a social influence analysis of perceived organizational support

More documents

Recommendations

Info

REFERENCES Allen, N.J., & Meyer, J.P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1–18. Allen, D.G., Shore, L.M., & Griffeth, R.W. (2003). The role of perceived organizational support and supportive human resources practices in the turnover process. Journal of Management, 29, 99-118. Andrews, M. C., & Kacmar, K. M. (2001). Discriminating among organizational politics, justice, and support. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 347–366. Armeli, S., Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P, & Lynch, P. (1998). Perceived organizational support and police performance: The moderating influence of socioemotional needs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 288-297. Arthur, M.B., & Rousseau, D.M. (1996). Introduction: The boundaryless career as a new employment principle. In M.B. Arthur & D.M. Rousseau (Eds.), The boundaryless career: 3-20. New York: Oxford. Aselage, J., & Eisenberger, R. (2003). Perceived organizational support and psychological contracts: A theoretical integration. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 491-509. Baldwin, T.T., Bedell, M.D., & Johnson, J.L. (1997). The social fabric of a team- based MBA program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1369-1397. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley. Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., & Freeman, L.C. 1999. UCINET 6.0 Version 1.00. Natick: Analytic Technologies. Brass, D.J. (1984). Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 518-539. Brass, D.J. (1985). Men’s and women’s networks: A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 327-343. Brass, D.J. (1992). Power in organizations: A social network perspective. In G. Moore & J.A. Whitt (Eds.), Research in Politics and Society, vol. 4: (pp. 295-323). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Brass, D.J., & Burkhardt, M.E. (1993). Potential power and power use: An investigation 99
of structure and behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 441-470. Brass, D.J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H.R., & Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 795- 819. Bucher, R., & Stelling, J.G. (1977). Becoming professional. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Burkhardt, M.E. (1994). Social interaction effects following a technological change: A longitudinal investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 869-898. Burkhardt, M.E., & Brass, D.J. (1990). Changing patterns or patterns of change: The effect of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 104-127. Burt, R. S. (1980). Models of network structure. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 79-141. Burt, R.S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Cialdini, R.B., Borden, R.J., Thorne, A., Walker, M.R., Freeman, S., & Sloan, L. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 366-375. Coleman, J. S. (1961). The adolescent society. New York: Free Press. Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120. Coleman, J.S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Coleman, J.S., Katz, E. & Menzel, H. (1966). Medical innovation: A diffusion study. New York: Bobbs-Merrill. Coyle-Shapiro, J.A.M. & Kessler, I. (2002). Exploring reciprocity through the lens of the psychological contract. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, 69-86. Coyle-Shapiro, J.A.M., & Kessler, I. (2000). Consequences of the psychological contract for the employment relationship: A large scale survey. Journal of Management Studies, 37, 903-930. Cropanzano, R., Howes, J.C., Grandey, A.A. & Toth, P. (1997). The relationship of organizational politics and support to work behaviors, attitudes, and stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 159-180. 100
Page 1 and 2:
TITLE PAGE A SOCIAL INFLUENCE ANALY
Page 3 and 4:
Copyright by Thomas J. Zagenczyk 20
Page 5 and 6:
with the expectation that reciproca
Page 7 and 8:
LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Hypothesize
Page 9 and 10:
PREFACE Thank you to my chair, Audr
Page 11 and 12:
epresentatives of the organization
Page 13 and 14:
Researchers also consider the conte
Page 15 and 16:
Exploring the effects of social inf
Page 17 and 18:
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW Orga
Page 19 and 20:
Levinson’s work explained the lar
Page 21 and 22:
Eisenberger and colleagues (1986) a
Page 23 and 24:
In subsequent studies, researchers
Page 25 and 26:
the organization is based on percei
Page 27 and 28:
esearch exploring the antecedents o
Page 29 and 30:
a manager with high formal status s
Page 31 and 32:
to carry out tasks on their own, an
Page 33 and 34:
occurs because the norm of reciproc
Page 35 and 36:
on their daily tasks. Examining thi
Page 37 and 38:
coworkers are able to provide infor
Page 39 and 40:
when forming perceptions and evalua
Page 41 and 42:
identifies with and interacts with
Page 43 and 44:
Miles, and Grover (2003) showed tha
Page 45 and 46:
instance, a researcher may find a p
Page 47 and 48:
likely to discuss sensitive issues
Page 49 and 50:
it does not require that the role m
Page 51 and 52:
among tellers. In one branch, no se
Page 53 and 54:
eside outside of the focal individu
Page 55 and 56:
To test the effects of social influ
Page 57 and 58: disseminating organizational inform
Page 59 and 60: less positive. Thus, the POS of the
Page 61 and 62: ties (and other combinations of str
Page 63 and 64: Research Setting Hypotheses were te
Page 65 and 66: network data concerning recurring i
Page 67 and 68: I explored these different requirem
Page 69 and 70: or not the employees with whom they
Page 71 and 72: frequent contact with person j, or
Page 73 and 74: employee held a leadership position
Page 75 and 76: correlation analysis has two steps.
Page 77 and 78: Organizational Support was .84, whi
Page 79 and 80: Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for
Page 81 and 82: Correlations. Two different types o
Page 83 and 84: Control Variables Table 7: Pearson
Page 85 and 86: Control Variables Table 9: Pearson
Page 87 and 88: Results of Hypotheses Tests using Q
Page 89 and 90: positions had perceptions of organi
Page 91 and 92: CHAPTER FIVE: DISCUSSION AND CONCLU
Page 93 and 94: elationship may not have been consi
Page 95 and 96: social learning theory (Bandura, 19
Page 97 and 98: to provide false information is les
Page 99 and 100: Fourth, when studying social influe
Page 101 and 102: theoretical foundation of POS is so
Page 103 and 104: consistent with past research (Ibar
Page 105 and 106: employees who were widely regarded
Page 107: etween employees, only strong frien
Page 111 and 112: organizational support. In J. A-M.
Page 113 and 114: Hammer, M. (1985). Implications of
Page 115 and 116: Kohlberg, L. (1963). Moral developm
Page 117 and 118: Mehra, A., Kilduff, M., & Brass, D.
Page 119 and 120: Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of i
Page 121 and 122: networks: An introduction to Markov
Page 123 and 124: Name of employee Yes Yes No No Name
show all

a social influence analysis of perceived organizational support

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?