a social influence analysis of perceived organizational support
a social influence analysis of perceived organizational support
a social influence analysis of perceived organizational support
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
occurs because the norm <strong>of</strong> reciprocity (Gouldner, 1960) obligates employees who receive<br />
favorable treatment from the organization to help the organization reach its goals.<br />
In the following sections, research on the attitudinal and behavioral consequences <strong>of</strong> POS<br />
is reviewed briefly.<br />
Attitudinal Consequences <strong>of</strong> POS. The fundamental proposition <strong>of</strong> POS research is that<br />
employees’ beliefs regarding how committed the organization is to them will result in employee<br />
commitment to the organization. To empirically assess this claim, researchers have investigated<br />
the relationship between POS and affective <strong>organizational</strong> commitment. POS is hypothesized to<br />
be positively related to affective commitment because it fulfills the socioemotional needs <strong>of</strong><br />
employees including respect, caring and approval (Armeli, Eisenberger, Fasolo, & Lynch, 1998)<br />
and therefore results in a strong sense <strong>of</strong> belonging to the organization. Consistent with<br />
expectations, studies consistently provide <strong>support</strong> for a positive relationship between POS and<br />
affective <strong>organizational</strong> commitment (Eisenberger et al., 1990; Eisenberger et al., 2001; Gakovic<br />
& Tetrick, 2003; O’Driscoll & Randall, 1999; Wayne et al., 1997).<br />
Researchers have also speculated that POS would make employees satisfied with their<br />
jobs because they believe that aid is available when they need it and have strong performance-<br />
reward expectancies. That is, employees with high levels <strong>of</strong> POS realize that the organizations<br />
that they work for will reward them for their efforts on the job. Research provides strong <strong>support</strong><br />
for this proposition as well (Eisenberger et al., 1997; Masterson et al., 2000; Witt, 1991).<br />
Finally, researchers have explored the relationship between POS and job involvement.<br />
Job involvement is defined as an individual’s identification with and interest in the specific work<br />
that they perform (Lodhal & Kejner, 1965). O’Driscoll and Randall (1999) argued, and found<br />
24