25.02.2013 Views

a social influence analysis of perceived organizational support

a social influence analysis of perceived organizational support

a social influence analysis of perceived organizational support

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

less positive. Thus, the POS <strong>of</strong> the friend who received positive treatment will increase, and the<br />

POS <strong>of</strong> the focal employee, who <strong>perceived</strong> less positive treatment, will decrease following<br />

comparison with his/her friend. Since ego’s POS decreases, and ego’s friend’s POS increases,<br />

the POS <strong>of</strong> the two friends will become less similar.<br />

Tesser (1988) stresses that the outcome in question determines whether or not the<br />

occurrence <strong>of</strong> an association or comparison function is likely. When considering POS, then, a<br />

focal employee’s POS would increase (and become more similar to the similar other’s POS) if<br />

the similar other received a training opportunity that the focal employee was not interested in<br />

having for him/herself, or if all employees received an across-the-board raise or a new benefit<br />

from the organization. On the other hand, if the similar other received a promotion that the focal<br />

employee desired, his or her POS could become dissimilar to the POS <strong>of</strong> the similar other.<br />

However, it is also very possible that friends could be happy for a friend who is treated favorably<br />

by the organization, even if they were competing for an outcome. In such a case, even when<br />

employees are competing, an employee’s POS may become similar to the POS <strong>of</strong> his or her<br />

friendship ties.<br />

Research on justice perceptions and POS is useful in predicting whether or not a<br />

comparison or association function will occur between friends. Specifically, researchers have<br />

shown that the relationship between procedural justice and POS is stronger than the relationship<br />

between distributive justice and POS (Masterson et al., 2000; Tekleab et al., 2005; Wayne et al.,<br />

2002) because employees deal with procedural justice on a daily basis while promotions and<br />

raises occur infrequently. This suggests that the organization’s policies (procedural justice) are<br />

more important to employees’ <strong>perceived</strong> <strong>support</strong> than are the rewards that they themselves<br />

receive (distributive justice). Thus, it is policies and procedures, which Tesser (1988) would<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!