a social influence analysis of perceived organizational support

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3. Gibbons, D.E. (2004). Friendship and advice networks in the context of changing professional values. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 238-262. Gibbons, F.X., Benbow, C.P., & Gerrard, M. (1994). From top dog to bottom half: Social comparison strategies in response to poor performance. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 67, 638-652. Gibson, D.E. (2003). Developing the professional self-concept: Role model construals in early, middle, and late career stages. Organization Science, 14: 591-610. Gibson, D.E. (2004). Role models in career development: New directions for theory and research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65: 134-156. Gibson, D.E., & Barron, L.A. (2003). Exploring the impact of role models on older employees. Career Development International, 198-209. Gibson, D.E., & Cordova, D.I. (1999). Women’s and men’s role models: The importance of exemplars. In Murrell, A.J., Crosby, F.J., & Ely, R.J. (Eds.), Mentoring dilemmas: Developmental relationships within multicultural organizations (pp. 121-142). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Gouldner, A.W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161-178. Graen, G., & Cashman, J. (1975). A role-making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental approach. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership frontiers (pp. 143–166). Kent, OH: Kent State University Press. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380. Granovetter, M. (1982). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In P.V. Marsden & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 105-130). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Greenberg, J. (1990). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 561-568. Hackman, J.R., & Oldham, G.R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159-170. Hall, D.T., & Mirvis, P.H. (1996). The new protean career: Psychological success and the path with a heart. In D.T. Hall (Ed.), The career is dead – long live the career (pp. 15- 45). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 103
Hammer, M. (1985). Implications of behavioral and cognitive reciprocity in social network data. Social Networks, 7, 189-201. Hansen, M. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82-111. Harrington, E.B. (2002). The pervasive effect of network content. Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings, OB, N1-N6. Henry, R., & Butler, B. (2005). Context, structure and influence: A field study of social networks and individual IT acceptance. Working Paper. Higgins, M.C., & Kram, K.E. (2001). Reconceptualizing mentoring at work: A developmental network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 264-298. Hinds, P.J., Carley, K.M., Krackhardt, D., & Wholey, D. (2000). Choosing work group members: Balancing similarity, competence, and familiarity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81, 226-251. Higle, R.A., Feick, L.F., & Price, L.L. (1991). The importance of peripheral cues in attitude formation for enduring and task involved individuals. Advances in Consumer Research, 18, 187-193. Ho, V. T. (2002). Evaluations of psychological contract fulfillment: A social networks perspective. Unpublished Ph.D Dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. Ho, V.T. (2005). Social influence on evaluations of psychological contract fulfillment. Academy of Management Review, 30, 113-128. Ho, V., Levesque, L., & Rousseau, D. (2002). Filling in the blanks: How social networks shape psychological contracts. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Conference, Denver, CO. Homans, G.C. (1951). The human group. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World. Hutchison, S. (1997). A path model of perceived organizational support. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 159-174. Hutchison, S., & Garstka, M.L. (1996). Sources of perceived organizational support: Goal setting and feedback. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1351-1366. Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 422- 447. 104
Page 1 and 2:
TITLE PAGE A SOCIAL INFLUENCE ANALY
Page 3 and 4:
Copyright by Thomas J. Zagenczyk 20
Page 5 and 6:
with the expectation that reciproca
Page 7 and 8:
LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Hypothesize
Page 9 and 10:
PREFACE Thank you to my chair, Audr
Page 11 and 12:
epresentatives of the organization
Page 13 and 14:
Researchers also consider the conte
Page 15 and 16:
Exploring the effects of social inf
Page 17 and 18:
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW Orga
Page 19 and 20:
Levinson’s work explained the lar
Page 21 and 22:
Eisenberger and colleagues (1986) a
Page 23 and 24:
In subsequent studies, researchers
Page 25 and 26:
the organization is based on percei
Page 27 and 28:
esearch exploring the antecedents o
Page 29 and 30:
a manager with high formal status s
Page 31 and 32:
to carry out tasks on their own, an
Page 33 and 34:
occurs because the norm of reciproc
Page 35 and 36:
on their daily tasks. Examining thi
Page 37 and 38:
coworkers are able to provide infor
Page 39 and 40:
when forming perceptions and evalua
Page 41 and 42:
identifies with and interacts with
Page 43 and 44:
Miles, and Grover (2003) showed tha
Page 45 and 46:
instance, a researcher may find a p
Page 47 and 48:
likely to discuss sensitive issues
Page 49 and 50:
it does not require that the role m
Page 51 and 52:
among tellers. In one branch, no se
Page 53 and 54:
eside outside of the focal individu
Page 55 and 56:
To test the effects of social influ
Page 57 and 58:
disseminating organizational inform
Page 59 and 60:
less positive. Thus, the POS of the
Page 61 and 62: ties (and other combinations of str
Page 63 and 64: Research Setting Hypotheses were te
Page 65 and 66: network data concerning recurring i
Page 67 and 68: I explored these different requirem
Page 69 and 70: or not the employees with whom they
Page 71 and 72: frequent contact with person j, or
Page 73 and 74: employee held a leadership position
Page 75 and 76: correlation analysis has two steps.
Page 77 and 78: Organizational Support was .84, whi
Page 79 and 80: Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for
Page 81 and 82: Correlations. Two different types o
Page 83 and 84: Control Variables Table 7: Pearson
Page 85 and 86: Control Variables Table 9: Pearson
Page 87 and 88: Results of Hypotheses Tests using Q
Page 89 and 90: positions had perceptions of organi
Page 91 and 92: CHAPTER FIVE: DISCUSSION AND CONCLU
Page 93 and 94: elationship may not have been consi
Page 95 and 96: social learning theory (Bandura, 19
Page 97 and 98: to provide false information is les
Page 99 and 100: Fourth, when studying social influe
Page 101 and 102: theoretical foundation of POS is so
Page 103 and 104: consistent with past research (Ibar
Page 105 and 106: employees who were widely regarded
Page 107 and 108: etween employees, only strong frien
Page 109 and 110: of structure and behavior. Academy
Page 111: organizational support. In J. A-M.
Page 115 and 116: Kohlberg, L. (1963). Moral developm
Page 117 and 118: Mehra, A., Kilduff, M., & Brass, D.
Page 119 and 120: Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of i
Page 121 and 122: networks: An introduction to Markov
Page 123 and 124: Name of employee Yes Yes No No Name
show all

a social influence analysis of perceived organizational support

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?