a social influence analysis of perceived organizational support

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Lockwood, P., & Kunda, Z. (1997). Superstars and me: Predicting the impact of role models on the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 91-103. Lockwood, P., & Kunda, Z. (1999). Increasing the salience of one’s best selves can undermine inspiration by outstanding role models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 214-228. Lodhal, T.M., Kejner, M.M. (1965). The definition and measurement of job Involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 24-33. Logsdon, J.M., & Wood, D.J. (2002). Business citizenship: From domestic to global level of analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12, 155-188. Lynch, P.D., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (1999). Perceived organizational support: Inferior vs. superior performance by wary employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 467-483. Madhaven, R., Gnyawali, D.R., & He, J. (2004). Two’s company, three’s a crowd? Triads in cooperative-competitive networks. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 918-927. Manz, C.C. (1992). Self-leading work teams: Moving beyond self-management myths. Human Relations, 45, 1119-1140. Marsden, P.V. (1988). Homogeneity in confiding relations. Journal of Social Networks, 10, 57-76. Marsden, P.V. (1990). Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 435-463. Marsden, P.V., & Campbell, K.E. (1984). Measuring tie strength. Social Forces, 63, 482- 501. Marsden, P., & Friedkin, N.E. (1994). Network studies of social influence. Sociological Methods and Research, 22, 127-151. Masterson, S.S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B.M., & Taylor, M.S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 738-748. Mayo, E. (1945). The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilization. New Hampshire: Ayer. McAllister, D.J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24-59. 107
Mehra, A., Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. J. (2001). The social networks of high and low selfmonitors: Implications for workplace performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 121-146. Meyer, G.W. (1994). Social information processing and social networks: A test of social influence mechanisms. Human Relations, 47, 1013-1047. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1984). Testing the “side-bet theory” of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 372–378. Meyer, J.P., & Allen, N.J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–98. Meyer, J.P., & Allen, N.J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Meyer, J.P., Allen, N.J., & Smith, C.A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538-551. Moorman, R.H., Blakely, G.R., & Niehoff, B.P. (1998). Does perceived organizational support mediate the relationship between procedural justice and OCB? Academy of Management Journal, 41, 351-358. Morrison, E.W. (1993). Newcomer information seeking: Exploring types, modes, sources, and out-comes. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 557-589 Morrison, E.W. (2002). Newcomer’s relationships: The role of social networks ties during socialization. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1149-1160. Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Mowday, R.T., Steers, R.M., & Porter, L.W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224–247. Nelson, R.E. (1989). The strength of strong ties: Social networks and intergroup conflict in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 377-401. Nicholson, N. (1984). A theory of work role transitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 172-191. O’Driscoll, M.P., & Randall, D.M. (1999). Perceived Organizational support, satisfaction with rewards, and employee job involvement and organizational 108
Page 1 and 2:
TITLE PAGE A SOCIAL INFLUENCE ANALY
Page 3 and 4:
Copyright by Thomas J. Zagenczyk 20
Page 5 and 6:
with the expectation that reciproca
Page 7 and 8:
LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Hypothesize
Page 9 and 10:
PREFACE Thank you to my chair, Audr
Page 11 and 12:
epresentatives of the organization
Page 13 and 14:
Researchers also consider the conte
Page 15 and 16:
Exploring the effects of social inf
Page 17 and 18:
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW Orga
Page 19 and 20:
Levinson’s work explained the lar
Page 21 and 22:
Eisenberger and colleagues (1986) a
Page 23 and 24:
In subsequent studies, researchers
Page 25 and 26:
the organization is based on percei
Page 27 and 28:
esearch exploring the antecedents o
Page 29 and 30:
a manager with high formal status s
Page 31 and 32:
to carry out tasks on their own, an
Page 33 and 34:
occurs because the norm of reciproc
Page 35 and 36:
on their daily tasks. Examining thi
Page 37 and 38:
coworkers are able to provide infor
Page 39 and 40:
when forming perceptions and evalua
Page 41 and 42:
identifies with and interacts with
Page 43 and 44:
Miles, and Grover (2003) showed tha
Page 45 and 46:
instance, a researcher may find a p
Page 47 and 48:
likely to discuss sensitive issues
Page 49 and 50:
it does not require that the role m
Page 51 and 52:
among tellers. In one branch, no se
Page 53 and 54:
eside outside of the focal individu
Page 55 and 56:
To test the effects of social influ
Page 57 and 58:
disseminating organizational inform
Page 59 and 60:
less positive. Thus, the POS of the
Page 61 and 62:
ties (and other combinations of str
Page 63 and 64:
Research Setting Hypotheses were te
Page 65 and 66: network data concerning recurring i
Page 67 and 68: I explored these different requirem
Page 69 and 70: or not the employees with whom they
Page 71 and 72: frequent contact with person j, or
Page 73 and 74: employee held a leadership position
Page 75 and 76: correlation analysis has two steps.
Page 77 and 78: Organizational Support was .84, whi
Page 79 and 80: Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for
Page 81 and 82: Correlations. Two different types o
Page 83 and 84: Control Variables Table 7: Pearson
Page 85 and 86: Control Variables Table 9: Pearson
Page 87 and 88: Results of Hypotheses Tests using Q
Page 89 and 90: positions had perceptions of organi
Page 91 and 92: CHAPTER FIVE: DISCUSSION AND CONCLU
Page 93 and 94: elationship may not have been consi
Page 95 and 96: social learning theory (Bandura, 19
Page 97 and 98: to provide false information is les
Page 99 and 100: Fourth, when studying social influe
Page 101 and 102: theoretical foundation of POS is so
Page 103 and 104: consistent with past research (Ibar
Page 105 and 106: employees who were widely regarded
Page 107 and 108: etween employees, only strong frien
Page 109 and 110: of structure and behavior. Academy
Page 111 and 112: organizational support. In J. A-M.
Page 113 and 114: Hammer, M. (1985). Implications of
Page 115: Kohlberg, L. (1963). Moral developm
Page 119 and 120: Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of i
Page 121 and 122: networks: An introduction to Markov
Page 123 and 124: Name of employee Yes Yes No No Name
show all

a social influence analysis of perceived organizational support

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?