a social influence analysis of perceived organizational support
a social influence analysis of perceived organizational support
a social influence analysis of perceived organizational support
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 11: Results <strong>of</strong> Hypotheses Tests Using QAP Regression<br />
Dependent Variable Similarity in POS<br />
Independent Variables Reciprocated Ties Analysis Non-Reciprocated Ties Analysis<br />
Control Variables<br />
Gender -.004** -.004**<br />
Tenure .012*** .012***<br />
Leadership Positions -.083*** -.083***<br />
Weak Ties<br />
Friend .018 -.301*<br />
Advice -.061 -.072<br />
Friend-Advice -.037 .030<br />
Role Model .211** .217*<br />
Friend-Role Model .243 .006<br />
Advice-Role Model -.045 .-013<br />
Friend-Advice-Role Model -.137 .146<br />
Strong Ties<br />
Friend (H3) .020 -.126<br />
Advice (H1) .009* .087<br />
Friend-Advice -.035 .179<br />
Role Model .310*** .033<br />
Friend-Role Model .072 .233<br />
Advice-Role Model (H2) .231*** .092<br />
Friend-Advice-Role Model (H4) .138*** .330***<br />
Unstandardized beta coefficients are displayed. Coefficient signs indicate greater (+) or lesser<br />
(-) interpersonal perceptual similarity.<br />
*Significant at .10 level<br />
**Significant at .05 level<br />
***Significant at .01 level<br />
81