majority of these patients were in labor.<br />

If left-lateral tilt is used to improve maternal hemodynamics<br />

during cardiac arrest, the degree of tilt should be maximized.<br />

However, at a tilt �30° the patient may slide or roll off the<br />

inclined plane, 106 so this degree of tilt may not be practical<br />

during resuscitation. Although important, the degree of tilt is<br />

difficult to estimate reliably; 1 study reported that the degree of<br />

table tilt is often overestimated. 110 Using a fixed, hard wedge of<br />

a predetermined angle may help.<br />

Figure 1. Maternal cardiac<br />

arrest algorithm.<br />

Two studies in pregnant women not in arrest found that<br />

manual left uterine displacement, which is done with the patient<br />

supine, is as good as or better than left-lateral tilt in relieving<br />

aortocaval compression (as assessed by the incidence of hypotension<br />

and use of ephedrine). 111,112<br />

Therefore, to relieve aortocaval compression during chest<br />

compressions and optimize the quality of CPR, it is reasonable<br />

to perform manual left uterine displacement in the supine<br />

position first (Class IIa, LOE C). Left uterine displacement can<br />

be performed from either the patient’s left side with the<br />

2-handed technique (Figure 2) or the patient’s right side with the<br />

1-handed technique (Figure 3), depending on the positioning of<br />

the resuscitation team. If this technique is unsuccessful, and an<br />

appropriate wedge is readily available, then providers may<br />

consider placing the patient in a left-lateral tilt of 27° to 30°, 106<br />

using a firm wedge to support the pelvis and thorax (Figure 4)<br />

(Class IIb, LOE C).<br />

If chest compressions remain inadequate after lateral uterine<br />

displacement or left-lateral tilt, immediate emergency cesarean<br />

section should be considered. (See “Emergency Cesarean Section<br />

in Cardiac Arrest,” below.)<br />

Airway<br />

Airway management is more difficult during pregnancy<br />

(see “ACLS Modifications: Airway,” below), and placing the<br />

Downloaded from<br />

circ.ahajournals.org at NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIV on October 18, <strong>2010</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!