Proceedings - Teaching and Learning Centre - Simon Fraser ...
Proceedings - Teaching and Learning Centre - Simon Fraser ...
Proceedings - Teaching and Learning Centre - Simon Fraser ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Fraser</strong> River Action Plan 3rd Research Workshop<br />
Summary<br />
Effluent Dispersion from the L<strong>and</strong>sdowne Road<br />
Wastewater Treatment <strong>Centre</strong>, Prince George<br />
D. Hodgins<br />
Seaconsult Marine Research Ltd.<br />
On October 13, 1993, an effluent plume delineation study was carried out at the Prince George L<strong>and</strong>sdowne<br />
Road Wastewater Treatment <strong>Centre</strong> to evaluate performance of the outfall in terms of dilution rate <strong>and</strong><br />
distribution of the effluent down-river.<br />
A fluorescent red dye was added to the effluent stream to act as a measurable tracer of the effluent which<br />
allowed mapping of the plume from the diffuser to 12 km downstream. During the survey, the <strong>Fraser</strong> River<br />
discharge at Prince George was approximately 400 m 3 /s which was roughly 1,000 times the Lansdowne outfall<br />
discharge. Surveying with an in situ fluorometer successfully traced the dye effluent to concentrations of less<br />
than 0.05% with positional accuracy of +/-5 m in the horizontal.<br />
Initial dilution was rapid from 100% effluent concentration in the diffuser to 0.65% or less within 250 m of the<br />
outfall <strong>and</strong> vertical mixing was complete at 1 km. Beyond about 8 km no concentrations were observed<br />
anywhere in the river that exceeded 0.1% effluent. North of the 8-km section, there was no observed contact<br />
with the eastern shore.<br />
Lateral mixing appeared to be inhibited by current shear zones separating the central, fast-moving core of the<br />
river (which contained most of the freshly discharged effluent) <strong>and</strong> relatively quiescent areas along some<br />
sections of the shorelines. Because mixing across the shear zones is slow, effluent in the quiescent waters will<br />
tend to be of older origin (i.e., discharged earlier) than effluent in the main river core.<br />
The diffuser discharged effluent in two persistent jets that were separated by roughly 10 m. This characteristic<br />
appears to be indicative of the diffuser performance. No leaks were detected.<br />
Page 59