a social influence analysis of perceived organizational support

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Cropanzano, R., Prehar, C., & Chen, P.Y. (2002). Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural justice from interactional justice. Group and Organizational Management, 27, 324-451. Cropanzano, R., Rupp, D.E., Mohler, C.J., & Schminke, M. (2001). Three roads to organizational justice. In G. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (vol. 20, pp 1-113). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Crosby, F.J. (1999). The developing literature on developmental relationships. In Murrell, A.J., Crosby, F.J., & Ely, R.J. (Eds.), Mentoring dilemmas: Developmental relationships within multicultural organizations (pp.3-20). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Cross, R., & Prusak, L. (2002). The people who make organizations go – or stop. Harvard Business Review, June, 5-12. Dabos, G. E. & Rousseau, D. M. (2004). Social interaction patterns shaping employee psychological contracts. Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings, OB, N1-N6. Dean, J.W., Jr. & Brass, D.J. (1985). Social interaction and the perception of job characteristics in an organization. Human Relations, 38, 571-582. Deutsch, M. & Gerard, H.B. (1955). A study of normative and information social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636. Earley, P.C., & Kanfer, R. (1985). The influence of component participation and role models on goal acceptance, goal satisfaction, and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 378-390. Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P.D., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 42-51. Eisenberger, R., Cummings, J., Armeli, S., & Lynch, P. (1997). Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 812-820. Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 51-59. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500-507. Eisenberger, R., Jones, J. R., Aselage, J., & Sucharski, I. L. (2004). Perceived 101
organizational support. In J. A-M. Coyle-Shapiro, L. M. Shore, M. S. Taylor, & L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), The employment relationship: Psychological and contextual perspectives (pp. 206–225). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Eisenberger, R., Stinglehaumber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I.L., & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to Perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 565-603. Erickson, E.H. (1982). Networks, ideologies, and belief systems. In P. Marsden & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage (pp. 159-172). Erickson, E.H. (1985). Childhood and Society, 35 th anniversary ed. W.W. Norton, New York. Erickson, B.H. (1988). The relational basis of attitudes. In Wellman, B. & Berkowitz, S.D. (eds.), Social structures: A network approach (pp. 99-121). New York: Cambridge University Press. Etzioni, A. (1961). A comparative analysis of complex organizations. New York: Free Press. Feldman, D.C., & Weitz, B.A. (1991). From the invisible hand to the gladhand: Understanding a careerist orientation to work. Human Resources Management, 30, 237- 257. Felson, R.B., & Reed, M. (1986). The effect of parents on the self-appraisals of children. Social Psychology Quarterly, 49, 302-308. Festinger, L., Schacter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press. Fischer, C.S. (1982). To dwell among friends. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Fiske, S.T., & Taylor, S.E. 1991. Social Cognition (2 nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley. Friedkin, N. E. (1982). Information flow through strong and weak ties in intraorganizational social networks. Social Networks, 3, 273-285. Friedkin, N. E. (1993). Structural bases of interpersonal influence in groups: A longitudinal case study. American Sociological Review, 58, 861-872. Gakovic, A., & Tetric, L. (2003). Psychological contract breach as a source of strain for employees. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18, 235-246. Garton, L., Haythornthwaite, C. & Wellman, B. (1997). Studying online social networks. 102
Page 1 and 2:
TITLE PAGE A SOCIAL INFLUENCE ANALY
Page 3 and 4:
Copyright by Thomas J. Zagenczyk 20
Page 5 and 6:
with the expectation that reciproca
Page 7 and 8:
LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Hypothesize
Page 9 and 10:
PREFACE Thank you to my chair, Audr
Page 11 and 12:
epresentatives of the organization
Page 13 and 14:
Researchers also consider the conte
Page 15 and 16:
Exploring the effects of social inf
Page 17 and 18:
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW Orga
Page 19 and 20:
Levinson’s work explained the lar
Page 21 and 22:
Eisenberger and colleagues (1986) a
Page 23 and 24:
In subsequent studies, researchers
Page 25 and 26:
the organization is based on percei
Page 27 and 28:
esearch exploring the antecedents o
Page 29 and 30:
a manager with high formal status s
Page 31 and 32:
to carry out tasks on their own, an
Page 33 and 34:
occurs because the norm of reciproc
Page 35 and 36:
on their daily tasks. Examining thi
Page 37 and 38:
coworkers are able to provide infor
Page 39 and 40:
when forming perceptions and evalua
Page 41 and 42:
identifies with and interacts with
Page 43 and 44:
Miles, and Grover (2003) showed tha
Page 45 and 46:
instance, a researcher may find a p
Page 47 and 48:
likely to discuss sensitive issues
Page 49 and 50:
it does not require that the role m
Page 51 and 52:
among tellers. In one branch, no se
Page 53 and 54:
eside outside of the focal individu
Page 55 and 56:
To test the effects of social influ
Page 57 and 58:
disseminating organizational inform
Page 59 and 60: less positive. Thus, the POS of the
Page 61 and 62: ties (and other combinations of str
Page 63 and 64: Research Setting Hypotheses were te
Page 65 and 66: network data concerning recurring i
Page 67 and 68: I explored these different requirem
Page 69 and 70: or not the employees with whom they
Page 71 and 72: frequent contact with person j, or
Page 73 and 74: employee held a leadership position
Page 75 and 76: correlation analysis has two steps.
Page 77 and 78: Organizational Support was .84, whi
Page 79 and 80: Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for
Page 81 and 82: Correlations. Two different types o
Page 83 and 84: Control Variables Table 7: Pearson
Page 85 and 86: Control Variables Table 9: Pearson
Page 87 and 88: Results of Hypotheses Tests using Q
Page 89 and 90: positions had perceptions of organi
Page 91 and 92: CHAPTER FIVE: DISCUSSION AND CONCLU
Page 93 and 94: elationship may not have been consi
Page 95 and 96: social learning theory (Bandura, 19
Page 97 and 98: to provide false information is les
Page 99 and 100: Fourth, when studying social influe
Page 101 and 102: theoretical foundation of POS is so
Page 103 and 104: consistent with past research (Ibar
Page 105 and 106: employees who were widely regarded
Page 107 and 108: etween employees, only strong frien
Page 109: of structure and behavior. Academy
Page 113 and 114: Hammer, M. (1985). Implications of
Page 115 and 116: Kohlberg, L. (1963). Moral developm
Page 117 and 118: Mehra, A., Kilduff, M., & Brass, D.
Page 119 and 120: Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of i
Page 121 and 122: networks: An introduction to Markov
Page 123 and 124: Name of employee Yes Yes No No Name
show all

a social influence analysis of perceived organizational support

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?