a social influence analysis of perceived organizational support

More documents

Recommendations

Info

commitment. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48, 197-209. Organ, D.W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Orphen, C. (1994). The effects of exchange ideology on the relationship between perceived organizational support and job performance. The Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 407-408. Ostroff, C., & Kozlowski, S.W.J. (1992). Organizational socialization as a learning process: The role of information acquisition. Personnel Psychology, 45, 849-874. Price, I., & Feick, L. (1984). The role of interpersonal sources in external search: An informational perspective. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 250-255. Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24 Raider, H., & Krackhardt, D.J. (2001). Intraorganizational networks. In Joel A.C. Baum (Ed.), Companion to Organizations (pp. 58-74). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Randall, D, Cropanzano, L, Bormann, C., & Birjulin (1999), A, Organizational politics and organizational support as predictors of work attitudes, job performance, and organizational citizenship behavior, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 159- 174. Rentsch, J.R. (1990). Climate and culture: Interaction and qualitative differences in organizational meanings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 668-681. Reynolds, F.D., & Wells, W.D. (1977). Consumer behavior. New York: McGraw Hill. Rhoades, L. & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 698-714. Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Employee commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 825–836. Rice, R.E., & Aydin, C. (1991). Attitudes toward new technology: Network proximity as a mechanism for social information processing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 219-244. Roethlisberger, F.J., & Dickson, W.J. (1939) Management and the Worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 109
Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press. Rogers, E.M., & Kincaid, L.D. (1981). Communication networks. New York: Free Press. Rousseau, D.M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. The Employee Rights and Responsibilities Journal, 2, 121-139. Rousseau, D.M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Rousseau, D.M. (2001). Schema, promises, and mutuality: The psychology of the psychological contract. Journal of Organizational and Occupational Psychology, 24, 511-541. Rousseau, D.M., & Tijoriwala, S.A. (1998). Assessing psychological contracts: Issues, alternatives and measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 679-695. Salancik, G.R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224-253. Schein, E.H. (1978). Career dynamics: Matching individual and organizational needs. Reading, MA. Schneider, B., & Rentsch, J. (1988). Managing climates and cultures: A futures perspective. In J. Hage (Ed.), Futures of Organizations (pp. 181-200). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Settoon, R.P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R.C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 219-227. Settoon, R.P., & Mossholder, K.W. (2002). Relationship quality and relationship context antecedents of person- and task-focused interpersonal citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 255-267. Shapiro, E.C., Haseltine, F.P., & Rowe, M.P. (1978). Moving up: Role models, mentors, and the “patron system.” Sloan Management Review, 19, 51-58. Sherif, M. (1935). A study of some social factors in perception, Archives of Psychology, 187, 1-60. Shore, L.M. & Shore, T.H. (1995). Perceived organizational support and organizational justice. In R.S. Cropanzano & K.M. Kacmar (Eds.), Organizational politics, justice, and support: Managing the social climate of the workplace (pp. 149-164). Westport, CT: Quorum. 110
Page 1 and 2:
TITLE PAGE A SOCIAL INFLUENCE ANALY
Page 3 and 4:
Copyright by Thomas J. Zagenczyk 20
Page 5 and 6:
with the expectation that reciproca
Page 7 and 8:
LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Hypothesize
Page 9 and 10:
PREFACE Thank you to my chair, Audr
Page 11 and 12:
epresentatives of the organization
Page 13 and 14:
Researchers also consider the conte
Page 15 and 16:
Exploring the effects of social inf
Page 17 and 18:
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW Orga
Page 19 and 20:
Levinson’s work explained the lar
Page 21 and 22:
Eisenberger and colleagues (1986) a
Page 23 and 24:
In subsequent studies, researchers
Page 25 and 26:
the organization is based on percei
Page 27 and 28:
esearch exploring the antecedents o
Page 29 and 30:
a manager with high formal status s
Page 31 and 32:
to carry out tasks on their own, an
Page 33 and 34:
occurs because the norm of reciproc
Page 35 and 36:
on their daily tasks. Examining thi
Page 37 and 38:
coworkers are able to provide infor
Page 39 and 40:
when forming perceptions and evalua
Page 41 and 42:
identifies with and interacts with
Page 43 and 44:
Miles, and Grover (2003) showed tha
Page 45 and 46:
instance, a researcher may find a p
Page 47 and 48:
likely to discuss sensitive issues
Page 49 and 50:
it does not require that the role m
Page 51 and 52:
among tellers. In one branch, no se
Page 53 and 54:
eside outside of the focal individu
Page 55 and 56:
To test the effects of social influ
Page 57 and 58:
disseminating organizational inform
Page 59 and 60:
less positive. Thus, the POS of the
Page 61 and 62:
ties (and other combinations of str
Page 63 and 64:
Research Setting Hypotheses were te
Page 65 and 66:
network data concerning recurring i
Page 67 and 68: I explored these different requirem
Page 69 and 70: or not the employees with whom they
Page 71 and 72: frequent contact with person j, or
Page 73 and 74: employee held a leadership position
Page 75 and 76: correlation analysis has two steps.
Page 77 and 78: Organizational Support was .84, whi
Page 79 and 80: Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for
Page 81 and 82: Correlations. Two different types o
Page 83 and 84: Control Variables Table 7: Pearson
Page 85 and 86: Control Variables Table 9: Pearson
Page 87 and 88: Results of Hypotheses Tests using Q
Page 89 and 90: positions had perceptions of organi
Page 91 and 92: CHAPTER FIVE: DISCUSSION AND CONCLU
Page 93 and 94: elationship may not have been consi
Page 95 and 96: social learning theory (Bandura, 19
Page 97 and 98: to provide false information is les
Page 99 and 100: Fourth, when studying social influe
Page 101 and 102: theoretical foundation of POS is so
Page 103 and 104: consistent with past research (Ibar
Page 105 and 106: employees who were widely regarded
Page 107 and 108: etween employees, only strong frien
Page 109 and 110: of structure and behavior. Academy
Page 111 and 112: organizational support. In J. A-M.
Page 113 and 114: Hammer, M. (1985). Implications of
Page 115 and 116: Kohlberg, L. (1963). Moral developm
Page 117: Mehra, A., Kilduff, M., & Brass, D.
Page 121 and 122: networks: An introduction to Markov
Page 123 and 124: Name of employee Yes Yes No No Name
show all

a social influence analysis of perceived organizational support

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?